To determine the effect of delays in radiation treatment preparation task timeliness on reported safety events. For 2022, all patients treated at four community-based radiation oncology clinics were included for analysis. Safety reports which occurred during treatment preparation tasks (i.e., between CT simulation and the first treatment) were included for this analysis. Patients with a reported safety event were the report cohort and those without were the control cohort. Treatment preparation tasks are completed sequentially and included contouring, treatment planning, Radiation Oncologist review, Medical Physicist review, Therapist quality check. At baseline, each task was scheduled a standard interval for completion based on treatment technique. The time taken to complete each task was captured using ARIA v16.0 Care Path module (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and extracted through database query. For each task, two metrics were quantified: Task (1) Completion Timeliness: the time (hours) to complete each task, relative to the time allocated to each task. A negative value indicated more time taken than scheduled. (2) Overall Timeliness: specific task timeliness (hours) relative to overall timeliness for the whole Care Path. A negative value indicated the tasks were behind schedule. A student's t-test with an alpha of 0.05 was used to indicate significance. Over the study period, 66 courses had a reported treatment preparation safety event (report) and 2690 did not (control). Techniques include 54% and 56% 3DCRT, 35% and 35% IMRT, 3% and 3% SRS, and 6% and 8% SBRT, for the report and control groups, respectively. Disease sites include breast, GU, GI, head and neck, CNS, thoracic, skin, secondary, gynecological, sarcoma, and heme. Table 1 displays the timeliness for each of the five tasks. Of the courses with safety events, overall timeliness was significantly behind the control group from the in contouring, treatment planning, Radiation Oncologist review, and Medical Physicist review. Courses with safety events took significantly more time than scheduled early in treatment preparation with a significant increase at treatment planning and significantly less time towards the end with the therapist quality check. Patient courses with reported safety events had significantly longer treatment planning times, and as a result inadequate time to perform each downstream pre-treatment activity. The implication of this analysis is that a flag could be created to indicate risk of a safety event early in the treatment preparation process.
Read full abstract