Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

Results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with general, regional, and local/monitored anesthesia care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

This study examined outcomes of endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) using general, spinal, epidural, and local/monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in a multicenter North American hospital database reflecting contemporary anesthesia and surgical practices. Elective EVAR cases performed between 2005 and 2008 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Excluded were emergency cases and patients with concomitant procedures requiring general anesthesia. Patient-level comorbidities, characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative details were examined. Complications were analyzed individually and in aggregate categories, including wound, pulmonary, renal, venous thromboembolic, cardiovascular, operative, and septic. Length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality were examined. Characteristics and outcomes were described using mean ± standard deviation or count (%), and comparisons were evaluated for statistical significance using χ(2), Fisher exact test, and univariate linear regression. LOS was analyzed with linear regression techniques using a log transformation. Associations between anesthesia type and outcomes were examined using univariable and multivariable regression techniques. We identified 6009 elective EVAR procedures for analysis. General anesthesia was used in 4868 cases, spinal anesthesia in 419, epidural anesthesia in 331, and local/MAC in 391. Defined morbidity occurred in 11% of patients. Median LOS was 2 (interquartile range, 1-3) days, and mean LOS was 2.8 ± 4.3 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.1%. Significant multivariate associations were observed between anesthesia type, pulmonary morbidity, and log-LOS. General anesthesia was associated with an increase in pulmonary morbidity vs spinal (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-12.5; P = .020) and local/MAC anesthesia (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.4; P = .041). Use of general anesthesia was associated with a 10% increase in LOS for general vs spinal anesthesia (95% CI, 4.8%-15.5%; P = .001) and a 20% increase for general vs local/MAC anesthesia (95% CI, 14.1%-26.2%; P < .001). Trends toward increased pulmonary morbidity and LOS were not observed for general vs epidural anesthesia. No significant association between anesthesia type and mortality was observed. In contemporary North American anesthetic and surgical practice, general anesthesia for EVAR was associated with increased postoperative LOS and pulmonary morbidity compared with spinal and local/MAC anesthesia. These data suggest that increasing the use of less-invasive anesthetic techniques may limit postoperative complications and decrease the overall costs of EVAR.

Comparable mortality with open repair of complex and infrarenal aortic aneurysm

A consequence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of anatomically straightforward infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair cohort (AAA) is that open aneurysm repair is more commonly performed for complex anatomy. Complex aneurysm repair with visceral vessel involvement (CAA) or combined aneurysm repair and visceral vessel reconstruction (VVR) has traditionally been considered to increase morbidity and mortality compared with repair of infrarenal AAA. This study evaluated contemporary outcomes of open abdominal aneurysm surgery, including AAA, CAA, and VVR using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The NSQIP Participant Use File was queried by CPT code to identify patients undergoing AAA, CAA, and VVR (2005-2008). Comparative analysis of clinical features, technical details and 30-day outcomes was performed using univariate methods. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality. A total of 2820 patients underwent AAA and 592 CAA. Renal insufficiency (ie, creatinine >1.4 mg/dL) rates were similar in AAA and CAA patients, however, more frequent in patients with VVR (51% vs 31% [no bypass]; P < .01). CAA was less likely to be performed urgently (6.3% vs 9.1%; P < .05) and was associated with increased operative time (254 ± 100 vs 224 ± 93; P < .01) compared with AAA. Univariate analysis showed that CAA did not increase mortality (5.7% vs 5.1%; P = .5). CAA slightly increased overall complications (32% vs 27%; P = .01) compared with AAA. 73 (2.5%) AAA and 84 (12%) CAA patients had simultaneous VVR and these patients exhibited a trend toward increased mortality (8.9% vs 5.2%; P = .07). VVR increased complications (43% (VVR) vs 26% [no bypass]; P < .01), including ventilation >48 hours (21% [VVR] vs 12% [no bypass]; P < .01), renal failure (7.6% [VVR] vs 4.1% [no bypass]; P = .04), and sepsis (13% [VVR] vs 6.3% ([no bypass]; P < .01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAA (odds ratio [OR], 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-1.6]; P = .01) and VVR (OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.8-3.6]; P < .01) increased the odds of any complication. Independent predictors of mortality included dependent functional status (OR, 3.6 [95% CI, 2.3-5.4]; P < .01), elevated pre-op creatinine (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.2-4.0]; P < .01), type II diabetes (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.05-2.4]; P = .03), and age (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.08]; P < .01). Neither CAA (OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.84-1.8]; P = .3) nor VVR (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.89-2.9]; P = .11) were associated with increased mortality compared with AAA. In contemporary practice the migration of open repair to increasingly complex cases has been achieved with 30-day mortality essentially equivalent to open repair of infrarenal AAA. Patients who require VVR do sustain increased complications, in particular renal failure. These data also emphasize the importance of baseline renal insufficiency in clinical decision making. CAA and VVR are associated with increased morbidity in comparison to AAA repair; however, both procedures can be safely performed in patients without increased risk of operative mortality.

Local Anaesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms

Objective The study aimed to analyse and report the results of a ‘local anaesthesia first’ approach in elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients. Material and methods Between January 2007 and August 2010, a total of 217 continuous patients (187 men, median age 76 years, range 52–94 years) underwent elective EVAR using this approach, with predefined exclusion criteria for local anaesthesia (LA). A retrospective analysis regarding technical feasibility, mortality, complication and endoleak rate was performed. The results are reported as an observational study. Results LA was applied in 183 patients (84%), regional anaesthesia (RA) in nine patients (4%) and general anaesthesia (GA) in 25 patients (12%). Anaesthetic conversion from LA to GA was necessary in 14 patients (7.6%). Airway obstruction ( n = 4) and persistent coughing ( n = 3) were the most common causes for conversion to GA. Thirty-day mortality in the LA group was 2.7%, with 16/183 patients (8.7%) experiencing postoperative complications. All type I endoleaks ( n = 5, 2.7%) occurred in patients with LA and challenging aneurysm morphologies. Conclusions A ‘local anaesthesia first’ strategy can successfully be applied in 75% of patients undergoing EVAR. The use of LA can impact imaging quality and thus precise endograft placement, which should be considered in patients with challenging aneurysm morphologies.

Endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair in patients with horseshoe kidneys: case series and literature review

Horseshoe kidney may cause technical and access problems during open aortic aneurysm repair. The aim of this study is to report two cases from our institution and to review the world's literature on successful endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair in patients with horseshoe kidneys. A retrospective review of a prospectively entered departmental computerized database was performed for the two patients from our institution. Articles were searched electronically from PubMed and Medline, using the terms 'horseshoe kidney' and 'aneurysm'. Endovascular cases were reviewed from the world's literature. In addition to the two patients from our institution, there were 19 patients with infrarenal aneurysms and horseshoe kidneys in published literature who underwent successful endovascular aneurysm repair. The occlusion of lower-pole or accessory renal arteries does not seem to cause significant endoleak or renal impairment in the long run. In conclusion, our experience and current literature seem to suggest that endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms for patients with horseshoe kidneys is safe. Renal impairment will depend on the area of kidney perfused by the accessory renal arteries. The endovascular treatment option is less invasive than open repair, and circumvents the problem of difficult exposure, especially in those patients with significant co-morbidity.

Long-term dilatation of polyester and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tube grafts after open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Since 1995, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts have been implemented in open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and are supposed to show less dilatation than polyester grafts. This study examined differences in graft dilatation and clinical outcome. This single-center long-term, prospective randomized study monitored 99 consecutive patients after OSR of AAA. Implanted were 90 tube ePTFE Gore-Tex Stretch grafts, 56 tube Dacron grafts (Uni-Graft KDV, polyester, B. Braun, knitted), and 51 tube Dacron grafts (Gelseal Plus, polyester, Vascutek, triaxial knitted). Follow-up with ultrasound examination was performed at discharge, at 12 months, and at 6 years. Patients were a mean age of 67 years. Thirty-day mortality was 2.5% (n = 5 of 199), without significant differences among the groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 5-year survivals of 0.82 (ePTFE/Gore), 0.81 (polyester/Braun), and 0.83 (polyester/Vascutek). Mean ± standard deviation dilatation of the midgraft segment was 1% ± 5% (ePTFE/Gore), 10% ± 9% (polyester/Braun), and 7% ± 8% (polyester/Vascutek) (P ≤ .001) at discharge; 8% ± 11% (ePTFE/Gore), 24% ± 7% (polyester/Braun), and 20% ± 13% (polyester/Vascutek; P ≤ .001) after 12 months; and 19% ± 21% (ePTFE/Gore), 33% ± 22% (polyester/Braun), and 23% ± 19% (polyester/Vascutek; (P ≤ .001) after 6 years. No graft failure or rupture occurred. Graft patency was 100%. After a mean implantation of 6 years, the ePTFE/Gore, polyester/Braun, and polyester/Vascutek tube grafts presented with significant differences. The ePTFE grafts showed a stronger resistance against dilatation than the two types of polyester grafts. Owing to similar perioperative and postoperative courses, no advantage could be identified in any group concerning the overall outcome. Vascular implants for OSR of AAA made of ePTFE and polyester are safe, even after a long implantation time. Therefore, the choice of the suitable graft does not depend on its postimplantation dilative characteristics. The outcome is not likely to be connected with dilatation of the implanted graft, because a causal connection between graft dilatation and death cannot be made. The study does not offer a basis for the preference of one of the three graft types. Nevertheless, continuous ultrasound examinations should be performed after implantation of an aortic tube graft to identify possible problems arising from changes in the graft and the residual vascular branches over time.

Minimal incision approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair

To evaluate the appropriate use of the minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) approach in nonruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, we prospectively compared the MIAS approach with the transperitoneal approach (TPA). Eighteen patients in whom the MIAS was used and 18 who had the TPA during the same period were included in this study. There was a significant difference in intraoperative fluid needs (2050 ± 510, MIAS; 3500 ± 300, TPA) and estimated blood loss (ml) (855 ± 316, MIAS; 1246 ± 615, TPA) between the two groups. The MIAS approach had a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (1 d vs. 2.4 d), hospital stay (8.3 d vs. 14.5 d), quicker return to general dietary feeding (2 d vs. 6.9 d), and less morbidity (23.5% vs. 77.7%) than the TPA group. The MIAS group had a smaller total cost payment than the TPA group (US$ 3,000 ± 150 vs. US$ 3,750 ± 200) because of less complications, shorter ICU, and shorter hospital stay. Our findings indicated that MIAS is a safe, effective, and suitable method for nonruptured infrarenal AAA repair.

Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach for reconstruction of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with previous laparotomy

Although the standard surgical approach for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been the transperitoneal approach, several reports have suggested the usefulness of retroperitoneal aortic reconstruction. However, the superiority of the retroperitoneal compared with transperitoneal approach is still controversial. To compare the efficacy of the retroperitoneal with that of the transperitoneal approach in elective AAA resection, 19 consecutive cases with previous laparotomies were randomly reviewed. From January 1990 through December 1992, 94 consecutive patients underwent elective reconstructions of an infrarenal AAA. Among them, 75 patients had had no previous surgery of any kind. In all of them, the transperitoneal approach was used (Group I). Nineteen other patients who had various laparotomies were randomly divided into two groups. The transperitoneal approach was used in 10 patients (Group II), and the retroperitoneal approach was used in 9 patients (Group III). Thus, the patients were separated into three groups and the intra- and postoperative parameters were compared. Surgical data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and aortic cross-clamping time did not differ significantly between the transperitoneal approach in the patients without laparotomy (Group I) and the retroperitoneal approach (Group II). In addition, the postoperative recovery including the initiation of alimentation and postoperative hospitalization also did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in the operative time and the blood loss between the retroperitoneal approach (Group II) and transperitoneal approach (Group III) in the patients with previous laparotomy. In addition, the postoperative parameters including the initiation of oral intake was sooner and hospitalization was significantly shorter in the retroperitoneal group (Group II) than in the transperitoneal group (Group III) with previous laparotomy. There was no incidence of postoperative adhesive ileus in the patients with the retroperitoneal approach (Group II). The results demonstrated no important advantage for the retroperitoneal approach compared with routine transperitoneal approach in the patients without previous laparotomy. However, in the patients with previous laparotomies, the retroperitoneal approach is a preferable alternative to the transperitoneal route.

Tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal infrarrenal em pacientes com anatomia favorável para o procedimento: experiência inicial em um serviço universitário

CONTEXTO: Desde sua introdução, em 1991, o reparo endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal infrarrenal tem se tornado uma alternativa atraente para o tratamento dessa doença. Avaliar nossos resultados iniciais quanto à segurança e eficácia dessa técnica nos levou à realização deste estudo. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a mortalidade perioperatória, a sobrevida tardia, as reoperações, as taxas de perviedade e o comportamento do saco aneurismático em pacientes com anatomia favorável para a realização do procedimento. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo longitudinal, observacional e retrospectivo realizado entre outubro de 2004 e janeiro de 2009 com 41 pacientes que foram submetidos à correção endovascular do aneurisma de aorta abdominal infrarrenal por apresentarem anatomia favorável para o procedimento. Foram analisados os achados dos exames diagnósticos, o tratamento e o seguimento em todos os pacientes. RESULTADOS: Foram implantadas, com sucesso, 31 (75,6%) próteses bifurcadas e 10 (24,5%) monoilíacas, de 5 diferentes marcas. O diâmetro médio dos aneurismas fusiformes era de 62 mm. A mortalidade perioperatória foi de 4,8% e a sobrevida tardia, 90,2%. Durante o acompanhamento médio de 30 meses, 2 (4,8%) pacientes necessitaram de reintervenção, um por migração da endoprótese e outro por vazamento tipo II. Dois (4,8%) pacientes apresentaram oclusão de ramo da prótese. Oito (19,5%) vazamentos foram diagnosticados e não houve nenhuma rotura dos aneurismas. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar do pequeno número de pacientes, os resultados observados parecem justificar a realização do procedimento endovascular nos pacientes com anatomia favorável.

Fast track management reduces the systemic inflammatory response and organ failure following elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is common after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of a multimodal fast track (FT) regimen on incidence rates of SIRS after elective infrarenal AAA repair. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial including 99 patients after either traditional (TC) or FT care. Basic FT elements were no bowel preparation, reduced preoperative fasting, patient controlled epidural analgesia, enhanced postoperative feeding and mobilization. The presence of SIRS, organ failure and mortality, length of stay (LOS) on intensive care unit (ICU) were analyzed during the postoperative course. The incidence of SIRS in the FT treatment arm was significantly lower as compared to TC: 28% vs. 50%, P = 0.04. The rate of any organ failure (AOF) and multiple organ failure (MOF) was lower in the FT group: AOF: 16% vs. 36%, P = 0.039; MOF: 2% vs. 12%; P = 0.112. LOS on ICU showed a slight advantage for FT care: 20 hours vs. 32 hours (P = 0.183). An optimized patient care program in elective open AAA repair significantly decreases the postoperative incidence of SIRS as well as rates of organ failure.

In situ versus extra-anatomic reconstruction for primary infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

There is no standard procedure for revascularization after infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. This study examines the outcomes of two contemporary methods. We retrospectively reviewed medical records for patients who underwent repair of infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms from January 1998 to December 2007 at a single institution. Patients with infected prosthetic aortic grafts were excluded. Twenty-eight patients (22 men; mean age, 65 ± 12) had in situ graft (group I, n = 13) or extra-anatomic bypass (group II, n = 15), with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Mean hospital lengths of stay were 36 ± 16 days for group I and 46 ± 17 days for group II. Overall perioperative mortality was 5 of 28 (18%), comprising 1 of 13 in group I (8%) and 4 of 15 in group II (27%; P = .333). No early or late vascular-related complications occurred in group I. In group II, three patients had early vascular-related complications, including, graft infection, graft occlusion and ischemia colitis, and five patients had late vascular-related complications, including graft infection and graft occlusion. One patient ultimately lost a limb. Group I had a 0% late complication rate vs 33% in group II (P = .044). For cumulative survival rates, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing revealed no significant differences between groups I and II. In situ graft revascularization is viable in afebrile patients or patients who have good response to preoperative antibiotic therapy. Extra-anatomic bypass grafting for infected infrarenal abdominal aneurysm resection has a similar long-term survival rate and should be considered in patients who are unsuitable for in situ graft revascularization; however, the postoperative complication rate is higher. Further prospective study with large patient populations is needed to determine the selection criteria for using in situ revascularization as alternative methods for treatment of infected abdominal aneurysms.

Outcome in cirrhotic patients after elective surgical repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm

Abdominal surgery in patients with advanced liver disease has been reported to be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, the surgical risk of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in cirrhotics remains ill-defined. We reviewed our experience to investigate the predictors of the outcome in cirrhotic patients after elective AAA open repair. Between January 2001 and March 2006, 1189 patients underwent elective open repair of infrarenal AAA and 24 (2%) had a biopsy-proven cirrhosis (23 male, 1 female; mean age, 68 ± 7 years). The latter were retrospectively stratified according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Operative variables, perioperative complications, and survival were recorded and compared with those of 48 concurrent noncirrhotic controls matched (2:1) by gender, age, aneurysm size, preoperative glomerular filtration rate, and type of reconstruction. The effect of CTP and MELD scores on midterm survival was investigated in cirrhotics with the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method. No intraoperative or 30-day deaths were recorded. No significant differences in terms of major perioperative complications were observed between cirrhotic patients and controls. Operative time and intraoperative blood transfusion requirement were significantly higher in cirrhotics (162 ± 49 vs 132 ± 39 minutes; P = .007 and 273 ± 364 vs 84 ± 183 mL; P = .040, respectively). Hospital length of stay was nearly doubled in cirrhotic patients (11.0 ± 2.8 vs 5.8 ± 1.5 days; P < .0001). Twenty-two cirrhotic patients were classified as CTP A and two as CTP B. Median MELD score was 8 (range, 6-14). CTP class B was associated with higher intraoperative blood transfusion requirement (941 ± 54 vs 213 ± 314 mL; P = .029). At a mean follow-up of 30.7 ± 22.1 months, five deaths were recorded in cirrhotics, and three in controls. Actuarial survival at 2 years was 77.4% in cirrhotics and 97.8% in controls (log-rank test, P = .026). Both CTP B patients died within 6 months. CTP class B and a MELD score ≥10 were associated with reduced midterm survival rates (log-rank test, P < .0001 and P = .021, respectively). In our experience, elective AAA open repair in relatively compensated cirrhotics was safely performed with an acceptable increase of the magnitude of the operation. However, the reduced life expectancy of cirrhotics with a MELD score ≥10 suggests that such a procedure may not be warranted in this subgroup of patients.

Treatment of Type I Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Usefulness of N-butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization in Cases of Failed Secondary Endovascular Intervention

Purpose To evaluate the technical feasibility and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization using a percutaneous transabdominal or a transarterial approach in the failed secondary endovascular treatment of type I endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods From 2000–2007, seven patients with failed secondary endovascular treatment of type I endoleaks (five patients with type Ia endoleak, one patient with type Ib endoleak, and one patient with type Ia and Ib endoleaks) were treated with embolization using NBCA with or without a coil. Embolizations were performed using either a percutaneous transabdominal ( n = 5) or a transarterial ( n = 5) approach. Four patients underwent a single session of embolization, and three underwent two sessions of embolization. The duration between EVAR and endoleak treatment was 9.6 months ± 15.3 (mean ± standard deviation; range 0–42 months). Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated for changes in size and shape of the aneurysm sac and presence or resolution of endoleaks. The follow-up period after endoleak treatment was 18.0 months ± 20.4 (mean ± standard deviation; range 0–53 months). Results Technical success was achieved in six patients with complete resolution of the endoleak confirmed by follow-up CT scans. One technical failure was observed in a patient who eventually underwent surgical conversion. There were no procedure-related complications. Conclusions Embolization with NBCA by a percutaneous transabdominal or a transarterial approach for the treatment of type I endoleaks after EVAR was technically feasible and clinically effective, with no major complications.

Outcome in cirrhotic patients after elective surgical repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm

Outcome in cirrhotic patients after elective surgical repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm

Risk factors for the development of persistent type ii endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

To determine, based on preoperative imaging findings, which patients treated with endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair are at high risk for the development of persistent type II endoleaks. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiographies of 136 patients, treated endovascularly, were retrospectively examined for possible anatomic predictors of type II endoleak development. Specifically, the number of patent aortic branches and thrombus load parameters (i.e., thickness, perimeter, area, and localization) were recorded. Thrombus load parameters were evaluated at the level of maximum aneurysm diameter, at the level of sac lumbar arteries' ostia, and at the level of inferior mesenteric artery ostium. Follow-up CT angiographies were also studied for the presence of persistent type II endoleaks (present at six-month follow-up examination). The association of these anatomic features with the development of persistent type II endoleaks was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Aortic branch patency increased the risk for persistent type II endoleak development, while thrombus load parameters decreased this risk. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the total number of patent aortic branches (odds ratio = 4.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.72-10.42, P = 0.002 for each additional branch), and the percentage of aortic perimeter covered by a thrombus at the level of the sac lumbar arteries' ostia (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.06-0.44, P < 0.001 for a 15% increase) were independent predictors. Anatomic characteristics of a preoperative aorta can be used to predict patients with higher risk for persistent type II endoleak development.

Techniques in endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVARs) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic aneurysms, with over half of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs performed endoluminally each year. Since the first endografts were placed two decades ago, many changes have been made in graft design, operative technique, and management of complications. This paper summarizes modern endovascular grafts, considerations in preoperative planning, and EVAR techniques. Specific areas that are addressed include endograft selection, arterial access, sheath delivery, aortic branch management, graft deployment, intravascular ultrasonography, pressure sensors, management of endoleaks and compressed limbs, and exit strategies.

Results of Open Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Tabular Review of the Literature

Open surgical repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms requires more extensive dissection and aortic clamping above the renal or mesenteric arteries. Although results of open surgical series have shown variation, morbidity and mortality is higher compared with infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair. Potential complications include renal insufficiency, mesenteric ischemia, multisystem organ failure, and death. Although endovascular treatment with fenestrated and branched endografts might potentially decrease the risk of complications and mortality, its role is not yet defined and the technology is not widely available. Issues related to durability of the procedure and secondary interventions might limit its application to patients with higher risk or those with hostile anatomy. This article summarizes the clinical results of open surgical repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms to provide a benchmark for comparison with results of endovascular treatment, using fenestrated and branched techniques.

Midterm results of adjunctive neck therapies performed during elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

This study evaluated the durability of adjunctive endovascular neck procedures, including aortic cuffs, Palmaz stents (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Fla), and high-pressure balloon angioplasty, at managing intraoperative proximal neck complications during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This was a single-center retrospective review of EVARs. The primary outcome variable studied was survival free of a graft-related event (GRE). GRE was defined by the occurrence of one of the following: type I endoleak, sac enlargement, aneurysm rupture, death, or procedure related to the aortic neck. These outcome variables were assessed relative to the preoperative anatomic neck variables (neck length, diameter, degree of angulation, degree of circumferential thrombus, and presence of conicity), procedural variables (manufacturing type of graft, use of a Palmaz stent), and patient characteristics (age and presence of medical comorbidities). Outcomes were assessed by t tests, Pearson χ(2), and Kaplan-Meier analysis, when appropriate. A total of 174 EVARs performed between January 2005 and December 2007 were evaluated. Fifty-six adjunctive procedures were performed, with a 97% primary-assisted exclusion rate. Patients who received an adjunctive therapy had similar freedom from a GRE compared with EVARs that did not require adjunctive therapy (35.5 ± 2.6 vs 34.8 ± 1.5 months, P = .31, log-rank test). Subset analysis identified a significant association between Palmaz stent placement at the time of EVAR and decreased freedom from GREs (hazard ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-6.77; P = .02). Midterm results suggest that adjunctive therapies to manage intraoperative proximal neck complications do not compromise durability. The subset of patients requiring aortic neck Palmaz stent placement at the time of EVAR are among those at highest risk for subsequent GRE.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association

From the Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular Imaging and Intervention (T.G.W., S.P.K., K.Y., S.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medical Imaging (S.K.), Scarborough General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Interventional Radiology (P.D.), West Allis Memorial Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (B.J.D.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiology (S.C.R.), University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California; and Department of Radiology (J.F.C.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania. Received May 4, 2010; final revision received May 24, 2010; accepted July 11, 2010. Address corre-

Incidental Detection of a Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Used for Attenuation Correction in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With SPECT

A 68-year-old patient with known 3-vessel coronary artery disease, a history of aortocoronary bypass surgery, and presently without chest pain, was referred to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative risk assessment as infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair was planned. Single photon emission computed tomography (CT) revealed normal myocardial perfusion at adenosine-stress and at rest. However, the CT scan used for attenuation correction (AC) demonstrated a large tumor in the right upper lung as an incidental finding, and the patient was referred for staging with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT and subsequently to thoracic surgery. The lesion was resected and diagnosed to be an adenocarcinoma (stage pT2, cN0, cM0). When last seen, the patient was recovering well from surgery.

Impact of Intrasac Thrombus and a Patent Inferior Mesenteric Artery on EVAR Outcome

To assess the significance of a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and presence of intrasac thrombus on the outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Between June 2004 and June 2007, 114 AAA patients (100 men; mean age 75 years, range 56-87) treated electively with a bifurcated stent-graft were assessed with computed tomography pre- and postoperatively. Incidences of type II endoleaks and reinterventions were compared with preoperative intrasac thrombus and IMA patency. Over a mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6-38), there was no aneurysm rupture. Eleven (11%) of 101 patients with and 7 (54%) of 13 patients without preoperative intrasac thrombus presented with a type II endoleak (p<0.01). The postoperative change in aneurysm diameter was 0 mm (-20 to 16) in 18 patients with type II endoleak and -9 mm (-30 to 18) in sealed aneurysms (p<0.001). Fourteen (78%) type II endoleaks originated from lumbar arteries and 4 (22%) from the IMA in spite of the fact that most patients (69%) had a patent IMA. There were 5 reinterventions for type II endoleak with expansion of the sac. The reinterventions did not seem related to intrasac thrombus or a patent IMA. Prophylactic embolization of the IMA was unsuccessful in 4 (33%) cases. In this series, type II endoleaks inhibited sac shrinkage and occurred more frequently in aneurysms without intrasac thrombus. Most type II endoleaks originated from lumbar arteries and not from the IMA. Prophylactic embolization of the IMA does not seem justified and is not always technically successful.