Most of the objective measures which are currently used to quantify spatial impression in auditoria, such as lateral energy fraction (LF), interaural cross-correlation coefficient (IACC) and late lateral relative sound level (GLL), are calculated from an impulse response. For subjective testing, these impulse responses are often later convolved with music recorded in an anechoic environment to simulate music performance in the hall. One spatial impression measure, though, interaural level fluctuations (IALFs) which was first proposed by Griesinger [Aud. Eng. Soc., Preprint No. 3292 (1992)] and further developed by L. M. Wang and A. C. Gade [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2891(A) (2000)], is calculated from the musical source signal instead of from the impulse response. Preliminary investigations showed that the IALF, calculated from simulated sound fields generated by ODEON, changed relatively the same for different pieces of music across various halls. If IALF is a valid measure for spatial impression, then this indicates that the musical source is not critical in evaluating the difference in spatial impression between halls. In this paper, results from subjective listening tests are presented to determine if the same trend is perceived by listeners across different musical motifs, which would aid in validating IALF.