Implant Stability Quotient Research Articles

Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Short Deep Threaded Dental Implant During Early Healing Period: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

Objectives: To assess the initial stability of short, deep-threaded dental implants placed in the posterior mandible and to determine the influence of deep-thread design on implant stability during early healing. Methods: Twenty short, deep-threaded implants were placed in the posterior mandibular region of ten patients. Insertion torque value (ITV) was recorded at implant placement. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately post-surgery and at weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5. Results: No significant difference in ITV was observed between short and standard implants. ISQ values did not significantly differ between implant types across the evaluation period (F = 1.17, p = 0.3). Conclusion; Short, deep-threaded implants demonstrate comparable primary stability to standard implants in the posterior mandible. These findings support their use as a viable treatment option for patients with advanced alveolar ridge resorption

Multi-Scale Characterization of Conventional and Immediate Dental Implant Systems

We hypothesized that the different post-implantation healing stages between the conventional and immediate implantations produce different amounts and tissue composition of the peri-implant bone. Thus, the objective of the current study was to examine whether the stability of dental implant systems is associated with characteristics of the interfacial bone area at different post-implanation healing periods. Mandibular molars were extracted from each beagle dog. After 10 weeks post-extraction, a screw-type titanium dental implant was placed in the molar location following a conventional dental implant (Con) procedure. Simultaneously, mandibular premolars were extracted and the same type of dental implant was placed in the distal site of the extracted premolar root following an immediate dental implant (Imm) procedure. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were not significantly different between Con and Imm groups at 0-, 3-, and 6-weeks post-implantation. However, 3D micro-computed tomography and 2D histological images confirmed that the Imm system had more gaps between the bone and implant than the Con system. On the other hand, the nanoindentation modulus value at the bone–implant interface was significantly higher for the Imm group than the Con group at both 3 weeks and 6 weeks post-implantation. The current results from multi-scale characterization suggest that the higher interfacial bone quality of the Imm system, despite its earlier post-implantation stage, plays a crucial role in maintaining stability comparable to that of the Con system.

Comparative assessment of the stability of buccal shelf mini-screws with and without pre-drilling- a split-mouth, randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesTo examine and compare the stability of buccal shelf mini-screws using self-drilling and pre-drilling implant placement techniques.MethodologyIt was a split-mouth, randomized controlled trial comprising of 7 patients, each receiving two buccal shelf bone screws. The screws were placed using a self-drilling protocol in one quadrant and a pre-drilling protocol in the opposing quadrant decided via coin toss randomization. Stability was examined at the time of placement and 1,2, 3 and 4 months thereafter, using the Resonance Frequency Analysis method with the Osstell Beacon TM device. The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) obtained was then compared and assessed between both quadrants. Friedman’s Two-Way Analysis of Variance and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were utilized for the intergroup comparison. A statistically significant result was defined as one with a p-value of less than 0.05.ResultsA statistically significant difference between the mean ISQ reading in the pre-drilling and self-drilling group was observed, indicating higher stability of bone screws placed with the pre-drilling protocol. The primary stability of the buccal shelf screws decreased after placement, but the secondary stability remained stable.ConclusionBuccal shelf bone screws placed with a pre-drilling protocol depicted greater primary and secondary stability as compared to the self-drilling protocol, as depicted by the ISQ readings obtained. Resonance Frequency Analysis can be used as a valuable tool to assess the stability of buccal shelf bone screws.Clinical relevanceThe use of buccal shelf screws has increased tremendously over the past few years due to their myriad applications and have now become an essential part of an orthodontist’s armamentarium. It is therefore essential for clinicians to be well-informed about all aspects of their use including insertion techniques. The results of this trial indicate that the pre-drilling protocol provides better stability and therefore treatment outcomes.

Autogenous Tooth Graft Biomaterial in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review

Objective: This review evaluated the use of autogenous tooth as a bone graft material in guided bone regeneration (GBR). Moreover, it compared the results of GBR using autogenous demineralized dentin, partially demineralized dentin, and mineralized dentin with or without membrane to verify its clinical advantage, effectiveness, and safety. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Specific criteria were established for the inclusion and exclusion of studies, including types of studies considered, target population (clinical studies: humans), evaluated intervention (studies assessing and comparing autologous demineralized dentin, partially demineralized dentin, and mineralized dentin in GBR with or without resorbable membrane), and language and publication period of articles (English and published in the last 11 years). A detailed assessment of the methodological quality of the selected studies was conducted using the JBI critical appraisal tool. Results: Based on the analysis conducted, out of 174 potentially relevant articles obtained, only 19 publications met the inclusion criteria, with three papers showing medium quality/moderate risk of bias and the rest with high quality/low risk of bias. Comparison between groups revealed stability of the newly formed bone, low marginal bone loss, clinically acceptable primary and secondary implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, and high implant survival rates after using autogenous tooth biomaterial. Conclusions: The results of this review on the use of autogenous teeth as a bone graft material in guided bone regeneration indicated that the technique has the potential to be an effective and safe treatment option. Analysis of selected studies showed favorable evidence for the use of autogenous teeth in bone regeneration, suggesting clinical benefits, most for socket preservation. These results are relevant for guiding clinical practice and assisting dental professionals in having options for biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Implant Stability After Graftless Motor-Driven Crestal Sinus Elevation: A Cohort Study.

Graftless motor-driven crestal sinus elevation may be a preferable alternative to conventional methods due to the reduction of postsurgical complications and lower cost. This prospective cohort study evaluated the stability of implants installed using this technique. Twenty-nine Straumann BLT (bone level tapered) implants in 29 patients were included in the sample. Average implant stability quotients (ISQ) were measured immediately after surgery (mean: 73.5 ± 9.2) and after a period of healing (mean: 77.1 ± 4.5) using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). There was a significant increase in implant stability after healing (P = .035). The healing duration did not significantly influence how implant stability increased (P =.373). The mean ISQ after healing was significantly higher than the clinically acceptable stability value of 65 ISQ (P < .001). Implant length and width were not significantly correlated with ISQ increase (P = .764 and P = .085, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in average ISQ values measured immediately postsurgery (at baseline) or after healing between implants with and without registered perforations during surgery (P = .118 and P = .366, respectively). The posthealing stability of 4 implants that did not achieve primary stability was not significantly less stable after the healing period than those that had achieved primary stability (P = .086). Moreover, the level of insertion torque significantly impacted implant stability immediately postsurgery (P < .001), but the ISQ values measured after healing were not significantly different based on the initial insertion torque values (P = .131). This study suggests that implants installed using graftless motor-driven crestal sinus elevation may achieve clinically acceptable stability as measured by RFA.

The relationship between the secondary implant stability quotient and oxidized implant-related factors: A retrospective study

ObjectiveThe present retrospective study aimed to determine the relationship between the secondary implant stability quotient and different parameters related to an oxidized implant. MethodsA total of 135 patients (305 oxidized implants) were included. Implant-related factors (length, diameter, surgical and loading protocols, grafting, insertion torque, and primary stability) were used for comparisons and linear regression analyses, using secondary ISQ as the dependent variable. ResultsAt the patient level, the mean time from implantation to secondary ISQ registration was 20.3 ± 29 weeks, and the mean secondary ISQ was 77.30 ± 7.22. The ISQ did not reveal significant differences regarding implant lengths, loading protocol, and simultaneous grafting. In contrast, platform diameters (3.5, 4.3, and 5.0), surgical protocols (one stage versus two stages), insertion torque (<35 Ncm versus >35 Ncm), and primary stability (achieved versus not achieved) all revealed significant secondary ISQ differences. Nevertheless, the regression analysis demonstrated that the platform diameter was the only variable significantly and positively predicted the secondary ISQ. Similar findings were found with the implant level analysis. ConclusionsAmong different implant- and protocol-related parameters, the platform diameter of the oxidized implant appears to be the only significant predictor of high secondary ISQ values at the time of superstructure connection.

Osseointegration of Dental Implants after Vacuum Plasma Surface Treatment In Vivo.

Previous studies have highlighted the need for post-treatment of implants due to surface aging. This study investigated the effect of vacuum plasma (VP) treatment on the osseointegration of sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) implant surfaces. The hypothesis was that VP might enhance implant stability, measured by implant stability quotient (ISQ) and histological osseointegration through bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area ratio (BA) in rabbit models. Eighteen implants were either untreated or treated with VP and installed into the femurs of six rabbits, which were sacrificed after four weeks. Histological analyses of BIC and BA, along with micro-CT analysis of bone volume and ISQ, were performed. The VP-treated group showed higher levels of BA, bone volume, and ISQ, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the control and experimental groups. Despite limitations, both groups achieved better osseointegration and regeneration, warranting further studies on plasma treatment effects over varying implantation periods.

Analysis of osseointegration of implants with macrogeometries with healing chambers: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundTo verify the influence of macrogeometry with healing chambers on the osseointegration of dental implants by analyzing implant stability quotient (ISQ) and evaluate the correlation between insertion torque and ISQ insertion with different macrogeometries.MethodsIn total, 26 implants were installed in the posterior mandible of eight patients with sufficient bone height for the installation of implants measuring 3.5 mm in diameter and 9.0 mm in length. The implants were categorized according to two types of macrogeometry: a test group (GT) with 13 conical implants with healing chambers and a control group (GC) with 13 conical implants with conventional threads. To insert the implants, a bone drilling protocol was used up to a diameter of 3 mm with the last helical bur. The insertion torque of the implants was evaluated, followed by the measurement of ISQ at 0 (T-0), 7 (T-7), 14 (T-14), 21 (T-21), 28 (T-28), and 42 (T-42) days.ResultsThe mean insertion torque was 43 Ncm in both groups, without a significant difference. Moreover, no significant difference in the ISQ values was found between the groups at different time points (p > 0.05), except at T-7 (GT = 69.87±1.89 and GC = 66.48±4.49; p = 0.01). Although there was no significant difference, ISQ median values were higher in the GT group than GC group at 28 days (GT = 67.98 and GC = 63.46; p = 0.05) and 42 days (GT = 66.12 and GC = 60.33; p = 0.09). No correlation was found between the insertion torque and ISQ insertion (p > 0.05).ConclusionFurthermore, implants with a 3.5 mm diameter macrogeometry, with or without healing chambers, inserted with a drilling protocol up to 3 mm in diameter of the last helical bur, led to a similar secondary stability, with no difference in ISQ values. Although, implants with healing chamber demonstrates ascending values in the graph of ISQ, having a trend of faster osseointegration than implants without healing chambers. Both macrogeometries provide a similar primary stability to implants.Trial registrationThis study was registered retrospectively in ReBec (brazilian registry of clinical trials) under the number RBR-96n5×69, on the date of 19/06/2023.

The Effect of Increasing Thread Depth on the Initial Stability of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study

Background: The long-term success of dental implants largely depends on achieving primary stability, previously described as crucial to obtaining osseointegration and immediate loading protocol requirements. Implant thread depths seem to be one of the key factors influencing primary stability, particularly in low-density bone. Insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) are considered the most reliable tests to assess primary stability. The aim of this work was to evaluate how different thread depths of commercially available dental implants affect primary stability in low-density D3 bone. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was carried out between February 2024 and March 2024. Twenty-four dental implants were divided into four groups (six implants each) according to their thread depths (Group A: 4 mm, Group B: 4.5 mm, Group C: 5 mm, Group D: 5.5 mm) and were inserted in D3-type artificial bone blocks. The main outcome variables were the IT and the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measured in four different areas of the implant (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) with an Osstel® ISQ reader. Descriptive and inferential analyses of the data were performed, and the significance value was set at 5%. Results: A total of 24 implants were analyzed. The highest IT values were obtained in Group D, with a mean of 54.03 Ncm (standard deviation (SD) = 8.99), while the lowest measurements were observed in Group A (mean = 25.12; SD: 2.96 N.cm). The mean ISQ values were consistently higher in Group D for each analyzed area, with a mean of 70.13 N.cm (SD = 1.12). Conclusions: Taking into consideration the limitations of this in vitro study, greater thread depths seem to increase the primary stability of dental implants placed in soft bone. Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between all IT and ISQ values, regardless of the thread depth.

A Comparison of Different Implant Site Preparation Techniques in Low-Density Bone: An Ex-Vivo Study.

Osseointegration is considered a prerequisite for the long-term success of dental implants, and many researchers have considered the stability of the implant when placed in the bone. Many techniques include undersized drilling, densifying burs, magnetic mallets, and expanders. These methods have led to higher initial insertion torque values. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of expanders, densifying burs, and magnetic mallet methods for preparing the implant site in low-density bone and compare them in terms of achieving good initial implant stability. The present study was conducted in an ex vivo animal model using bovine rib bones. This study was performed on 20 bovine ribs; each rib had four implant site preparations divided into four groups according to the drilling method: a control group of the conventional technique (n=20), the expanders group (n=20), the densification burs group (n=20), and the magnetic mallet group (n=20). The measured values were Primary Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). The highest average insertion torque was in the magnetic Mallet group, where the average was 43.75 N/cm2, followed by the burs group, where the average was 43.00 N/cm2, then the expanders group with an average of 32.80 N/cm2, then the conventional preparation group with 19.30 N/cm2as the lowest average among the study groups. The highest ISQ mean was in the burs group, where the mean was 80.30, followed by the magnetic Mallet group, where the mean was 80.20, then the expanders group with a mean of 68.90, then the conventional preparation group with 50.10 as the lowest mean among the study groups. Within the limitation of this study, we conclude that all methods used were better than conventional preparation in both ISQ and insertion torque, with the magnetic mallet group outperforming the insertion torque and the Densah burs outperforming the ISQ.

Unlocking implant success: the impact of surgical techniques on primary stability in the posterior maxilla.

The study conducted by Olmedo-Gaya et al. aimed to investigate the effects of various surgical techniques on the initial stability of implants placed in the posterior maxilla through a randomized controlled clinical trial. The study compared insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotients (ISQ) among implants placed using under preparation, expanders, and standard surgical instrumentation. The study enrolled 108 patients, each receiving one implant in the posterior maxilla region. Patients were distributed into three groups: group 1 (n = 36) with the under preparation technique, group 2 (n = 36) using the expander technique, and group 3 (n = 36) with conventional drilling. IT was measured using a torque indicator, while ISQ was recorded through resonance frequency analysis immediately post-surgery. The ISQ values were analyzed in relation to the patient's bone quality, categorized into types II, III, and IV. ISQ values varied significantly with bone quality, being highest in type II (76.65) and type III (73.60), and lowest in type IV (67.34) bone, with a significant difference (p < 0.0001). The conventional drilling technique yielded lower ISQ values (69.31) compared to under preparation (74.29) and expander techniques (73.99), with statistical significance (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively). Surgical technique significantly influences primary stability in low-quality bone. Conventional drilling results in lower ISQ values, suggesting that alternative techniques such as under preparation or expanders should be used in low-quality bone to achieve better primary stability. For implants in low-quality bone, replacing the conventional drilling technique with under preparation or expander techniques can enhance primary stability.

Three-dimensional volumetric assessment and stability of simultaneously placed implant following sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized human demineralized tooth matrix or deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

This study aimed to analyze and compare three-dimensional volumetric bone changes and stability of simultaneously placed dental implants following sinus augmentation using deproteinized human demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Twenty-four patients who required lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous dental implant placement were randomly assigned to receive either dpDTM (n = 12) or DBBM (n = 12). Cone-beam computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis of implant stability were conducted immediately after surgery and 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the graft sinus floor and graft height volumes in the sagittal and coronal views, along with the implant stability quotient (ISQ), were analyzed and compared. Volumetric graft alteration was comparable between dpDTM (120.33 ± 77.48 mm3) and DBBM (108.51 ± 65.15 mm3) (p = 0.690). Reduction in the average graft height was also comparable: dpDTM group ranged from - 0.59 to - 0.93mm and the DBBM group ranged from - 0.55 to - 0.82mm (p > 0.05) at most examined levels. However, greater reduction in the mesial-graft height occurred in the dpDTM group (- 1.08 ± 0.70mm vs. -0.58 ± 0.39mm, p = 0.04). The ISQ values increased similarly in both groups to reach 70 at 6 months. dpDTM demonstrated comparable stability in graft volume and height during the healing process compared to DBBM and could serve as a viable alternative to DBBM for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement.

Competence of allogenic demineralized tooth matrix in socket seal surgery for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized control clinical trial.

To assess and compare the clinical, radiological, and histological outcomes of socket seal surgery between two protocols: deproteinized demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) each covered with a free gingival graft. Twenty extraction sockets in the anterior or premolar region were randomly allocated to either the dpDTM or FDBA protocol (n = 10 per group). Measurements of the alveolar ridge changes were obtained using an intraoral scanner and cone-beam computed tomography at 3 months post-operation. Three-month post surgery, the dental implant was installed (n = 5 per group), bone biopsies were obtained for histomorphometrical and micro-computed tomography analyses. Implant stability quotients (ISQs) were determined and compared at 3 months post-implant. Lower significant reductions in buccal alveolar ridge height and hard tissue volume were observed in dpDTM group compared to FDBA group at 3 months (0.25 ± 0.35mm vs. 1.60 ± 0.66mm [p = .000] and 9.64 ± 15.39% mm3 vs. 31.45 ± 18.11% mm3 [p = .010], respectively). At the same time, lower soft tissue volume reduction was detected in the dpDTM group compared to FDBA group (4.21 ± 5.25% mm3 vs. 5.25 ± 5.79% mm3). No statistically significant difference in the percentage of mineralized tissue formation was found between dpDTM group (53.39 ± 11.16%) and FDBA group (49.90 ± 3.27%). Even though the ISQ in the dpDTM group showed a higher value than the FDBA group at 3 months post-implant, the results were without statistical significance. Alveolar ridge preservation using dpDTM is an efficacious procedure for providing the conditions for the development of functional and esthetic implants.

Comparative Evaluation of Primary Stability in Truncated Cone Implants with Different Macro-Geometries in Low-Density Polyurethane Blocks Simulating Maxillary Sinus Rehabilitations

After tooth loss, particularly in the posterior maxilla, the alveolar ridges undergo bone resorption. Therefore, ensuring the appropriate quantity and quality of alveolar bone is crucial for accurate implant positioning and achieving optimal esthetic and functional results. This study aimed to evaluate biomechanical parameters (insertion torque: IT, removal torque: RT, and implant stability quotient: ISQ) of distinct truncated cone implant designs (Sinus-plant and SLC) on polyurethane blocks simulating type D3 and D4 bone. SLC implants exhibited significantly higher IT, RT, and ISQ values compared to Sinus-plant implants, except in the 10 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) density block with a cortical layer for the IT (24.01 ± 0.91 vs. 23.89 ± 1.66 Ncm). The IT values for SLC implants ranged from 13.95 ± 0.19 Ncm in the lowest density block to 37.94 ± 0.45 Ncm in the highest density block, consistently providing significantly higher primary stability with an ISQ of approximately 70 in the highest density block. Despite lower ISQ in the lowest density block (48.60 ± 0.52 and 48.80 ± 0.42 in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions), it was deemed acceptable considering the inadequate bone densities in the maxillary region. These findings on SLC suggest potential clinical advantages, including reduced procedure duration and costs, improved stability, and the possibility of immediate implant placement following sinus augmentation, thereby streamlining the rehabilitation process.

An eight-year retrospective study on the clinical outcomes of laser surface-treated implants

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate peri-implant bone loss and health status associated with the long-term use of laser surface-treated implants.MethodsFor control study, total of 23 titanium ASTM F136 grade 23 implants were placed in the edentulous molar area of the mandible. When the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) ≥ 70 and insertion torque value (ITV) ≥ 35–50 Ncm at the insertion site, an immediate provisional restoration was connected to the implant within a week after surgery. The definitive restorations were placed 2 months after surgery for all implants. 13 implants were immediately loaded, while 10 implants were conventionally loaded. For comparative study, Radiographs were taken from third years for and then annually for the subsequent eight years to monitor marginal bone loss.ResultsAfter eight year of implant installation, the average change in vertical bone loss was 0.009 mm (P < 0.001), while the average change in horizontal bone loss 8 year after implant placement was 0.026 mm (P < 0.001). The mean marginal bone loss was < 0.2 mm on average.ConclusionsIn this retrospective study, laser-treated implants exhibit a low rate of bone absorption around the implants.

Primary stability evaluation of different morse cone implants in low-density artificial bone blocks: A comparison between high-and low-speed drilling

This study aimed to evaluate various biomechanical parameters associated with the primary stability of Maestro and Due Cone implants placed in low-density artificial bones, prepared using high-speed drilling with irrigation and low-speed drilling without irrigation. The insertion torque (IT), removal torque (RT), and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded for Maestro and Due Cone implants placed in low-density polyurethane blocks (10 and 20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) with and without a cortical layer) prepared using high-speed and low-speed with or without irrigation using a saline solution, respectively. A three-way ANOVA model and Tukey's post-hoc test were conducted, presenting data as means and standard deviations. P-values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. No statistically significant differences in IT, RT, and ISQ between drilling speeds were observed. However, Maestro implants exhibited lower IT and RT values after high- and low-speed drilling across almost all polyurethane blocks, significantly evident in the 20 PCF density block for IT and in the 20 PCF density block with the cortical layer for the RT with low-speed drilling (IT: 47.33 ± 10.02 Ncm and 16.00 ± 12.49 Ncm for Due Cone and Maestro implants, respectively, with p < 0.01; RT: 44.67 ± 22.81 Ncm and 20.01 ± 4.36 Ncm for Due Cone and Maestro implants, respectively, with p < 0.05) and among the same implant types inserted in different bone densities. Additionally, the study found that for all bone densities and drilling speeds, both implants registered ISQ values exceeding 60, except for the lowest-density polyurethane block. Overall, it can be inferred that low-speed drilling without irrigation achieved biomechanical parameters similar to conventional drilling with both implant types, even with lower IT values in the case of Maestro implants. These findings suggest a promising potential use of low-speed drilling without irrigation in specific clinical scenarios, particularly when focusing on preparation depth or when ensuring proper irrigation is challenging.

Influence of Crown Height and Width on Marginal Bone Loss and Long-Term Stability of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.

Still, a major focus of research in implantology is how crown height and width affect marginal bone loss (MBL) and the long-term durability of dental implants. Maximizing the success of implants and lowering problems depends on an awareness of these elements. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review searched pertinent studies across several databases using keywords unique to databases. Studies on MBL and long-term implant stability evaluated in the review included those on crown height and width, horizontal and vertical cantilevers, and prosthesis dimensions. In the chosen studies, we found that both implant success and crestal bone loss were greatly influenced by crown height and width. Particularly in the posterior sections, horizontal cantilevers were connected to both increasing MBL and mechanical problems. Vertical cantilevers also affected MBL; however, their impacts were more obvious in circumstances with greater crown heights. Greater prosthesis widths, especially in the mandibular molar area, were linked to higher MBL. Bone density and insertion torque (IT) were the main determinants of MBL, more than the primary implant stability quotient. Early MBL was influenced by abutment height, mucosal thickness, and implant insertion depth; bone levels stabilized six months later. Short implants allow single crowns to be supported, but in some cases, a higher failure rate was seen. The success and stability of dental implants were found to be mostly dependent on crown height, width, and cantilever design. MBL and long-term stability are greatly influenced by horizontal and vertical cantilevers, which calls for careful design and planning. With specific care for bone density, IT, and early MBL stabilization, both short and standard implants can produce equivalent results. These results highlight the need for customized treatment plans to maximize implant success and lifetime.

Correlation Between Implant Stability Quotient and Percussion Sound Frequency.

To determine the correlation between the primary implant stability quotient and the implant percussion sound frequency. A total of 14 pigs' ribs were scanned using a dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner to classify the bone specimens into three distinct bone density Hounsfield units (HU) value categories: D1 bone: >1250 HU; D2: 850-1250 HU; D3: <850 HU. Then, 96 implants were inserted: 32 implants in D1 bone, 32 implants in D2 bone, and 32 implants in D3 bone. The primary implant stability quotient (ISQ) was analyzed, and percussion sound was recorded usinga wireless microphone connected and analyzed with frequency analysis software. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the primary ISQ and the bone density HU value (r = 0.719; p < 0.001), and statistically significant positive correlations between the primary ISQ and the percussion sound frequency (r = 0.606; p < 0.001). Furthermore, significant differences inprimary ISQ values and percussion sound frequency were found between D1 and D2 bone, as well as between D1 and D3 bone. However, no significant differences were found in primary ISQ values and percussion sound frequency between D2 and D3 bone. The primary ISQ value and the percussion sound frequency are positively correlated.

Evaluation of Dental Implant Stability in Narrow Alveolar Ridges Utilizing Osseodensification Technique Versus Screw Expansion: A Randomized Single Blinded Clinical Trial

Introduction: We aimed to compare the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of endosteal dental implants (DIs) inserted into narrow alveolar ridges via osseodensification (OD) versus manual screw expansion (SE). Methods: Nineteen patients were randomized into two groups. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 59 years, with 46 implant osteotomy sites and 41 DIs. Twenty DIs were installed using OD drilling (OD group), and 21 DIs were inserted using manual screw expander drills (SE group). Primary stability was measured at the surgery time, and secondary stability was measured at the 24th week using the Osstell ISQ device. A probability value &lt; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: No statistical difference was observed between the mean values of primary stability of the OD (ISQ: 67.06 ± 4.41) and SE (ISQ: 67.76 ± 4.79) groups (P = 0.518). No statistical difference was noted between the mean values of secondary implant stability of the OD (ISQ: 68.53 ± 6.70) and SE (68 ± 5.68) groups (P = 0.780). Conclusion: The OD technique is comparable with the manual SE counterpart in terms of primary and secondary stability.

Resonance Frequency Analysis Identifies Implant- and Host-Related Factors Associated With Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant Stability.

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a reliable, noninvasive method to assess the stability of bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs), although surgical-, implant-, and host-related factors can affect its outcome. BAHI plays an important role in restoring hearing function. However, implant- and host-related factors contribute to premature implant extrusion. To mitigate this, noninvasive methods to assess implant stability, along with a better understanding of factors contributing to BAHI failure, are needed. We evaluated the utility of RFA to quantify implant stability in sawbone (bone mimicking material), 29 human cadaveric samples, and a prospective cohort of 29 pediatric and 27 adult participants, and identified factors associated with implant stability. To validate the use of RFA in BAHI, we compared RFA-derived implant stability quotient (ISQ) estimates to peak loads obtained from mechanical push-out testing. ISQ and peak loads were significantly correlated (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.0088), and ISQ reliably predicted peak load up to 1 kN. We then showed that in cadaveric samples, abutment length, internal table bone volume, and donor age were significantly associated with implant stability. We validated findings in our prospective patient cohort and showed that minimally invasive Ponto surgery (MIPS; versus linear incision), longer implantation durations (>16 wk), older age (>25 yr), and shorter abutment lengths (≤10 mm) were associated with better implant stability. Finally, we characterized the short-term reproducibility of ISQ measurements in sawbone and patient implants. Together, our findings support the use of ISQ as a measure of implant stability and emphasize important considerations that impact implant stability, including surgical method, implant duration, age, and abutment lengths.