the author during January-April 2012. Peristaltic movement was judged by observation in the antrum of the stomach for 20 min (none, mild, and severe: severe indicates peristalsis involving the pylorus). Next, 20 mL of the l-menthol preparation was dispersed on the antrum, and observations were conducted again for 20 min to evaluate the inhibitory effect on peristalsis and the effect on tumor identification (whether tumors are found after dispersion of the l-menthol preparation). In addition, the efficacy in borderline determination was evaluated by dispersing the l-menthol preparation on tumors when borderline determination was difficult in cases where tumors had already been diagnosed. Results: Patients were 66.7 years of age on average (27-88), and the male:female ratio was 81:43. The background gastric mucosa consisted of 78.2% atrophic gastritis, 46.8% before/after the treatment of malignant gastric tumors (58/124; 39 after gastric cancer ESD/EMR, 9 before the treatment of gastric cancer, 9 after the treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma, and 1 during chemotherapy of gastric cancer). Peristaltic movement after the dispersion of the l-menthol preparation was: 37.1% none, 13.7% mild, and 49.2% severe. The inhibitory effect on peristalsis after dispersion was: total inhibition in 49.2%, partial inhibition in 6.5%, originally no peristalsis (none) in 37.1%, and no effect in 7.3%. The scope passed through the pyloric ring smoothly in 94.4%. In addition, peristalsis was inhibited completely after the dispersion of the l-menthol preparation in 77.0% of patients with severe peristalsis (47/61). Tumors were newly found in two cases in the antrum after dispersion (0-IIc tub1 and 0-IIa-like adenoma). Moreover, the author experienced three cases (2 corpus IIc and 1 antrum IIc) in which the borderline was clarified by dispersion of the preparation directly on the tumor when it was difficult to determine the borderline of tumors. Conclusion: The lmenthol preparation was effective not only for the inhibition of gastric peristalsis but also for identification and borderline determination of gastric tumors. Presumably, it is also superior because of its simplicity and convenience. It requires no highlighting of imaging such as those for NBI or magnification.