Impact Of COVID-19 Research Articles

The impact of COVID-19 on the willingness to work in teams

This paper studies the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals’ willingness to work in teams, using an online experiment. We implement a setup where individuals can choose to work on a real effort task either individually or together with a partner through online interaction. We find that although working in a team is more profitable and participants also expect this, a large fraction makes a financially costly decision by shying away from teamwork. Moreover, participants primed with COVID-19 are less likely to self-select into teamwork in a dynamic setting with two team selection periods, with the effect coming mainly from the second selection period, after a random fraction of participants are exogenously assigned to teamwork. We find that in addition to COVID-19 salience, social confidence, the willingness to socialize, and prior exposure to teamwork are significant predictors of the decision to join or avoid socially interactive work environments. Our findings provide insights into the potential impact of the pandemic on social interactions in a work setting.

Impact of COVID-19 on missed diagnoses of uterine cancer: Who is most affected?

Impact of COVID-19 on missed diagnoses of uterine cancer: Who is most affected?

Piloting an Assessment Tool to Organize Surgical Care in Armed Conflicts: Findings From Cameroon

IntroductionArmed conflict is increasing globally and is dramatically disrupting surgical care than ever before. To address this, the PIPESS (Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, Supplies, and Standard) tool was designed to facilitate assessment of hospital capacity. It assesses 6 key categories at 3 timepoints: preconflict, during conflict, and postconflict. This tool was piloted to assess the impact of conflict and COVID-19 on surgical care delivery at the Buea Regional Hospital in Cameroon. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, qualitative study combining in-depth interviews and on-site observations of the surgical care unit. The data collected during the interviews were then applied to the modified PIPESS tool to calculate a preconflict score based on recall and a during conflict score to quantify differences before and during conflict. ResultsWe interviewed 12 key informants: 6 patients, 3 doctors, and 3 other staff. The themes extracted from the preconflict period highlight major barriers including rudimentary prehospital care and referral limitations from remote areas, lack of funding and training, and a demand exceeding the supply of care. COVID-19 resulted in an influx of resources into the region and did not disrupt care to the extent of the conflict. Quantitatively, the PIPESS score for preconflict was 110, and the PIPESS score during conflict was 115, showing an increase in resources, specifically in personnel and infrastructure during conflict. ConclusionsThe conflict increased the burden on existing health centers and strained resources for trauma care. Paradoxically, surgical resources increased during the conflict likely because of increased international support along with local displacement of staff toward the hospital. Further data should be collected during the postconflict setting.

Assessing the influence of nursing home size and care models on COVID-19 case and mortality rates

IntroductionThis study examines the impact of COVID-19 on older adults in traditional nursing homes, Green Houses (GHs), and Continuing Care Retirement Communities-Nursing Homes (CCRCNHs). MethodsCOVID-19 cases and deaths from CMS and LTCFocus data across 11 states from 6/2020 to 9/2022 were used, and Poisson regressions to compare care settings while adjusting for covariates. ResultsCCRCNH and GH residents were older (84.4 and 83.1 years) than those in traditional NHs (77.5 and 77.6 years, p < 0.0001), with more female and White individuals. COVID-19 risk was higher in CCRCNHs (RR 1.51, 95 % CI 1.10–2.07), large NHs (RR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.14–2.15), and highest in small NHs (RR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.32–2.47). Mortality rates across NH types showed no significant difference. ConclusionThe study shows that smaller, person-centered GHs are more effective in controlling COVID-19 infection, suggesting a need to rethink care models to incorporating GH features for better outcomes.GEORGE2 07-AUG-2024 11:31.

A New Test for Evaluating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 in Nurses

Introduction During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health care workers were involved and suffered significant physical and psychological strain, and nursing was one of the main players. Clearly and objectively establishing the psychological impact on nurses during the pandemic is necessary for long-term recovery and to be prepared for new outbreaks in the future. Aim The aims of this study were to evaluate the perceived impact on nurses at risk of psychological stress at work during a major health care crisis and determine the psychological impact and its influencing factors. Methods An online questionnaire was designed and distributed between April 9 and April 19, 2020, in Spain. The comprehensive self-conducted questionnaire included demographic information and the Psychological Stress and Adaptation at work Score. For the analysis, descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, and receiver operating characteristic curves were determined. Results A total of 825 nurses (33% working in intensive care units and emergency departments) answered the questionnaire. A logistic regression analysis revealed that nurses with higher psychological stress scores experienced more physical overload (P = .02), higher psychological overload (P &lt; .01), poor teamwork (P = .02), more distress due to new circumstances (P &lt; .01), more personal impact of how society responded to COVID-19 (P &lt; .01), anticipation of negative future consequences (P &lt; .01), and worse balance between family and work (P &lt; .01). The area under the curve for the cutoff point of Psychological Stress and Adaptation at work Score 40 was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.91), with 70% sensitivity and 81% specificity. The positive predictive value was 72%, and the negative predictive value was 80%. Conclusion Psychological Stress and Adaptation at work Score is a rapid and accurate test for evaluating the psychological well-being of health care staff that can be used when crisis prevents the use of conventional stress diagnosis methods. Higher psychological impact was observed in nurses who worked in the intensive care unit and in the hospital ward.

The Frequency of Health Anxiety, Coronavirus Anxiety and Anxiety Disorder in Patients With Tinnitus During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Impact of Pandemic on Tinnitus.

This study aimed to examine the frequency of anxiety disorder, coronavirus anxiety and health anxiety in tinnitus patients during the pandemic and also, determined the psychophysiological impact of COVID-19 on tinnitus. This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary central pandemic hospital from 15 July 2021 to 15 December 2022. In total, 124 patients with tinnitus and 77 healthy controls participated in the study. The sociodemographic data, a set of valid and reliable assessment instruments were used to measure outcomes of anxiety disorder, coronavirus anxiety, health anxiety and severity of tinnitus. Patients with tinnitus were found to experience higher levels of coronavirus anxiety, health anxiety and anxiety disorder than controls (p < 0.05). In tinnitus patients, the frequency of coronavirus anxiety was 22.6% and anxiety disorder was 18.5%. Notably, the levels of tinnitus severity were moderate to severe in more than half of the patients (51.6%) and also most of them (81.3%) reported that the severity of tinnitus during the pandemic was higher compared with the pre-pandemic. Tinnitus patients had high levels of anxiety disorder, coronavirus anxiety and health anxiety. In line with these findings, it was evaluated that there was a relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic with psychological problems and tinnitus. Therefore, the predominance of tinnitus symptoms at presentation should not lead the clinician to neglect the underlying psychopathological problems in these patients.

Impact of covid-19 on family dynamics in relation to age: A comparative study

This study examines the differential impact of COVID-19 on family dynamics across two distinct age groups: young adults (20-40 years) and middle-aged adults (41-60 years). The primary aim is to assess how the pandemic affected family interactions and emotional well-being in relation to age. A sample of 100 participants was selected, with 50 individuals from each age group. Data was collected using a validated questionnaire designed to measure the pandemic's impact on family dynamics through a Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were calculated for each group, followed by a t-test to compare the two age groups. The results indicate a statistically significant difference in the impact on family dynamics, with a t-value of -2.15 and a p-value of 0.034, suggesting that middle-aged adults experienced more significant changes in family dynamics compared to young adults. This study contributes to understanding the age-related psychological and emotional responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights the need for targeted interventions based on age-specific challenges.

Post–crises capability development – the silver lining: learning from e-tailers’ adaptation to greater protection needs

Purpose This study draws lessons from e-tailer adaptations to the enhanced protection needs of employees and customers and capability development, during events such as social distancing causing crises (SDCC) and provides a conceptual framework. Design/methodology/approach A grounded theory-based approach has been used wherein 130 news articles and 48 journal papers were analyzed to understand the real-world measures and impact. Findings E-tailers adapt to provide their workforce an environment that caters to their increased need for physical and mental well-being and take measures for customers health protection. They also take initiatives toward mitigation of the high incidence of cyber fraud faced by the vulnerable customers. In the process, they develop several capabilities during and post-crises. Research limitations/implications The study focuses only on the impact of COVID-19 on e-tailing. This is a limitation and other industries and crises may be studied in the future. Practical implications The study holds significant potential for future research as the three research propositions offered can enable hypothesis generation for larger quantitative studies. The adaptation to the enhanced protection needs of employees and customers result in the development of several capabilities such as a more equitable work environment, a more loyal, productive and adaptable workforce, increased customer retention and acquisition and a better image. Hence this study has several organizational development practical implications as it provides managers lessons to survive and thrive from future crises. Originality/value Few studies have investigated e-tailers adaptations for enhanced protection needs of employees and customers and its impact during and after SDCC. This empirical study extends a body of literature which is scarce.

Covid-19 and mental health hospitalizations in Italy. Results from a multicenter longitudinal cohort

Abstract Background The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on mental health (MH) is still being assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Covid-19 on ordinary hospital admissions for psychiatric disorders in Italy. Methods The multicenter project “Covid-19 and mental health” (CoMeH), coordinated by the National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty, enrolled an open cohort of subjects resident in three large areas of Italy (2018-2021) aged 10 + (N = 5,159,363), and followed-up until 2021. The study outcome was the first ordinary admission with a psychiatric disorder as main diagnosis (FMHA). Citizenship and deprivation level (DL) are the socioeconomic factor considered. Different groups of diagnosis were used to characterize the hospitalizations. The impact of Covid-19 on FMHAs was evaluated by interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, pre (until February 2020) and post (from March 2020) the outbreak of pandemic, using a step-change model. Results 11,171 FMHAs were observed. Patients hospitalized with a MH diagnosis were younger compared to the study population; the distributions by sex, deprivation level and citizenship were similar. A decrease of incidence of FMHAs was found after the outbreak of the pandemic, overall and for all group of diagnoses, except for post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD). A reduction in adjusted FMHA rates after the onset of Covid-19 (RR 0.80[0.72-0.90]) were observed through multivariate ITS. The oldest patients had the lowest probabilities of FMHAs in pre Covid-19 and experienced the highest reduction in post-Covid19. PTSD presented trend in countertendency compared with the other diagnosis, with an immediate effect of Covid-19 increasing FMHAs (+97%), followed by a post-outbreak return to the pre-pandemic levels, below the counterfactual line. Conclusions Covid-19 pandemic determined a general reduction of admissions for psychiatric disorders. A significant impact was observed among the eldest (decrease) and for PTSD (increase). Key messages • Covid-19 pandemic determined a reduction of admissions for psychiatric disorders. • Older people were mostly affected. No significant socioeconomic impact was observed.

6.X.1. Disentangling Long-COVID: prevalence, risk factors and impact

Abstract Background Prolonged symptoms after the acute SARS-COV2 infection significantly alter daily functioning and work ability for substantial number of people. Application of different long COVID definitions result in variable prevalence estimations, while aetiology of long COVID as well as its impact is insufficiently understood. Our workshop is set to discuss the public health impact of long COVID in the general population, to identify risk factors of developing long COVID, and stimulate dialog to advance adequate health care and public health actions aimed to reduce the impact of this condition. Objectives and Key Questions The overall objective is to discuss the public health impact as well as geographic variations across Europe in long COVID prevalence, major risk factors for long COVID and impact on work capacity, accounting for different population-based and hospital study settings. Specifically, the workshop will address the following key questions: 1) what are the challenges in estimating prevalence of long COVID? 2) what are the risk factors of long COVID and some of the most vulnerable population groups? 3) what is a distribution of long COVID in Europe? 4) what is the impact of long COVID on work ability? Brief Overview The workshop will include 3 presentations (in combined total duration of 12 min) on challenges for research and practice attributable to variability in defining long COVID, prevalence of long COVID across several European countries, risks factors of long COVID and impact on work ability. Active discussion of 13 min will conclude the session. Key messages • Standardized definitions, such as WHO-PCC definition with severity thresholds would facilitate surveillance of long COVID and advance knowledge on the risk factors related to this condition. • Understanding better the risk factors and impact of long COVID will inform more adequate screening and therapeutic strategies, and possibly anticipate effects of potential new infectious threats.

Assessment of the impact of Long COVID on labour market participation and potential economic effects in the EU

Abstract This paper estimates the economic cost of long COVID through its direct impacts on the labour market. The direct implications of long COVID for affected individuals concern their capacity to work, and their productivity at work. Some individuals might continue to work, but at a lower productivity level, some might reduce their hours worked, including as a result of temporary absences, and some might stop working at all. To the best of our knowledge, so far, no study has explicitly addressed the impact of long COVID on the EU labour market. The present paper provides a tentative assessment using available estimates from surveys, clinical follow-up studies and model simulations of the prevalence of long COVID. This tentative approach yields an estimated negative impact on labour supply of 0.2-0.3% in 2021 and 0.3-0.5% in 2022. In person-equivalents, this means long COVID would have reduced labour supply by 364,000-663,000 in 2021 and by 621,000-1,112,000 in 2022, combining the effect of lower productivity, higher sick leaves, lower hours, and increased unemployment or inactivity. The lower bound of this range is close to a recent estimate put forward for the US (Abraham &amp; Rendell, 2023). Available labour market data suggest a mixed picture when it comes to the impact of long COVID. Overall, the possible role of long COVID in the rising trend in sick leave, disability and activity-limiting health factors, warrants careful monitoring going forward, due to its potential impact on labour supply and labour productivity, and on public finances through increased social benefits, pensions, health care and long-term care expenditure.

Inferring diagnoses from prescription data: a machine-learning approach

Abstract Estimating disease prevalence is a fundamental while challenging public-health goal: in the absence of solid diagnostic data, it typically requires expensive and time intensive studies. Analyzing existing medical records is an alternative, complementary approach. In particular, prescription records offer a glimpse into the health status of populations, prescribing patterns, and operational dynamics. We asked whether these could be used to infer diagnostics and, therefore, estimate disease prevalence. We used the Portuguese electronic medical prescriptions dataset (ADD NUMBERS) and trained a machine learning model that captures the probability that specific drugs are prescribed for the same or related medical conditions. We 1) constructed a manually-curated dataset of diseases and associated medications; 2) used this dataset to train embeddings models; 3) tested these models against human-classified data; 4) used the trained/tested model to uncover comorbidities associated with a) antibiotic prescription (to validate the model), and b) the impact of COVID-19 in prescription patterns of chronic-diseases. The model was able to accurately identify drugs used for targeting ten specific diseases, with few false positives and false negatives. Our analysis showed that the COVID-19 pandemic had almost no effect on the number of prescriptions for some chronic diseases (such as diabetes and depression), but, importantly, had a strong impact on the number of new diagnoses, with new users of diabetes medication in 2019 dropping by more than 16.8% in 2020. Medical prescriptions offer a promising tool to quickly assess disease prevalence, underdiagnosis, and allow a broad overview of the medical status of the population, especially in the face of health emergencies that strongly pressure the medical system. Key messages • We propose a new approach to infer diagnostics from prescription data with several promising applications. • We propose a new approach to infer diagnostics from prescription data with several promising applications.

Impact of COVID-19 on Management, Quality and Satisfaction of Health Organizations

Abstract The hospital health care professionals are the frontline fighting COVID-19 considering they are responsible for all the care provided to patients during all the time they spend at the hospital for diagnosis, treatment or recovering of the COVID-19 disease and other diseases. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of COViD-19 at the hospital management level and, also, to understand how psychosocial environment, and satisfaction of Health Professionals were affected. A case study was performed in a Portuguese Hospital. Data were collected at one hospital under study at two different occasions: the first before the pandemic (November 2019) and the second almost two years after the pandemic started (November 2021). Regarding data collection, 37.0% of participants responded in the occasion 1 (n = 296) and 63.0% responded in the occasion 2 (n = 503). The instrument for the Assessment of Global Management of Health Organizations (AGMHO) Comparing timings pre and during pandemic COVID-19, it was found that the participants in the pre- COVID-19 era showed stronger organizational culture, higher quality of life, better psychosocial environment regarding content/leadership and higher job satisfaction when compared to the participants during pandemic COVID-19. On the other hand, participants in the second occasion were found to have higher psychosocial risks related to mental health when compared to participants in the pre- COVID-19 phase. The results obtained allow us to identify priorities in terms of promoting well-being and satisfaction of professionals and overall wellbeing of the health organization, namely intervention in leadership relationships and psychosocial risks at work related to the physical and psychological demands of work, stress management and a more active and involved role for the professional. Key messages • This knowledge facilitates labelling and prioritizing the promotion of well-being and satisfaction of professionals and overall wellbeing of the health organization. • The product is a comprehensive diagnostic model of the factors influencing the results in health organizations.

The Africa CDC Guidance for Strengthening NCDI-MH Surveillance Systems: The role of HIS assessments

Abstract Deaths due to NCDs, injuries and mental health conditions are expected to at least triple by 2063 in the region of the African Union. Population-based data for NCDI/MH and their determinants remain scarce in many AU MS; therefore, NCDI/MH surveillance is a flagship initiative in the Africa CDC NCDI/MH Strategy. In a survey conducted by Africa CDC and RKI in 2022 on the impact of COVID-19 on NCDI/MH in 10 AU MS, countries signaled the need for a continental guidance document. In 2023, Africa CDC and RKI performed desk reviews and facilitated peer-to-peer multi-country HIS assessment workshops, based on modified WHO and IANPHI tools. The first workshop took place in Zambia with experts from Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo/DRC, Kenya and Zambia. The second workshop was hosted in Ghana and included DRC, Ghana, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone. Participants came i.a. from ministries of health, national public health institutes or academia. The process included a virtual introductory meeting as well as half-day training sessions at the physical meeting for participants to familiarize themselves with the tools. Peer-to-peer assessment sessions took place on days 2 and 3. Day 4 was reserved for site visits to (public) health institutions of the hosting countries. On day 5, participants presented their findings to the plenary, which included high-level representations from host countries. The combined results from the survey, desk reviews and workshops informed the development of the continental Africa CDC Guidance for strengthening surveillance for NCDI/MH, launched at the 3rd Conference on Public Health in Africa. In four chapters, the Guidance covers recommendations on indicators, data sources and data types; surveillance system capacities; surveillance integration with existing systems; and data use. Implementation of the Guidance, including development of core health indicators, has been initiated by Africa CDC in 2024.

The impact of major infectious disease events and government relief packages on the film industry: evidence from Taiwan

This study focuses on the impact of COVID-19 on the film industry and the effectiveness of government relief policies. Taiwan was a region with a low level of infection at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), and the film industry could be maintained under government policies; therefore, this case study was conducted. Multiple regression models were used to explore the explanatory factors for movie box offices based on running size, production studios and countries, vacations, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis covered a period from September 30, 2019, to September 27, 2020, encompassing a 52-week sample of 5686 films. The results indicated that weekly box office receipts (number of tickets sold) experienced a steep decline of more than 50% despite the implementation of various relief measures. While the number of locally produced films screened diminished significantly, the number of theatres, films, and rerun films and their market share increased substantially. This suggests that although the quantity of films remained stable during the pandemic, their quality or novelty did not correspondingly improve. Key findings from the regression models included the following: (1) there is a size effect (number of theaters screening the film) on the box office; (2) box offices decrease with the number of weeks since the opening week, and films from well-known producers and major studios, as well as products from the US, Japan, and Taiwan, can have positive effects on the box office; (3) student vacations have had a positive effect; and (4) the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative effect.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lifestyle’s behaviours of school-aged children in Portugal

Abstract Background COVID-19 pandemic impacted children’s daily routines. Based on this, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition and Childhood Obesity in collaboration with WHO Regional Office for Europe coordinated the study about the impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle’s behaviours of school-age children in Europe, where 17 Member States participated, including Portugal. Methods Cross-sectional study was conducted within the sixth round of COSI Portugal, following a WHO common methodological protocol, during 2021-2022 school year. A national representative sample of families with children 6-8 years old were included and asked to report on variables comparing two periods: pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 5139 families participated. 11.4% reported a worsening of their perceived wealth and the percentage of fathers and mothers working full- or part-time decreased (74.6% to 68.7% and 70.6% to 59.6%, respectively) during pandemic. Children’s consumption of sweets (19.4%), savoury snacks (13.8%), fruit (11.9%) and vegetables (7.1%) increased, and sugary soft drinks (13.8%) decreased during pandemic. Family behaviours with the highest increases during pandemic were “eating together as a family” (35.4%), “cooking meals together with your child” (33.6%), “buying food in large quantities” (33.6%) and “eating home-cooked meals” (29.1%). Approximately, one in four parents reported children’s physical activity decreased and almost one in two reported an increase in recreational screen time. Parents who perceived their child as overweight during pandemic doubled (f7.9% to 14.6%). Children’s well-being behaviours that worsened more during pandemic were “having fun with friends” (44.3%), “got on well at school” (27.9%), “feel full of energy” (23.8%) and “feel fit and well” (22.2%). Conclusions These observations underscore the need to “build back better” post-pandemic with a focus on preventing and controlling childhood obesity and its determinants. Key messages • Portuguese children experienced negative impacts of the pandemic in their lifestyle behaviours, particularly on their physical health and well-being, with a report of a poorer socioeconomic situation. • This study and its findings give us a first-of-its-kind view into the physical and mental outcomes of the pandemic on school-aged children with a focus on the long-term, high-risk disease of obesity

Beyond Numbers: Investigating the Impact of COVID-19 on Suicide Rates in Austria

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals’ mental health faced substantial challenges. This study aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the pandemic’s impact on suicide rates in Austria, with a particular focus on variations by gender, region, and age. The study employs a regression discontinuity in time design and an interrupted time series analysis, utilising monthly death records from January 2015 to December 2021. To account for seasonal variations and potential underreporting of suicides, harmonic Fourier terms are incorporated into the analysis, and both suicides with intended self-harm and self-harm with undetermined intent are included. While existing research offers valuable insights into the impact of the pandemic on suicidal behaviour, it does not yet allow for specific conclusions to be drawn for Austria. In contrast to the methods typically employed in previous research on other countries, this approach enables a comprehensive examination of the temporal effects surrounding the implementation and lifting of pandemic-related measures. The study reveals a significant negative trend in Austria’s suicide rates before the start of the pandemic and more suicides than expected after its onset. In particular, the number of suicides among men aged 64-85 and women in the age groups 0-19, 20-34, and 65-84 was significantly higher than expected. Conversely, the data indicated a positive impact among women aged 35-64. This study contributes to understanding the impact of the pandemic on suicide rates in Austria. It demonstrates that, even within the same country, the impact can differ by gender, age, and region, thereby supporting the need for subgroup analysis. It also highlights that potential underreporting of suicides may result in an underestimation of the impact of the pandemic on suicides in previously conducted studies. Understanding these nuances is crucial for suicide prevention and informing policy decisions to improve health system resilience. Key messages • The study found higher than expected suicide rates in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially among men aged 64-85 and women aged 0-19, 20-34, and 65-84. • The underreporting of suicides may result in an underestimation of the impact of COVID-19 on suicides in previously conducted studies.

STI/HIV care in times of COVID-19 according to Dutch healthcare professionals: A mixed methods study

Abstract Background Surveillance data from the Netherlands show that STI/HIV testing decreased at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting barriers in access to STI/HIV care. However, the impact of the pandemic on STI/HIV care may be more complex, and key populations could be differentially affected. The aim of this study was to gain more insight into the impact of COVID-19 on STI/HIV care in the Netherlands from the perspective of STI/HIV care providers. Methods We investigated whether professionals in STI/HIV care experienced changes compared to pre-COVID in access to care, demand and provision of care, shifts online care, and quality of care. An online survey was completed by 192 STI/HIV care professionals. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were held with 23 STI/HIV care professionals. Results According to participants, specific subgroups of priority populations may have had difficulties accessing STI/HIV care during the pandemic especially during lockdowns and at public sexual health services. Professionals were concerned to have lost sight of subpopulations in vulnerable circumstances and that the pandemic may have magnified inequalities in access to STI/HIV care, which may be related to different levels of health and digital literacy required for telephone and video consultations. Furthermore, participants found online care provision was not up to standards and were concerned about follow-up care for patients using private online providers of remote tests. Conclusions Professionals experienced that COVID-19 measures may have compounded existing disparities. To minimize inequalities in access to STI/HIV care during a pandemic, it is recommended to prioritize services for people in vulnerable circumstances such as recent migrants and people with low health or digital literacy. More collaboration between and within sectors may help in better organizing healthcare and prevent overburdening of specific sectors. Key messages • According to STI/HIV care providers, the COVID-19 pandemic differentially impacted different STI/HIV care sectors, but also increased existing inequalities in access to care for vulnerable groups. • Professionals experienced that COVID-19 measures impacted the provision of STI/HIV care, access to care for vulnerable populations, and quality of care.

Vaccination in the post pandemic era - a qualitative study of the experiences of Somali immigrants

Abstract Background The Somali population is the largest non-European immigrant group in Norway and past studies have indicated lower coverage for both childhood vaccines and COVID-19. However, little is known about views and experiences of vaccination among this group and how their experiences might impact their vaccination decision-making process. This study explored views and experiences with vaccination among Somali immigrants in Norway. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants in the fall of 2022. To better understand the participants’ perceptions of vaccine information, the data was inductively analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Results Based on the thematic analysis, we focused on four sub themes: 1) the impact of COVID-19 on views of vaccines; 2) new versus old vaccines; 3) childhood vaccination; 4) trust in vaccines. The study found that the participants’ experiences during the pandemic have impacted their views on vaccination in general. Many of the participants expressed positive views and high levels of trust in the Norwegian health authorities and their vaccination recommendations. It was found that having sufficient information and trust in vaccination recommendations contributed to higher vaccine readiness. Viewing vaccines as new and insufficiently tested or researched, as well as lacking information about potential side-effects, increased participants’ hesitancy when faced with vaccination decisions. Among the parents in this study, postponing the measles-mumps-rubella-vaccine due to fear of autism was a common occurrence. Conclusions The current study fills an important gap in knowledge about views, experiences, and vaccination decisions among the Somali population in Norway. Knowledge from this study can help adapt better vaccine information and further improve the prevention of infectious diseases in Norway in general and for under-vaccinated groups in particular. Key messages • Having sufficient information and trust in vaccination recommendations contributed to higher vaccine readiness. • Viewing vaccines as new and insufficiently tested/researched, as well as lacking information about potential side-effects, increased participants’ vaccine hesitancy.

Impact of Covid19 on chronic respiratory diseases

Abstract Introduction This study was created to test the hypothesis that Covid19 pandemic may have influenced the increase in chronic respiratory diseases, particularly asthma, COPD, and mixed forms. This aspect does not seem to have been investigated previously in the literature. Methods The study population consisted of all residents in the province of Grosseto in the two study years (2019 and 2022) aged over 17 and under 90 (n. 368,326). For each of them, the presence of chronic lung disease (OUTCOME), Covid 19 positivity (between 2019 and 2022), age, sex, and Charlson index were reported in the database. To test the effect of the study variables on the identified outcomes (asthma, COPD, and mixed forms), a single-variable statistical analysis was conducted, followed by multiple logistic regression in which, in addition to the main variable, sex, age, and Charlson index were included to adjust the results, using STATA Vers. 17.0 Be-Basic Edition Results Multivariate statistical analyses showed that those who had COVID between 2019 and 2022 had a 75% higher risk of taking asthma therapy than those who did not (OR 1.75, p &amp;lt; 0. 001); all other variables were also significantly correlated with the outcome: fewer people were taking asthma therapy in the year 2022 than in 2019 (OR 0.89, p &amp;lt; 0.001); men had a lower risk (OR 0.79, p &amp;lt; 0.001); and those who had a higher CI had a higher risk (3.43, p &amp;lt; 0.001). In the study sample, 2.69% took asthma medication in the study years. Conclusions The Covid19 pandemic has had a significant impact on chronic respiratory diseases, especially asthma; patients with higher age and more comorbidities are more likely to develop asthma; males have a lower risk than females, and these data do not seem to have been analyzed in the scientific literature. Key messages • The Covid19 pandemic has had a significant impact on chronic respiratory diseases. • Patients with higher age and more comorbidities are more likely to develop asthma.