While operating upon the elderly, and even the very elderly, for cardiac, orthopaedic or vascular diseases is increasingly accepted, there is continued reluctance to recommend aggressive interventions for several malignancies, other than those arising in the colon [1]. Surgical resection is accepted as the only curative therapy for most solid tumours [2], but elderly subjects may be denied surgery because of their presumed higher mortality and morbidity; the situation that existed at the beginning of this century [3]. Surprisingly, reluctance to advise or to accept an operation is often unrelated to the presence of co-existing debilitating conditions or impaired functional status [4]. In the first half of this century operative mortality was high for patients ]70 years of age (19%) [5]. The increasing size of the elderly population meant a parallel increase in need for surgery in the elderly. A report in 1975 by Greenfield showed that operative mortality was halved during a 40-year period among the same age group [6]. This was the consequence of improvements in anaesthetic and surgical techniques, the availability of new drugs and optimised post-operative care. However, common clinical practice and scientific reporting continue to exclude the aged from optimal surgical treatment [7]. While the incidence of post-operative myocardial infarction and bronchopneumonia have remained unchanged among colorectal cancer patients treated before and after 1980, the mortality rate associated with these complications was dramatically reduced from 100 to 38% and from 55 to 15% (PB0.005), respectively, due to earlier diagnosis and aggressive treatment of post-operative complications [8]. A protocol of pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative haemodynamic monitoring and post-operative intensive care has been formalised for use in the elderly poor-risk subjects [9]. Mortality rates among a group of non-cancer patients \90 years old were 2.3% in elective surgery, 16% in urgent and 45% for emergency cases [1]. An Italian study on 435 patients \80 years old confirmed these figures; a significant difference was recorded between emergency and elective operations (morbidity 42 vs. 20%, mortality 18 vs. 6%) [2]. In a selected series of colorectal cancer patients there was a 2-fold increase in mortality in patients aged between 69 and 74 years and a 4-fold increase in those \74 years old operated on emergency basis and also operative deaths were significantly increased after emergency surgery (26 vs. 11.6%) [9]. Age-related changes are most evident under physical/ psychological stress and elderly people are slower to react and recover [10]. While anaesthesiological guidelines for management (pre-operative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring and post-operative intensive care) of elderly people at high risk for surgery are to be further developed [11,8], detailed evaluation of major organ function helps in choosing anaesthetic and pharmacological agents. Despite this wide experience, only two risk factors for peri-operative cardiac morbidity have been definitively identified: recent myocardial infarction and current congestive heart failure [12]. In the past years, multivariate analyses have identified combinations of risk factors allowing the organisation of scoring systems [13]. These scores are generally based on costly clinical and laboratory tests, often referring to further investigations. Most recently it has been argued that routine clinical evaluation before surgery is neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific and that higher costs are justified if specialised testing provides otherwise unavailable information. The topic of pre-operative assessment of cardiovascular patients is addressed for both, elderly and non elderly patients, by the recent overview by Mangano [14,15]. For these reasons the results of retrospective evaluation of large surgical series aimed at the * Corresponding author. MultiMedica 300, via Milanese, Sesto S. Giovanni, 20099 Milan, Italy. Tel.: +39 2 24209481; fax: +39 2 224209313.
Read full abstract