Biogeographia vol. XX VII - 2006 (Pubblicato il 30 dicembre 2006) Biogeografia del/’Appennino centrale e sertentrionale.‘ trent’anni dopo The allochthonous component in the fauna of peninsular Italy MARZIO ZAPPAROLI Dzpzzrriivzenro di Prarezimze zlelle Pizlnte, Um'z2er5z'tz‘z degli Stzzdi della 72155222, Via 5471 C. De Lellis s.7z.c., 01100 Viterbo (Italy); e—mzzz'/.' zzzppmqo[@zmz'tzz5. it Key words: Italy, introduced species, biological invasions SUMMARY A broad picture of the animal species, both terrestrial and inland water, that have recently been introduced in the Apennine region of Italy (from Tuscany to Calabria) is presented in this paper. Information was gathered from a) the latest studies on the consistency and distribution of the Italian fauna (e.g., “Checklist delle specie” and “Clemap” projects), b) syntheses on particular taxonomic groups and/or fields of research, and c) other information from scientific literature or from taxonomists. Extinct allochthonous species, species whose status of acclimatizationl naturalization is unknown, and patautochthonous species (introduced before 1500 A.D.), were excluded from this analysis. 397 allochthonous species have been documented as introduced in this area, of which 320 (80.6%) have naturalized (represented by self- sustaining populations) and 77 (19.4%) have acclimatized (with populations in the wild, but not yet self sustaining). The naturalized species constitute 1.2°/o of the fauna in the study area (26,200 total species). The majority of introduced species are Arthropoda, in particular lnsecta (68% of the naturalized species, especially Homoptera Sternorrhyncha and Coleoptera), followed by Vertebrata (16% of the naturalized species, especially Osteichthyes). Annelida Oligochaeta, Mollusca Gastropoda and Bivalvia, Platyhelminthes and Nematoda are also present, but are much less numerous. According to the presence/ absence regional data of 189 introduced species (both acclimatized and naturalized), Lazio, Tuscany and Campania are the surveyed administrative regions in which the highest number of species have been recorded. This result could be due to a greater effort of research having been realized in these areas or to the presence of factors that “predispose‘’ the entry of allochthonous species, such as the high number of city centers, economic activities, and anthropic disturbance. Witli regard to the causes of introduction, the unintentionally introduced species represent 75% (304 species), while the intentional introductions represent only 25% (93 species) of the total; in both categories the naturalized species constitute 75-80%. Intentional introductions were carried out for biological control (34%), professional and sport fishing (27%), collection/ornamental (18%), hunting/alimentary (12%), industrial (fur and other) (4%) and scientific (3%) purposes. The unintentional introductions occurred largely through the importation of plants and/or vegetable products (58%), human movements (17%), importation of stored products (11.5%), fish spawning/aquaculture (5.5%), and importation of infected animals (2%) or other (4%). According to the zoogeographic origin of 298 introduced species, 44% are of Palaearctic (16% E-Palaeatctic, 28% W-Palaearctic), 21% Neoarctic, 11% Afrotropical, 10% Neotropical, 9% Oriental, 6% Australoasiatic origin. A preliminary assessment based on the presence and distribution in selected macrohabitats of potentially or efl-ectively invasive (impacting on biodiversity) species suggest that natural inland water habitats are at greater risk of invasion in comparison with natural/semi—natural terrestrial ones. However differing amounts of knowledge are available for the two main type of habitats, greater for the inland water, smaller for the terrestrial ones. In the latter, the effects produced by allochthonous mammals and birds are especially known, meanwhile information about the impact of introduced invertebrates is highly laclting, in particular of insects, which While represented in great numbers of species are at present largely confined to artificial habitats (urban areas and/ or agroecosystems).
Read full abstract