Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) have great potential in bone regenerative therapy. The main method used today to obtain BMMNCs is Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. However, the centrifugal force for this isolation method is still suboptimal. To determine the optimal centrifugal force in Ficoll density gradient centrifugation of bone marrow (BM) to achieve high stem/progenitor cell content BMMNCs for regenerative therapy. BM was aspirated from nine minipigs and divided into three groups according to different centrifugal forces (200g, 300g and 400g). Immediately after BMMNCs were obtained from each group by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, residual red blood cell (RBC) level, nucleated cell counting, viability and flow cytometric analyses of apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation were measured. The phenotypic CD90 and colony formation analyses of BMMNCs of each group were performed as well. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were harvested at passage 2, then morphology, cell phenotype, proliferation, adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic lineage differentiation potential of BMSCs from each group were compared. The 300g centrifugal force was able to isolate BMMNCs from BM with the same efficiency as 400g and provided significantly higher yields of CD90+ BMSCs and fibroblastic colony-forming units of BMSC (CFU-f(BMSC)), which is more crucial for the regenerative efficacy of BMMNCs. Meanwhile, 200g hosted the most RBC contamination and minimum CFU-f (BMSC) yield, which will be disadvantageous for BMMNC-based cell therapy. As for in vitro cultured BMSCs which were isolated from BMMNCs by different centrifugal forces, no significant differences were found on morphology, cell proliferation rate, phenotypic marker, adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential. 300g may be the optimal centrifugal force when using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation to isolate BMMNCs for bone regenerative therapy. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.