Impact Of Colostomy Research Articles

Adaptation of the Colostomy Impact Score for Use in the Turkish Population: A Validity and Reliability Study

Adaptation of the Colostomy Impact Score for Use in the Turkish Population: A Validity and Reliability Study

The Impact of Colostomy on Inpatient Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction The inpatient postoperative outcomes of patients with colostomies following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have not been well studied in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze how colostomy impacts the immediate postoperative outcomes of TKA. Our null hypothesis is that after correcting for common variables, a colostomy does not predispose patients undergoing TKA to surgical site infections (SSIs) and periprosthetic infections. Methods The National Inpatient Sample database was used to retrieve information on colostomy patients and patients without a colostomy who had undergone primary TKA from 2016 to 2019. Patients with colostomies were matched to a cohort of non-colostomy control groups in a 1:1 propensity score algorithm by age, sex, race, and pertinent comorbidities. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, length of hospital stay (LOS), total hospital charges, and inpatient complications were compared. Results Following propensity score matching, 399 patients with colostomies were compared to 385 patients without a colostomy (control). The colostomy group had a prolonged LOS (3.15 ± 2.67 vs 2.44 ± 3.15 days, p<0.001) compared to the control group. Also, the colostomy group had significantly higher incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) (6.02% vs 1.56%, odds ratio (OR): 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63-10.00, p<0.001), blood loss anemia (20.55% vs 13.25%, OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16-2.48, p=0.008), and blood transfusions (4.01% vs 0.26%, OR: 16.04, 95% CI: 2.12-121.56, p<0.001). There was no difference in periprosthetic infection, superficial SSI, or deep SSI. Conclusion Patients with colostomies face a notably higher risk of experiencing AKI, blood loss anemia, and blood transfusion requirements during the immediate postoperative period following primary TKA. Despite the perceived risk of postoperative infection in colostomy patients, this patient population is not at an increased risk of developing periprosthetic infection, superficial SSI, or deep SSI following TKA.

Surgery of the colon; the impact of colostomy and postoperative complications on patients' quality of life

Surgery of the colon; the impact of colostomy and postoperative complications on patients' quality of life

Many Patients Will Experience Stool and Bowel Movement-Related Symptoms After Treatment for Colorectal and Anal Cancer-A Descriptive Study

Purpose: Stool-related late complications have a major impact on patients’ quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate stool and bowel movements as late complications to colorectal and anal cancer treatment. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study from a single center using patient reported outcome measurements. We included patients who had surgery for colorectal and anal cancer from October 2019 to January 2022. This was supplemented by a subgroup of patients with late complications after chemo-radiation therapy for anal cancer. The study population comprised 293 patients. The main outcome included descriptive data on stool and bowel movement related complications. We used the Low Anterior Resection Symptom score (LARS), St Mark´s incontinence score, Bristol stool form scale, Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Score (PAC-SYM), colostomy impact factor and self-rated health on a visual analog scale as measurement tools. Results: The low anterior resection symptom score was median 36 (range 24-41) in patients with rectum cancer, for patients with anal cancer it was 39 (4-41), for patients with a right or left sided hemicolectomy it was 26 (4-41) and 25 (0-41), respectively. Conclusion: Patients who had surgery for rectum cancer had in 90% of the cases major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). Patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer would in about one third of the cases experience stool or bowel movement impairments. Patients with anal cancer who had chemo-radiation therapy experienced a very high degree of stool and bowel movement impairment.

Quality of Life and Financial Impacts of Permanent Colostomy for Rectal Cancer

Abstract Introduction Returning to work is an important cancer recovery milestone. Permanent colostomy can be required for rectal cancer treatment and can significantly impact well-being. We aimed to evaluate the impact of permanent colostomy on health-related quality of life and return to work in patients with rectal cancer. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study on 23 employed patients receiving curative surgery for rectal cancer requiring permanent colostomy. Demographic and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (the Colostomy Impact Score (CIS), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, and the EORTC QLQ-CR29) were posted to eligible patients. Results On average, patients (10 female, 13 male, mean age 61.8 years) were 5.0 ± 3.5 years post-surgery. At the time of questioning, 73.9% had returned to work (21.7% changed their type of work), while 17.4% never returned to work. Of those that returned to work, 11.8% returned within 1 month of surgery, while 23.5% had not returned after 12 months. Comparison of CIS between patients that returned to the same work (14.6 ± 0.93), changed their work (13.0 ± 0.74), and did not return to work (14.3 ± 2.3) revealed no significant differences (p = 0.36). CIS did not correlate with days worked on return, or time to return to work (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion Returning to work following rectal cancer treatment with permanent colostomy is challenging, with 17.4% never returning to work. Of those who returned to work, 23.5% required more than 12 months. This was not associated with CIS in our study.

Validation and adaptation of the Russian version colostomy impact score (CIS)

BACKGROUND: The number of people with intestinal stomas in Russia reaches 140 thousand people according to the registry of stoma patients. For any outcomes stoma on the anterior abdominal wall has an extremely negative effect on the body image and quality of life of this patient.AIM: Validation and cultural adaptation of the CIS questionnaire in the Russian Federation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The official translation of the CIS questionnaire was performed according to current WHO and EORTC guidelines. The study involved 209 patients from 9 centers (3 national and 6 regional) from different districts of Russia.RESULTS: The stoma impact on quality-of-life questionnaire showed an inverse negative relationship with the EORTC QLQ-C30 global quality of life scale, physical, role, emotional and social functioning (all p&lt;0,05).CONCLUSION: The CIS Questionnaire reliably identifies a group of patients with a significant impairment in the quality of life and can be used in Russia.

Surviving rectal cancer at the cost of a colostomy: global survey of long-term health-related quality of life in 10 countries.

Colorectal cancer management may require an ostomy formation; however, a stoma may negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to compare generic and stoma-specific HRQoL in patients with a permanent colostomy after rectal cancer across different countries. A cross-sectional cohorts of patients with a colostomy after rectal cancer in Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, China, Portugal, Australia, Lithuania, Egypt, and Israel were invited to complete questionnaires regarding demographic and socioeconomic factors along with the Colostomy Impact (CI) score, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and five anchor questions assessing colostomy impact on HRQoL. The background characteristics of the cohorts from each country were compared and generic HRQoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 presented for the total cohort. Results were compared with normative data of reference European populations. The predictors of reduced HRQoL were investigated by multivariable logistic regression, including demographic and socioeconomic factors and stoma-related problems. A total of 2557 patients were included. Response rates varied between 51-93 per cent. Mean time from stoma creation was 2.5-6.2 (range 1.1-39.2) years. A total of 25.8 per cent of patients reported that their colostomy impairs their HRQoL 'some'/'a lot'. This group had significantly unfavourable scores across all EORTC subscales compared with patients reporting 'no'/'a little' impaired HRQoL. Generic HRQoL differed significantly between countries, but resembled the HRQoL of reference populations. Multivariable logistic regression showed that stoma dysfunction, including high CI score (OR 3.32), financial burden from the stoma (OR 1.98), unemployment (OR 2.74), being single/widowed (OR 1.35) and young age (OR 1.01 per year) predicted reduced stoma-related HRQoL. Overall HRQoL is preserved in patients with a colostomy after rectal cancer, but a quarter of the patients interviewed reported impaired HRQoL. Differences among several countries were reported and socioeconomic factors correlated with reduced quality of life.

Life with a stoma across five European countries-a cross-sectional study on long-term rectal cancer survivors.

Stoma-related problems are known to be important to patients and potentially affect everyday life. The prevalence of stoma-related problems in rectal cancer survivors remains undetermined. This study aimed to examine aspects of life with a long-term stoma, stoma management, and stoma-related problems and explore the impact of stoma-related problems on daily life. In total, 2262 patients from 5 European countries completed a multidimensional survey. Stoma-related problems were assessed using the Colostomy Impact score. Multivariable regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, provided odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stoma-related problems' association with restrictions in daily life. The 2262 rectal cancer survivors completed the questionnaire at a median of 5.4years (interquartile range 3.8-7.6) after stoma formation. In the total sample, leakage (58%) and troublesome odour (55%) were most prevalent followed by skin problems (27%) and pain (21%). Stoma-related problems were more prevalent in patients with parastomal bulging. A total of 431 (19%) reported feeling restricted in daily activities in life with a stoma. Leakage, odour, skin problems, stool consistency, and frequent appliance changes were significantly associated with restrictions in daily life. The highest risk of experiencing restrictions was seen for patients having odour (OR 2.74 [95% CI: 1.99-3.78]) more than once a week and skin problems (OR 1.77 [95% CI: 1.38-2.27]). In this large cohort with rectal cancer, stoma-related problems were highly prevalent and impacted daily life. Supportive care strategies should entail outreach to patients with a long-term stoma.

Validation of the Chinese version of the colostomy impact score in rectal cancer patients with permanent colostomy.

To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the colostomy impact score (CIS) among patients with a permanent colostomy in China. A total of 218 patients completed the survey either in the clinic or remotely and mailed their responses. Reliability was estimated based on test-retest reliability. Validity was evaluated based on content validity, construct validity, and discriminative validity. The sensitivity and specificity of the score were analysed. The area under the curve was analysed by drawing the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve; the optimal cutoff point was calculated to assess the impact of a stoma on domestic patients. The test-retest reliability of the CIS was 0.967. The content validity was 0.98, and the construct and discriminative validities were good; sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve were 100, 48.53, and 0.806%, respectively. The optimal cutoff point for the Chinese version of the Colostomy Impact Score was 11.5. The Chinese version of the CIS indicated good reliability and validity, making it suitable for the evaluation of the impact of a permanent colostomy.

P-243 A prospective study to assess the impact of colostomy on psychosocial aspects of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients

Surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment for colorectal cancers. Despite significant advances in the detection and treatment of colorectal cancers, a significant number of patients require an intestinal stoma. This study was done to assess the impact of colostomy on psychosocial aspects of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients at the time of registration and 6 months after the commencement of treatment.

Translation and international validation of the Colostomy Impact score.

Optimal oncological resection in cancers of the lower rectum often requires a permanent colostomy. However, in some patients a colostomy may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Colostomy Impact (CI) score is a simple questionnaire that identifies patients with stoma dysfunction that impairs HRQoL by dividing patients into 'minor' and 'major' CI groups. This aim of this study is to evaluate construct and discriminative validity, sensitivity, specificity and reliability of the CI score internationally, making it applicable for screening and identification of patients with stoma-related impaired HRQoL. The CI score was translated in agreement with WHO recommendations. Cross-sectional cohorts of rectal cancer survivors with a colostomy in Australia, China, Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden were asked to complete the CI score, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life 30-item core questionnaire, the stoma-specific items of the EORTC quality of life 29-item colorectal-specific questionnaire and five anchor questions assessing the impact of colostomy on HRQoL. A total of 2470 patients participated (response rate 51%-93%). CI scores were significantly higher in patients reporting reduced HRQoL due to their colostomy than in patients reporting no reduction. Differences in EORTC scale scores between patients with minor and major CI were significant and clinically relevant. Sensitivity was high regarding dissatisfaction with a colostomy. Regarding evaluation of discriminative validity, the CI score relevantly identified groups with differences in HRQoL. The CI score proved reliable, with equal CI scores between test and retest and an intraclass correlation coefficient in the moderate to excellent range. The CI score is internationally valid and reliable. We encourage its use in clinical practice to identify patients with stoma dysfunction who require further attention.

Validation of the colostomy impact score in patients ostomized for a benign condition.

The colostomy impact (CI) score is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQL) due to a stoma. The score was originally developed and validated in a cohort of rectal cancer survivors with a permanent colostomy. For the CI score to be applied to patients with a colostomy after surgery for a benign condition it must be validated in this patient group. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and known groups validity of the CI score in patients with a colostomy after surgery for a benign condition. In a cross-sectional survey among ostomates in the Capital Region of Denmark, patients completed the CI score and the SF-36 v2 questionnaires. Construct validity was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficients and known groups validity was assessed by t-test when dividing patients into groups of minor or major CI. The CI score showed a moderate negative correlation with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of -0.41 and a weak negative correlation with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of -0.39. The strength of the correlation depended on the underlying condition leading to stoma formation. Differences were significant between the minor and major CI groups in mean PSC and MCS with t-values of 5.32 and 3.86, respectively. The CI score is a valid instrument for assessing stoma-related impact on HRQL regardless of the underlying condition leading to stoma formation, and the CI score discriminates meaningfully between groups with known differences in stoma-related reduced HRQL.

Impact of bowel and stoma dysfunction on female sexuality after treatment for rectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to measure the impact of bowel dysfunction and a poorly functioning stoma on the risk of sexual inactivity and sexual dysfunction in female patients. In a population-based cross-sectional study, Danish rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2014 were invited to answer a comprehensive questionnaire regarding cancer- and treatment-related late side effects after rectal cancer treatment. Bowel function was assessed using the Low Anterior Resection score and stoma function using the Colostomy Impact score. Female sexuality was measured by sexual activity, overall sexual dysfunction (the Rectal Cancer Female Sexuality score) and by different domains of sexual dysfunction (Sexual Vaginal Changes questionnaire). Eight-hundred and thirteen female patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 49.2%). Major bowel dysfunction did not significantly increase the risk of sexual inactivity (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.93-2.07) but clearly increased the risk of sexual dysfunction (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.67-5.51). The most distinct problems were dyspareunia and inability to complete intercourse. On the contrary, poor stoma function increased the risk sexual inactivity (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.16-4.40) but not the risk of sexual dysfunction (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.27-1.99). The most distinct problem was dissatisfaction with own physical appearance. Both bowel dysfunction and stoma dysfunction negatively, but differently, affect sexuality. After restorative surgery, bowel dysfunction was primarily associated with sexual dysfunction while poor stoma function after abdominoperineal excision was associated with sexual inactivity.

Chimney Trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundParastomal hernias (PSHs) are common, troubling the lives of people with permanent colostomy. In previous studies, retromuscular keyhole mesh placement has been the most-used technique for PSH prevention but results have been controversial. Additionally, surgical treatment of PSHs is associated with a high rate of complications and recurrences. Therefore, it is crucial to find the most effective way to prevent PSHs in the first place without an increased risk of complications. Due to a lack of adequate research, there is no clear evidence or recommendations on which mesh or technique is best to prevent PSHs.Methods/designThe Chimney Trial is a Nordic, prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter trial designed to compare the feasibility and the potential benefits of specifically designed, intra-abdominal onlay mesh (DynaMesh®-Parastomal, FEG Textiltechnik GmbH, Aachen, Germany) against controls with permanent colostomy without mesh.The primary outcome of the Chimney Trial is the incidence of a PSH detected by a computerized tomography (CT) scan at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are the rate of clinically detected PSHs, surgical-site infection as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification, the reoperation rate, operative time, length of stay, quality of life as measured by the RAND-36 survey and colostomy impact score, and both direct and indirect costs. For each group, 102 patients were enrolled at attending hospitals and randomized at a ratio of 1:1 by browser-based software to receive a preventive mesh or a conventional colostomy without a mesh. Patients will be followed for 1 month and at 1, 3, and 5 years after the operation for long-term results and complications.DiscussionThe Chimney Trial aims to provide level-I evidence on PSH prevention.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03799939. Registered on 10 January 2019

Patient and healthcare professional perceptions of colostomy-related problems and their impact on quality of life following rectal cancer surgery

BackgroundThe perception of colostomy‐related problems and their impact on health‐related quality of life (QoL) may differ between patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to investigate this using the Colostomy Impact Score (CIS) tool.MethodsHealthcare professionals including consultant colorectal surgeons, stoma nurses, ward nurses, trainees and medical students were recruited. An online survey was designed. From the 17 items used to develop the CIS, participants chose the seven factors they thought to confer the strongest negative impact on the QoL of patients with a colostomy. They were then asked to rank the 12 responses made by patients to the final seven factors contained in the CIS. Results were compared with the original patient rankings at the time of development of the CIS.ResultsA total of 156 healthcare professionals (50·4 per cent of the pooled professionals) from 17 countries completed the survey. Of the original seven items in the CIS, six were above the threshold for random selection. Ranking the responses, a poor match between participants and the original score was detected for 49·7 per cent of the professionals. The most under‐rated item originally present in the CIS was stool consistency, reported by 47 of the 156 professionals (30·1 per cent), whereas frequency of changing the stoma bag was the item not included in the CIS that was chosen most often by professionals (124, 79·5 per cent). Significant differences were not observed between different groups of professionals.ConclusionThe perspective of colostomy‐related problems differs between patients with a colostomy and healthcare professionals.

Impact psychologique de la stomie sur la qualité de vie des patients atteints d’un cancer colorectal : rôle de l’image du corps, l’estime de soi et l’anxiété

Surgery accounts for an important part of the therapeutic arsenal of colorectal cancer treatment. In digestive cancers, ostomy devices induce the loss of anal function and control. This medical appliance generates changes affecting all aspects of patients' lives. This study explores, on the one hand, the psychological impact of colostomy on colorectal cancer patients' quality of life and on the other hand, it analyzes the correlational links between body image, self-esteem and anxiety during the stoma. Thirty-five patients with colorectal cancer participated in the study, divided into 2 subgroups: 23 were carriers of a definitive stoma and the 12 others with a temporary stoma. All completed the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-C), the Body Image Scale (BIS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) and the Self Esteem Scale (ETES). Analysis revealed the quality of life of temporary ostomates is more affected than that of the definitive ones. All three of them, body image, self-esteem and anxiety negatively affect the quality of life regardless of the type of stoma. This study highlights the prevalence of physical self-esteem for temporary ostomy; the role of a good body image and substantial emotional self-esteem for the permanent ostomy. Future studies are required to explore the underlying causes of the acceptance of this equipment and the mediating role of care devices.

The impact of colostomy on the patient's life

PurposeTo evaluate the emotional, psychological, sexual, social, and professional impact, before and after surgery, on individuals submitted to a colostomy. MethodsThe study was carried out in two stages, with the participation of 15 individuals. First, we evaluated the emotional, psychic, sexual, social, and professional aspects of their lives, in the preoperative period of colostomy surgery. After that, the same aspects were evaluated six months after the surgery. This evaluation was based on the application of a questionnaire with 16 objective questions. ResultsOf the interviewees, 53.64% decreased their willingness to go out and do activities outside their homes, with a statistical significance of p=0.001. Regarding the environment, 53.85% of the interviewees showed a perception of worsening of the environment. About physical activity, 66.65% showed a difference in the performance of physical activity after colostomy, being statistically significant, with p=0.001. The sports environment did not change in 50% of the participants. Patient sexuality showed a significant decline with statistical significance (p=0.008). ConclusionThe impact that the colostomy generated on the patients’ lives, regarding the evaluated aspects, was perceptible, being of great importance the careful indication of this procedure to the patient.

The colostomy impact score: development and validation of a patient reported outcome measure for rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy. A population‐based study

The aim was to develop and validate a simple scoring system evaluating the impact of colostomy dysfunction on quality of life (QOL) in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer treatment. In this population-based study, 610 patients with a permanent colostomy after previous rectal cancer treatment during the period 2001-2007 completed two questionnaires: (i) the basic stoma questionnaire consisting of 22 items about stoma function with one anchor question addressing the overall stoma impact on QOL and (ii) the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30. Answers from half of the cohort were used to develop the score and subsequently validated on the remaining half. Logistic regression analyses identified and selected items for the score and multivariate analysis established the score value allocated to each item. The colostomy impact score includes seven items with a total range from 0 to 38 points. A score of ≥10 indicates major colostomy impact (Major CI). The score has a sensitivity of 85.7% for detecting patients with significant stoma impact on QOL. Using the EORTC QLQ scales, patients with Major CI experienced significant impairment in their QOL compared to the Minor CI group. This new scoring system appears valid for the assessment of the impact on QOL from having a permanent colostomy in a Danish rectal cancer population. It requires validation in non-Danish populations prior to its acceptance as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure for patients internationally.

The Effect of Colostomy and Ileostomy on Acts of Worship in the Islamic Faith.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of colostomy and ileostomy on Muslim patients' acts of worship. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study. The research setting was a stoma therapy unit of a 500-bed capacity training and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The study sample comprised 150 patients with colostomies (40.7%) or ileostomies (59.3%); their mean age was 51.6 ± 12.9 (mean ± standard deviation), more than half (60.7%) were men, and 84.7% were married. Participants were queried about specific religious practices following ostomy surgery including those related to salat, fasting, and pilgrimage. Data were collected using forms specifically designed for this study; respondents were interviewed either face-to-face or via telephone. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the influence of a fecal ostomy on specific religious activities. Participants reported decreasing the frequency of daily and Friday prayers (25.2% and 22.7%, respectively) or stopped practicing these activities all together (12.0% and 14.0%, respectively). Respondents tended to increase the frequency of acts of absolution while reducing acts of fasting. Perceptions of cleanliness, central to performance of salat within the Islamic faith, emerged as a central concern. Ostomy surgery influences multiple religious acts practiced by Muslims. Awareness of the potential impact of a fecal ostomy on religious acts within the Islamic faith, combined with specialized education about spiritual practices delivered by the WOC nurse or a knowledgeable resource person, is strongly recommended for all persons following ostomy surgery.

Nursing intervention influences on life quality of colostomy patients

Objective To discuss the quality of live of the patients with Miles operation for rectal cancer,minimize the negative impact of colostomy on their life by a series of nursing interventions. Methods 134 patients with Miles operation for rectal cancer were collected and experienced a series of nursing intervention, the WHO quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to evaluate the data, the difference of the patients with Miles operation and the patients with Dixon operation were compared. Results The total score of the patients with Dixon operation was (77.506 ± 17. 197), the total score of the patients with Miles operation was(76. 701 ± 15. 138).Both in total score, the field of physiology, psychology, social relationship, erwiornment and general health perception were no significant difference (P ＞ 0. 05). Conclusions The quality of life of patients with Miles operation and with Dixon operation was overall not high. But there was no significant difference between them.Many factors can affect the quality of life of patients with colostomy, so we should strengthen the nursing intervention and get support of society and families. Key words: Nursing intervention; Colostomy patients; Life quality