Cotton gins are required to obtain operating permits from state air pollution regulatory agencies (SAPRA), whichregulate the amount of particulate matter that can be emitted. Industrial Source Complex Short Term version 3 (ISCST3) isthe Gaussian dispersion model currently used by some SAPRAs to predict downwind concentrations used in the regulatoryprocess in the absence of field sampling data. The maximum ambient concentrations for PM10 and PM2.5 are set by theNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) at 150 .g/m3 and 65 .g/m3 (24 h average), respectively. Some SAPRAs usethe NAAQS concentrations as property line concentrations for regulatory purposes. This article reports the results of a uniqueapproach to estimating downwind PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations using Monte Carlo simulation, the Gaussian dispersionequation, the Hino power law, and a particle size distribution that characterizes the dust typically emitted from cotton ginexhausts. These results were then compared to a 10 min concentration (C10) and the concentrations that would be measuredby an FRM PM10 and PM2.5 sampler. The total suspended particulate (TSP) emission rate, particle size distributions, andsampler performance characteristics were assigned to triangular distributions to simulate the real-world operation of the ginand sampling systems. The TSP emission factor given in AP-42 for cotton gins was used to derive the PM mass emission ratefrom a 40 bale/h plant. The Gaussian equation was used to model the ambient TSP concentration downwind from the gin.The performance characteristics for the PM10 and PM2.5 samplers were then used to predict what the measured concentrationwould be for two PSD conditions. The first PSD assumption was that the mass median diameter (MMD) and geometricstandard deviation (GSD) were constant at 12 .m and 2, respectively, and the second scenario assigned a triangulardistribution to the MMD and GSD of {15, 20, 25} .m and {1.8, 2.0, 2.2}, respectively. The results show that the PM2.5 fractionof the dust emitted under either PSD condition was negligible when compared to the NAAQS for PM2.5 of 65 .g/m3. The resultsalso demonstrate that correcting for wind direction changes within the hour using the power law reduces the ambientconcentration by a factor of 2.45.