Antitachycardia Pacing Research Articles

A Modular Communicative Leadless Pacing–Defibrillator System

BackgroundThe subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) is associated with fewer lead-related complications than a transvenous ICD; however, the subcutaneous ICD cannot provide bradycardia and antitachycardia pacing. Whether a modular pacing–defibrillator system comprising a leadless pacemaker in wireless communication with a subcutaneous ICD to provide antitachycardia and bradycardia pacing is safe remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a multinational, single-group study that enrolled patients at risk for sudden death from ventricular arrhythmias and followed them for 6 months after implantation of a modular pacemaker–defibrillator system. The safety end point was freedom from leadless pacemaker–related major complications, evaluated against a performance goal of 86%. The two primary performance end points were successful communication between the pacemaker and the ICD (performance goal, 88%) and a pacing threshold of up to 2.0 V at a 0.4-msec pulse width (performance goal, 80%).ResultsWe enrolled 293 patients, 162 of whom were in the 6-month end-point cohort and 151 of whom completed the 6-month follow-up period. The mean age of the patients was 60 years, 16.7% were women, and the mean (±SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.1±12.6%. The percentage of patients who were free from leadless pacemaker–related major complications was 97.5%, which exceeded the prespecified performance goal. Wireless-device communication was successful in 98.8% of communication tests, which exceeded the prespecified goal. Of 151 patients, 147 (97.4%) had pacing thresholds of 2.0 V or less, which exceeded the prespecified goal. The percentage of episodes of arrhythmia that were successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing was 61.3%, and there were no episodes for which antitachycardia pacing was not delivered owing to communication failure. Of 162 patients, 8 died (4.9%); none of the deaths were deemed to be related to arrhythmias or the implantation procedure.ConclusionsThe leadless pacemaker in wireless communication with a subcutaneous ICD exceeded performance goals for freedom from major complications related to the leadless pacemaker, for communication between the leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous ICD, and for the percentage of patients with a pacing threshold up to 2.0 V at a 0.4-msec pulse width at 6 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; MODULAR ATP ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04798768.)

Safety, efficacy, and reliability evaluation ofa novel small-diameter defibrillation lead: Global LEADR pivotal trial results

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter-defibrillators last longer, and interest in reliable leads with targeted lead placement is growing. The OmniaSecure defibrillation lead is a novel, small-diameter, catheter-delivered lead designed for targeted placement, based on the established SelectSecure SureScan MRI Model 3830 lumenless pacing lead platform. ObjectiveThis trial assessed safety and efficacy of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. MethodsThe worldwide LEADR pivotal clinical trial enrolled patients indicated for de novo implantation of a primary or secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, all of whom received the study lead. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation per protocol. The primary safety end point was freedom from study lead–related major complications at 6 months. The primary efficacy and safety objectives were met if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% credible interval was >88% and >90%, respectively. ResultsIn total, 643 patients successfully received the study lead, and 505 patients have completed 12-month follow-up. The lead was placed in the desired right ventricular location in 99.5% of patients. Defibrillation testing at implantation was completed in 119 patients, with success in 97.5%. The Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from study lead–related major complications was 97.1% at 6 and 12 months. The trial exceeded the primary efficacy and safety objective thresholds. There were zero study lead fractures and electrical performance was stable throughout the mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 4.8 months (mean ± SD). ConclusionThe OmniaSecure lead exceeded prespecified primary end point performance goals for safety and efficacy, demonstrating high defibrillation success and a low occurrence of lead-related major complications with zero lead fractures.

CONTINUOUS LEFT STELLATE GANGLION BLOCK DURING VT ABLATION TO SLOW VT AND IMPROVE ABLATION OUTCOME

Abstract Introduction Perioperative management of advanced patients with indication to ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is complex. A PAINESD score ≥ 15 was proposed to identify those who might benefit from pre–emptive mechanical cardiopulmonary support (MCS). We present a case successfully managed with continuous percutaneous left stellate ganglion block (C–PLSGB). Case A 71–year–old diabetic man with severe post–ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 24%, NYHA Class III) and chronic pulmonary disease was admitted for electrical storm with multiple ICD shocks due to poorly tolerated monomorphic VT (MMVT) at 176 bpm resistant to anti–tachycardia pacing (ATP), despite ongoing chronic oral therapy with amiodarone and carvedilol. Poorly tolerated and ATP–resistant MMVTs at 170–180 bpm recurred despite intravenous (iv) amiodarone and lidocaine (20 mcg/kg/min) and oral propranolol. Ultrasound guided C–PLSGB was therefore started; lidocaine was chosen for the continuous infusion due to the short half–life, at the initial dose of 10 mg/h; 6 hours later, his poorly tolerated MMVT recurred at 167 bpm. Therefore, at first we increased iv lidocaine to 30 mcg/kg/min, without benefit, then we increased C–PLSGB at 37.5 mg/h and decreased iv lidocaine to 20 mcg/kg/min due to neurological symptoms. With this regimen, the patient stayed VT free for 2 hours, then the clinical VT recurred at 130 bpm, with good hemodynamic tolerability and ATP–response. C–PLSGB infusion was than increased to 75 mg/h, with no more VT. Endocardial VT ablation was planned. Despite a very high PAINESD score (31) we decided to avoid pre–emptive MCS. We stopped lidocaine (both iv and as C–PLSGB) 2 hours before ablation. As soon as the patient came in the EP room (before instrumentation), the clinical MMVT recurred at 133 bpm. C–PLSGB was then resumed (initially at 100 mg/h for 30 minutes, then at 37.5 mg/h). The MMVT then spontaneously recurred at 133 bpm: it was mapped and ablated in the medio–apical anterior wall, with acute VT interruption. A second VT morphology then appeared, that was mapped and ablated at a more basal site, despite a partial epicardial component of the circuit was identified. C–PLSGB was then stopped and no more VT occurred nor were induced 1 hour later. At 8 months the patient is still alive with no more VT. Conclusion C–PLSGB with individually tailored infusion rates could be used during VT ablation as a mean to reduce VT cycle length and allow for mapping without MCS.

VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER–DEFIBRILLATOR BEFORE AND AFTER THE TREATMENT WITH SODIUM–GLUCOSE CO–TRANSPORTER 2 INHIBITORS

Abstract Background Role of sodium–glucose co–transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of chronic heart failure is increasing. However, some case series described appropriate shocks from ICD in patients following the initiations of SGLT2i and a larger analysis is not present in the literature. Methods The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of ventricular arrhythmic burden and appropriate anti–tachycardia therapy from ICD before and after the initiation of SGLT2i therapy. A retrospective single–center analysis was performed, comparing ventricular events from home monitoring reports 3 months before and 3 months after SGLT2i therapy treatment. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled in the study. The baseline clinical e therapy characteristics of patients are shown in the table. Ten patients (59%) had mono cameral or dual cameral ICD and 7 had implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators.During the 3 months before SGLT2i treatment, 4/17 patients had nun–sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) vs 8/17 (23% vs 47%, P value 0.23) patients with NSTV after the treatment. Seven patients (41%) had an increase in the rate of NSVT events (with a patient with 28 NSVT after treatment vs 0 before treatment). No patients had anti–tachycardia therapy in the 3 months before treatment, while during the 3 months after the SGLT2i treatment, 1 patient had a ventricular tachycardia treated with anti–tachycardia pacing (110 days after the beginning of the treatment) and 2 patients had a ventricular tachycardia treated with appropriate shock (2 and 25 days after the beginning of SGLT2i treatment). Conclusion This small retrospective analysis showed an increase in ventricular arrhythmic events in the 3 months after the initiation of SGLT2i. These data prospect the need for a larger analysis for a stronger statistical correlation.

When the dual-chamber pacing system is the optimal choice for Brugada patients in need of implantable cardiac defibrillator.

Abstract This letter discusses key points from Esposito et al.'s case report on a Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patient treated with S-ICD and later TV-ICD due to recurrent syncope. It highlights the significance of asystole in BrS-related. Additionally, it recommends dual-chamber TV-ICD systems with CLS algorithms for optimal management, citing their efficacy in reducing syncopal recurrences. Finally, it underscores the importance of considering reflex bradyarrhythmias in device selection for BrS patients at increased sudden cardiac death risk.

A CATASTROPHIC COMPLICATION OF A CHEST TRAUMA: A CASE REPORT

Abstract A 43 year old patient came to the Emergency Department of our hospital for a cardiology visit. The EKG revealed polymorfic ventricular tachycardia with a heart rate of 160 bpm so that he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. In 2005, he had a post traumatic myocardial infarction after a car accident treated with the implantation of one drug eluted stent on the descending artery. Three years later, a single–chamber ICD was placed. On admission in Intensive Care Unit, cardiac auscultation revealed normal heart sounds without murmurs. No lower extremity edema was observed. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed general hypokinesis with reduced global left ventricle systolic function and no pericardial effusion (EF=20%). The patient was haemodynamically stable, the blood pressure was of 130/80 mmHg. The device was also interrogated and it showed six ineffective attempts of antitachycardia pacing. After that, the patient was given an effective intracavitary shock. Moreover, the patient underwent coronary angiography which showed no disease progression and patency of the stent previously implanted on the proximal descending artery. The electrophysiological study was performed and subsequently 3 ventricular ectopic focuses were effectively ablated. Multiple DC shocks were delivered during the procedure and the atrioventricular bundle was damaged. In consideration of the clinical features and the left ventricular reduced ejection fraction, an indication to the implantation of CRT–D was given. Conclusions This case report describes a rare complication of a blunt chest trauma. A young patient with no significant past medical history suffered a dissection of the coronary descending artery resulting in ST–elevation myocardial infarction. The mechanism of coronary occlusion following blunt chest injury may be due to: shear force applied to the coronary arteries leading to intraluminal thrombosis; vascular rupture; embolism to the coronary arteries; fissuring of an atherosclerotic plaque with dislodgment of plaque material; vascular spasm at the site of the injury. Anyway, severe left ventricular dysfunction caused the developing of polymorfic ventricular tachycardia which was unresponsive to medical treatment and was treated with ablation.

Perioperative management and outcomes in patients receiving low-dose rivaroxaban and/or aspirin: a subanalysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial

BackgroundNo study has investigated the perioperative management and clinical outcomes in patients who are receiving rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81 to 100 mg daily. ObjectiveTo assess perioperative management and outcomes in patients who are receiving low-dose rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice-daily, and low-dose ASA, 81 to 100 mg daily. To assess perioperative management and outcomes in patients who are receiving low-dose rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice-daily, and low-dose ASA, 81 to 100 mg daily. MethodsSubanalysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial was performed to assess perioperative management and clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary or peripheral artery disease who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day plus ASA 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day, or ASA 100 mg daily. Patients studied required a surgery/procedure during the trial. The study outcomes, which included myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, acute limb ischemia, bleeding, and death, were assessed according to treatment allocation. ResultsThere were 2632 patients studied (mean age, 68 years; 80% male) who had a surgery/procedure, comprising percutaneous coronary interventions (∼43%), carotid or other arterial angioplasty (∼15%), pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation (∼9%), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (∼7%). Perioperative study drug management varied, with about one-third of patients not interrupting study drug and the remainder interrupting it between 1 and ≥10 days preprocedure. The incidences of adverse outcomes across treatment groups were 12.7% to 15.3% for myocardial ischemia, 0.8% to 1.2% for stroke, 0.1% to 0.2% for venous thromboembolism, and 3.1% to 4.2% for any bleeding. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome rates across treatment groups. ConclusionIn patients in the COMPASS trial who required a surgery/procedure, there was no significant difference in perioperative adverse outcomes whether patients were receiving rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day and ASA 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day, or ASA alone.

Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice.

The implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and defibrillators, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years and has been accompanied by a significant rise in cardiac device infections (CDIs), which pose a substantial clinical and economic burden. CDIs are associated with hospitalizations and prolonged antibiotic therapy and often necessitate device removal, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Approximately 1-2% of CIED implants are associated with infections, making this a critical issue to address. In this contemporary review, we discuss the burden of CDIs with their risk factors, healthcare costs, prevention strategies, and clinical management.

Active Arrhythmia Pattern: A Novel Predictor of ICD Shocks-A Subanalysis From the PARTITA Study.

In the PARTITA trial (Does Timing of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Affect Prognosis in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?), antitachycardia pacing (ATP) predicted the occurrence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after the first shock reduced the risk of death or worsening heart failure. A threshold of ATPs that might warrant an ablation procedure before ICD shocks is unknown. Our aim was to identify a threshold of ATPs and clinical features that predict the occurrence of shocks and cardiovascular events. We analyzed data from 517 patients in phase A of the PARTITA study. We used classification and regression tree analysis to develop and test a risk stratification model based on arrhythmia patterns and clinical data to predict ICD shocks. Secondary end points were worsening heart failure and cardiovascular hospitalization. Classification and regression tree classified patients into 6 leaves by increasing shock probability. Patients treated with ≥5 ATPs in 6 months (active arrhythmia pattern) had the highest risk of ICD shocks (93% and 86%, training and testing samples, respectively). Patients without ATPs had the lowest (1% and 2%). Other predictors included left ventricle ejection fraction<35%, age of <60 years, and obesity. Survival analysis revealed a higher risk of worsening heart failure (hazard ratio, 5.45 [95% CI, 1.62-18.4]; P=0.006) and cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 7.29 [95% CI, 3.66-14.5]; P<0.001) for patients with an active arrhythmia pattern compared with those without ATPs. Patients with an active arrhythmia pattern (≥5 ATPs in 6 months) are associated with an increased risk of ICD shocks, as well as heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. These data suggest that additional treatments may be helpful to this high-risk group as a preventive strategy to reduce the incidence of major events. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefits of early ventricular tachycardia ablation in this setting.

Long-term clinical course of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: A more than 10-year follow-up cohort study

ABSTRACT Background: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited disorder characterized by ventricular arrhythmias induced by physical or emotional stress. Currently, there are limited data available on the long-term prognosis of CPVT. Methods and Results: In this study, which included both retrospective and prospective components, 12 patients with CPVT (7 males and 5 females) under 18 years old were enrolled to gather and evaluate demographic, clinical, and genetic data. The mean age at diagnosis onset was 7.0 ± 3.1 years. All patients experienced syncope. The mean follow-up duration was 20.1 years. During the follow-up period, all patients experienced at least one episode of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Despite beta-blocker therapy, nine patients experienced syncope (75%), and four patients were noncompliant with their treatment. An implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation was performed in 10 patients (83%), and among those 5 (50%) experienced appropriate shocks. Inappropriate shocks were observed in all patients with an ICD. The left cardiac sympathetic denervation was performed in 6 patients (50%). One patient died during the follow-up period. Genetic testing was performed in eight patients, five of whom had RYR2 mutations, one patient had mutations in CASQ2, one in TECRL, and one was gene-elusive. Conclusions: The prevalence of cardiac events, even after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy, was found to be distressingly high during long-term follow-up. SVT, such as atrial fibrillation, were found to be more common than previously thought. Combination therapy with a beta-blocker and an IC antiarrhythmic drug shows promise. An individualized approach to the selection of treatment strategies is essential.

Clinical impact of remote heart failure management using the multiparameter ICD HeartLogic alert

Introduction and objectivesThe multiparametric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator HeartLogic index has proven to be a sensitive and timely predictor of impending heart failure (HF) decompensation. We evaluated the impact of a standardized follow-up protocol implemented by nursing staff and based on remote management of alerts. MethodsThe algorithm was activated in HF patients at 19 Spanish centers. Transmitted data were analyzed remotely, and patients were contacted by telephone if alerts were issued. Clinical actions were implemented remotely or through outpatient visits. The primary endpoint consisted of HF hospitalizations or death. Secondary endpoints were HF outpatient visits. We compared the 12-month periods before and after the adoption of the protocol. ResultsWe analyzed 392 patients (aged 69±10 years, 76% male, 50% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (20%) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (80%). The primary endpoint occurred 151 times in 86 (22%) patients during the 12 months before the adoption of the protocol, and 69 times in 45 (11%) patients (P<.001) during the 12 months after its adoption. The mean number of hospitalizations per patient was 0.39±0.89 pre- and 0.18±0.57 postadoption (P<.001). There were 185 outpatient visits for HF in 96 (24%) patients before adoption and 64 in 48 (12%) patients after adoption (P<.001). The mean number of visits per patient was 0.47±1.11 pre- and 0.16±0.51 postadoption (P<.001). ConclusionsA standardized follow-up protocol based on remote management of HeartLogic alerts enabled effective remote management of HF patients. After its adoption, we observed a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and outpatient visits.

The axillary vein puncture for implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation: 14 years of experience. Analysis of the results

BackgroundAxillary vein puncture (AVP) is a valid alternative to Subclavan vein puncture for leads insertion in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, that may reduce acute and delayed complications. Very few data are available about ICD recipients.A simplified AVP technique is described. MethodsAll the patients who consecutively underwent “de novo” ICD implantation, from March 2006 to December 2020 at the University of Verona, were considered.Leads insertion was routinely performed through an AVP, according to a simplified technique. Outcome and complications have been retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe study population consisted of 1711 consecutive patients. Out of 1711 patients, 38 (2.2%) were excluded because they were implanted with Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead.Out of 1673 ICD implantations, 963 (57.6%) were ICD plus cardiac resynchronization therapy, 434 (25.9%) were dual-chamber defibrillators, and 276 (16.5%) were single-chamber defibrillators, for a total of 3879 implanted leads. The AVP success rate was 99.4%. Acute complications occurred in 7/1673 (0.42%) patients. Lead failure (LF) occurred in 20/1673 (1.19%) patients. Comparing the group of patients with lead failure with the group without LF, the presence of three leads inside the vein was significantly associated with LF, and the multivariate analysis confirmed three leads in place as an independent predictor of LF. ConclusionAVP, according to our simplified technique, is safe, effective, has a high success rate, and a very low complication rate. The incidence of LF was exceptionally low.The advantages of AVP are maintained over time in a population of ICD recipients.

Characteristics of successful termination of atrial fibrillation by atrial antitachycardia pacing in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often found in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Second-generation atrial antitachycardia pacing (A-ATP) is effective in managing AF in patients implanted with CIEDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-ATP in patients implanted with CIEDs. This was a single-center retrospective study involving 91 patients (male 46 patients, mean age 74 ± 9years) implanted with Reactive A-ATP equipped devices (84 patients with pacemakers, 6 with ICDs, and 1 with a CRT-D). The AF burden, rate of AF termination, and details of the activation of the A-ATP were analyzed in each patient. During a mean follow-up period of 21 ± 13months, A-ATP was activated in 45 of 91 patients (49.5%). No patients had adverse events. Although the efficacy of the A-ATP varied among the patients, the median rate of AF termination was 44%. In comparison to the A-ATP start time, "0min" had a higher AF termination rate by the A-ATP (39.4% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.011). The rate of termination by the A-ATP was high for AF with a long cycle length and a relatively regular rhythm. A-ATP successfully terminated AF episodes in some patients implanted with CIEDs. The optimal settings of the A-ATP will be determined in future studies.

Predicting postinfarct ventricular tachycardia by integrating cardiac MRI and advanced computational reentrant pathway analysis

BackgroundImplantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation can protect against sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. However, improved risk stratification for device requirement is still needed. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to improve assessment of postinfarct ventricular electropathology and prediction of appropriate ICD therapy by combining late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and advanced computational modeling. MethodsADAS 3D LV (ADAS LV Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and custom-made software were used to generate 3-dimensional patient-specific ventricular models in a prospective cohort of patients with a myocardial infarction (N = 40) having undergone LGE imaging before ICD implantation. Corridor metrics and 3-dimensional surface features were computed from LGE images. The Virtual Induction and Treatment of Arrhythmias (VITA) framework was applied to patient-specific models to comprehensively probe the vulnerability of the scar substrate to sustaining reentrant circuits. Imaging and VITA metrics, related to the numbers of induced ventricular tachycardias and their corresponding round trip times (RTTs), were compared with ICD therapy during follow-up. ResultsPatients with an event (n = 17) had a larger interface between healthy myocardium and scar and higher VITA metrics. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant independent association with an event: interface (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44–5.44; P < .01), unique ventricular tachycardias (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.04–2.68; P = .03), mean RTT (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.11–4.12; P = .02), and maximum RTT (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.19–3.81; P = .01). ConclusionA detailed quantitative analysis of LGE-based scar maps, combined with advanced computational modeling, can accurately predict ICD therapy and could facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction.

A randomized clinical trial of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for suppression of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 trial

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized.All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques.The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction.Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02830360

Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia in a patient with Fabry disease

BackgroundBundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia is a unique type of VT that employs both bundles and the ventricular septum as integral components of a re-entrant circuit. It is usually observed in dilated cardiomyopathy, and its circuit depends exclusively on the specialized conduction system.Case presentationA 67-year-old man with a history of Fabry disease, and atrial fibrillation ablation, was admitted for a wide QRS tachycardia at 150 bpm, with an LBBB. Pharmacological therapy failed to stop the arrhythmia. Intracardiac recordings confirm the diagnosis. His Bundle recordings are essential, and Atrioventricular (AV) dissociation is typically present. The method used to induce left BBRVT is right ventricle apex stimulation. An electrophysiological study showed an AV dissociation a long HV sequence and a similar QRS morphology between VT and sinus rhythm. An overdrive stopped it. The same arrhythmia reappears and is restored to sinus rhythm by electrical cardioversion. We decided to implant an Implantable Cardiac defibrillator (ICD) with a backup pacing for secondary prevention and to ablate the right bundle branch.ConclusionBBRVT is a rare entity that is underreported. Pharmacological therapy is usually inefficient. An ICD is recommended for secondary prevention and can provide backup pacing, frequently required after catheter ablation to prevent the development of AV block or an excessive prolonged HV interval. Catheter ablation of the bundle branch is the first-line therapy.

Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up.

Patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). We retrospectively compared transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) and intermuscularly implanted subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) associated infections and complication rates together with hospitalizations in recipients with stage 4 kidney disease. We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients from six German centers with stage 4 CKD who received either a prophylactic TV-ICD with a single right ventricular lead, 49 patients, or a S-ICD, 21 patients. Follow-Ups (FU) were performed bi-annually. The TV-ICD patients were significantly older. This group had more patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias and more were prescribed anti-arrhythmic medication compared with the S-ICD group. There were no significant differences for other baseline characteristics. The median and interquartile range of FU durations were 55.2 (57.6-69.3) months. During FU, patients with a TV-ICD system experienced significantly more device associated infections (n = 8, 16.3% vs. n = 0; p < 0.05), device-associated complications (n = 13, 26.5% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05) and device associated hospitalizations (n = 10, 20.4% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05). In this long-term FU of patients with stage 4 CKD and an indication for a prophylactic ICD, the S-ICD was associated with significantly fewer device associated infections, complications and hospitalizations compared with TV-ICDs.

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Background: In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention, sex differences may exist in clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate sex differences in appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate and inappropriate shock, and all-cause mortality in this patient population. Methods: A total of 257 patients who received an ICD for a secondary prevention indication in the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively included in a consecutive manner. Appropriate ICD therapy, comprising shock and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), was the primary outcome. Results: The patient population included 257 patients, of whom 45 (18%) were women and 212 (82%) were men. The median of the age was 64 (interquartile range (IQR) 53-72) years. During follow-up (median duration 6.2 (IQR 4.8-7.8) years), first appropriate device therapy took place in 10 (22%) patients for women and 85 (40%) patients for men. Female sex was negatively associated with the rate of appropriate ICD therapy, univariably (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.93]; p = 0.030) and multivariably (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.95]; p = 0.036). Conclusions: Women with secondary prevention ICDs were less likely than men to receive appropriate ICD therapy.

The point on the treatment of arrhythmic storm.

Arrhythmic storm is a clinical emergency associated with high mortality, which requires multi-disciplinary management. Reprogramming of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) aimed at reducing shocks, adrenergic blockade using beta-blockers, sedation/anxiolysis, and blockade of the stellate ganglion represent the first simple and effective manoeuvres, but further suppression of arrhythmias with antiarrhythmics is often required. A low-risk patient (e.g. monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, functioning ICD, and haemodynamically stable) should be managed with a beta-blocker (possibly non-selective) plus amiodarone, in addition to sedation with a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine; in patients at greater risk (high burden and haemodynamic instability), autonomic modulation with blockade of the stellate ganglion and the addition of a second antiarrhythmic (lidocaine) should be considered. In patients refractory to these measures, with advanced heart failure, general anaesthesia with intubation and the establishment of a haemodynamic circulatory support should be considered. Ablation, performed early, appears to be superior in terms of mortality and reduction of future shocks compared with titration of antiarrhythmics.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices and bloodstream infections: management and outcomes.

Bloodstream infection (BSI) of any cause may lead to device infection in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) patients. Aiming for a better understanding of the diagnostic approach, treatment, and outcome, patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator (CRT-D) hospitalized with BSI were investigated. This is a single-centre, retrospective, cohort analysis including consecutive ICD/CRT-D patients implanted between 2012 and 2021. These patients were screened against a list of all hospitalized patients having positive blood cultures consistent with diagnosed infection in any department of a local public hospital. The total cohort consisted of 515 patients. Over a median follow-up of 59 months (interquartile range 31-87 months), there were 47 BSI episodes in 36 patients. The majority of patients with BSI (92%) was admitted to non-cardiology units, and in 25 episodes (53%), no cardiac imaging was performed. Nearly all patients (85%) were treated with short-term antibiotics, whereas chronic antibiotic suppression therapy (n = 4) and system extraction (n = 3) were less frequent. Patients with BSI had a nearly seven-fold higher rate (hazard ratio 6.7, 95% confidence interval 3.9-11.2; P < .001) of all-cause mortality. Diagnostic workup of defibrillator patients with BSI admitted to a non-cardiology unit is often insufficient to characterize lead-related endocarditis. The high mortality rate in these patients with BSI may relate to underdiagnosis and consequently late/absence of system removal. Efforts to increase an interdisciplinary approach and greater use of cardiac imaging are necessary for timely diagnosis and adequate treatment.