The concept of Panchayati Raj has undergone several changes ever since its inception five decades back. These changes have come through various means, amendment to the constitution, corresponding changes to the various State Panchayati Raj Acts and through both positive (progressive) and negative (regressive) activities at the grassroots level by the participants themselves.The present study attempts to capture the political dynamics involved in the running of a Gram Panchayat. The first part of the paper focuses on the alliances and counter alliances made by the elected members to get elected to the posts of the Chairperson and the deputy chairperson, contrary to the general research conclusions that caste plays a predominant role in the Panchayati Raj institutions, especially in the village panchayats. This issue gains importance in the state of Karnataka where the top posts in PRIs are held on quota reservation system, (allotment of reservation to SCs/STs and women by rotation to different panchayat constituencies and various executive posts) something similar to the American system of Gerry(Jerry) mandering. The former is politico-social in nature while the latter is politico-geographical. The second part of the paper shows how after having made an alliance, the leadership, in informal terms, the ruling alliance, functions, responding to the demands of the alliance on the one hand and keeping at bay the opposition on the other. This paper is a qualitative analysis and shows how weak leaderships based on opportunistic alliances function and who gains from such a political phenomena. Further more, it shows how the bargaining power of the electorate from ‘the other side’(non-ruling alliance) is reduced to mere requests, and how the ruling alliance gets the developmental work done through their own people and for their own people. Panchayati Raj Institutions, which were supposed to be ‘participatory’ in nature is reduced to mere participation of the ruling alliance and how the people from ‘the other side’ (both elected members and the common villagers) respond to the dynamics. The paper concludes by showing how such political dynamics at the grassroots level weaken the real and original objective of taking governance to the people branding it ‘participatory democracy’ and how the weak leadership plays into the hands of the permanent executive. According to the statistics provided by the Ministry of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, government of India, there are about 231815 Gram Panchayats with a total number of 2186452 elected representatives. Each gram Panchayat is distinctively different from each other. The present paper attempts to analyse not the comprehensive developmental and political activities of the Gram Panchayat and compare it with other successful panchayats, but to observe how political dynamics within the leadership effects political and developmental activities in the villages and how the grassroots stakeholders respond to such dynamics.Though the 73rd amendment to the Indian Constitution visualized democratizing deliberative bodies at the grassroots level, the p resent study suggests that this ‘democracy’ is actually hijacked by some local leaders through various political/social and cultural means merely to neutralize the influence of the mandatory provisions of reservations in order to suit their political interests and to retain their control over the local polity and resources, without effecting the provisions of reservation.