The research paper carves out the technicalities of the commonly used terms Victim, Victimology and Victimization along with its various types. Moving forward, it shows several Administration failures such as Pending cases and Improper gender representation. Indian people despite having these flaws, bound their indomitable faith in Judiciary get into return the further victimization, called Secondary Victimization, which is visible in insensitively handled cases. The obscene and gender insensitive remarks of none but Judges about women, their making unmaking and weird judgments are not only unconstitutional but also immoral. The question arises is what are the reason behind such astounded behavior. The reason behind this is traditional & immoral thoughts, ill mentality regarding women, division of labour and deep rooted patriarchy. It further shows the sheer failure of victim compensation schemes framed to restore aggrieved victims. The paper draws link to the mental trauma faced and deteriorated mental health of victims due to the secondary victimization.. Each and every reason behind sub-heads and argument is presented with illustrations, facts and viewpoints. The research methodology used is doctrinal and analytical. The research paper not only pick and gather information from various websites, resources and references, but also provides a clear insight and connect smoothly to main topic. The paper enquires into the exact definitions of terms like victim, victimization, victimology; the process of the ill mind-sets of judicial authorities further victimizing victims; and explore the various administrative and judicial failures leading to mental illness of victims. The research paper concludes with strict reforms in Indian Judiciary. Most importantly, initiatives must be taken for gender sensitization programs for Judges. It’ll result in a whole new perspective of how the angle of cases’ trials should be set and seen.