Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for US women, and nearly two thirds who died suddenly of CVD had no previous symptoms.1 Therefore, it is of great importance to identify “at-risk” women early, so that effective primary prevention strategies can be instituted. A universal recommendation of prevention guidelines is that all asymptomatic women should undergo a global risk assessment.2 Article see p 1748 The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program set thresholds for lipid treatment based on one's predicted 10-year risk for a hard coronary heart disease (CHD) event (myocardial infarction or CHD death) using a modified Framingham risk score (FRS).3 There are limitations, however, with use of the ATP-III model for CVD prediction in women. The ATP-III version predicts “hard” CHD events but not angina or revascularizations, even if such revascularizations are performed to manage an acute coronary syndrome. Yet women are more likely to experience “soft” CHD events or strokes than men. Moreover, a single laboratory measurement does not reflect lipid values over a woman's lifetime. The FRS does not take into account family history of premature CHD, a well-established independent risk factor for CHD events.4 Also, because stroke accounts for a higher proportion of CVD events than CHD in women before age 75 years,1 we believe that total CVD risk should be the outcome for prediction and preventive strategies. Indeed, that is the conclusion of the 2011 American Heart Association CVD prevention guidelines for women.5 Furthermore, the FRS only predicts 10-year risk, whereas for women, the issue is most often “lifetime” risk. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found that among women without a history of CHD or diabetes, 92% of those aged 60 to 69 years and >98% aged <59 …
Read full abstract