Event Abstract Back to Event Sampling based inference with linear probabilistic population codes Jeff Beck1*, Alexandre Pouget2 and Peter Latham1 1 University College London, United Kingdom 2 University of Rochester , United States An ever increasing corpus of behavioural data from animals as simple as insects and those as complex as humans indicates that probabilistic reasoning is the rule when it comes to tasks that range from low level sensory-motor transformation to high level cognition and decision making. This remarkable set of behaviours require a neural code which (1) represents probability distributions over task relevant latent variables (stimuli), (2) is consistent with observed neural statistics, and (3) can be used to implement the operations of probabilistic inference using biologically plausible neural operations. Over the past few years we have worked to develop such a probabilistic population code or PPC and have utilized such a code to model tasks which involve probabilistic operations such as cue combination, evidence accumulation, prior implementation, and maximum a posteriori estimation. However, to some extent, these are the easy problems probabilistic inference, or at least, these are the problems of probabilistic inference for which the specific type of PPC which we have proposed, the linear PPC, is ideally suited. Unfortunately, as is often the case, a representation which makes a particular problem easy can make another problem difficult. In this case, the probabilistic operation made difficult by this choice of code is the marginalization operation. Here, marginalization involves taking a complex generative model for neural activity, r, which is conditioned upon many latent variables (i.e. some p(r|s1,s2,...,sn)) and then inverting that model to obtain a posterior distribution over only a few task relevant latent variables. This involves a potentially high dimensional integral over say s2..sn to obtain a marginal posterior distribution p(s1|r). Previously, we had some success in generating biologically plausible networks which perform the relatively low dimensional marginalization operations needed to implement computations such as non-linear coordinate transforms for sensory-motor information integration, Kalman filters for motor control and object tracking, explaining away in infants (a.k.a backward masking), and auditory localization. This was accomplished using networks which implement a quadratic non-linearity and divisive normalization, operations which are observed throughout cortex. This was intriguing as, previously, divisive normalization had been implicated in gain control, attention and redundancy reduction, and these results suggest a more generic and possibly unifying computational role. Unfortunately, it was not clear from this previous work that these results would generalize to higher dimensional marginalization operations which can only be made tractable by utilizing sampling methods. Indeed, it was not initially clear that sampling methods were compatible with the probabilistic population coding approach at all. In this work, we address this issue by first demonstrating that samples can be generated naturally within the PPC framework in a variety of ways, some of which require nothing more than stochastic synapses and dynamic attractor networks comparable to those used to generate maximum a posteriori estimates. Moreover, we show that the samples generated in this way can be easily adapted to the purpose of implementing the marginalization operation in a way that, once again, indicates that divisive normalization performs a critical computation role. Conference: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 25 Feb - 2 Mar, 2010. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Poster session III Citation: Beck J, Pouget A and Latham P (2010). Sampling based inference with linear probabilistic population codes. Front. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2010. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.03.00258 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 05 Mar 2010; Published Online: 05 Mar 2010. * Correspondence: Jeff Beck, University College London, London, United Kingdom, bayesian.empirimancer@googlemail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Jeff Beck Alexandre Pouget Peter Latham Google Jeff Beck Alexandre Pouget Peter Latham Google Scholar Jeff Beck Alexandre Pouget Peter Latham PubMed Jeff Beck Alexandre Pouget Peter Latham Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract