Research Article| May 01, 2012 Controls on emplacement of the Caledonian Ross of Mull Granite, NW Scotland: Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and magmatic and regional structures M.S. Petronis; M.S. Petronis 1Environmental Geology, Natural Resource Management Department, New Mexico Highlands University, P.O. Box 9000, LasVegas, New Mexico 87701, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar B. O'Driscoll; B. O'Driscoll 2School of Physical and Geographical Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar C.T.E. Stevenson; C.T.E. Stevenson 3School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar R.J. Reavy R.J. Reavy 4Geology, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information M.S. Petronis 1Environmental Geology, Natural Resource Management Department, New Mexico Highlands University, P.O. Box 9000, LasVegas, New Mexico 87701, USA B. O'Driscoll 2School of Physical and Geographical Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK C.T.E. Stevenson 3School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK R.J. Reavy 4Geology, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland †E-mail: mspetro@nmhu.edu Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 26 Jun 2010 Revision Received: 28 Jul 2011 Accepted: 09 Aug 2011 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2012 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2012) 124 (5-6): 906–927. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30362.1 Article history Received: 26 Jun 2010 Revision Received: 28 Jul 2011 Accepted: 09 Aug 2011 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation M.S. Petronis, B. O'Driscoll, C.T.E. Stevenson, R.J. Reavy; Controls on emplacement of the Caledonian Ross of Mull Granite, NW Scotland: Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and magmatic and regional structures. GSA Bulletin 2012;; 124 (5-6): 906–927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B30362.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) was measured from 139 sites across the exposed portion of the Caledonian Ross of Mull Granite, Argyllshire, NW Scotland, to investigate the internal architecture of the pluton. Field and petrographic observations support the results of the AMS study, and a complementary suite of rock magnetic experiments was used to quantify the magnetic mineralogy of the granite. AMS data reveal a fabric that records a partial tectonic overprint of an emplacement-related magma inflow fabric. The partially preserved inflow pattern indicates a south to north emplacement of subhorizontal sheets that coalesced to form a tabular pluton. The AMS data are remarkably consistent across the intrusion, with clear north-south strikes and trends dominating the magnetic foliation and lineation patterns, respectively. These AMS fabrics are discordant to internal zonation in the granite. In the southernmost part of the granite, AMS data are parallel to bedding-cleavage orientations preserved in many large (>100 m) Proterozoic Moine blocks. The scarcity of Moine blocks in the northern part of the intrusion and the prevalence of randomly oriented stoped blocks suggest that this part of the intrusion is nearer to the ceiling of the pluton. The partial tectonic overprint, consistent with east-west compression, occurred during the latter stages of emplacement and mainly affected the younger granite facies (RM2), while the oldest granite facies (RM1) and certain magmatic structures (diorite enclaves) preserve the original emplacement fabric. An alternative explanation interprets the magnetic lineations as an intersection fabric between a shallowly dipping emplacement fabric and a steep tectonic fabric. We argue that emplacement was not associated with eastward orogenic collapse of the Scandian Moine nappes, as proposed by previous workers, but occurred either before orogenic collapse or during a period of compressional reactivation. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Read full abstract