CMV (Compaction Meter Value) and stiffness coefficient ks are the two most commonly used indexes in the intelligent compaction technology for subgrade soil. However, the applicability of CMV is affected by the operation mode and the working parameters of the vibrating roller. The calculation model of stiffness coefficient ks does not consider the plastic characteristics of the soil and the data usage rate of its calculation method is low. As a result, the current ICMVs (intelligent compaction measurement values) are only applicable to the compaction quality characterization in the later stage of compaction, and the accuracy and applicability of the compaction quality characterization in the whole process of construction are low, which limits the application of intelligent compaction technology. In view of the above problems, this paper aims to establish a comprehensive stiffness coefficient index which is not affected by the operation mode of the roller, comprehensively reflects the elastic–plastic mechanical properties and has strong resistance to accidental factors, in order to provide an accurate basis for the characterization of subgrade soil compaction quality. Firstly, a numerical simulation model of subgrade soil vibrating compaction with real-time change of soil Mohr-Coulomb model parameters with triaxial strain response is established, which provides accurate data support for ICMV calculation. Secondly, the calculation model and application method of CMV and ks are analyzed. Aiming at the shortcomings of the two indexes, the comprehensive stiffness coefficient kcs reflecting the elastic–plastic characteristics of soil and its complete calculation method are established. Finally, based on the simulation data, the accuracy of kcs is verified, and the variation law of the kcs calculation model parameters and the evolution mechanism of soil elastic–plastic properties are clarified. Based on the field tests data, the accuracy of kcs is verified. The results show that the deciding coefficients between kcs and compaction degree obtained by numerical simulation and field test are R2 = 0.83 and R2 = 0.72, respectively, which are higher than that between ks and compaction degree (R2 = 0.72, R2 = 0.52) and that between CMV and compaction degree (R2 = 0.04, R2 = 0.23). The accuracy of kcs to characterize compaction quality is higher, and it can maintain high stability during field application. During the compaction process, the elastic–plastic mechanical properties of subgrade soil evolve continuously, and each parameter of kcs calculation model increases with the rolling pass.
Read full abstract