Rationale and ObjectivesThis study investigates the dose burden of photon-counting detector (PCD) lung CT with ultra-high-resolution (UHR) and standard mode using organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM). Materials and MethodsAn anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando phantom was scanned in UHR and standard mode with and without OBTCM on three dose levels (IQ 5, 20, 50). Effective radiation dose was determined by thermoluminescent dosimetry in 13 measurement sites and compared with the calculated effective dose derived from the dose-length product. Image quality was evaluated subjectively by six radiologists using an equidistant 7-point scale and objectively by means of modulation transfer function analysis. ResultsMeasured effective radiation exposure was lower in UHR and OBTCM studies than in standard mode (IQ 5: 0.34–0.36, IQ 20: 1.57–1.70, IQ 50: 3.76–3.99 mSv). Compared with the “calculated effective dose”, the radiation exposure measured with thermoluminescence dosimetry was 131–170% higher. Noise in UHR mode was rated lower than in standard (all p≤0.042) and OBTCM images (all p≤0.028) for all dose levels, while image sharpness was deemed highest for UHR protocols (all p≤0.042). The use of OBTCM had no significant effect on either dimension of subjective image quality (all p≥0.999). Modulation transfer function analysis confirmed the highest spatial frequency in UHR datasets (all p≤0.016). ConclusionIn PCD-CT of the lung, full field-of-view UHR imaging entails no dose disadvantage over standard mode despite superior image quality. OBTCM possesses moderate dose saving potential. Thermoluminescence dosimetry yielded considerably higher effective doses than those calculated from dose-length products.