Incidence Of Treatment-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenic inhibitors in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients.

To report the efficacy and safety data of immunotherapy plus angiogenic inhibitors treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Eligible patients with pathological or cytological confirmed locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus angiogenic inhibitors were enrolled. The primary endpoints were progressive free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. A total of 46 consecutive enrolled patients received ICI plus angiogenic inhibitor, and the median follow-up was 9.6months (range 1.5-32.5). The ORR and DCR were 8.7% (n = 4) and 50% (n = 23), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2.9months (95% CI 2.1-3.7) and 12.3months (95% CI 7.6-17.0), respectively. Patients at stage IVB had an inferior PFS than stage IIIC or IVA (2.8months vs 4.4months, P = 0.003). The median PFS of patients who were treated with ICI plus bevacizumab was shorter than ICI plus anlotinib or apatinib (1.2 monthsvs 3.3months, P = 0.005). The occurrence of hypertension during the combination treatment has been related to a tendency for prolonged PFS (5.5 monthsvs 2.6months; P = 0.05). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) was 89.1% (n = 41), and grade 3-4 TRAE was occupied 21.4% (n = 10). This study objectively demonstrated that the treatment of ICI and antiangiogenic agents in lung adenocarcinoma could be a promising alternative therapeutic regimen, and the toxic effects were manageable. Subgroup analysis revealed that small molecular angiogenic inhibitors plus ICI and low tumor burden during treatment were better prognostic factors.

The efficacy and safety of cemiplimab in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative analysis of retrospective studies versus prospective studies.

Cemiplimab has been widely recommended by international guidelines to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis to integrate the efficacy and safety data in the published prospective and retrospective studies for better understanding the application of cemiplimab. The online databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were searched to find out eligible studies from inception to November 4, 2021. The "R" software and the "meta" package were used to synthesize the objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), and the incidences of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Overall, three retrospective studies with 398 patients and three prospective studies with 219 patients were enrolled. The pooled ORR and DCR were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46-59) and 70% (95% CI 57-82) for retrospective studies versus 45% (95% CI 39-52) and 68% (95% CI 56-79) for prospective studies. In regard of toxicities, prospective studies reported much higher incidences of any grade (99% vs. 47%) and grade 3-4 TRAEs (43% vs. 15%) against retrospective studies. The most reported TRAE was fatigue, followed by diarrhea and pruritus. In addition, nine treatment-related deaths (four in retrospective studies vs. five in prospective studies) were documented. In both retrospective and prospective clinical practices, cemiplimab could be an effective regimen for locally advanced or metastatic CSCC patients, but toxicities during the treatment deserve further attention.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

PurposeTo assess the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (DEB-TACE+ICIs) versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine+cisplatin) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included unresectable iCCA patients treated with DEB-TACE+ICIs or chemotherapy between May, 2019 and August, 2021. The differences in tumor responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between the 2 groups. Patient baseline characteristics, PFS, and OS were compared among 2 groups before and after propensity score-matching (PSM). Factors affecting PFS and OS were analyzed by Cox’s proportional hazards regression model.ResultsThe study included 49 patients with unresectable iCCA patients, 20 in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group and 29 in the chemotherapy group. PSM analysis created 20 pairs of patients in 2 groups. The patients in the DEB-TACE+ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (55.0% vs. 20.0%, P=0.022), higher PFS (median, 7.2 vs. 5.7 months, P=0.036), and higher OS (median, 13.2 vs. 7.6 months, P=0.015) than those in the chemotherapy group. Multivariate analyses suggested that chemotherapy, tumor size >5cm, and multiple tumors were the independent risk factors for PFS and OS. The incidence of TRAEs was similar between the 2 groups.ConclusionCompared to chemotherapy, DEB-TACE plus ICIs improved survival and was well-tolerated in patients with unresectable iCCA.

The efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with language training for motor aphasia after stroke: study protocol for a multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial

BackgroundMotor aphasia after stroke is a common and intractable complication of stroke. Acupuncture and language training may be an alternative and effective approach. However, the efficacy of acupuncture and language training for motor aphasia after stroke has not been confirmed. The main objectives of this trial are to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and low-intensity, low-dose language training in treating ischemic motor aphasia after stroke from 15 to 90 days.MethodsThis is a multicenter randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. We will allocate 252 subjects aged between 45 and 75 years diagnosed with motor aphasia after stroke with an onset time ranging from 15 to 90 days into two groups randomly in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the experimental group will be treated with “Xing-Nao Kai-Qiao” acupuncture therapy plus language training, and those in the control group will be treated with sham-acupoint (1 cun next to the acupoints) acupuncture therapy plus language training. All the patients will be given acupuncture and language training for 6 weeks, with a follow-up evaluation 6 weeks after the end of the treatment and 6 months after the onset time. The patients will mainly be evaluated using the Western Aphasia Battery and Chinese Functional Communication Profile, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events at the 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks of treatment will be recorded. The baseline characteristics of the patients will be summarized by group, the chi-squared test will be used to compare categorical variables, and repeated measures of analysis of variance or a linear mixed model will be applied to analyze the changes measured at different time points.DiscussionThe present study is designed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of traditional acupuncture therapy and language training in ischemic motor aphasia after stroke and explore the correlation between the treatment time and clinical effect of acupuncture. We hope our results will help doctors understand and utilize acupuncture combined with language training.Trial registrationChiCTR ChiCTR1900026740. Registered on 20 October 2019

Safety evaluation of oral calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists in patients with acute migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists have been suggested as novel treatments for acute migraine. This study aimed to use meta-analysis to compare the safety and tolerability of five existing oral CGRP receptor antagonists (BI44370TA, MK-3207, rimegepant, telcagepant, and ubrogepant) with that of a placebo or triptans against acute migraine. Five prominent databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials on this topic. The primary safety outcomes of interest were any adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and secondary outcomes were individual events, namely diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, fatigue, nausea, paresthesia, somnolence, upper abdominal pain, and vomiting. Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were examined in detail. Although, compared to placebo, oral CGRP receptor antagonists significantly increased the incidence of any AEs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.23), there was no difference in the incidence of TRAEs (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.00-1.38). Moreover, CGRP receptor antagonists were safer than triptans with respect to primary safety outcomes, such as any AEs (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63-0.98) and TRAEs (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.58-0.79). Despite oral CGRP receptor antagonists posing a significantly higher risk of AEs when compared to placebo, CGRP receptor antagonists have a favorable safety profile compared to triptans. Our findings inform strategies to enhance safety and tolerability in the treatment of acute migraine.

Adverse events in lymphoma patients treated with phosphoinositide 3 kinase Inhibitor in clinical trials: a meta-analysis.

Malignant lymphomas are one of the most common cancers worldwide and with high biologic heterogeneity, while the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway is crucial in maintaining cell growth and survival both in physiological and in pathological conditions (i.e., lymphoma). PI3K inhibitors have been proven to be effective in several subtypes of lymphomas. However, the high incidence of treatment-related adverse events as well as the special safety profile in PI3K inhibitors draws great attention. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare adverse events in PI3K inhibitors to conventional regimens in lymphoma patients. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials and phase III clinical trials that used PI3K inhibitors comparing with non-PI3K inhibitors in lymphoma patients. To achieve the appropriate results, we calculated the risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Four trials with 1399 patients that met our criteria were included. The PI3K inhibitors group significantly increased the risk of all-grade adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and high-grade AEs (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57-0.70), compared with the non-PI3K inhibitors group. Besides, the incidence of neutropenia (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.90), pneumonia (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83), and diarrhea (RR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32-0.49) were significantly high in the PI3Ki group, while the incidence of anemia (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.50-1.20) and thrombocytopenia (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.51-1.42) had no statistic significant. PI3K inhibitors increased the risk of certain AEs in lymphoma patients.

The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis - A network meta-analysis.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for psoriasis. However, there is no direct comparison of JAK inhibitors in plaque psoriasis. In order to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in psoriasis, we conducted a network meta-analysis using eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) from baseline, and the proportion of patients achieving the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) was also assessed. A total of eight RCTs with tofacitinib, peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib were included. A total of 3612 participants who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were analysed. Overall, JAK inhibitors showed superior PASI75 response over placebo at both 8 and 12 weeks. Among all included JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib 15 mg twice a day (BID) had the highest probability of achieving PASI75 at both 8 and 12 weeks (SUCRA = 0.938 and 0.937, separately), followed by tofacitinib 10 mg BID (SUCRA = 0.905 and 0.908, separately) and deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily (QD) (SUCRA = 0.874 and 0.837, separately). A similar finding was observed for PGA response. Safety assessment showed that all JAK inhibitors had non-inferior safety compared with placebo, except for deucravacitinib 6 mg BID and 12 mg QD. Tofacitinib 2 mg BID was the first-ranked drug for safety profile followed by deucravacitinib 3 mg QD, and tofacitinib 5 mg BID. When comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety, tofacitinib (2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg BID) was superior to other included JAK inhibitors with satisfying PASI75 and PGA response, as well as relatively low incidence of AEs. Our study confirmed that JAK inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib showed superior efficacy and safety over peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib.

A phase II clinical trial of camrelizumab (CAM, an IgG4 antibody against PD-1) combined with apatinib (APA, a VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and temozolomide (TMZ) as the first-line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced acral melanoma (AM).

9508 Background: PD-1 monotherapy as the first line stand treatment for advanced melanoma yields an objective response rate (ORR) of < 20% in AM. Although multiple clinical trials are ongoing testing TMZ/APA, TMZ/PD-1 and APA/PD-1 combo therapies in AM, the reported ORR (range 17-23.8%) are far from satisfactory. We therefore conducted a phase II study of CAM/APA/TMZ combo in this subtype aiming for improved efficacy. Methods: We performed a single center, single arm phase II study (NCT04397770) testing the efficacy and safety of CAM/APA/TMZ combo as first-line therapy in pts with advanced AM. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST1.1, secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. All pts received iv CAM (200mg q2w), iv TMZ (200mg/m2 d1-5, q4w) and po APA (250mg qd) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Results: By Jan 2022, fifty pts were enrolled (48 evaluable), the median follow-up was 12.1 mo (IQR 8.4-14.5). Thirty-one pts achieved CR/PR as the best response (including 1 CR and 30 PR), the ORR was 64.6% (95% CI 49.4-77.4%). The DCR was 95.8% (95%CI, 84.6-99.3%). Both the median PFS and OS was not reached (NR); 6-mo and 12-mo PFS rate was 81.7% (95%CI 71.6-93.3%) and 62.9% (95%CI 48.4-81.7%), respectively; 12-mo OS rate was 82.3% (95%CI 68.2-99.2%). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 94% (47/50). Of 50 patients, the most common grade ≥3 TRAEs included γ-glutamyl transferase elevation (24.0%), direct bilirubin elevation (22.0%), aspartase transaminase elevation (20.0%), alanine transaminase elevation (16.0%), and hypertriglyceridemia (14.0%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: The CAM/APA/TMZ combination demonstrated promising efficacy as the first-line treatment for pts with advanced AM, and was generally well tolerated. Phase III randomized control trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04397770.

GALLANT: A phase 2 study using metronomic gemcitabine, doxorubicin, nivolumab, and docetaxel as second/third-line therapy for advanced sarcoma (NCT04535713).

11518 Background: In our experience, combinatorial therapy with lower doses of doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel has been effective with a manageable toxicity profile in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Hypothesis: The addition of nivolumab will have synergistic effects and improve treatment outcomes. Methods: Primary objective: To assess progression-free survival; Secondary objectives: (1) To evaluate best overall response during treatment period confirmed in a 6-week follow-up, (2) PFS rate at 6 and 9 months, (3) Overall survival rate at 6, 12 months, and (4) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Inclusion criteria: Previously treated male and female subjects, > 18 years of age, pathologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic sarcoma, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and acceptable hematologic and organ functions. Exclusion Criteria: History of autoimmune disorder. Treatment schedule: Metronomic doses of gemcitabine (600 mg/m2 max:1000 mg), doxorubicin (18 mg/m2; max: 32 mg), docetaxel (25 mg/m2; max:42 mg) on Day 1 and Day 8, and nivolumab (240 mg) on Day 1 only. Repeat treatment cycles may be given every three weeks if toxicity grade is <1. Results: This is an Interim Report on the modified Intent-to-treat population (n = 43). This population completed at least one treatment cycle and had a follow-up CT or MRI scan at week 6. The most common histological subtypes in this group include leiomyosarcoma (n = 15), pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 4), synovial sarcoma (n = 4), liposarcoma (n = 3), osteosarcoma (n = 3) and other (n = 10). Best Overall Response = 2 CR (surgical CR), 6 PR, 30 SD, 5 PD. The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 88.4%. Median PFS was > 4.6 (range: 1-27) months; 4 month PFS rate 60%. Median OS 6.2 months, with 4-month OS 74%. Historically, the median PFS on preceding lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-14) months. There were no unexpected side effects noted in this study. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs include Fatigue (n = 13), Nausea (n = 9), Neutropenia (n = 8), thrombocytopenia (n = 6), Anemia (n = 6). Conclusions: The GALLANT protocol using metronomic Gemcitabine, Doxorubicin (Adriamycin), Nivolumab, and Docetaxel (Taxotere) (1) is an effective regimen as second/third-line therapy for advanced sarcoma with no unexpected side effects, and (2) may have synergistic activity when this metronomic chemotherapy is combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Clinical trial information: NCT04535713.

AMEERA-4: A preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of amcenestrant or letrozole in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2− primary breast cancer.

528 Background: Amcenestrant is an optimized oral selective ER degrader (SERD) that antagonizes and degrades the ER and has demonstrated favorable preliminary safety and antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer, irrespective of baseline (BL) ESR1 mutation status. Here we present the final results of AMEERA-4 (NCT04191382), a Phase 2 preoperative WOO study that evaluated the PD activity of two dose levels of amcenestrant or letrozole using paired biopsies assessed for biomarkers. Methods: Postmenopausal women with operable stage I–III (tumor size ≥ 10 mm by ultrasound) ER+/HER2− breast cancer and Ki67 levels ≥ 15% by local assessment were randomized 1:1:1 to amcenestrant 400 mg once daily (QD), amcenestrant 200 mg QD or letrozole 2.5 mg QD for 14 days before surgery. Antiproliferative activity, as measured centrally by change from BL in Ki67 using paired biopsies before and after a 14-day treatment with 2 different doses of amcenestrant vs letrozole, was the planned primary endpoint. Main secondary endpoints included ER target engagement, assessed through the change in ER expression measured by change from BL in H-Score, and safety. Results: Trial enrollment was voluntarily stopped early, as informative data supporting adjuvant development became available; therefore, no formal statistical comparisons were conducted. Among 105 randomized patients (amcenestrant 400 mg: n = 34, amcenestrant 200 mg: n = 36, letrozole: n = 35), 95 were treated and had available pre- and post-treatment Ki67 per central review (modified ITT population). No major imbalances in BL patient and tumor characteristics were observed. The geometric least squares means (LSM) estimate (95% CI) of Ki67 reduction was 75.9% (67.9, 81.9) for amcenestrant 400 mg, 68.2% (58.4, 75.7) for amcenestrant 200 mg and 77.7% (70.0, 83.4) for letrozole. The LSM estimate (95% CI) of absolute change from BL in ER H-score was −176.7 (−201.4, −152.0) for amcenestrant 400 mg, −202.9 (−226.1, −179.7) for amcenestrant 200 mg and −32.5 (−57.2, −7.7) for letrozole, with median relative changes of −65.3%, −68.3% and −9.5%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 21.2% for amcenestrant 400 mg, 22.2% for amcenestrant 200 mg and 25.7% for letrozole. No Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in any treatment arm. Conclusions: Both doses of amcenestrant demonstrated robust Ki67 reductions, strongly engaged the ER target, and continued to show a favorable safety profile in an early breast cancer population, consistent with previous published reports. Based on PD activity and safety, and emerging results from other ongoing amcenestrant trials, the 200 mg QD dose of amcenestrant was selected for our ongoing study in the adjuvant setting; AMEERA-6 (NCT05128773). Clinical trial information: NCT04191382.

Five-year results of a phase 2 trial using ipilimumab (I), nivolumab (N), and trabectedin (T) for previously untreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma (NCT03138161).

11573 Background: Understanding the bifunctional role that the immune system plays in tumor eradication vs growth promotion is critical in the design and timing of tumoricidal and immunologic therapies for sarcomas. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors that promote sustained T cell activation would be most effective when given as first line therapy, together with a tumoricidal agent. Methods: Eligible patients for this Phase 2 study are males or females ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, previously untreated, with measurable disease by RECIST v1.1. Treatment protocol: (I) mg/kg i.v. q 12 wks, (N) 3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 wks, (T) 1.2 mg/m2 CIV q 3 wks. Treatment Outcome Parameters: (1) Best objective response rate by RECIST v1.1, (2) Progression-free survival (PFS), (3) Overall survival (OS), and (4) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Results: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Efficacy analysis (n = 88): There were 8CR (1 surgical CR), 11PR, 58SD, 11PD. Overall response rate was 21.6%, Disease Control Rate, 87.5%. The median PFS was 7 (range:1-44) months, median OS, 14 (range: 1-46) months. Grade 3 TRAEs include fatigue (n = 8), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), dehydration (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 2), increased AST (n = 8), increased ALT (n = 24), increased ALP (n = 2), port site infection (n = 2), psoriasis exacerbation (n = 1), anemia (n = 9), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and neutropenia (n = 5). Grade 4 TRAES include anemia (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), increased AST (n = 2), increased ALT (n = 2), and increased CPK (n = 2). Grade 5 TRAES include rhabdomyolysis (n = 1). There was no incidence of alopecia nor cardiac toxicity reported. Conclusions: Taken together, these data indicate that first-line combinatorial therapy with Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Trabectedin (1) may be more effective than standard first line therapy (doxorubicin/ifosfamide/mesna), and (2) is safer than standard first line therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03138161.

Two year results of blessed: Expanded access for deltarex-g for an intermediate size population with advanced pancreatic cancer and sarcoma (NCT04091295) and individual use IND for EARLY-STAGE invasive carcinoma of breast (IND# 19130) .

e15048 Background: Defects in cell cycle control are fundamental oncogenic drivers and targeting deregulated cell cycling is under intensive study. Cell cycle cyclin G1 (CCNG1) inhibitor therapy, exemplified by DeltaRex-G, a tumor-targeted retro vector encoding a cytocidal CCNG1 inhibitor gene, has been tested in over 280 cancer patients worldwide in early studies, inducing long term (10-13 years) survival in certain patients with intractable metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, and breast cancer. Hence, further clinical development of DeltaRex-G for cancer patients who have few or no therapeutic options is apropos. Methods: Primary objective: To determine overall survival. Secondary objective: To evaluate disease control, best overall response, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Patient and Methods: Study 1 is entitled “Blessed: Expanded Access for DeltaRex-G for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Sarcoma (NCT04091295)”. Study 2 is entitled “Compassionate Use of DeltaRex-G for Advanced Cancers. In both studies, patients will receive DeltaRex-G at 1-3 x 10e11 cfu i.v. over 15-30 minutes, 3 x a week until significant disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled, 9 sarcomas, 2 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 1 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 breast carcinoma, 1 prostate cancer, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis. Three patients were enrolled in Study 1 and 14 patients were enrolled in Study 2. Two patients were initially enrolled in Study 1 and later enrolled in Study 2. Twelve of 17 enrolled patients were treated with DeltaRex-G monotherapy or in combination with FDA-approved cancer therapies. Of the 12 treated patients, 5 are alive 10 to 30 months from DeltaRex-G treatment initiation. Two patients with early-stage triple receptor-positive and triple receptor-negative breast cancer who received DeltaRex-G as adjuvant/first-line therapy are alive one year in complete remission; 2 patients with chemo-resistant Stage 4 sarcoma are alive 2 1/2 years, and one patient with advanced basal cell carcinoma is alive 10 months from treatment initiation. There were no treatment-related adverse events reported. Conclusions: Taken together,the data suggest that (1) Adjuvant/first-line therapy with DeltaRex-G may reduce the incidence of recurrence of early-stage invasive carcinoma of the breast and (2) DeltaRex-G may evoke tumor growth stabilization after failing standard chemotherapy. Phase 2 studies are planned to evaluate if DeltaRex-G (1) will reduce the incidence of recurrence in early-stage invasive carcinoma of breast, (2) improve survival in pancreatic cancer, and (3) prolong progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04091295.

Radiotherapy and olaptesed pegol (NOX-A12) in partially resected or biopsy-only MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma: Interim data from the German multicenter phase 1/2 GLORIA trial.

2050 Background: Pre-clinical studies consistently demonstrate that inhibition of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis abrogates recruitment of pro-vasculogenic bone marrow-derived cells after radiotherapy (RT) of glioblastoma (GBM) and promotes T cell exclusion from the tumor microenvironment (TME). The German multicenter phase 1/2 trial GLORIA (NCT04121455) assesses safety of RT plus escalating dose levels (DL) of the CXCL12-neutralizing RNA-Spiegelmer Olaptesed pegol (OLA; NOX-A12) in patients with chemotherapy-resistant GBM. Methods: Until now, GLORIA enrolled 10 patients newly diagnosed with incompletely resected (n = 8) or biopsied (n = 2) GBM with ECOG≤2, age ≥18 and without MGMT promoter hypermethylation. All patients receive standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions or 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions) and continuous (24/7) i.v. infusions of either 200 mg (DL1; n = 3), 400 mg (DL2; n = 3) or 600 mg (DL3; n = 4) per week of OLA for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint (EP) is safety as per incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE). Secondary EPs include radiographic response as per mRANO criteria, dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion (DSC) and the fraction of highly-perfused tumor (FTBhigh) as well as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Target lesions (TL) and non-target lesions (NTL, i.e. in-field satellite lesions) are analyzed separately. Tumor tissue is assessed by high-plex immunofluorescence imaging (co-detection by indexing; CODEX). Matched reference cohorts serve as controls for MRI (n = 14) and CODEX (n = 8) data. Results: Combination of RT and OLA was well-tolerated and safe. Of all G ≥ 2 AEs (n = 77), 3 (4%) were deemed to be solely OLA-related, including 1 grade 3 AE at DL3. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. In total, eight of the nine patients (89%) with TLs at baseline showed a TL response during OLA therapy, with four (40%) reaching partial remission (PR) as per radiologic mRANO criteria (n = 2 at DL1 and n = 2 at DL3). All three patients treated at DL1 and all four of DL3 reached PR of one or more NTLs. In three cases (n = 2 at DL1; n = 1 at DL3), at least one NTL completely disappeared. Under OLA, radiographic responses of NTL were best at the highest DL (DL1 +49.5/DL2 +488.3/DL3 -59%), as was the increase in diffusion (mean ADC increase +46.4/+28.2/+56.7%) and the decrease in FTBhigh (mean -33.5/-32.8/-47.7%). Matched pre-/post-surgery CODEX of a confirmed pseudoprogression revealed intralesional clusters of proliferating cytotoxic T cells. Analysis of tissue from a non-responding patient showed T-cell encapsulation by M2-polarized macrophages in an immune-cell enriched TME. Additional follow-up is ongoing. Conclusions: Interim data from the ongoing GLORIA trial demonstrates safety of RT plus OLA and suggests promising clinical efficacy of a new class of drugs targeting CXCL12 in GBM. Clinical trial information: NCT04121455.

A phase Ib study of pembrolizumab following trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): PETAL.

e16195 Background: Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold-standard for intermediate stage HCC. We hypothesised the ischemic and cytotoxic effect of TACE to boost anti-cancer immunity and to synergise with the anti PD-1 pembrolizumab (pembro). We designed a phase Ib study to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of pembro after TACE in intermediate HCC. Methods: PETAL study will enroll up to 32 patients with intermediate HCC to receive pembro 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 1 year or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first safety-run-in phase includes 6 patients: if no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) emerge over a 21-day window after first pembro, the others are enrolled in the expansion phase. Pembro is given within 30 days after 1 or 2 TACEs. The first phase includes 1 patient scoring Child-Pugh (CP)-B7 and the remaining have to be CP-A. Safety is the primary endpoint and is measured as the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), graded according to NCI CTCAEv4. Efficacy is the secondary endpoint and is evaluated as progression free survival (PFS) from first TACE, according to mRECIST criteria. Survival is estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. All the patients who have received at least one dose of pembro are evaluable for safety. Results: At the time of data cut-off, on the 14th of January 2022, 14 patients had received at least one dose of pembro. The median age was 72 (IQR: 63.3-74.6), 79% were male, 71% were cirrhotic, 29% had viral hepatis and 43% ECOG PS 1. One patient had Child-Pugh (CP) class B7 and 13 had A. The median number of nodules was 1.5 (IQR:1-2.8), and 4.1 cm (IQR: 3.7-4.5) the median diameter. Overall, 5 patients received 2 TACEs and 9 had 1. Patients received a median of 4.5 cycles (IQR: 2.3-6.5) of pembro. No DLTs emerged in the first phase. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade (G) were reported in 86% of participants, 21% of participants experienced G3 TRAEs, and there were no G4 or G5 TRAEs. Specific skin-related toxicity was the most frequently reported (35%) TRAE. No patients had treatment-related liver toxicity. Causes of treatment discontinuation were PD (n=7), TRAEs (n=1), clinical deterioration in the CP B patient (n=1), COVID pandemic (n=2) and withdrawal of consent (n=1); at the time of data cut-off, mPFS from first TACE was 10.8 months (95%CI: 6.63-14.97). Conclusions: Adjuvant pembro following TACE is manageable and tolerable with signs of activity. These results prompt the investigation in larger trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03397654. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib/II study of AK112, a PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, as first- or second-line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

9040 Background: Besides the well-known antiangiogenic effects, anti-VEGF agents also modulate the tumor immune micro-environment, leading to synergic anti-tumor effects. AK112 is a humanized IgG1 bispecific antibody against PD-1 and VEGF. Here, we reported results of an ongoing phase Ib/II trial of AK112 in advanced NSCLC pts. Methods: Pts with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1 and negative oncogenic drivers were enrolled and given AK112 (10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W or 30 mg/kg Q3W) intravenously. The primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 and safety. Results: At data cutoff (January 5, 2022), 94 pts were enrolled: median age 66.0 years (range: 48-75), PS 1 90.4%, male 85.1%, non-squamous 48.9%, PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥1%) 70.2% and treatment-naïve 84.0%. Of 83 pts evaluable for efficacy, ORR (unconfirmed, similarly hereinafter) and DCR were 22.2%/88.9%, 44.0%/92.0%, 37.9%/93.1% and 100%/100% at doses of 10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W and 30 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. When doses of AK112 > 10mg/kg Q3W, ORR and DCR were 42.9% (24/56) and 92.9% (52/56) in 56 evaluable pts, 56.3% (18/32) and 100% (32/32) in pts with TPS≥1% at 1st line setting, and 23.5% (4/17) and 76.5% (13/17) in pts with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, respectively. Grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 10.6% (10/94) pts, in which the most common event (occurring in > 1 pt) was pneumonia (2.1%, 2/94). No TRAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Most frequent TRAEs (incidence ≥10%) were proteinuria (17.0%), hypertension (16.0%), lipase increase (12.8%), alanine aminotransferase increase (12.8%), blood urea increase (10.6%), apolipoprotein E increase (10.6%) and hyperglycaemia (10.6%). No significant difference in the incidences of TRAEs were observed between non-squamous and squamous pts. Conclusions: In advanced NSCLC, AK112 was well-tolerated and presented remarkable anti-tumor efficacy. Further phase III studies are planned to validate the findings of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT04900363.

Randomized, phase 3 study of second-line tislelizumab vs chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, RATIONALE 302: Asia subgroup.

e16107 Background: In the global Phase 3 study RATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843), tislelizumab (TIS) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) vs chemotherapy (chemo) (median OS 8.6 vs 6.3 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57, 0.85; p=0.0001) in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Here, we report data from the Asia subgroup. Methods: Eligible patients who had disease progression after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive TIS 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks or chemo (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population). The key secondary endpoint was OS in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score* ≥ 10%; other secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), health-related quality of life, and safety. Results: Of the 512 randomized patients, 404 (79%) were enrolled from China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea and constituted the Asia subgroup (n=201 TIS, n=203 chemo). At data cut-off (December 1, 2020), median follow-up was 6.9 months in the Asia subgroup. Median OS was 8.5 months with TIS vs 6.3 months with chemo (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90). Median PFS was 1.5 months with TIS vs 1.7 months with chemo (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.64, 1.02). TIS resulted in a higher ORR (20.4% [95% CI 15.1, 26.6] vs 9.4% [95% CI 5.7, 14.2]) and longer median DoR (7.4 vs 4.0 months; HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21, 0.84) vs chemo. In the safety analysis set (n=201 TIS, n=191 chemo), patients treated with TIS had fewer treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (74.1% vs 95.3%), fewer ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs (19.4% vs 57.1%), fewer serious TRAEs (15.4% vs 20.9%), and a similar incidence of TRAEs leading to death (2.5% vs 2.6%) vs chemo. Conclusions: In the Asia subgroup, TIS improved OS and tumor response vs chemo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and showed a well-tolerated safety profile. These findings were consistent with published results in the overall population. *The TAP score methodology has been previously referred to as visually-estimated combined positive score (vCPS) and was previously presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, June 4–8, 2021, ESMO World Gastrointestinal Congress 2021, June 30–July 3, 2021, and The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, September 25–29, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03430843.

Safety and activity of an engineered, liver-tropic adeno-associated virus vector expressing a hyperactive Padua factor IX administered with prophylactic glucocorticoids in patients with haemophilia B: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1, pilot trial

A novel, engineered, liver-tropic adeno-associated virus vector expressing a hyperactive Padua factor IX (FIX) protein (BBM-H901) has been developed and is promising for haemophilia B gene therapy. We aimed to explore its safety and activity in increasing FIX concentrations and reducing bleeding frequency. We did a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1, pilot trial evaluating the safety and activity of a single intravenous infusion of BBM-H901 at the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (Tianjin, China). We enrolled adult patients with haemophilia B (aged >18 years) with baseline FIX coagulation activity (FIX:C) of less than 2 IU/dL, no FIX inhibitor, and low titre of neutralising antibodies (≤1:4) against vector capsid. Eligible participants were intravenously infused with a single dose of 5 × 1012 vector genomes (vg)/kg of BBM-H901 after 1 week of prophylactic prednisone treatment (1 mg/kg per day). Primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST), and development of antibodies against vector capsid within 1 year of infusion. We report the results of the prespecified 1-year analysis following complete enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04135300, and is complete. Between Oct 16, 2019, and Jan 13, 2021, 12 male participants were assessed, and ten Chinese participants were enrolled and infused with BBM-H901. After a median follow-up of 58 weeks (IQR 51·5-99·5), mean FIX:C reached mean 36·9 IU/dL (SD 20·5). No serious adverse events, no grade 3-4 adverse events were observed. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to BBM-H901 include pyrexia (1 [10%]) and elevation of aminotransferase(1 [10%]). No FIX inhibitors were observed. All participants developed antibodies against vector capsid after infusion. Eight (80%) participants had ALT and AST concentrations below the upper limit of normal throughout the follow-up period. Two (20%) participants had elevation of ALT and AST accompanied with decrease of FIX:C, which remained at 7 IU/dL and 11.8 IU/dL, respectively. This pilot study suggests that liver-tropic BBM-H901 is safe 1 year after infusion. Vector derived FIX:C concentration is sufficiently high to prevent bleeding events and minimise the need for replacement therapy in small populations with haemophilia B. These findings support further study. Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences.

When Less May Be Enough: Dose Selection Strategies for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Focusing on AntiPD-(L)1 Agents.

Early clinical trials investigating antiPD(L)-1 agents rarely reached a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and efficacy signals were observed even at the lowest dose levels. Most extended treatment intervals investigated indicated that these drugs do not follow a direct dose-toxicity or dose-efficacy relationship. Within this context and considering the high cost of antiPD(L)-1 agents, there is a significant debate on whether lower doses or the administration of such agents at an extended interval should be prospectively evaluated in already-approved agents, or at least be considered in novel combination trials involving antiPD(L)-1 drugs. Herein, we review the dosing, overall response rates, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events of antiPD(L)-1 agents in early dose-escalation trials and discuss the appropriateness of recommended Phase 2 dose selection as well as the final regulatory approved doses of such agents. Efficacy and safety data from randomized dose-range Phase 2 trials and real-world data (RWD) on the usage of lower doses and/or non-standard extended treatment intervals are also examined. As the accumulating evidence suggests lower doses or extended dosing intervals of antiPD(L)-1 may achieve a similar clinical benefit in comparison to the currently approved doses, we address the clinical and financial toxicity implications of using potentially higher doses than necessary. Last, we discuss ways to resolve the current dosing conundrum of antiPD-(L)1 agents such as performing near-equivalence studies and propose a framework for future development of immunotherapeutics to find the lowest efficacious dose instead of MTD.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: a post-marketing surveillance

BackgroundThis all-case post-marketing surveillance (PMS) evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with un-resectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, non-interventional, observational PMS study (registered from August 2016 to January 2017) was conducted in patients who were newly initiated on nivolumab monotherapy. Assessments included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of special interest, patient characteristics affecting safety, and effectiveness over 12 months.ResultsOverall, 580 patients were enrolled; 555 and 554 patients comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median (range) age of the population was 66 (14–90) years. Nivolumab was initiated as 1st-, 2nd-, and ≥ 3rd-line treatment in 0.2%, 42.0%, and 57.8% of patients, respectively. TRAEs were reported in 275 (49.5%) patients. The most common TRAEs of special interest included thyroid dysfunction (9.5%), hepatic dysfunction (8.6%), and interstitial lung disease (6.7%). The incidence of TRAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients (≥ 65 vs < 65 years; ≥ 75 vs < 75 years); patients with lower C-reactive protein levels (< 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/dL); and patients with vs without a past medical history, including hepatic, thyroid, and autoimmune diseases. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.8% and 57.9%, respectively.ConclusionThe safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced RCC was similar to that in the phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. No new safety signals were observed in this study.

A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome, which can be ameliorated by methylprednisolone pulse therapy, thereby reducing the risk of progression to respiratory failure and death. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulse therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, seventy patients (age, 35–91 years) who were admitted to Saitama Medical University Hospital in Japan between March 2020 and January 2021 due to COVID-19 pneumonia were included. The difference in mortality between the methylprednisolone pulse therapy (n = 22) and dexamethasone therapy (n = 48) groups was the primary outcome. Between-group differences in the average length of intensive care unit stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events were the secondary outcomes. The methylprednisolone pulse therapy group showed a significantly lower mortality rate (3.8% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.006) and increased survival rate compared with the dexamethasone therapy group (p = 0.044). Additionally, without statistical significance, the average length of intensive care unit stay tended to be shorter in the methylprednisolone pulse therapy group (11.5 ± 6.1 days) than in the dexamethasone therapy group (22.3 ± 23.1 days) (p = 0.793). The average duration of invasive mechanical ventilation also tended to be shorter in the methylprednisolone pulse therapy group (15.3 ± 10.1 vs. 28.8 ± 9.2 days, p = 0.120). There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events between the two groups. In conclusion, methylprednisolone pulse therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia significantly reduced mortality and increased the survival rate compared to conventional dexamethasone therapy.