Hostile Anatomy Research Articles

Case Report: Emergency endovascular management of a ruptured giant abdominal aortic aneurysm with severely angulated and conical shaped neck using novel multiple stiff wire technique

Background Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is commonly fatal, with an overall mortality rate of nearly 90%, and the risk of subsequent rupture remains high, especially in large aneurysm diameters or progressive disease. Unfavorable neck anatomy in EVAR is linked to early graft failure and long-term complications. Recently, a novel multiple stiff wire (MSW) technique has been developed to overcome the challenges of hostile neck anatomy without introducing additional devices and procedural complexity. It has also been feasible in a series of elective cases. In this case, we report the first-ever utilization of the MSW technique in an emergency case of an acute contained rAAA with a conical-shaped, severely angulated neck who underwent Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). Case presentation A 61-year-old man came with intermittent sharp stomach pain radiating to his back since three weeks ago. Physical examination showed elevated blood pressure and anemic conjunctiva. Laboratory examinations showed anemia, leukocytosis, elevated D-dimer level, high creatinine level, and low eGFR. CT-Scan Angiography (CTA) revealed severely hostile anatomy, a conical-shaped abdominal aorta aneurysm with a length of 13.2 cm and a maximum diameter of 9.3 cm with angulation of 90.1°. The patient was diagnosed with Ruptured AAA with a conical-shaped, severely angulated neck. Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR) management with MSW technique was planned for him. After four days, The patient was discharged in a clinically stable condition with optimal medical treatment and education. Conclusion The endovascular approach could be performed in emergency settings and has been proven to reduce length of stay, mortality, and morbidity rates. In this case, the endovascular approach with the MSW technique showed promising results for the patient.

Endovascular Aortic Repair With the E-Tegra Device: Preliminary Outcomes From a Multicenter National Registry.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is currently expanding its feasibility thanks to design innovations, but hostile proximal necks and narrow iliac arteries are still a constraint, as expressed by the Instructions for Use (IFU) of most devices. Our aim is to report the preliminary results of the E-Tegra endograft in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) performed in 15 high-volume centers. The e-Tegra Italian endoGraft REgistry (TIGRE) is a prospectively maintained database of consecutive EVAR with the E-Tegra stent-graft across 15 participating centers between March 2021 and March 2023. The registry records baseline clinical data, anatomic measurements of the abdominal aorta, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, with a scheduled follow-up period of 3 years for all patients. This is a preliminary analysis of the first results updated to January 2024. The primary endpoints are technical and clinical success, perioperative mortality, freedom from endograft rupture, and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints are freedom from reintervention, and any type of endoleak (EL). The results were analyzed in relation with the anatomic characteristics of the AAAs, namely, iliac axes tortuosity and proximal neck hostility. The registry included 147 consecutive EVAR (138 elective and 9 in emergent setting), 7 of which were associated with an iliac branch implantation. Ninety patients had at least 1 criterion of anatomical hostility, and 25 were treated outside the device IFU. Primary technical success was achieved in 146 cases (99.3%) and assisted success in 147 (100%), with no perioperative mortality. After a median follow-up period of 20 months, no aneurysm-related mortality occurred. Reinterventions were 5: 2 for type IB EL and 3 for type II ELs with aneurysm sac increase. Five more type II ELs with aneurysm sac stability are under observation. No differences in terms of reinterventions were noted between aneurysms with standard and hostile anatomy. The E-Tegra endograft is safe and effective in treating AAAs with standard and hostile anatomy, with a low rate of complications and reinterventions, although longer-term outcomes and larger numbers are needed to compare its performances related to specific anatomic criteria. This multi-center nationwide Registry reports a real-world experience of EVAR performed with the E-Tegra abdominal endograft across 15 high-volume Centers, providing early- and mid-term device-specific results, which will help vascular surgeons in endograft selection. In particular, this study focuses on clinical results obtained in treating aneurysms with hostile anatomy, analyzing the performances of the E-Tegra endograft in cases of hostile proximal necks and narrow or tortuous iliac axes.

An evolution in carotid care: Contemporary TCAR data and optimization techniques

ObjectiveCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard for revascularization of atherosclerotic extra-cranial carotid artery lesions. The introduction of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) led to multiple randomized controlled trials to compare the safety and efficacy of an endovascular approach against traditional CEA in the management of carotid artery stenosis. The operative management of carotid artery stenosis continues to evolve, with the more recent introduction of TransCarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and a novel flow-reversal neuroprotection system. This manuscript reviews a brief history regarding carotid artery revascularization, as well as the indications, technical considerations, and clinical outcomes of the TCAR procedure. Technical considerationsThe preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative medical and technical considerations are explored. Topics of discussion will include the indications and contraindications for TCAR, anatomic requirements, instructions for use (IFU) and off-label utility, optimal pharmacologic regimen with carotid stent placement, standard deployment and suggestions for hostile anatomy, as well as recommended postoperative management and surveillance imaging. DiscussionThe Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) has published a consensus statement on the pathways available to obtain clinical competency and maintain technical proficiency with TCAR. Meta-analyses reviewing the contemporary technical success and clinical outcomes of TCAR have demonstrated high rates of procedural success and low rates of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. Studies have further illustrated comparable one-year rates of peri‑procedural stroke between TCAR and CEA, for asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid lesions, with both outperforming TFCAS. ConclusionManagement of extra-cranial carotid artery stenosis utilizing TCAR with the ENROUTE flow-reversal neuroprotection system has been widely adopted, yielding clinical outcomes and stroke prevention similar to traditional CEA and superior to TFCAS.

Incidence of endoleak type IA in patients undergoing chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) vs. standard endovascular repair.

Almost half of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures are performed in hostile anatomy, increasing the risk of procedure related complications such as type IA endoleaks, which may be prevented with the chimney technique in EVAR (ChEVAR). Our aim is to describe the differential characteristics between EVAR in favorable anatomy and ChEVAR in hostile necks. A cohort of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) that were treated with EVAR or ChEVAR were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of type IA endoleak. Secondary outcomes were the rate of chimney occlusion, reintervention, migration, rupture, acute limb ischemia, sac growth, and aneurysm-related mortality during the follow-up period. . With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, 79 patients were treated with EVAR and 21 with ChEVAR. The overall age was 76.49 ± 7.32 years old, and 82% were male. The ChEVAR cohort had a higher prevalence of tobacco use than the EVAR cohort (38.1% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.041), and a shorter neck (7.88 mm ± 5.73 vs 36.28 mm ± 13.73, p<0.001). There were no differences in type IA endoleak incidence between the groups (a single endoleak type IA in the EVAR group, p = 0.309). One patient experienced an asymptomatic chimney occlusion in the ChEVAR group, and another patient required a reintervention due to chimney occlusion. Sac regression and reinterventions were not different between groups. There were no migration, rupture, acute limb ischemia, or aneurysm-related mortality events. . In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, ChEVAR in hostile necks had similar event rates to EVAR in favorable necks.

Unsuspected Limitations of 3D Printed Model in Planning of Complex Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Treatment.

Static 3-dimensional (3D) printing became attractive for operative planning in cases that involve difficult anatomy. An interactive (low cost, fast) 3D print allowing deliberate surgical practice can be used to improve interventional simulation and planning. Endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms is technically challenging, especially in case of narrow aortic lumen or significant aortic angulation (hostile anatomy). The risk of complications such as graft kinking and target vessel occlusion is difficult to assess based solely on traditional software measuring methods and remain highly dependent on surgeon skills and expertise. A patient with juxtarenal AAA with hostile anatomy had a 3-dimensional printed model constructed preoperatively according to computed tomography images. Endovascular graft implantation in the 3D printed aorta with a standard T-Branch Cook (Cook® Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) was performed preoperatively in the simulation laboratory enabling optimized feasibility, surgical planning and intraoperative decision making. The 3D printed aortic model proved to be radio-opaque and allowed simulation of branched endovascular aortic repair (BREVAR). The assessment of intervention feasibility, as well as optimal branch position and orientation was found to be useful for surgeon confidence and the actual intervention in the patient. There was a remarkable agreement between the 3D printed model and both CT and X-ray angiographic images. Although the technical success was achieved as planned, a previously deployed renal stent caused unexpected difficulty in advancing the renal stent, which was not observed in the 3D model simulation. The 3D printed aortic models can be useful for determining feasibility, optimizing planning and intraoperative decision making in hostile anatomy improving the outcome. Despite already offering satisfying accuracy at present, further advancements could enhance the 3D model capability to replicate minor anatomical deformities and variations in tissue density.

Open Management of an Asymptomatic 4.2Cm Middle Colic Artery Aneurysm and Liteture Review.

Aneurysms of the middle colic artery (MCAA) and its branches are exceedingly rare accounting for <3% of total visceral aneurysms. Very few MCAA cases have been reported in the literature with only three cases accounting for a diameter >4cm. We describe the successful open repair with ligation of a 4.2cm asymptomatic MCAA in a female patient through the gastrohepatic ligament taking meticulous caution to avoid injury of the pancreas. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the fifth postoperative day. At 1month follow-up the postoperative computed tomographic angiography documented complete exclusion of the MCAA and absence of contrast agent in the sac both in the arterial and the venous phase. While the endovascular treatment is the first-line option for visceral aneurysms, the open approach is still reserved for certain cases of hostile anatomy, challenging location and large size. Our case highlights the irreplaceable role of open surgery and underlines the collaboration between surgical specialties.

Five-Year Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Repair With the TREO Abdominal Endograft.

Newer generation abdominal endografts, including Treo (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, Florida), have shown optimal safety and effectiveness in treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), even with hostile anatomy over the short- and mid-term. The durability of such results, however, is still a controversial issue, due to the paucity of long-term data. Our aim is to show the long-term outcomes of endovascular aortic repair of both standard and hostile AAAs with the Treo endograft on a cohort of patients treated between 2016 and 2017. We analyzed the postoperative follow-up of 37 consecutive patients who have undergone endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with the Treo Endograft between 2016 and 2017, whose baseline clinical conditions, operative data, and short-term outcomes had been published in 2018. All patients were followed up by computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 6 and 12 months and 5 years postoperatively. Primary endpoints were aortic-related mortality, type I-III endoleak (EL), and reintervention rate. Secondary endpoints were the rates of type II ELs and aneurysm sac regression. Of 37 patients, 27 had at least one criterion of anatomic hostility and 11 were performed outside the device-specific instructions for use (IFU). In the perioperative period, we observed 100% technical success, with no perioperative mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (66 months), 3 patients (8.1%) were lost to follow-up and 3 (8.1%) died of non-aortic causes (overall survival: 91.9%). One type IA EL of an AAA with a hostile neck (but within the IFU) and a type III EL of an AAA with standard anatomy were observed and treated by endovascular relining (overall reintervention rate: 5.5%). Four type II ELs were associated with aneurysm sac stability over time and are still under surveillance. Mean aneurysm shrinkage was 11.25±8.30 mm. The optimal results of the Treo Endograft in terms of complication and reintervention rates reported over the mid-term by the current literature (ITA-ENDOBOOT registry) are maintained on the long term, both in case of hostile and friendly aortic anatomy, with a satisfactory shrinkage rate of the aneurysm sac. The innovative characteristics of Treo and its short-term results are well-known and reported. The present case series contributes to the scientific validation of a new-generation abdominal aortic endograft over the long-term, focusing especially on its performance in treating AAAs with hostile anatomy. Its 5-years outcomes confirm the optimal results already reported over the short- and mid-term.

Use of the right retroperitoneum as an alternative approach to the abdominal aorta

ObjectiveThe left retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is a well-established technique for aortic exposure. The right retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is performed less commonly, and the outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of right retroperitoneal aortic-based procedures and to determine its utility in aortic reconstruction when faced with hostile anatomy or infection in the abdomen or left flank. MethodsA retrospective query of a vascular surgery database from a tertiary referral center was performed for all retroperitoneal aortic procedures. Individual patient charts were reviewed, and data were collected. Demographics, indications, intraoperative details, and outcomes were tabulated. ResultsFrom 1984 through 2020, there have been 7454 open aortic procedures; 6076 were retroperitoneal-based, and 219 of which were performed from the right retroperitoneal approach (Rrp). Aneurysmal disease was the most common indication (48.9%), and graft occlusion was the most common postoperative complication (11.4%). The average aneurysm size was 5.5 cm, and the most common reconstruction was with a bifurcated graft (77.6%). Average intraoperative blood loss was 923.8 mL (range, 50-6800 mL; median, 600 mL). Perioperative complications occurred in 56 patients (25.6%) for a total of 70 complications. Perioperative mortality occurred in two patients (0.91%). The 219 patients treated with Rrp required 66 subsequent procedures in 31 patients. These included 29 extra-anatomic bypasses, 19 thrombectomies/embolectomies, 10 bypass revisions, 5 infected graft excisions, and 3 aneurysm revisions. Eight Rrp eventually underwent a left retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction. Fourteen patients with a left-sided aortic procedure required a Rrp. ConclusionsThe right retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is a useful technique in the setting of prior surgery, anatomic abnormality, or infection that complicates the use of other more frequently employed approaches. This review demonstrates comparable outcomes and the technical feasibility of this approach. The right retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery should be considered a viable alternative to left retroperitoneal and transperitoneal access in patients with complex anatomy or prohibitive pathology for more traditional exposure.

Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion.

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an accepted alternative to open repair (OR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) despite “hostile” anatomies that may reduce its effectiveness. Guidelines suggest refraining from EVAR in such circumstances, but in clinical practice, up to 44% of EVAR procedures are performed using stent grafts outside their instruction for use (IFU), with acceptable outcomes. Starting from this “inconsistency” between clinical practice and guidelines, the aim of this contribution is to report the technical results of the use of EVAR in challenging anatomies as well as the ethical aspects to identify the criteria by which the “best interest” of the patient can be set. Materials and Methods: A literature review on currently available evidence on standard EVAR using commercially available endografts in patients with hostile aortic neck anatomies was conducted. Medline using the PubMed interface and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 6 May 2021, considering the following outcomes: technical success; need for additional procedures; conversion to OR; reintervention; migration; the presence of type I endoleaks; AAA-related mortality rate. Results: A total of 52 publications were selected by the investigators for a detailed review. All studies were either prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting the immediate, 30-day, and/or follow-up outcomes of standard EVAR procedures in patients with challenging neck anatomies. No randomized trials were identified. Fourteen different endo-grafts systems were used in the selected studies. A total of 45 studies reported a technical success rate ranging from 93 to 100%, and 42 the need for additional procedures (mean value of 9.04%). Results at 30 days: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 37 studies with a mean value of 2.65%; 31 studies reported a null migration rate and 32 a null conversion rate to OR; in 31 of the 35 studies that reported AAA-related mortality, the incidence was null. Mid-term follow-up: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 48 studies with a mean value of 6.65%; 30 studies reported a null migration rate, 33 a null conversion rate to OR, and 28 of the 45 studies reported that the AAA-related mortality incidence was null. Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, EVAR appears to be a safe and effective procedure—and therefore recommendable—even in the presence of hostile anatomies, in patients deemed unfit for OR. However, in order to identify and pursue the patient’s best interest, particular attention must be paid to the management of the patient’s informed consent process, which—in addition to being an essential ethical-legal requirement to legitimize the medical act—ensures that clinical data can be integrated with the patient’s personal preferences and background, beyond the therapeutic potential of the proposed procedures and what is generically stated in the guidelines.

Transcarotid artery revascularization is safe in necks with anatomy hostile for carotid endarterectomy

ObjectiveThe outcomes associated with transcarotid revascularization (TCAR) have proved to be noninferior to the historical results established for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Therefore, TCAR has been increasingly offered to patients with neck anatomy hostile for traditional CEA. The present investigation was completed to evaluate whether a difference exists for patients undergoing TCAR in de novo anatomy with unviolated surgical planes compared with those undergoing TCAR in necks with hostile anatomy. MethodsThe demographic data and outcomes were captured at two high-volume TCAR institutions from December 2015 to December 2021 via a query of two parallel, prospectively maintained, carotid intervention databases at these two health institutions. A hostile neck anatomy was defined as a history of previous ipsilateral neck radiation, oncologic dissection, or CEA. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the two cohorts at an α of 0.05. ResultsDuring the inclusion period, the data from 750 TCARs were captured, including 108 procedures in hostile neck anatomy and 642 in de novo necks. No significant differences were found in the baseline comorbidity burden using the Charlson comorbidity index or the indication for revascularization. Intraoperatively, no significant increase in case complexity was observed with respect to those with a hostile neck, except for the operative time, which was 10% longer (69.5 vs 63.4 minutes; P = .01). The flow reversal and fluoroscopic times, blood loss, radiation exposure, and contrast use were identical. Postoperatively, no differences were observed between the hostile and de novo necks with respect to stroke (0.9% vs 2.5%; P = .49), myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 0.2%; P = .27), and death (0% vs 1.5%; P = .37). Additionally, hematoma formation and the need for reintervention did not seem to vary between the two groups. Similarly, no differences in the two cohorts were noted during follow-up. ConclusionsAccording to the findings from our large, dual-institutional series, the performance of TCAR in surgical fields traditionally hostile for CEA was not associated with increased intraoperative complexity or postoperative morbidity.

Strategies for Facilitating Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR Procedures.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the treatment of aortic stenosis and should ideally be performed as a totally percutaneous procedure via the transfemoral (TF) approach. Peripheral vascular disease may impede valve delivery, and vascular access site complications are associated with adverse clinical outcome and increased mortality. We review strategies aimed to facilitate TF valve delivery in patients with hostile vascular anatomy and achieve percutaneous management of vascular complications.

Antegrade Endograft Deployment with Supra-Aortic Debranching to Treat Arch and Descending Thoracic Aortic Lesions. A Single-Center Experience

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a widely used procedure that has drastically changed the management of thoracic aortic diseases. We assess the effectiveness of supra-aortic debranching during antegrade TEVAR procedures with a retrospective analysis of our clinical experience. Between December 2005 and April 2017, 55 patients underwent 64 TEVAR procedures. Among them, there were 8 male patients, mean age 72, who underwent hybrid antegrade stent-graft deployment. Particularly, for degenerative aneurysms of the aortic arch, 3 patients for aneurysm of descending thoracic aorta 3, for post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm 1, and for penetrating aortic ulcer 1 which had resulted in an aortoesophageal fistula. Proximal landing zones were Z0:1, Z1:3 and Z2:4. Type I hybrid aortic arch repair was performed in 1 case, carotid-carotid bypass in 2, carotid-subclavian in 5 and aorto-carotid in1. The 30-day postoperative mortality was 12.5%. One patient suffered a temporary right hemiplegia which resolved after left aorto-carotid bypass. No endoleaks were observed postoperatively and in follow-up period. In the long term and a mean follow-up of 4.9years, there were no deaths related to the stent-graft implantation or to revascularization procedures. Regarding the aortic arch rerouting procedure, there were no pseudoaneurysm or other anastomotic events. Antegrade delivery of the endograft, combined with hybrid and revascularization procedures of the supra-aortic vessels is a safe treatment modality, in complex hostile anatomies. However, further improvements are recommended due to the presence of neurologic complications and reinterventions.

Comparing Carotid Revascularization Procedures: Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid artery stenosis is an atherosclerotic disease that, if not treated, can have significant morbidity and mortality due to stroke. Management of carotid artery stenosis has evolved over the years. Initially, optimal medical management and carotid endarterectomy were the preferred treatments. Although still preferred by many surgeons, advancements in carotid stenting have made it a viable alternative, especially in necks with hostile anatomy. As medical therapy and stenting have continued to improve, we report the changing patterns in the delivery of carotid revascularization.

Open surgical conversion and management of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous endovascular aneurysm repair

Introduction/Objective. The objective was to present the results and technical considerations from high-volume center when performing late open surgical conversion (LOSC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) patients. Methods. This was a single center retrospective study. LOSC was performed whenever eventual endovascular reintervention failed, was not feasible due to hostile anatomy and unavailability of specific endograft materials, or when patient was hemodynamically unstable necessitating emergent surgery. Results. All previously implanted EVARs had bimodular configuration with suprarenal fixation. Total endograft explantation was performed in 40% of patients. Hospital mortality was 20%. Both patients who died had total endograft explantation with supraceliac clamp lasting more than 30 minutes. 30-day mortality was 30%, with one more patient who died from pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge and two hospital deaths were due to myocardial infarction. Conclusion. LOSC due to RAAA after previous EVAR carries greater mortality for the patient, suggesting multifactorial impacts on the outcome. The appropriate choice of surgical method and technical success are of ultimate importance, with total graft explantation having negative impact on patient?s survival.

The Incraft stent graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: an iliac-friendly device with an effective conventional proximal sealing mechanism

ABSTRACT Introduction The Incraft aortic stent graft (Cordis, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) is a trimodular endovascular stent graft with a conventional suprarenal active fixation specifically designed to overcome the anatomic limitation of small, stenotic, and tortuous iliac vessels. Areas covered The present article provides a complete description of the Incraft stent graft, its clinical performance, its technical characteristics as well as a comparison with other competitive endografts. Expert opinion The Incraft stent graft is an EVAR ultra low-profile device initially designed for overcoming the limitation of the hostile iliac anatomy. Recently, the device is being increasingly used in real-world conditions and not only in complex iliac anatomies with good mid-term results. Whether it remains a useful EVAR toolbox or will become a workhorse endograft is yet to be determined.

Update on the TREO endograft device: overview of its safety and efficacy

ABSTRACT Introduction The TREO abdominal aortic stent graft system (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, Fla) is a low-profile, trimodular endovascular endoprosthesis for the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The objective of the present study was to collect and discuss all the available modern data of this device highlighting especially its mid-and long-term clinical results. Areas covered This updated review article presents the most current results from great-scale clinical studies and the RATIONALE registry involving also angulated neck anatomies and challenging AAA geometries, reflecting the real-world experience. Expert opinion The global, multicenter RATIONALE registry prospectively enrolled 202 patients (mean age 73.0 ± 7.8 years) who underwent EVAR. Technical success, primary clinical success and assisted primary patency rate was 96%, 92.2% and 97%, respectively. The clinical success at 1 year was 96%. Another multicenter, non-randomized, clinical trial confirmed also high technical and clinical success. Additionally, a comparative study comparing favorable and hostile necks in AAA, demonstrated a comparable technical success (95.2%), achieving proper sealing and technical success in the hostile neck group. TREO endograft seems to be safe and effective for EVAR, especially in hostile neck anatomies. Long-term outcomes from ongoing registries are awaited to complete these results.

Akutna ishemija lijeve ruke nakon TEVAR-a zbog anatomske varijante vertebralne arterije

Aim: In this case we report acute left arm ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the saccular thoracic aortic aneurysm due to a rare anatomical variation of the left vertebral artery. Case report: Thoracic aortic stent-graft was deployed to cover the aneurysm, but six hours later acute left arm ischemia occurred due to a rare form of vertebral artery origin from the aortic arch instead of from the left subclavian artery. This hostile anatomy led to an iatrogenic acute ischemia which was the indication for an emergency left-common-carotid-to-subclavian-artery bypass grafting. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary approach and careful pre-procedural planning should always be the standard procedure in complex cases to avoid this complication.

Feasibility of Endovascular Aortic Repair With Precannulated Contralateral Gate to Treat Occlusive and Aneurysmal Disease

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is the commonly used approach for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) but can also be used treat occlusive disease. Cannulation of the contralateral gate during EVAR is the rate-limiting step and can be hindered by hostile anatomy, such as tortuosity and a narrow aortic diameter. We reviewed our experience of EVAR with precannulation of the gate to overcome the challenges of cannulation.

Use of custom-made scalloped thoracic stent grafts in different hostile aortic anatomies

Use of custom-made scalloped thoracic stent grafts in different hostile aortic anatomies

A Modified Through and Through Guidewire Steerable Sheath Technique for Transfemoral Access to Visceral Arteries with Hostile Anatomy

A Modified Through and Through Guidewire Steerable Sheath Technique for Transfemoral Access to Visceral Arteries with Hostile Anatomy