Abstract Background: The relationship between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) has been the subject of scientific debate. Objective: To estimate the summary association between red meat intake and CRC and to examine sources of heterogeneity, a meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted. Design: Thirty-four prospective studies of red meat and CRC were identified, of which, 25 represented independent non-overlapping study populations. Summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for high vs. low intake and dose-response relationships were calculated. Results: In the high vs. low intake meta-analysis, the SRRE was 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04-1.21) with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.014). Summary associations were modified by tumor site and gender. The SRREs for colon cancer and rectal cancer were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19) and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.97-1.46), respectively. The SRREs among men and women were 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04-1.42) and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.87-1.17), respectively. Conclusions: The available epidemiologic data are not sufficient to support an independent and unequivocal positive association between red meat intake and CRC. This conclusion is based upon summary associations that are weak in magnitude, heterogeneity across studies, inconsistent patterns of associations across the sub-group analyses, and the likely influence of confounding by other dietary and lifestyle factors. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1908. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1908
Read full abstract