Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) were collected during winter 1982-83 in eastern Colorado and subjected to whole-carcass analysis to determine carcass composition and develop a physiological index. Condition index was defined as body fat/fat-free body weight. Multiple regression equations using body weight and wing length were highly correlated with total body fat in male (R2 = 0.643) and female (R2 = 0.679) mallards. When tested on an independent data set, fat predictor equations accurately estimated measured body fat (R2 = 0.796). Weight and wing measurements were easily obtained on live mallards under field conditions with high repeatability among observers (CV < 1%). By accounting for variability in structural size among birds, models were able to detect differences in body that were not detectable using body weight alone. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 49(3):564-568 Early studies of the endogenous reserves of live waterfowl used body weight as an indicator of nutritional status (Hanson 1962, Folk et al. 1966, Street 1975, Owen and Cook 1977). Implicit in this approach were the assumptions that: (1) lean body weight was constant within a species (Connell et al. 1960); (2) fat was most important in determining condition; and (3) structural size differences among individuals of a species did not affect conclusions about nutritional status. Later, researchers recognized that structural size biased based only on body weight, and condition indices were developed to eliminate such biases. Most have used the simple quotient of body weight divided by a measure of structural size such as wing, keel, tarsus, bill, or total body length, or a combination thereof. Whereas some researchers have used body measurements that correlate with lean body weight (Bailey 1979, Chappell and Titman 1983), skeletal weight (Wishart 1979), or total body fat (Woodall 1978), others have adopted arbitrary structural measurements (Harris 1970, Bennett and Bolen 1978) or ocular estimates (Owen 1981). We define as a measure of the chances of survival of an individual at a particular time of the year and/or of its potential for breeding successfully (Evans and Smith 1975). During winter, fat is the component of that is the most labile and potentially limiting to the mallard. In addition to serving as a supplemental energy source necessary for survival during winter periods of high energy demand and food scarcity (Jordan 1953), winter fat reserves may also provide a source of energy and nutrients used during reproduction (Krapu 1981). Waterfowl researchers are striving to understand the interrelationships among the breeding, post-breeding, and wintering periods. Energetics, with emphasis on the dynamics of nutrient reserves, is the common denominator linking these periods. A physiological index for the mallard, a species that serves as he focus for much duck research and management, would aid winter energetics studies by providing managers with a method to evaluate the biological effects of hunting regimes and habitat manipulations. The objectives of our study were to: derive an equation to predict total carcass fat of live birds; develop a index using estimated fat and a structural size measure; and test the index on a sample data set to evaluate its performance. The index had to be suitable for use in field situations on live birds, offer a major improvement over body weight alone in predicting condition, and be applicable throughout the winter period (late Nov-Feb) on birds of all sexes and age-classes. We acknowledge the help of G. M. Lorentzson in duck trapping and carcass preparation and especially thank J. F. Corey for his dedicated work on all phases of the study. D. C. Bowden offered guidance on statistical analyses. Many Div. of Wildl. employees assisted in trapping operations, particularly M. C. Creamer and G. Berlin. C. A. Weinland and M. L. Stevens conducted laboratory analyses and offer d valuable advice, and M. P. Schoenfeld coded and entered carcass and data. Thanks are extended to J. E. Black for manu-
Read full abstract