In recent years, the objectives of green agricultural development have increasingly diversified, incorporating food safety, pollution control, and resource conservation. This diversification has further heightened the potential for conflicts between policy objectives and the individual interests of farmers. Understanding farmer trade-offs with respect to multiobjective green production (MOGP) policies is crucial for the comprehensive implementation of agricultural green development policies. The green and healthy aquaculture action (GHAA) encompassing multiple green technology objectives promoted by the Chinese government provides a favorable policy context. On the basis of the policy background of the GHAA, this study utilized the choice experiment method (CEM) to explore the preferences of aquaculture farmers for various green technology objectives and supporting measures. The results indicate that aquaculture farmers are willing to make trade-offs among various green technology objectives with the support of specific measures to transform traditional production methods. Farmers have varying preferences for different green technology objectives. Overall, they tend to prefer implementing compound feed utilization but are averse to implementing aquaculture effluent treatment. In terms of support measures, providing technical guidance is more effective than providing aquaculture insurance in incentivizing farmers to participate in MOGP schemes. Further analysis indicates that there are three latent preference classes, which differ in their preferences for green technology objectives and support measures. Age, gender, aquaculture area, risk preferences, and participation in cooperatives explain the probability of preference class membership.