It is true that in measurements of the small effect of plasma turbulence on the spectral shape near allowed lines in the parent gas one must be on guard against spurious effects, impurities, etc. Furthermore, as noted in our paper (1), there is an added difficulty due to the fact that the turbulence in the field of view of the spectrometer is not very reproducible from shot to shot or from one run to the next. The feature we have identified as the forbidden line (F), due to low-frequency turbulence, is present in most of the runs in contrast to the satellites (S*) due to electron plasma oscillations, which are expected at a wavelength separation of f h2(27cc)-'a,, from the forbidden line, with a,, = ( t z e 2 / m ~ ~ L ' Z , the electron plasma frequency. Pie1 and Pinnekamp (2) suggest that the features we have interpreted in terms of plasma turbulence may instead be due to molecular impurities in the helium discharge. We do not find their arguments convincing and would like to deal with them in two parts. First their conclusion, labelled (I), that our observed profile for the allowed line is narrower than the theoretical profile leads them to conclude that the emissions observed actually originate near the wall. If true this would be serious since the plasma density at the wall is too low to allow interpretation of the satellites in terms of electron plasma oscillations. However, the conclusion (I) of Pie1 and Pinnekamp is incorrect for the following reason. The shape of the allowed line in the theoretical curve they have used bears no relation to our conditions. It includes Doppler broadening, with the emitting neutrals also assumed to be at 4 x lo4 K (see Pie1 and Pinnekamp ref. 4) and this is in fact the dominant broadening mechanism at the plasma density assumed, rather than Stark broadening. (Doppler broadening alone gives a halfwidth of 0.35 A, very close to the halfwidth of their theoretical profile; see also Barnard et al. (3) for corroboration of this statement.) Actually, in our experiment the neutrals entering the plasma from the walls are expected to be much colder than 4 x lo4 K, and to remain cold on the time scale of the experiment. At our high electron temperature, furthermore, Stark broadening will have even less influence (4) on the allowed line shape than in the conditions assumed by Pie1 and Pinnekamp. Consequently the allowed line width is not expected to be much larger than the instrumental width and cannot be used to provide information on the spatial origin of the emissions. (A detailed analysis of the observed shape of the allowed line shows that it is not Gaussian but that it can be explained in terms of two groups of neutral atoms -a cold group and a group created by charge exchange with the ions. The cold group predominates, however, and the line width at half maximum is largely determined by that group.) The remainder of the argument of Pie1 and Pinnekamp that we are observing emissions from impurities rather than structure due to turbulence rests on the circumstance of similarity between one of our spectra and one they have obtained from a hydrogen-contaminated helium discharge. We consider this evidence to be unconvincing for the following reasons: (a) The feature we have identified as S+ (first small peak from the left in the reproduction of our spectrum in ref. (2) is always observed to be smaller than S(third small peak) as it should be according to an interpretation in terms of plasma turbulence. This is not in agreement with the measurements from a hydrogen-contaminated discharge. (b) Our measurements in the vicinity of the 4471 A line show similar features S+ and F as well as similar estimates for fluctuating field strengths (see Table 2 of ref. 1) to those found from the 4922 A line. Furthermore, it is not evident from the work cited by Pie1 and Pinnekamp (their ref. 2) that these features could be due to molecular emissions. (c) It would be surprising if a significant level of hydrogen impurity were present in our experiment. It was more than a year since hydrogen had been used in the device and many thousands of shots in helium were made prior to the spectroscopic measurements reported. It is unfortunately not possible to verify the absence of significant amounts of hydrogen for the spectroscopic work since the system has been used recently in other experiments with hydrogen discharges.
Read full abstract