Aims/Purpose: The loss of ocular surface homeostasis leads to the Dry Eye Disease (DED) onset. Although tear substitutes are the front‐line treatment for DED, recent advances suggest new therapeutic approaches to modulate the different mechanisms leading to the ocular surface impairment [1]. For this reason, there is a need to better understand the specific interactions between the new formulations and the native components of the tears. This pilot study is focused on assessing the chemical stability of two major human tear proteins, lysozyme C (LYS‐C) and lactoferrin (Lf), after the contact with formulations containing trehalose (Thealoz Duo, A) and trehalose plus N‐acetyl‐aspartyl‐glutamic acid (Thealoz Total, B).Methods: Human LYS‐C and Lf (Sigma) were resuspended in saline, incubated at 37°C with A and B previously diluted to simulate the final concentration in a real‐life condition, up to 2 hours. The chemical structures of LYS‐C and Lf were analyzed by circular dichroism (CD) (J‐815, Jasco) as alone, and after the incubation with A and B, with blank subtraction performed on saline.Results: Data from CD showed that the contribution of both formulations had no impact on the structural conformation change of both LYS‐C and Lf. The spectra of the protein structures remained unchanged showing a chemically matched profile of the secondary structure elements in native proteins (Wavelength 208‐222 nm). Further studies will be focused on assessing if protein stability could be affected after longer incubation times.Conclusions: Thealoz Duo and Thealoz Total did not produce any conformational change in native LYS‐C and Lf. Data suggest that analysis of possible chemical interactions with the native tear proteins could be of benefit during the process of new tear substitute formulation.References Barabino, S et al.“Dry eye disease treatment: the role of tear substitutes, their future, and an updated classification.” Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.2020; 24(17): 8642‐8652.
Read full abstract