Incidence Of Treatment-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Two year results of blessed: Expanded access for deltarex-g for an intermediate size population with advanced pancreatic cancer and sarcoma (NCT04091295) and individual use IND for EARLY-STAGE invasive carcinoma of breast (IND# 19130) .

e15048 Background: Defects in cell cycle control are fundamental oncogenic drivers and targeting deregulated cell cycling is under intensive study. Cell cycle cyclin G1 (CCNG1) inhibitor therapy, exemplified by DeltaRex-G, a tumor-targeted retro vector encoding a cytocidal CCNG1 inhibitor gene, has been tested in over 280 cancer patients worldwide in early studies, inducing long term (10-13 years) survival in certain patients with intractable metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, and breast cancer. Hence, further clinical development of DeltaRex-G for cancer patients who have few or no therapeutic options is apropos. Methods: Primary objective: To determine overall survival. Secondary objective: To evaluate disease control, best overall response, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Patient and Methods: Study 1 is entitled “Blessed: Expanded Access for DeltaRex-G for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Sarcoma (NCT04091295)”. Study 2 is entitled “Compassionate Use of DeltaRex-G for Advanced Cancers. In both studies, patients will receive DeltaRex-G at 1-3 x 10e11 cfu i.v. over 15-30 minutes, 3 x a week until significant disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled, 9 sarcomas, 2 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 1 non-small cell lung cancer, 2 breast carcinoma, 1 prostate cancer, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis. Three patients were enrolled in Study 1 and 14 patients were enrolled in Study 2. Two patients were initially enrolled in Study 1 and later enrolled in Study 2. Twelve of 17 enrolled patients were treated with DeltaRex-G monotherapy or in combination with FDA-approved cancer therapies. Of the 12 treated patients, 5 are alive 10 to 30 months from DeltaRex-G treatment initiation. Two patients with early-stage triple receptor-positive and triple receptor-negative breast cancer who received DeltaRex-G as adjuvant/first-line therapy are alive one year in complete remission; 2 patients with chemo-resistant Stage 4 sarcoma are alive 2 1/2 years, and one patient with advanced basal cell carcinoma is alive 10 months from treatment initiation. There were no treatment-related adverse events reported. Conclusions: Taken together,the data suggest that (1) Adjuvant/first-line therapy with DeltaRex-G may reduce the incidence of recurrence of early-stage invasive carcinoma of the breast and (2) DeltaRex-G may evoke tumor growth stabilization after failing standard chemotherapy. Phase 2 studies are planned to evaluate if DeltaRex-G (1) will reduce the incidence of recurrence in early-stage invasive carcinoma of breast, (2) improve survival in pancreatic cancer, and (3) prolong progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04091295.

Radiotherapy and olaptesed pegol (NOX-A12) in partially resected or biopsy-only MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma: Interim data from the German multicenter phase 1/2 GLORIA trial.

2050 Background: Pre-clinical studies consistently demonstrate that inhibition of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis abrogates recruitment of pro-vasculogenic bone marrow-derived cells after radiotherapy (RT) of glioblastoma (GBM) and promotes T cell exclusion from the tumor microenvironment (TME). The German multicenter phase 1/2 trial GLORIA (NCT04121455) assesses safety of RT plus escalating dose levels (DL) of the CXCL12-neutralizing RNA-Spiegelmer Olaptesed pegol (OLA; NOX-A12) in patients with chemotherapy-resistant GBM. Methods: Until now, GLORIA enrolled 10 patients newly diagnosed with incompletely resected (n = 8) or biopsied (n = 2) GBM with ECOG≤2, age ≥18 and without MGMT promoter hypermethylation. All patients receive standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions or 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions) and continuous (24/7) i.v. infusions of either 200 mg (DL1; n = 3), 400 mg (DL2; n = 3) or 600 mg (DL3; n = 4) per week of OLA for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint (EP) is safety as per incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE). Secondary EPs include radiographic response as per mRANO criteria, dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion (DSC) and the fraction of highly-perfused tumor (FTBhigh) as well as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Target lesions (TL) and non-target lesions (NTL, i.e. in-field satellite lesions) are analyzed separately. Tumor tissue is assessed by high-plex immunofluorescence imaging (co-detection by indexing; CODEX). Matched reference cohorts serve as controls for MRI (n = 14) and CODEX (n = 8) data. Results: Combination of RT and OLA was well-tolerated and safe. Of all G ≥ 2 AEs (n = 77), 3 (4%) were deemed to be solely OLA-related, including 1 grade 3 AE at DL3. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. In total, eight of the nine patients (89%) with TLs at baseline showed a TL response during OLA therapy, with four (40%) reaching partial remission (PR) as per radiologic mRANO criteria (n = 2 at DL1 and n = 2 at DL3). All three patients treated at DL1 and all four of DL3 reached PR of one or more NTLs. In three cases (n = 2 at DL1; n = 1 at DL3), at least one NTL completely disappeared. Under OLA, radiographic responses of NTL were best at the highest DL (DL1 +49.5/DL2 +488.3/DL3 -59%), as was the increase in diffusion (mean ADC increase +46.4/+28.2/+56.7%) and the decrease in FTBhigh (mean -33.5/-32.8/-47.7%). Matched pre-/post-surgery CODEX of a confirmed pseudoprogression revealed intralesional clusters of proliferating cytotoxic T cells. Analysis of tissue from a non-responding patient showed T-cell encapsulation by M2-polarized macrophages in an immune-cell enriched TME. Additional follow-up is ongoing. Conclusions: Interim data from the ongoing GLORIA trial demonstrates safety of RT plus OLA and suggests promising clinical efficacy of a new class of drugs targeting CXCL12 in GBM. Clinical trial information: NCT04121455.

A phase Ib study of pembrolizumab following trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): PETAL.

e16195 Background: Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold-standard for intermediate stage HCC. We hypothesised the ischemic and cytotoxic effect of TACE to boost anti-cancer immunity and to synergise with the anti PD-1 pembrolizumab (pembro). We designed a phase Ib study to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of pembro after TACE in intermediate HCC. Methods: PETAL study will enroll up to 32 patients with intermediate HCC to receive pembro 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 1 year or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first safety-run-in phase includes 6 patients: if no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) emerge over a 21-day window after first pembro, the others are enrolled in the expansion phase. Pembro is given within 30 days after 1 or 2 TACEs. The first phase includes 1 patient scoring Child-Pugh (CP)-B7 and the remaining have to be CP-A. Safety is the primary endpoint and is measured as the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), graded according to NCI CTCAEv4. Efficacy is the secondary endpoint and is evaluated as progression free survival (PFS) from first TACE, according to mRECIST criteria. Survival is estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. All the patients who have received at least one dose of pembro are evaluable for safety. Results: At the time of data cut-off, on the 14th of January 2022, 14 patients had received at least one dose of pembro. The median age was 72 (IQR: 63.3-74.6), 79% were male, 71% were cirrhotic, 29% had viral hepatis and 43% ECOG PS 1. One patient had Child-Pugh (CP) class B7 and 13 had A. The median number of nodules was 1.5 (IQR:1-2.8), and 4.1 cm (IQR: 3.7-4.5) the median diameter. Overall, 5 patients received 2 TACEs and 9 had 1. Patients received a median of 4.5 cycles (IQR: 2.3-6.5) of pembro. No DLTs emerged in the first phase. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade (G) were reported in 86% of participants, 21% of participants experienced G3 TRAEs, and there were no G4 or G5 TRAEs. Specific skin-related toxicity was the most frequently reported (35%) TRAE. No patients had treatment-related liver toxicity. Causes of treatment discontinuation were PD (n=7), TRAEs (n=1), clinical deterioration in the CP B patient (n=1), COVID pandemic (n=2) and withdrawal of consent (n=1); at the time of data cut-off, mPFS from first TACE was 10.8 months (95%CI: 6.63-14.97). Conclusions: Adjuvant pembro following TACE is manageable and tolerable with signs of activity. These results prompt the investigation in larger trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03397654. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib/II study of AK112, a PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, as first- or second-line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

9040 Background: Besides the well-known antiangiogenic effects, anti-VEGF agents also modulate the tumor immune micro-environment, leading to synergic anti-tumor effects. AK112 is a humanized IgG1 bispecific antibody against PD-1 and VEGF. Here, we reported results of an ongoing phase Ib/II trial of AK112 in advanced NSCLC pts. Methods: Pts with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1 and negative oncogenic drivers were enrolled and given AK112 (10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W or 30 mg/kg Q3W) intravenously. The primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 and safety. Results: At data cutoff (January 5, 2022), 94 pts were enrolled: median age 66.0 years (range: 48-75), PS 1 90.4%, male 85.1%, non-squamous 48.9%, PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥1%) 70.2% and treatment-naïve 84.0%. Of 83 pts evaluable for efficacy, ORR (unconfirmed, similarly hereinafter) and DCR were 22.2%/88.9%, 44.0%/92.0%, 37.9%/93.1% and 100%/100% at doses of 10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W and 30 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. When doses of AK112 > 10mg/kg Q3W, ORR and DCR were 42.9% (24/56) and 92.9% (52/56) in 56 evaluable pts, 56.3% (18/32) and 100% (32/32) in pts with TPS≥1% at 1st line setting, and 23.5% (4/17) and 76.5% (13/17) in pts with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, respectively. Grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 10.6% (10/94) pts, in which the most common event (occurring in > 1 pt) was pneumonia (2.1%, 2/94). No TRAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Most frequent TRAEs (incidence ≥10%) were proteinuria (17.0%), hypertension (16.0%), lipase increase (12.8%), alanine aminotransferase increase (12.8%), blood urea increase (10.6%), apolipoprotein E increase (10.6%) and hyperglycaemia (10.6%). No significant difference in the incidences of TRAEs were observed between non-squamous and squamous pts. Conclusions: In advanced NSCLC, AK112 was well-tolerated and presented remarkable anti-tumor efficacy. Further phase III studies are planned to validate the findings of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT04900363.

Randomized, phase 3 study of second-line tislelizumab vs chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, RATIONALE 302: Asia subgroup.

e16107 Background: In the global Phase 3 study RATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843), tislelizumab (TIS) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) vs chemotherapy (chemo) (median OS 8.6 vs 6.3 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57, 0.85; p=0.0001) in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Here, we report data from the Asia subgroup. Methods: Eligible patients who had disease progression after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive TIS 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks or chemo (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population). The key secondary endpoint was OS in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score* ≥ 10%; other secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), health-related quality of life, and safety. Results: Of the 512 randomized patients, 404 (79%) were enrolled from China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea and constituted the Asia subgroup (n=201 TIS, n=203 chemo). At data cut-off (December 1, 2020), median follow-up was 6.9 months in the Asia subgroup. Median OS was 8.5 months with TIS vs 6.3 months with chemo (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90). Median PFS was 1.5 months with TIS vs 1.7 months with chemo (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.64, 1.02). TIS resulted in a higher ORR (20.4% [95% CI 15.1, 26.6] vs 9.4% [95% CI 5.7, 14.2]) and longer median DoR (7.4 vs 4.0 months; HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21, 0.84) vs chemo. In the safety analysis set (n=201 TIS, n=191 chemo), patients treated with TIS had fewer treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (74.1% vs 95.3%), fewer ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs (19.4% vs 57.1%), fewer serious TRAEs (15.4% vs 20.9%), and a similar incidence of TRAEs leading to death (2.5% vs 2.6%) vs chemo. Conclusions: In the Asia subgroup, TIS improved OS and tumor response vs chemo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and showed a well-tolerated safety profile. These findings were consistent with published results in the overall population. *The TAP score methodology has been previously referred to as visually-estimated combined positive score (vCPS) and was previously presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, June 4–8, 2021, ESMO World Gastrointestinal Congress 2021, June 30–July 3, 2021, and The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, September 25–29, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03430843.

Safety and activity of an engineered, liver-tropic adeno-associated virus vector expressing a hyperactive Padua factor IX administered with prophylactic glucocorticoids in patients with haemophilia B: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1, pilot trial

A novel, engineered, liver-tropic adeno-associated virus vector expressing a hyperactive Padua factor IX (FIX) protein (BBM-H901) has been developed and is promising for haemophilia B gene therapy. We aimed to explore its safety and activity in increasing FIX concentrations and reducing bleeding frequency. We did a single-centre, single-arm, phase 1, pilot trial evaluating the safety and activity of a single intravenous infusion of BBM-H901 at the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (Tianjin, China). We enrolled adult patients with haemophilia B (aged >18 years) with baseline FIX coagulation activity (FIX:C) of less than 2 IU/dL, no FIX inhibitor, and low titre of neutralising antibodies (≤1:4) against vector capsid. Eligible participants were intravenously infused with a single dose of 5 × 1012 vector genomes (vg)/kg of BBM-H901 after 1 week of prophylactic prednisone treatment (1 mg/kg per day). Primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST), and development of antibodies against vector capsid within 1 year of infusion. We report the results of the prespecified 1-year analysis following complete enrolment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04135300, and is complete. Between Oct 16, 2019, and Jan 13, 2021, 12 male participants were assessed, and ten Chinese participants were enrolled and infused with BBM-H901. After a median follow-up of 58 weeks (IQR 51·5-99·5), mean FIX:C reached mean 36·9 IU/dL (SD 20·5). No serious adverse events, no grade 3-4 adverse events were observed. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to BBM-H901 include pyrexia (1 [10%]) and elevation of aminotransferase(1 [10%]). No FIX inhibitors were observed. All participants developed antibodies against vector capsid after infusion. Eight (80%) participants had ALT and AST concentrations below the upper limit of normal throughout the follow-up period. Two (20%) participants had elevation of ALT and AST accompanied with decrease of FIX:C, which remained at 7 IU/dL and 11.8 IU/dL, respectively. This pilot study suggests that liver-tropic BBM-H901 is safe 1 year after infusion. Vector derived FIX:C concentration is sufficiently high to prevent bleeding events and minimise the need for replacement therapy in small populations with haemophilia B. These findings support further study. Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences.

When Less May Be Enough: Dose Selection Strategies for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Focusing on AntiPD-(L)1 Agents.

Early clinical trials investigating antiPD(L)-1 agents rarely reached a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and efficacy signals were observed even at the lowest dose levels. Most extended treatment intervals investigated indicated that these drugs do not follow a direct dose-toxicity or dose-efficacy relationship. Within this context and considering the high cost of antiPD(L)-1 agents, there is a significant debate on whether lower doses or the administration of such agents at an extended interval should be prospectively evaluated in already-approved agents, or at least be considered in novel combination trials involving antiPD(L)-1 drugs. Herein, we review the dosing, overall response rates, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events of antiPD(L)-1 agents in early dose-escalation trials and discuss the appropriateness of recommended Phase 2 dose selection as well as the final regulatory approved doses of such agents. Efficacy and safety data from randomized dose-range Phase 2 trials and real-world data (RWD) on the usage of lower doses and/or non-standard extended treatment intervals are also examined. As the accumulating evidence suggests lower doses or extended dosing intervals of antiPD(L)-1 may achieve a similar clinical benefit in comparison to the currently approved doses, we address the clinical and financial toxicity implications of using potentially higher doses than necessary. Last, we discuss ways to resolve the current dosing conundrum of antiPD-(L)1 agents such as performing near-equivalence studies and propose a framework for future development of immunotherapeutics to find the lowest efficacious dose instead of MTD.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan: a post-marketing surveillance

BackgroundThis all-case post-marketing surveillance (PMS) evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with un-resectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, non-interventional, observational PMS study (registered from August 2016 to January 2017) was conducted in patients who were newly initiated on nivolumab monotherapy. Assessments included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of special interest, patient characteristics affecting safety, and effectiveness over 12 months.ResultsOverall, 580 patients were enrolled; 555 and 554 patients comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median (range) age of the population was 66 (14–90) years. Nivolumab was initiated as 1st-, 2nd-, and ≥ 3rd-line treatment in 0.2%, 42.0%, and 57.8% of patients, respectively. TRAEs were reported in 275 (49.5%) patients. The most common TRAEs of special interest included thyroid dysfunction (9.5%), hepatic dysfunction (8.6%), and interstitial lung disease (6.7%). The incidence of TRAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients (≥ 65 vs < 65 years; ≥ 75 vs < 75 years); patients with lower C-reactive protein levels (< 5 vs ≥ 5 mg/dL); and patients with vs without a past medical history, including hepatic, thyroid, and autoimmune diseases. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 71.8% and 57.9%, respectively.ConclusionThe safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced RCC was similar to that in the phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. No new safety signals were observed in this study.

A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome, which can be ameliorated by methylprednisolone pulse therapy, thereby reducing the risk of progression to respiratory failure and death. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulse therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, seventy patients (age, 35–91 years) who were admitted to Saitama Medical University Hospital in Japan between March 2020 and January 2021 due to COVID-19 pneumonia were included. The difference in mortality between the methylprednisolone pulse therapy (n = 22) and dexamethasone therapy (n = 48) groups was the primary outcome. Between-group differences in the average length of intensive care unit stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events were the secondary outcomes. The methylprednisolone pulse therapy group showed a significantly lower mortality rate (3.8% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.006) and increased survival rate compared with the dexamethasone therapy group (p = 0.044). Additionally, without statistical significance, the average length of intensive care unit stay tended to be shorter in the methylprednisolone pulse therapy group (11.5 ± 6.1 days) than in the dexamethasone therapy group (22.3 ± 23.1 days) (p = 0.793). The average duration of invasive mechanical ventilation also tended to be shorter in the methylprednisolone pulse therapy group (15.3 ± 10.1 vs. 28.8 ± 9.2 days, p = 0.120). There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events between the two groups. In conclusion, methylprednisolone pulse therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia significantly reduced mortality and increased the survival rate compared to conventional dexamethasone therapy.

A142 IMPACT OF HLADQA1*05G&amp;gt;A GENETIC-SCREENING FOR OPTIMAL ANTI-TNF THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A PRELIMINARY REPORT

Abstract Background Genetic variation in the human leukocyte antigen ( HLA) gene is strongly associated with the formation of anti-drug antibodies to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists (anti-TNF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is also associated anti-TNF loss of response and treatment discontinuation. Aims We aimed to evaluate the utility of preemptive HLADQA1*05G&amp;gt;A screening to reduce the incidence of treatment-related adverse events in an IBD population by lessening the need for combination therapy in those who do not carry the risk allele. We also assessed for the occurrence of anti-TNF anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation, anti-TNF loss of response, treatment discontinuation compared to an unscreened population. Methods A non-randomized open label study is ongoing in IBD patients being considered for anti-TNF therapy. Participants received either pre-treatment HLADQA1*05G&amp;gt;A screening (prospective-screening group, n=25/110 recruited), with the addition of one of azathioprine or methotrexate to anti-TNF therapy (combination therapy) if identified as a high risk variant carrier (G/A or A/A) or received combination therapy without undergoing prospective HLADQA1*05A&amp;gt;G screening (control group, n=25/110 recruited). All participants will be followed for up to 1 year and observed for the occurrence of any adverse drug events, formation of anti-TNF drug antibodies (ADA), anti-TNF loss of response and anti-TNF discontinuation. Results To date, the prevalence of HLADQA1*05 G/A and A/A was 20% in the prospective-screening group and thus 20% (n=5/25) received combination therapy and 80% (n=20) received anti-TNF monotherapy. All participants in the control group (n=25/25) received combination therapy. Considering all groups, 78% (n=39/50) received infliximab, while 22% (n=11/50) received adalimumab. To date, the median follow-up period is 5 (IQR=4) months. Fewer adverse drug events have been reported in the prospective-screening group versus the control group (16.7% vs 33.3%, odds ratio 0.40, 95%CI=0.12–1.56, p=0.18). Anti-TNF ADA formation and treatment discontinuation were similar between groups (prospective-screening, 0% versus control, 4.2%). A higher proportion of controls experienced anti-TNF loss of response (16.7% vs 8.3%, p=0.38). Conclusions Preemptive HLADQA1*05G&amp;gt;A screening appears to reduce the need for combination therapy when using anti-TNF agents in an IBD population. Fewer drug-related adverse events are reported to date in the screened cohort without a concomitant increase in deleterious outcomes such as ADA formation or anti-TNF discontinuation. Completion of this study will help define whether or not HLADQA1*05G&amp;gt;A-screening is a clinically-actionable and relevant tool for guiding the application of combination therapy in IBD. Funding Agencies Lawson Health Research Institute

Clinical and biomarker analyses of sintilimab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, open-label phase 2 study (ORIENT-2)

This randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 2 study (NCT03116152) assessed sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with efficacy. The median OS in the sintilimab group was significantly improved compared with the chemotherapy group (median OS 7.2 vs.6.2 months; P = 0.032; HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50–0.97). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 was lower with sintilimab than with chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 39.1%). Patients with high T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality and low molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) showed the longest median OS (15.0 months). Patients with NLR < 3 at 6 weeks post-treatment had a significantly prolonged median OS (16.6 months) compared with NLR ≥ 3. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in OS of sintilimab compared to chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC.

Combination of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Anlotinib and Pegaspargase "Sandwich" With Radiotherapy in Localized Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma.

Asparaginase/pegaspargase containing regimens combined with radiotherapy are highly effective and considered the cornerstone of localized Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) treatment. However, these chemotherapy regimens inevitably cause relatively high incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Herein we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of anti-PD-1 antibody, anlotinib and pegaspargase “sandwich” with radiotherapy in localized NKTL. Anti-PD-1 antibody and pegaspargase at 2500 U/m2 were administered on day 1, while anlotinib (12 mg once a day) was orally administered on days 1-14. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. All the eight patients included received 3 cycles of the regimen followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 87.5%. With a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 34.03-40.90 months), median PFS and OS times were not reached. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. No treatment-related death and no grade 4 TRAE was reported. No grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was detected, and half of the patients didn’t report any hematological toxicity. This study indicates that anti-PD-1 antibody combined with anlotinib and pegaspargase is a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen for localized NTKL, with mild toxicity and good tolerance.

Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundFirst-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma results in poor outcomes. The monoclonal antibody nivolumab has shown an overall survival benefit over chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.MethodsIn this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus the monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor-cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population (all randomly assigned patients).ResultsA total of 970 patients underwent randomization. At a 13-month minimum follow-up, overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 15.4 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.80; P<0.001) and in the overall population (median, 13.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 99.1% CI, 0.58 to 0.96; P=0.002). Overall survival was also significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 13.7 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.64; 98.6% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P=0.001) and in the overall population (median, 12.7 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 98.2% CI, 0.62 to 0.98; P=0.01). Among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, a significant progression-free survival benefit was also seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 98.5% CI, 0.46 to 0.92; P=0.002) but not with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 47% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 32% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and 36% with chemotherapy alone.ConclusionsBoth first-line treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, with no new safety signals identified. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 648 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03143153.)

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Nabiximols (THC:CBD) Oromucosal Spray versus Oral Dronabinol (THC) as Add-on Treatment for Severe Neuropathic Pain in Real-World Clinical Practice: Retrospective Analysis of the German Pain e-Registry.

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness and tolerability of add-on treatment with nabiximols (NBX: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol) oromucosal spray or oral dronabinol (DRO: synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol) in patients with severe neuropathic pain poorly responsive to established treatments.MethodsAn analysis was conducted of anonymized, propensity score-matched real-world data from the German Pain e-Registry, using a sequential non-inferiority superiority approach, for adult outpatients with neuropathic pain who had initiated treatment with NBX or DRO between 10 March 2017 and 31 December 2019. The primary effectiveness variable was percent change from baseline in a 9-factor aggregated symptom relief (ASR-9) score, a composite index of nine distinct pain- and health-related parameters assessed using validated patient-reported instruments. Safety was assessed by the incidence of physician-confirmed treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs leading to discontinuation.ResultsPropensity score-matched data were analyzed for 337 patients treated with NBX and 337 patients treated with DRO. Mean (standard deviation) THC dose over the 24-week evaluation period was 16.6 (6.5) mg for NBX and 17.2 (7.6) mg for DRO (p<0.001). Median (standard error) improvement relative to baseline in the ASR-9 composite score was 55.4% (0.5) for NBX and 40.5% (0.5) for DRO (least squares mean difference, 14.0 (0.7), 95% confidence interval 12.6–15.4; p<0.001), and incidences of TRAEs (21.1 vs 35%) and TRAE-related discontinuations (5.9 vs 14.8%) were significantly lower with NBX than DRO (p<0.001 for both), collectively indicating pre-specified non-inferiority and superiority of NBX. More NBX- than DRO-treated patients discontinued non-cannabinoid background pain medications and rescue analgesics, especially opioid analgesics (p<0.001 for both).ConclusionAdd-on treatment with cannabinoids is effective for treatment of severe neuropathic pain with inadequate response to established treatments. In daily practice, NBX had superior effectiveness and tolerability compared to DRO. The results emphasize the importance of combining CBD with THC in this patient population.

Randomized, phase 3 study of second-line tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, RATIONALE 302: Asia subgroup.

279 Background: In the global Phase 3 study RATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843), tislelizumab (TIS) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) vs chemotherapy (chemo) (median OS 8.6 vs 6.3 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.85; p=0.0001) in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report data from the Asia subgroup. Methods: Eligible patients who had disease progression after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive TIS 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks or chemo (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in all randomized patients (Intent-to-treat population). The key secondary endpoint was OS in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity Score* ≥ 10%; other secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), health-related quality of life, and safety. Results: Of the 512 randomized patients, 404 (79%) were enrolled from China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea and constituted the Asia subgroup (n=201 TIS, n=203 chemo). At data cut-off (December 1, 2020), median follow-up was 6.9 months in the Asia subgroup. Median OS was 8.5 months with TIS vs 6.3 months with chemo (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90). Median PFS was 1.5 months with TIS vs 1.7 months with chemo (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.64, 1.02). TIS resulted in a higher ORR (20.4% [95% CI 15.1, 26.6] vs 9.4% [95% CI 5.7, 14.2]) and longer median DoR (7.4 vs 4.0 months; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21, 0.84) vs chemo. In the safety analysis set (n=201 TIS, n=191 chemo), patients treated with TIS had fewer treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (74.1% vs 95.3%), fewer ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs (19.4% vs 57.1%), fewer serious TRAEs (15.4% vs 20.9%), and a similar incidence of TRAEs leading to death (2.5% vs 2.6%) vs chemo. Conclusions: In the Asia subgroup, TIS improved OS and tumor response vs chemo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and showed a well-tolerated safety profile. These findings were consistent with published results in the overall population. *The TAP score methodology has been previously referred to as visually-estimated combined positive score (vCPS) and was previously presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, June 4–8, 2021, ESMO World Gastrointestinal Congress 2021, June 30–July 3, 2021, and The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology 2021, September 25–29, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03430843.

A phase 3 safety study of fosnetupitant as an antiemetic in patients receiving anthracycline and cyclophosphamide: CONSOLE-BC.

BACKGROUNDFosnetupitant (FosNTP), an intravenous neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, demonstrated a favorable safety profile with a potentially low risk of injection site reactions (ISRs) and promising antiemetic efficacy in patients receiving cisplatin‐based highly emetogenic chemotherapy in a previous phase 2 study. We conducted a randomized, double‐blind safety study to evaluate the safety profile of FosNTP, including ISRs, in patients receiving doxorubicin‐cyclophosphamide or epirubicin‐cyclophosphamide (AC/EC) chemotherapy.METHODSPatients scheduled to receive AC/EC were randomized 1:1 to receive 235 mg of FosNTP or 150 mg of fosaprepitant (FosAPR), both in combination with 0.75 mg of intravenous palonosetron and 9.9 mg of dexamethasone on day 1. The stratification factors were age category (<55 vs ≥55 years) and study site. The primary end point was the incidence of treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) with FosNTP.RESULTSOverall, 102 patients were randomized to FosNTP (n = 52) or FosAPR (n = 50), and all were treated with the study drug and evaluated for safety. The primary end point, the incidence of TRAEs, was similar with FosNTP (21.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.1%‐34.7%) and FosAPR (22.0%; 95% CI, 11.5%‐36.0%), with any‐cause ISRs observed in 5.8% and 26.0% of patients, respectively, and treatment‐related ISRs observed in 0% and 10.0%, respectively. The overall (0‐120 hour) complete response (defined as no emetic event and no rescue medication) rate, standardized by age category in the full analysis set, was 45.9% (23 of 51 patients) with FosNTP and 51.3% (25 of 49 patients) with FosAPR.CONCLUSIONSFosNTP demonstrated a favorable safety profile with a very low risk of ISRs in the AC/EC setting.

Based on minimal clinically important difference values, a moderate dose of tanezumab may be a better option for treating hip or knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background:Tanezumab is a nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody that may regulate pain in hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low and moderate doses of tanezumab in treating hip or knee OA.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched for clinical trials published before 1 May 2021. Patients were assessed via efficacy and safety outcomes.Results:Twelve randomized controlled trials including 6022 patients were identified. Both low and moderate doses of tanezumab significantly improved efficacy outcomes. However, only the point estimates (mean difference, MD) of moderate-dose tanezumab significantly exceeded the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), withdrawals due to AEs, serious AEs, and total joint replacement between the tanezumab and placebo groups, whereas the incidence of AEs was higher in the tanezumab group (relative risk, RR = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 1.04–1.17). The incidence of rapidly progressive OA was significantly higher in the combined low- and moderate-dose tanezumab groups than in the placebo group (RR = 5.01; 95% CI = 1.17–21.33). Furthermore, both low and moderate doses of tanezumab significantly increased the incidence of abnormal peripheral sensation (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.21–3.28; RR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.91–3.67, respectively). Compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, tanezumab showed significantly improved efficacy outcomes (p < 0.05). However, the point estimates (MD) of tanezumab were not greater than the MCID. Pooled analysis showed no significant differences between tanezumab and NSAIDs and opioids in safety outcomes (p > 0.05).Conclusion:Tanezumab is efficacious in patients with hip or knee OA. Tanezumab is relatively well tolerated and safe but increases the incidence of AEs and reversible abnormal peripheral sensation. Additional studies on the occurrence of rapidly progressive OA are needed. A moderate dose of tanezumab may maximize the benefits for hip or knee OA.

Three-year follow-up and patient-reported outcomes from CheckMate 078: Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesIn the phase 3 CheckMate 078 study, nivolumab prolonged overall survival (OS) and showed a favorable safety profile versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, long-term efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life findings with second-line nivolumab are very limited in Asian patients with previously treated aNSCLC. Here, we report updated clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the phase 3 CheckMate 078 trial with a 3-year minimum follow-up. Materials and methodsPatients with aNSCLC and disease progression after platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival, safety, and disease-related symptom deterioration assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) by Week 12. Additional PRO assessments were exploratory endpoints. ResultsAt ≥ 37.3 months follow-up, 3-year OS rates were 19% with nivolumab and 12% with docetaxel; 30% and 0% of responders remained in response for ≥ 3 years, respectively. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events occurring after 2 years was lower than during the first 2 years. No new treatment-related deaths were reported. By Week 12 of treatment, rates of disease-related symptom deterioration were 32% with nivolumab and 47% with docetaxel. Completion rates for PRO questionnaires were ≥ 80% in both arms. Clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in LCSS Average Symptom Burden Index scores and delayed time to first symptom deterioration were observed with nivolumab against docetaxel. ConclusionsAt 3 years, nivolumab continued to demonstrate survival benefit versus docetaxel, exhibiting improvements in disease-related symptoms and overall health status in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated aNSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. These findings are similar to the global population.

CTNI-43. CXCL12 INHIBITION IN MGMT UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA – RESULTS OF AN EARLY PROOF-OF-CONCEPT ASSESSMENT IN THE MULTICENTRIC PHASE I/II GLORIA TRIAL (NCT04121455)

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical studies showed that CXCL12-mediated influx of highly angiogenic monocytes/macrophages is a key driver of tumor re-vascularization and re-growth after radiotherapy (RT) of glioblastoma (GBM). We report findings from a phase I/II proof-of concept (PoC) study on CXCL12 inhibition during and after RT of GBM. METHODS Patients ≥18years with incompletely or unresected GBM without MGMT promoter hypermethylation and ECOG≤2 were eligible to participate. Patients received continuous (24/7) i.v. infusions of 200mg/week (n=3), 400mg/week (n=3) or 600mg/week (n=3) of the CXCL12 inhibitor olaptesed pegol (OLA) for 26 weeks during and after normo- or hypofractionated RT (60Gy/40.05Gy). The primary endpoint was safety as per the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. The study was accompanied by PoC-research including multiparametric MRI biomarkers (relative cerebral blood volume, rCBV; fractional tumor burden with high perfusion, FTBhigh; apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) and of multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging (CODEX®) of reference and patient samples. Initial results of these analyses are reported for the first six patients enrolled. RESULTS Five of six (83%) patients assessed with advanced MRI showed response under OLA in rCBV/FTBhigh and ADC. Maximum reduction in perfusion (rCBV) from baseline was 55%, maximum reduction of FTBhigh was 55% and maximum increase in ADC was 77%. Furthermore, five of six (83%) patients analyzed showed reduction of enhancing tissue volumes in at least one scan under OLA therapy. In both one patient and two reference samples CXCL12 co-localized with endothelial cells of the microvascular proliferation zone. In a paired sample (before/during OLA) of one patient, endothelial cells stained positive for CXCL12 before but not during treatment and almost all GBM cells were negative in Ki67 staining in the sample obtained under OLA therapy. CONCLUSIONS Advanced MRI and multiplexed immunofluorescence suggest efficacy of combined radiotherapy and CXCL12 inhibition in unmethylated GBM. Funded by NOXXON Pharma AG; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04121455.

Tacrolimus Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone Alone As First-Line Treatment for Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia: The Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized Trial (TARGET 020)

▪IntroductionImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired, organ-specific, autoimmune disease and one of the most common bleeding disorders seriously endangering human health. Glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin are first-line treatments recommended by guidelines for patients with ITP. However, approximately 50%-85% of patients relapse during the first year of treatment. In addition, long-term use of glucocorticoids increases the risk for dose- and time-dependent glucocorticoid-related complications and serious side effects. Therefore, in-depth studies investigating new solutions for the first-line treatment of ITP are urgently needed. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor, which forms a complex by binding to FK506-binding protein. It is currently widely used in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease for organ transplantation as well as for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In addition to recent retrospective studies and case reports demonstrating its effectiveness in ITP, tacrolimus has been shown to improve anti-platelet antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia in mice, suggesting it may be a potential treatment for ITP. The aim of this study was to compare two first-line treatment options for ITP-a standard glucocorticoid-only regimen versus tacrolimus in combination with a standard glucocorticoid regimen-to determine which could help patients achieve stable platelet counts faster and experience a longer duration of remission.MethodsThis open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, enrolled adult ITP patients from seven different tertiary medical centers in China. Elderly patients had confirmed, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive ITP, platelet counts <30×10 9/L, or < 50×10 9/L and significant bleeding symptoms (World Health Organization bleeding scale ≥ 2). Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 with an interactive web-based response system to receive either oral tacrolimus (initial 0.03 mg/kg/day and maintain blood concentration at 3-5 ng/mL for 12 weeks) plus high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) or HD-DXM monotherapy for 12 weeks. DXM (40 mg) was administered orally daily for 4 consecutive days to both study arms. The 4-day course of DXM was repeated on days 11-14 in patients who lacked response by day 10. The primary endpoint was 6-month sustained response (SR), defined as platelet count maintained >50×10 9/L without any additional ITP-modifying therapy at the 6-month follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included initial response by day 14 (OR, platelet count ≥30×10 9/L and at least 2-fold increase in baseline platelet count and absence of bleeding; and CR, platelet count ≥ 100×10 9/L), duration of response, bleeding scores, and adverse events (AEs). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747080).ResultsTotal 140 patients newly diagnosed with ITP were randomly assigned to either the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM (n=72) or HD-DXM monotherapy (n=68) groups. At the 6-month follow-up, the proportion of patients exhibiting SR was significantly higher in the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM group than in the HD-DXM monotherapy group (65.3% vs 42.6%, p= 0.007). Of the 140 patients with ITP (males accounted for 48.6%), the mean age was 32.8 years, the mean platelet count was 16.7×10 9/L. The combination group exhibited a higher 14-day early remission rate than the monotherapy group (76.4% vs 55.9%, P=0.001). Significantly fewer treatment failures occurred in patients randomly assigned to the combination group(19.4% vs 38.2%, P=0.0014). During the follow-up period, fewer patients in the combination group experienced relapse than in the monotherapy group; the median time to relapse was 77 days (Tacrolimus+HD-DXM) vs 36 days (HD-DXM). The combination group exhibited a lower proportion of bleeding events and a lower bleeding score. The incidence of serious AEs, rescue therapy, and treatment side effects were similar between the two groups, and treatment was well tolerated by all patients, with no grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths reported. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related AEs between the two groups.ConclusionsLow-dose tacrolimus plus HD-DXM was an effective and safe treatment for ITP as first-line therapy and elicited a sustained prolonged response in adults. This therapy may be a new treatment option for adult patients with ITP. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure:It includes information or discussion of off-label drug use of tacrilimus.