Diarrheal disorders are the result of excessive fluid and electrolyte loss through the gastrointestinal tract. Many different underlying mechanisms are known to cause diarrhea. Fordtran suggested that in secretory diarrhea the osmolality of stool water should be accounted for by its electrolyte contents. Therefore, the osmotic gap between the measured osmolality and that estimated from electrolyte contents should be small. In osmotic diarrhea, due to the presence of the osmotic agent, there should be a greater gap between the measured and the estimated osmolalities. Osmotic gaps varying from 100 to 40 mOsm have been used arbitrarily in literatures to define the underlying pathogenesis. Because of the uncertainty, the usefulness of these measurements remains in question. In this article, methods used to measure stool osmolality and electrolyte contents are reviewed. Limitations of these measurements are discussed. Measurements derived from various diarrheal disorders revealed that the basic concepts put forward by Fordtran are corrected. However, we found that the osmotic gaps (measured osmolality - 2 [Na + K] in secretory diarrheal disorders are frequently negative numbers. In osmotic diarrhea, the osmotic gap (greater than 160 mOsm) is substantially greater than the figures used in the literature. In many diarrheal disorders the osmotic gap falls between the two extremes and the pathogenesis is multifactorial in origin. Under these circumstances, stool osmolality and electrolyte measurements provide little insight into the underlying mechanism causing the diarrhea. Furthermore, stool contains many biologically active organisms which can alter the stool osmolality. Unless these effects are appreciated, an inaccurate interpretation of these measurements may result.