Exercise intolerance is a hallmark feature of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Locomotor muscle afferent feedback contributes to exercise intolerance in patients with HFrEF. Locomotor muscle afferent inhibition via intrathecal fentanyl, compared to the sham condition (SHAM), results in increased peak workload, cardiac output, and leg oxygen delivery during maximal exercise. To date, the impact of locomotor muscle afferent feedback inhibition on locomotor muscle activation responses during exercise in patients with HFrEF have not been investigated. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on vastus lateralis (VL) muscle activation during incremental exercise in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Patients with HFrEF (n = 7, EF: 35 ± 13%, age: 60 ± 9 yrs, BMI 28.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2) performed an incremental cycle test to task failure with lumbar intrathecal fentanyl (FENT) or SHAM (in randomized order). Electromyography (EMG) of the VL was measured and the root-mean square (RMS) of 10 contractions were averaged at 30 W, 50 W, 70 W, and peak workload. Changes in RMS were normalized as a percent of the SHAM response (unloaded = 0%; peak workload = 100%). RESULTS: Peak workload was significantly greater with FENT compared to SHAM (129 ± 30 vs. 114 ± 31 W, p = 0.04). VL RMS was not different at 30 W between FENT and SHAM (FENT: 44 ± 22 vs. SHAM: 17 ± 33%, p = 0.06). However, VL RMS was greater with FENT compared to SHAM at 50 W (FENT: 82 ± 61 vs. SHAM: 31 ± 24%), 70 W (FENT: 96 ± 56 vs. SHAM: 45 ± 29%), and peak workload (FENT: 167 ± 55 vs. SHAM: 92 ± 10%) (all, p < 0.04). There was no significant relationship between the change in peak workload and VL RMS with FENT with both normalized as a percent of the SHAM response (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that locomotor muscle afferent feedback may contribute to exercise intolerance via inhibition of locomotor muscle activation during exercise in patients with HFrEF.
Read full abstract