Abstract The rapid proliferation of digital technologies in health and public health has led to various terms and concepts, often used interchangeably or inconsistently. This ambiguity hampers communication, complicates research efforts, and undermines the effectiveness and adaptation of interventions. Without a clear understanding of such concepts, stakeholders face difficulties using, evaluating, and regulating digital public health (DiPH) initiatives. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish a common language - across academic disciplines and in the science-to-practice/policy transfer - to foster collaboration, ensure accountability, and maximize the impact of DiPH interventions globally. This workshop highlights the need for a cross-sectoral understanding of terms and concepts related to DiPH interventions. For this, we identify effective strategies for engaging diverse populations in DiPH interventions, considering accessibility, usability, and cultural sensitivity. Additionally, we present how a more precise understanding of these concepts will impact positive population-health outcomes of DiPH interventions. Finally, we discuss DiPH terminology enhancement regarding data protection, highlighting the boundaries of digital interventions within and outside health policies and public health systems, given the diversity of the legal frameworks applicable in either case. We aim to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange, fostering a shared understanding of terminology and best practices. This will advance DiPH by promoting clarity, rigor, and transparency in research and practice. Shared understandings of key concepts will eventually enhance the design, implementation, and evaluation of DiPH interventions, leading to improved population health outcomes and informing evidence-based policymaking and regulatory frameworks. The workshop consists of four presentations and a 20-minute panel discussion on increasing understanding dissemination. The first talk highlights multi-stakeholder perspectives (including researchers, technicians, health and medical practitioners, and the general public) on the ever-changing terminology of DiPH concepts. The second presentation showcases how these varying perceptions influence the academic representation of DiPH interventions and that interventions - although summarized under the same terminology - drastically vary concerning their use case and characteristics. The third speaker will discuss why a clearer understanding of these terms is needed to increase engagement with DiPH interventions for positive population health outcomes and identify effective DiPH interventions based on evidence. The last talk explains why unclear terminology or standards threaten populations and result in over- or under-regulation of DiPH interventions. Overall, this workshop catalyzes advancing the DiPH agenda in Europe, empowering stakeholders to harness the full potential of technology for promoting population health. Key messages • When we create technical terms, it is our professional approach, characterized by our academic background. It does not necessarily transfer to other domains or the general population. • Digital Public Health can transform global healthcare. However clear & harmonized terminologies are crucial for comparing evolving technologies & paving the way for transformative digital healthcare.