Reviewed by: The Glass City: Toledo and the Industry that Built It by Barbara L. Floyd Frederick E. Witzig Barbara L. Floyd, The Glass City: Toledo and the Industry that Built It. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. 272 pp. $50. If there are people still unaware of the economic plight of many midwestern industries in recent decades, a quick tour of virtually any of the region’s urban sites will probably bring them up to date. Rusting warehouses, vacant office buildings, and idle factories all too poignantly testify to the tragedy of layoffs, bankruptcies, and overseas relocations that have afflicted American manufacturing since its heyday in the past century. An acute observer may also catch the hint, implicit in the same decay, that midwestern cities used to bustle with tremendous innovation and economic vitality. This book helps explain the triumphs and travails of one of those industries in one of those cities, glassmaking in Toledo, Ohio. Barbara Floyd is the Director of the Ward M. Canaday Center for Special Collections at the University [End Page 99] of Toledo, which houses the Owens Corning, Owens-Illinois, Libbey-Owens-Ford, and other corporate and personal records Floyd relied on for her research. In 1868, writer and city booster Jesup W. Scott confidently outlined exactly how Toledo would fulfill its destiny as “the Future Great City of the World” (13). Taking his prediction as a theme for her book, Floyd tells the story of the rise of glassmaking in Toledo from its inception in the late 1800s, when the swampy and disease-ridden town managed to lure Edmund Drummond Libbey’s New England Glass Company away from Boston. Floyd chronicles how Libbey, the industrial manager, joined forces with Michael J. Owens, the inventor, to automate glass production by World War I. Techniques used by skilled craftsmen for hundreds of years were, almost overnight, made obsolete by the Owens Bottle Machine Company’s new bottle-making machines, with predictable results for labor. Allied with investors and inventors from across the United States, Europe and Japan, Libbey and Owens made northwest Ohio headquarters for the American glass industry. Future generations of Toledo industrialists, including Edward Ford, William Levis, John Biggers, and Harold Boeschenstein, expanded into automobile windshields, Fibreglass, and glass block construction. They also invested in asbestos insulation, a decision that later made their corporations liable for billions of dollars of damages. Unfortunately for Toledo loyalists, the city’s glassmakers always seemed to promise a bit more than they could deliver, and by the end of the twentieth century the industry nearly abandoned Toledo altogether, having barely survived rapacious corporate raiders, fierce global competition, and asbestos litigation. Of course, Toledo never did surpass Chicago, much less Paris and London, as Jesup predicted. However much Libbey and his industrial descendants personally prospered, and Toledo arts benefited from Libbey’s philanthropic largesse, the city’s impending take-off always remained impending, its greatness always in the future. But Toledo’s failure to thrive remains assumed, rather than explained, in this book. Floyd maintains such a close focus on the glass industry that the reader may feel misled by the book’s title, which implies a history of how the industry built the city. Instead, the city itself only makes an appearance at the beginning of the book, when Floyd explains why Libbey relocated his factory to Toledo; briefly in the middle of the book, dealing with postwar Toledo; and again at the end, when the industrial leaders tried, and largely failed, to revitalize the city by building glitzy, new headquarters in the last decades of the twentieth [End Page 100] century. Little is said of the interaction between the glass industry and the city’s other businesses (ironically, Ward M. Canaday’s Willys-Overland, supplier of Jeeps during World War II, gets only a brief mention), or how industrial leaders responded to Progressive politics, or racial tensions, or urban migration patterns. Only rarely does the reader get brief glimpses of the progress, or regress, of the city itself. Though not uncritical of its subjects, this is largely a corporate history. Analysis is largely reserved for critiques of business decisions, and for an explication of Libbey...
Read full abstract