IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Relationship between molecular genetic and clinical and morphological parameters in patients with stage I–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: to study the molecular genetic landscape of the Russian cohort of patients with stage I–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, to identify correlations between molecular genetic and clinical and morphological parameters of the tumor. Materials and methods: routine pathological examination and targeted sequencing of tumor material (and paired material of normal lung tissue) in 90 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. Collection of clinical information. Statistical processing of the obtained material using the SPSS Statistics 23.0 program, based on the collected database. Descriptive statistics methods were used to analyze the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Results: data were obtained on the frequency of occurrence of somatic mutations included in the study panel among patients of the Russian population, the correlation between clinical and morphological (stage, gender, age, histological subtype) and genetic parameters of the tumor was studied. Conclusion: An in-depth study of the genetic profile in patients with localized NSCLC using the Next generation sequencing (NGS) method allows us to determine the mutational landscape of this group of patients in more detail. More detailed, per-exon sequencing makes it possible to more accurately determine the clinical significance of the identified mutations, which improves diagnosis and makes subsequent treatment tactics more precise.

Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis

Treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging, with a multitude of treatment options available for Stage III patients. We hypothesized that Stage IIIA outcomes differ by treatment received. We performed a retrospective review of NSCLC patients ≥18 years old with Stage IIIA disease treated 1/1/2010-03/01/2022. Demographics, treatment received, treatment outcomes, and failure patterns were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to compare groups. Of 352 patients identified, 160 had Stage IIIA NSCLC with a median follow-up of 29.1 months. Patients had a median age of 63 years, 79 (49.4%) were male, and 137 (85.6%) were current/former smokers (with 30 median pack-years). Patients were treated as follows: 17 (11%) surgery alone (S), 91 (57%) definitive radiation ± chemotherapy (CRT), 52 (33%) neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (Neo). 6 (12%) of the Neo group received chemoimmunotherapy, and 21 (51%) of the 41 CRT patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Between the three groups, there were no significant differences in tumor size as measured by T-staging (p = 0.83) and baseline FEV1/FVC (p = 0.92). Median PFS was 33.5mo (95% CI 13.2-NA) for group S, 18.4mo (95% CI 12.7-42.2) for CRT, and 19.7mo (95% CI 13.9-NA) for Neo with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.72). Median OS was 33.5mo (95% CI 13.2-NA) for S, 48.7mo (95% CI 36.0-88.9) for CRT, and 50.9mo (95% CI 41.9-NA) for Neo with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.94). Among the 17 primary surgical patients, 11 (65%) experienced failure: 6 (35%) local, 5 (29%) regional, and 7 (41%) distant. Among the 91 CRT patients, 57 (63%) experienced failure: 40 (44%) local, 35 (38%) regional, and 28 (31%) distant. Among the 52 Neo patients, 26 (50%) experienced failure: 14 (27%) local, 15 (29%) regional, and 17 (33%) distant. There were no significant differences in rates of local failure (p = 0.26), regional failure (p = 0.59), distant failure (p = 0.79), or any failure (p = 0.41) among the three treatment groups. The most common locations for distant failure were pleural effusions (n = 15, 29%), CNS (n = 14, 27%), and bone (n = 11, 21%). In this single institution retrospective study, we find no significant differences in PFS, OS, and failure patterns between patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC treated with definitive (chemo)radiation and neoadjuvant therapy. Numeric improvement in PFS in surgery-only patients is consistent with expected patient selection of this group. Further work in the immunotherapy era is needed.

Clinical significance of DNA damage response mutations in stage I and stage IIIa NSCLC.

DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are essential to sustain genomic stability and play a critical role in cancer development and progression. Here, we investigated the profile of DDR gene mutations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their prognostic values. We first examined 74 DDR genes involved in seven DDR pathways and then focused on six specific genes: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK1, BARD1, and BRIP1. A total of 179 stage I and IIIa NSCLC patients who received curative resection in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and their corresponding samples were collected for DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry and survival analysis. A total of 167 eligible patients were finally analyzed. Mutation frequencies were 82% and 26.3% for the selected 74 genes and six genes, respectively. Mismatch repair (MMR) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) alterations were observed more frequently in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and smokers were more likely to develop the selected six DDR gene mutations than those who never smoked. Deleterious mutations in the six genes were independent prognostic indicators of significantly longer disease-free survival and overall survival. No association was found between DDR gene status and PD-L1 expression, CD8 positive lymphocyte and tumor-associated macrophage infiltration in tumor area. However, numbers of mutations were significantly increased among patients with DDR alterations. Deleterious mutations of these six genes were common in resected NSCLC and could serve as prognostic biomarkers.

Geographical Variation in Underlying Social Deprivation, Cardiovascular and Other Comorbidities in Patients with Potentially Curable Cancers in England: Results from a National Registry Dataset Analysis

AimsTo describe the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), multiple comorbidities and social deprivation in patients with a potentially curable cancer in 20 English Cancer Alliances. Materials and methodsThis National Registry Dataset Analysis used national cancer registry data and CVD databases to describe rates of CVD, comorbidities and social deprivation in patients diagnosed with a potentially curable malignancy (stage I–III breast cancer, stage I–III colon cancer, stage I–III rectal cancer, stage I–III prostate cancer, stage I–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage I–IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, stage I–IV Hodgkin lymphoma) between 2013 and 2018. Outcome measures included observation of CVD prevalence, other comorbidities (evaluated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index) and deprivation (using the Index of Multiple Deprivation) according to tumour site and allocation to Cancer Alliance. Patients were allocated to CVD prevalence tertiles (minimum: <33.3rd percentile; middle: 33.3rd to 66.6th percentile; maximum: >66.6th percentile). ResultsIn total, 634 240 patients with a potentially curable malignancy were eligible. The total CVD prevalence for all cancer sites varied between 13.4% (CVD n = 2058; 95% confidence interval 12.8, 13.9) and 19.6% (CVD n = 7818; 95% confidence interval 19.2, 20.0) between Cancer Alliances. CVD prevalence showed regional variation both for male (16–26%) and female patients (8–16%) towards higher CVD prevalence in northern Cancer Alliances. Similar variation was observed for social deprivation, with the proportion of cancer patients being identified as most deprived varying between 3.3% and 32.2%, depending on Cancer Alliance. The variation between Cancer Alliance for total comorbidities was much smaller. ConclusionSocial deprivation, CVD and other comorbidities in patients with a potentially curable malignancy in England show significant regional variations, which may partly contribute to differences observed in treatments and outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of Selected Patients with IIIA-N2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Upfront Surgical Resection.

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a diverse group that requires multimodality treatment. The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcomes for patients with IIIA-N2 disease. We conducted a retrospective review of cases with IIIA-N2 (T1-2N2) NSCLC who underwent upfront surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the impact of various variables on survival. A total of 475 patients were ultimately included. With a median follow-up time of 108 months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.2% and 27.7%, respectively. R0 resection was found to be associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared with R1/R2 resection (p=0.041 for PFS; p=0.015 for OS). Patients with single-station N2 disease demonstrated significantly better PFS and OS than those with multiple-station N2 disease (p<0.001 for PFS; p=0.002 for OS). Following surgical resection, adjuvant therapy was significantly correlated with prolonged PFS and OS compared with those patients without any treatment. However, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy (p=0.915 for PFS; p=0.287 for OS). Patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion had significantly improved OS compared with those with L858R (p=0.040). Our study shows promising long-term outcomes for selected patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, especially those with R0 resection and single-station N2. This study sheds light on the potential management and treatment options for this challenging population.

Impact of pathological nodal staging and tumour differentiation on survival and postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA Non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundTumour differentiation is an important index for adjuvant therapy in many cancers; however, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an exception. Furthermore, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial in patients with NSCLC with N0-1 and N2 disease. We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumour-related factors on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and distant control (DC) in patients with completely resected stage IIIA NSCLC. Materials and MethodsPatients with stage IIIA non-metastatic NSCLC who underwent complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (January 2007–December 2017). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with PORT. Survival and relapse outcomes were compared using log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score-matched pairs. ResultsIn total, 1,897 patients were included and stratified according to PORT use (PORT vs. non-PORT). After adjusting for covariates, PORT was not found to be associated with improved survival outcomes. In patients with poorly differentiated tumours and N2 disease, absolute benefits for OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76), CSS (aHR 0.80), and DC (aHR 0.74) were observed. Multivariable hazard models of propensity score-matched pN2 disease and poorly differentiated tumour subgroups also showed significant survival benefit with PORT treatment. ConclusionsPatients with poorly differentiated tumours and receiving PORT for pN2 disease showed a lower risk of distant recurrence and more favourable survival outcomes in stage IIIA NSCLC with R0 resection.

Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Chinese Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The benefit of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. To assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC. In this randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted at 2 hospitals in China, patients aged 18 to 70 years with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC were enrolled between April 7, 2020, and January 12, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of camrelizumab (200 mg) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, 130 mg/m2, and platinum [cisplatin, 75 mg/m2; carboplatin, area under the curve, 5; or nedaplatin, 100 mg/m2]) or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery after 4 to 6 weeks. The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary end points included the major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Disease-free survival (DFS, defined as the time from surgery to disease recurrence or death from any cause) was analyzed post hoc. Efficacy was assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis. Ninety-four Chinese patients were randomized, and 88 (93.6%; median age, 61 years [IQR, 54-65 years]; 74 men [84.1%]) received allocated neoadjuvant treatment (43 received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, and 45 received chemotherapy alone). Among these 88 patients, the pCR rate was 32.6% (14 of 43; 95% CI, 19.1%-48.5%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs 8.9% (4 of 45; 95% CI, 2.5%-21.2%) with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.35-22.37; P = .008). The MPR rates were 65.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-79.0%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 15.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-29.5%) with chemotherapy alone. The radiographic ORRs were 72.1% (95% CI, 56.3%-84.7%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 53.3% (95% CI, 37.9%-68.3%) with chemotherapy alone. With a median follow-up of 14.1 months (IQR, 9.2-20.9 months), the median EFS and DFS were not reached in either group. The most common neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were decreased white blood cell count (6 of 43 [14.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 2 of 45 [4.4%] in the chemotherapy group) and decreased neutrophil count (3 of 43 [7.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 5 of 45 [11.1%] in the chemotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths were reported. This randomized clinical trial found that among patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the pCR rate with manageable toxic effects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04338620.

The prognosis of clinical stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer in Taiwan.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. The treatment of stage IIIa remained the most controversial of all stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reported on the heterogenicity and current treatment strategies of stage IIIa NSCLC in Taiwan. This study is a retrospective analysis using data from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry between January 2010 and December 2018. 4232 patients with stage IIIa NSCLC were included. Based on cell type, the best 5-year OS (40.40%) occurred among adenocarcinoma victims. The heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best 5-year OS (47.62%), followed by T4N0 (39.82%), and the others. Patients who underwent operations had better 5-year OS (over 50%) than those who did not (less than 30%). Segmentectomy (75.28%) and lobectomy (54.06%) showed better 5-year OS than other surgical methods (less than 50%). In multivariable analysis, young age, female, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score, adenocarcinoma cell type, well differentiated, T1N2/T4N0 heterogenicity, treatment with operation, and segmentectomy/lobectomy/bilobectomy were significant factors. In conclusions, the heterogenicity of T1N2 had the best outcomes followed by T4N0. Patients received surgical treatment revealed much better outcomes than those did not. As always, multimodal therapies with individualized treatment tend to provide better survival outcomes.

Alectinib-induced rash unresponsive to desensitization: a case report and literature review

BackgroundSince the inception of targeted therapies in treating lung cancer, providers have had to be aware of a new host of side effects when selecting management options for patients. Although targeted therapies are creating increased hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), understanding their side effects presents a challenge for providers. Alectinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a targeted therapy used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer found to have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Alectinib is the focus of this case report and literature review as we seek to understand side effects providers may encounter when prescribing these therapies.Case presentationWe begin our report with the case of a 63-year-old Hispanic female with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer found to have the ALK genomic alteration. She was started on Alectinib, and on Day 11, she developed a severe maculopapular rash requiring hospitalization. After complete resolution, desensitization with Alectinib was attempted but unsuccessful.ConclusionsDespite the unsuccessful desensitization of this patient, it is important to report this rare side effect in order to better understand how providers can pursue management. Case reports such as this can aid providers in potentially preventing, treating, and rechallenging patients on targeted therapies in the future.

Shenyi Capsule Prolongs Postoperative Survival of Patients with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the postsurgical administration of Shenyi capsules on the outcome and overall survival of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Patients with stages I–IIIA NSCLC were randomized to Shenyi or placebo groups (treatment duration: 6 months) and followed up for 10 years. One-year, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates and survival times were calculated. Symptoms, quality of life, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome, and recurrence were evaluated. Results: A total of 361 patients (treatment group, n = 185; placebo group, n = 176) were randomized and followed up for 10 years. The two groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Among all 361 patients, the treatment group had significantly longer median survival (31 months, respectively) than the placebo group (22.3 months, P &lt; 0.01). In stage II or III patients, recurrence and metastasis rates in the treatment group were lower than those in the placebo group (P &lt; 0.05). The treatment group also had significantly longer 1-year and 2-year survival rates based on the full analysis set and per-protocol set; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year and 10-year survival rates (P &lt; 0.01 for all comparisons). Multivariate analysis of variance showed that the interaction between stage and age had a significant impact on overall survival (P &lt; 0.05). Compared with the placebo group, the treatment group showed a significant decrease in TCM syndrome (P &lt; 0.01) and a significant increase in the Karnofsky Performance Score (P &lt; 0.01) and body weight (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Adjunctive therapy with Shenyi capsules significantly prolonged the 1-year and 2-year survival rates after surgery and improved the quality of life. Moreover, none of the patients experienced severe adverse effects. These results suggest that Shenyi capsules may have clinical applications in treating patients with NSCLC.

Monitoring with circulating tumor cells in the perioperative setting of patients with surgically treated stages I-IIIA NSCLC.

Surgery is regarded as the treatment's cornerstone for early stage and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whenever the tumor is considered resectable. Liquid biopsy is one of the most promising research areas in oncology in the last 10 years, providing a useful non-invasive tool to detect and monitor cancer. The prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been studied in different cancer types and had been related with a higher risk of relapse and worse prognosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of CTC detection in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC treated with surgery. We conducted a prospective, single-center study of 180 consecutive patients with resected and pathological confirmed stage I to IIIA (TNM AJCC/UICC 8th edition) NSCLC. Patients' blood samples were processed and CTCs were characterized before and after the surgery. A cohort of patients had CTC determination after chemotherapy and surgery. Cut-off points were established in 1 and 5 CTCs for statistical analysis. A proportion of 76.7% had at least 1 CTC before the surgery, and 30.6% had 5 or more, while 55.9% had at least 1 CTC after surgery, and 8.3% had 5 or more. We found no correlation between preoperative CTC detection for a cut-off of 5 with neither overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.99, P=0.887], disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 0.95, P=0.39) nor relapse (32.7% vs. 28.8%, P=0.596). We also did not find a correlation between postoperative CTCs detection for a cut-off of 5 with either OS (HR: 1.01, P=0.808), DFS (HR: 0.95, P=0.952) or relapse (26.7% vs. 29.5%, P=0.83). The mean change in the number of CTCs over time between preoperative and postoperative samples was 2.13, with a standard deviation of 6.78. Despite the large cohort of patients included in this study, CTC monitoring in the perioperative setting was not correlated with relapse, DFS or OS in our study, and therefore cannot be recommended as a reliable biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) after surgery.

Safety and efficacy of two-drug combination in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and validation of the Charlson Index as a predictor of survival.

The best platinum-based chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined in elderly patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Predictive indexes for toxicity and survival are also needed to give the safest and most effective treatment for this population. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC NSCLC over 70 years of age, treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were included. Patients from two cancer centers treated between 12/2006 and 08/2019 were included in the data analysis. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 76.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.6-83.4]. Thirty-nine patients were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy and 19 with a sequential strategy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted in a combination of platinum and taxanes. At a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 7-69), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Male sex and a high Charlson index were identified as independent prognostic factors for worse OS. Acute grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 34.4% of patients, including 1 grade 5 toxicity, and grade 3-4 late toxicities occurred in 17.2% of patients. In the whole cohort a high Charlson index was the only predictive factor for a higher risk of grade 3-5 acute toxicities (statistical trend in the concurrent cohort, P=0.06). The Charlson index correlated with toxicity and survival in elderly patients treated with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. The addition of taxanes to platinum chemotherapy was safe in the present study and warrants further exploration.

Perioperative Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundApproximately 20% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive a diagnosis of stage III disease. There is no current consensus regarding the most appropriate treatment for these patients.MethodsIn this open-label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (experimental group) or chemotherapy alone (control group), followed by surgery. Patients in the experimental group who had R0 resections received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 6 months. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival at 24 months and safety.ResultsA total of 86 patients underwent randomization; 57 were assigned to the experimental group and 29 were assigned to the control group. A pathological complete response occurred in 37% of the patients in the experimental group and in 7% in the control group (relative risk, 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 21.23; P=0.02). Surgery was performed in 93% of the patients in the experimental group and in 69% in the control group (relative risk, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.74). Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival at 24 months were 67.2% in the experimental group and 40.9% in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88). Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival at 24 months were 85.0% in the experimental group and 63.6% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 11 patients in the experimental group (19%; some patients had events of both grades) and 3 patients in the control group (10%).ConclusionsIn patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, perioperative treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADIM II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03838159; EudraCT number, 2018-004515-45.)

Dosimetric comparison of four radiotherapy techniques for stage III non‑small cell lung cancer.

The present study was implemented to compare the dosimetric parameters of the target dose coverage and critical structures in the treatment planning of four radiotherapy techniques [namely, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hybrid IMRT (h-IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)] for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) qualified plans for medical physicists, therapists and physicians. A total of 40 patients confirmed to have stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled, and four plans were designed for each patient. The prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was assigned as 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI) and parameters of organs at risk (OARs) were calculated. For the PTV, the CI for VMAT was found to be the highest of all the four techniques (P<0.05), whereas the HI for the h-IMRT technique was found to be the lowest (P<0.05). Concerning the OARs, for the percentage of lung volume receiving a dose >5 Gy (lung V5), the highest value was obtained with VMAT (P<0.05), whereas for lung V30 and heart V30, the VMAT and IMRT techniques were found to be better compared with 3D-CRT and h-IMRT (P<0.05). For esophagus V50, the maximal dose (Dmax) and mean dose for the IMRT technique displayed the best results (P<0.05), and in the case of the spinal cord, the Dmax with VMAT showed a significant advantage over the other techniques (P<0.05). The treatment monitor units (MUs) in IMRT were found to be the largest (P<0.05), whereas the treatment time with VMAT was the shortest (P<0.05). For smaller PTVs, VMAT was the technique that provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing of the heart. Compared with 3D-CRT alone, adding 20% IMRT to the 3D-CRT base plan was shown to improve the plan quality, and IMRT and VMAT, as techniques, had better dose coverage and sparing of OARs. Furthermore, for patients in whom the lung V5 could be kept low enough, VMAT potentially offered a good alternative to the technique to IMRT, thereby offering additional possibilities for sparing of other OARs, and decreasing the MUs and treatment time.

Overall survival analysis from the ADAURA trial of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with resected EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) stage IB–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

LBA3 Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation, central nervous system (CNS) active EGFR-TKI, that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. In the primary analysis from the Phase III ADAURA study (NCT02511106), adjuvant osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful, statistically significant, and practice-changing disease-free survival (DFS) benefit vs placebo in patients with completely resected EGFRm (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC ± adjuvant chemotherapy. In an updated DFS analysis, with 2 years additional follow-up, DFS and CNS DFS benefit with adjuvant osimertinib were sustained (stage II–IIIA DFS hazard ratio [HR] 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18, 0.30; stage IB–IIIA DFS HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.21, 0.34; stage II–IIIA CNS DFS HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.14, 0.42), with a tolerable safety profile observed over the extended treatment duration. Here, we report the planned final overall survival (OS) analysis from ADAURA. Methods: Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years [≥20 in Japan and Taiwan], WHO PS 0/1 with completely resected EGFRm (ex19del/L858R) stage IB, II or IIIA [AJCC/UICC 7th edition] NSCLC; adjuvant chemotherapy allowed) were randomized 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily or placebo until disease recurrence, treatment completion (3 years), or a discontinuation criterion was met. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed DFS in stage II–IIIA. Key secondary endpoints: DFS in stage IB–IIIA, OS and safety. Data cut-off: January 27, 2023. Results: Globally, 682 patients were randomized; osimertinib n=339, placebo n=343. Adjuvant osimertinib significantly improved OS vs placebo. In patients with stage II–IIIA disease, OS HR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.33, 0.73; p=0.0004; 100/470 events, 21% maturity); 5-year OS rate was 85% with osimertinib vs 73% with placebo. Median follow-up for OS in stage II–IIIA was 59.9 months (osimertinib) and 56.2 months (placebo). In the overall population (stage IB–IIIA), OS HR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.34, 0.70; p&lt;0.0001; 124/682 events, 18% maturity); 5-year OS rate was 88% with osimertinib vs 78% with placebo, with a median follow-up for OS of 60.4 months (osimertinib) and 59.4 months (placebo). Median OS was not reached in either population or treatment group. Conclusions: Adjuvant osimertinib demonstrated an unprecedented, highly statistically significant and clinically meaningful OS benefit in patients with EGFRm stage IB–IIIA NSCLC after complete tumor resection, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. ADAURA is the first global Phase III study to demonstrate a statistically significant DFS and OS benefit with targeted treatment for patients with EGFRm stage IB–IIIA NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02511106 .

Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

BackgroundAmong patients with resected, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–mutated, stage IB to IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant osimertinib therapy, with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy, resulted in significantly longer disease-free survival than placebo in the ADAURA trial. We report the results of the planned final analysis of overall survival.MethodsIn this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo until disease recurrence was observed, the trial regimen was completed (3 years), or a discontinuation criterion was met. The primary end point was investigator-assessed disease-free survival among patients with stage II to IIIA disease. Secondary end points included disease-free survival among patients with stage IB to IIIA disease, overall survival, and safety.ResultsOf 682 patients who underwent randomization, 339 received osimertinib and 343 received placebo. Among patients with stage II to IIIA disease, the 5-year overall survival was 85% in the osimertinib group and 73% in the placebo group (overall hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95.03% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.73; P<0.001). In the overall population (patients with stage IB to IIIA disease), the 5-year overall survival was 88% in the osimertinib group and 78% in the placebo group (overall hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95.03% CI, 0.34 to 0.70; P<0.001). One new serious adverse event, pneumonia related to coronavirus disease 2019, was reported after the previously published data-cutoff date (the event was not considered by the investigator to be related to the trial regimen, and the patient fully recovered). Adjuvant osimertinib had a safety profile consistent with that in the primary analysis.ConclusionsAdjuvant osimertinib provided a significant overall survival benefit among patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutated, stage IB to IIIA NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02511106.)

Sociodemographic factors affecting survival in stage IIIA NSCLC treated with surgery-based treatment or definitive chemoradiation with immunotherapy consolidation: An NCDB analysis.

e18555 Background: Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease treated by surgery-based approach or definitive chemoradiation (CRT) and immunotherapy (ICI) consolidation. Studies have shown that black patients in general are diagnosed at advanced stages, are less likely to receive ICI, and have lower overall survival (OS) compared to whites. Importantly, ICI was shown to impart similar or even better OS among advanced-stage black NSCLC patients, compared to whites. Geographical location and socioeconomic status have also been shown to affect outcomes. There are no studies on sociodemographic factors affecting survival in stage IIIA NSCLC in the ICI era. Methods: We used National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify 23,110 patients with clinical stage IIIA NSCLC treated with either surgery-based approach or definitive CRT followed by ICI during 2017-2019, and surgery-based treatment or CRT during 2014-2016. We analyzed age, race, sex, insurance type, income, geographic location, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and education. Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were used to examine survival curves and descriptive analysis was performed to examine the characteristics of sociodemographic variables by the two treatment modalities. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with OS. Results: ICI maintenance improved the OS of all stage IIIA NSCLC patients after CRT during 2017-2019 compared to CRT only in 2014-2016. On multivariate analysis of surgical and CRT-ICI cohorts, blacks had slightly better OS compared to whites (HR, 95%CI, p-value) (0.89, 0.84-0.95, &lt; 0.001) but lower than other races including Asians (0.77, 0.69-0.87, &lt; 0.001). While there was no OS difference in the surgical arm (0.94, 0.83-1.07, p = 0.356) between black and white patients, better survival was seen in blacks in the CRT-ICI arm (0.88, 0.82-0.94, &lt; 0.001). No significant interaction between race and CRT-ICI was identified which indicates the benefit of CRT-ICI is independent of the race effect. Other factors associated with lower OS were older age with age &gt; 75 HR 1.00, ages 19-39 (0.47, 0.35-0.64) ages 40-64 (0.71, 0.67-0.75), ages 65-74 (0.79, 0.76-0.83), median quartile income &lt; $40,227 (1.07, 1.01-1.14), non-metro location (1.12, 1.07-1.17), non-academic facility (1.09, 1.05-1.14), and male sex (1.24, 1.20-1.29). Insurance status had no effect on OS. Conclusions: Our study indicates that there is no survival difference between white and black patients treated with surgery, but blacks had better survival when treated with CRT-ICI. Racial disparity in NSCLC survival depends on stage and access to care. Treatment modality, income, metro location, and access to an academic center are more significant predictors of survival than race. Interestingly, health insurance had no impact on OS.

Outcomes and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent curable surgery: a protocol for a real-world, retrospective, population-based and nationwide Chinese National Lung Cancer Cohort (CNLCC) study

IntroductionSurgery is one of the main approaches for the comprehensive treatment of early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study conducts a nationwide multicentre study to explore...

Efficacy of radiomics model based on the concept of gross tumor volume and clinical target volume in predicting occult lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.

This study aimed to establish a predictive model for occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with clinical stage I-A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on contrast-enhanced CT. A total of 598 patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC from different hospitals were randomized into the training and validation group. The "Radiomics" tool kit of AccuContour software was employed to extract the radiomics features of GTV and CTV from chest-enhanced CT arterial phase pictures. Then, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to reduce the number of variables and develop GTV, CTV, and GTV+CTV models for predicting occult lymph node metastasis (LNM). Eight optimal radiomics features related to occult LNM were finally identified. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the three models showed good predictive effects. The area under the curve (AUC) value of GTV, CTV, and GTV+CTV model in the training group was 0.845, 0.843, and 0.869, respectively. Similarly, the corresponding AUC values in the validation group were 0.821, 0.812, and 0.906. The combined GTV+CTV model exhibited a better predictive performance in the training and validation group by the Delong test (p<0.05). Moreover, the decision curve showed that the combined GTV+CTV predictive model was superior to the GTV or CTV model. The radiomics prediction models based on GTV and CTV can predict occult LNM in patients with clinical stage I-IIA NSCLC preoperatively, and the combined GTV+CTV model is the optimal strategy for clinical application.

Randomized phase II study of daily versus alternate-day administrations of S-1 for the elderly patients with completely resected pathological stage IA (tumor diameter > 2 cm)-IIIA of non-small cell lung cancer: Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 1201.

It is shown that the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was associated with survival benefit in an elderly population. We aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of alternate-day S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with completely resected pathological stage IA (tumor diameter > 2 cm) to IIIA (UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th edition) NSCLC. Elderly patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for one year consisting of either alternate-day oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 4 days a week (Arm A) or a daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 consecutive days followed by 7-day rest (Arm B). The primary endpoint was feasibility (treatment completion rate), which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed the allocated intervention for 6 months with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of 70% or more. We enrolled 101 patients in which 97 patients received S-1 treatment. The treatment completion rate at 6 months was 69.4% in Arm A and 64.6% in Arm B (p = 0.67). Treatment completion rate in Arm B tended to be lower compared to Arm A, as the treatment period becomes longer (at 9 and 12 months). RDI of S-1 at 12 months and completion of S-1 administration without dose reduction or postponement at 12 months was significantly better in Arm A than in Arm B (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively). Among adverse events, anorexia, skin symptoms and lacrimation of any grade were significantly more frequent in Arm B compared with Arm A (p = 0.0036, 0.023 and 0.031, respectively). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 56.9% and 65.7% for Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.22). The 5-year overall survival rates were 68.6% and 82.0% for Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.11). Although several adverse effects were less frequent in Arm A, both alternate-day and daily oral administrations of S-1 were demonstrated to be feasible in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC. Unique ID issued by UMIN: UMIN000007819 (Date of registration: Apr 25, 2012) https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009128. Trial ID issued by jRCT: jRCTs061180089 (Date of registration: Mar 22, 2019, for a shift toward a "specified clinical trial" based on Clinical Trials Act in Japan) https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs061180089.