Hormone-free Interval Research Articles

Efficacy in Suppressing Ovulation and Safety of a Low dose Oral Contraceptive in a Continuous Regimen (84+7) With Continuous Ethinyl Estradiol Instead of a Hormone-Free Interval: An Evaluation of Ovulation Suppression and Ovarian Activity

Efficacy in Suppressing Ovulation and Safety of a Low dose Oral Contraceptive in a Continuous Regimen (84+7) With Continuous Ethinyl Estradiol Instead of a Hormone-Free Interval: An Evaluation of Ovulation Suppression and Ovarian Activity

Combined oral contraceptives with shortened hormone-free interval. Proven advantages of the therapy regime

Objective: To determine the benefits of COC in the 26/2 mode compared with the traditional 21/7 in reducing the frequency of side effects. Main provisions. Side effects – the main cause of women’s refusals to take COCs – occur predominantly on days of taking pills without hormones due to a drop in estradiol levels. Reduction of the hormone-free COC interval (mode 26/2) reduces the frequency of headache and pelvic pain and other symptoms. Conclusion. COC, with regimen 26/2, may be a promising option for users who experience adverse symptoms.

Effects of low-dose combined oral contraceptives and protein S K196E mutation on anticoagulation factors: a prospective observational study.

The association between low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and anticoagulation factors in Japanese women has been rarely studied. A total of 394 Japanese women with a new beginning cycle of COC use were enrolled, of whom 335 women visited the clinic within 4weeks after starting the first cycle of COC. Visits occurred in the active phase (272 women) and the placebo phase (63 women). Free protein S (PS) antigen and activity levels and antithrombin activity levels decreased significantly in both the active and placebo phase groups. Protein C (PC) activity levels increased significantly in both groups. Larger reductions in free PS antigen and activity levels occurred with COC comprising either 30µg ethinylestradiol/desogestrel or 20µg ethinylestradiol/drospirenone than that comprising 35µg ethinylestradiol/norethisterone. In four women with the Japanese-specific PS K196E mutation, mean PS activity was 65% before COC use and 57% during COC use, indicating further decrease with COC use. In conclusion, decreased antigen and activity levels of PS and antithrombin and increased activity levels of PC were observed even during the first cycle of low-dose COC use. The effects on PS and PC activities were also observed in the hormone-free interval.

Concordance of self-reported hormonal contraceptive use and presence of exogenous hormones in serum among African women

ObjectivesStudies that rely on self-report to investigate the relationship between hormonal contraceptive use and HIV acquisition and transmission, as well as other health outcomes, could have compromised results due to misreporting. We determined the frequency of misreported hormonal contraceptive use among African women with and at risk for HIV. Study designWe tested 1102 archived serum samples from 664 African women who had participated in prospective HIV prevention studies. Using a novel high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry assay, we quantified exogenous hormones for injectables (medroxyprogesterone acetate or norethisterone), oral contraceptives (OC) (levonorgestrel or ethinyl estradiol) and implants (levonorgestrel or etonogestrel) and compared them to self-reported use. ResultsAmong women reporting hormonal contraceptive use, 258/358 (72%) of samples were fully concordant with self-report, as were 642/744 (86%) of samples from women reporting no hormonal contraceptive use. However, 42/253 (17%) of samples from women reporting injectable use, 41/66 (62%) of samples from self-reported OC users and 3/39 (8%) of samples from self-reported implant users had no quantifiable hormones. Among self-reported nonusers, 102/744 (14%) had ≥1 hormone present. Concordance between self-reported method and exogenous hormones did not differ by HIV status. ConclusionAmong African women with and at risk for HIV, testing of exogenous hormones revealed agreement with self-reported contraceptive use for most women. However, unexpected exogenous hormones were identified among self-reported hormonal contraceptive users and nonusers, and an important fraction of women reporting hormonal contraceptive use had no hormones detected; absence of oral contraceptive hormones could be due, at least in part, to samples taken during the hormone-free interval. Misreporting of hormonal contraceptive use could lead to biased results in observational studies of the relationship between contraceptive use and health outcomes. ImplicationsResearch studies investigating associations between hormonal contraceptive use and HIV should consider validating self-reported use by objective measures; because both overreporting and underreporting of use occur, potential misclassification based on self-report could lead to biased results in directions that cannot be easily predicted.

Cycle control with an extended-regimen oral contraceptive combining levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol that includes continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol instead of the traditional hormone-free interval.

PurposeTo evaluate scheduled and unscheduled bleeding and spotting over 1 year of treatment with 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraception (COC) providing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) in place of the traditional 7-day hormone-free interval (HFI).Patients and methodsThis post hoc analysis of a multicenter, open-label, 1-year, Phase 3 study of extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg levonorgestrel (LNG) for 84 days and EE 10 µg for 7 days included 799 sexually active, adult women who completed at least one 91-day cycle of therapy. Subjects recorded bleeding and spotting episodes daily using electronic diaries. Logistic regression analyses are reported as ORs with 95% CIs.ResultsThere was a 10% increase (OR =1.102; 95% CI: 1.006–1.206) in the likelihood of reporting no scheduled bleeding for each additional 91-day cycle completed. From the third 91-day cycle, more than one fifth of women reported no scheduled bleeding (third cycle =23% [121/533]; fourth cycle =22% [97/446]). Among women who reported no scheduled bleeding at Cycle 1 (136/758 [18%]), ≥45% showed sustained lack of scheduled bleeding in later cycles. There were increases of 53% (OR =1.531; 95% CI: 1.393–1.683) and 31% (OR =1.307; 95% CI: 1.205–1.418) in the likelihood of reporting 0 to ≤6 days vs >6 days of unscheduled bleeding and spotting, respectively, for each additional 91-day cycle. By Cycle 2, more than 80% of women reported no unscheduled bleeding or ≤6 days of unscheduled bleeding during each 91-day cycle.ConclusionImproved cycle control with decreased bleeding over time was shown during extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg LNG for 84 days and continuous low-dose EE instead of the traditional 7-day HFI. Women considering this regimen should be informed that those who complete at least one 91-day COC cycle will likely experience less bleeding/spotting in future cycles.

Temporal relations in hormone-withdrawal migraines and impact on prevention- a diary-based pilot study in combined hormonal contraceptive users

BackgroundMenstrually related migraine (MRM) in the hormone-free interval (HFI) of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are according to the ICHD definition also estrogen withdrawal migraines (EWH). MRMs are less responsive to acute medication. Therefore short-term prevention, initiated 1–2 days before onset of the anticipated bleeding and continued for 6 days, is recommended. Such a long prophylactic triptan use might increase the risk for medication overuse headache in women suffering in addition from non-menstrual migraines. In CHC users onset of hormone decline is predictable. It is however unknown, whether the EWHs are rather associated with onset of hormone withdrawal or onset of bleeding. Improved understanding of this relation might contribute to better define and shorten the time interval for prevention.MethodsFor this observational diary-based pilot study we collected data from daily conducted headache diaries of CHC users with MRM in at least two of three cycles, visiting our clinic from 2009 to 2015. We analyzed frequency of migraines for each hormone free day, onset of migraine, onset of bleeding and the relation of migraine to onset of bleeding in the 7-day period following estrogen withdrawal. We identified in addition the onset of migraine attacks lasting more than 1 day (episodes).ResultsForty patient charts met the inclusion criteria, what allowed us to analyze 103 cycles. The mean number of migraine days in the HFI was 2.2 ± 1.6. Migraine started typically on days 1–5 and bleeding on days 3–5. In relation to first day of bleeding, migraines started on days −1 to 4. Almost half of the migraine attacks lasted longer than 24 h, despite the use of rescue medication.ConclusionMRM in CHC users starts on bleeding days −1 to 4, what differs from findings in the natural cycle. Referring to the HFI interval migraine started mostly on days 1–5. According to these data, it seems to be reasonable to initiate short-term prevention at the last day of pill use or the first day of the HFI and continue for 5 days.

Treatment of premenstrual dysphoria with continuous versus intermittent dosing of oral contraceptives: Results of a three-arm randomized controlled trial.

Although traditionally dosed combined oral contraceptives (COCs) (21 days of active pills, 7 days of inactive pills) have not been demonstrated as superior to placebo for the treatment of premenstrual dysphoria (PMD), some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that oral contraceptives administered with a shortened or eliminated hormone-free interval are superior to placebo. However, results of such trials are mixed, and no existing studies have directly compared continuous and intermittent dosing schedules of the same oral contraceptive. The present study compared placebo, intermittent dosing of oral contraceptives, and continuous dosing of contraceptives for the treatment of PMD. Fifty-five women with prospectively confirmed PMD completed a three-arm, RCT in which they were randomized to 3 months of placebo (n = 22), intermittent drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol dosed on a 21-7 schedule (n = 17), or continuous drospirenone/estradiol (n = 16) following a baseline assessment month. All three groups demonstrated similar, robust reductions in premenstrual symptoms over time. A marked placebo response was observed. The study fails to replicate a uniquely beneficial effect of continuous COC on PMD. Additional work is needed to understand the psychosocial context bolstering the placebo response in women with PMD.

Treating migraine with contraceptives.

At least 18% of women suffers from migraine. Clinically, there are two main forms of migraine: migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO) and more than 50% of MO is strongly correlated to the menstrual cycle. The high prevalence of migraine in females, its correlation with the menstrual cycle and with the use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) suggest that the estrogen drop is implicated in the pathogenesis of the attacks. Although CHCs may trigger or worsen migraine, their correct use may even prevent or reduce some forms of migraine, like estrogen withdrawal headache. Evidence suggested that stable estrogen levels have a positive effect, minimising or eliminating the estrogenic drop. Several contraceptive strategies may act in this way: extended-cycle CHCs, CHCs with shortened hormone-free interval (HFI), progestogen-only contraceptives, CHCs containing new generation estrogens and estrogen supplementation during the HFI.

Improvement of migraine with change from combined hormonal contraceptives to progestin-only contraception with desogestrel: How strong is the effect of taking women off combined contraceptives?

Migraine is a disabling headache disorder, which affects up to 17% of the female population. Oestrogen withdrawal during the menstrual cycle or the hormone-free interval in users of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) plays a pivotal role. Two diary-based studies demonstrated a positive impact of the progestin-only pill (POP) desogestrel 75 μg on the frequency of the migraine attacks and pain intensity. In both studies, CHC users as well as nonusers were included, which makes it difficult to distinguish between the effect of taking women off the CHC and the benefit of the POP itself. With the present study, we compared the therapeutic effect of the POP desogestrel 75 μg on migraine in current CHC users and nonusers. We found a positive influence of desogestrel on migraine not only in women who switched from CHCs to desogestrel, but also in those who had not used hormones over 6 months before starting it. Our findings need to be confirmed in prospectively conducted studies with larger sample size.

Effects of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone on menstrual-related symptoms: a randomised controlled trial

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy for menstrual-related symptoms of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone in comparison with a 24/4 d cyclical regimen of the same formulation.Methods: This randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, multicentre study was conducted in women aged 18–39 years. Their menstrual-related symptoms were assessed using the Penn Daily Symptom Rating (DSR17). Participants were randomised to use an extended flexible regimen of 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSPe.flex), comprising 168 consecutive days with a 4-d hormone-free interval (HFI, allowing for management of unexpected bleeding) or a conventional 24/4 cyclical regimen of the same pill (EE/DRSP24/4). The primary measure of efficacy was the percentage change in DSR17 total score from baseline to cycle 6. The secondary measures of efficacy were the percentage changes in DSR17 total score from baseline after each 28-d interval throughout the entire study and in the scores for individual DSR17 symptoms.Results: The primary analysis demonstrated that EE/DRSPe.flex was not inferior to EE/DRSP24/4 (Mean DSR17 score 9.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.5, 20.6; p = 0.123). Analysis at intervals throughout the entire evaluation period showed greater reduction in DSR17 total score for EE/DRSPe.flex than for the 24/4 regimen (p < 0.001). The decreases in individual scores for the symptoms ‘poor coordination’ and ‘depression/feeling sad/down or blue’ were greater for the extended flexible regimen than for the cyclical regimen (p < 0.05).Conclusion: The extended flexible regimen was not inferior to the 24/4 cyclical regimen in terms of the primary endpoint. It significantly improved symptoms in the interval analysis, and the effects on specific DSR17 symptoms, compared with the cyclical regimen.

Modulation of nociceptive threshold by combined hormonal contraceptives in women with oestrogen-withdrawal migraine attacks: a pilot study

BackgroundMenstrually-related headache and headaches associated with oestrogen withdrawal are common conditions, whose pathophysiology has not been completely elucidated. In this study we evaluated the influence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) on pain threshold in women presenting migraine attacks during hormone-free interval.FindingsEleven women with migraine attacks recurring exclusively during the oestrogen-withdrawal period were studied with the nociceptive flexion reflex, a neurophysiological assessment of the pain control systems, during the third week of active treatment and during the hormone-free interval.During the hormone-free interval, nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold was significantly lower (12.8 ± 8.0 mA) as compared to the third week of hormonal treatment (15.6 ± 6.6 mA) (p = 0.02). No change was observed in the pain perceived and in the temporal summation.ConclusionsOestrogen withdrawal may mediate an increased sensitivity to somatosensory stimuli in women with migraine attacks recurring during the hormone-free interval.

Perimenstrual asthma: from pathophysiology to treatment strategies.

The prevalence of asthma is about 9,7 % in women and 5,5 % in men.Asthma can deteriorate during the perimenstrual period, a phenomenon known as perimenstrual asthma (PMA), which represents a unique, highly symptomatic asthma phenotype. It is distinguished from traditional allergic asthma by aspirin sensitivity, less atopy, and lower lung capacity.PMA incidence is reported to vary between 19 and 40 % of asthmatic women. The presence of PMA has been related to increases in asthma-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations and emergency treatment including intubations.It is hypothesized that hormonal status may influence asthma in women, focusing on the role of sex hormones, and specifically on the impact of estrogens’ fluctuations at ovulation and before periods.This paper will focus on the pathophysiology of hormone triggered cycle related inflammatory/allergic events and their relation with asthma. We reviewed the scientific literature on Pubmed database for studies on PMA. Key word were PMA, mastcells, estrogens, inflammation, oral contraception, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), and hormone free interval (HFI).Special attention will be devoted to the possibility of reducing the perimenstrual worsening of asthma and associated symptoms by reducing estrogens fluctuations, with appropriate hormonal contraception and reduced HFI. This novel therapeutical approach will be finally discussed.

Perimenstrual asthma: from pathophysiology to treatment strategies

The prevalence of asthma is about 9,7 % in women and 5,5 % in men. Asthma can deteriorate during the perimenstrual period, a phenomenon known as perimenstrual asthma (PMA), which represents a unique, highly symptomatic asthma phenotype. It is distinguished from traditional allergic asthma by aspirin sensitivity, less atopy, and lower lung capacity. PMA incidence is reported to vary between 19 and 40 % of asthmatic women. The presence of PMA has been related to increases in asthma-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations and emergency treatment including intubations. It is hypothesized that hormonal status may influence asthma in women, focusing on the role of sex hormones, and specifically on the impact of estrogens’ fluctuations at ovulation and before periods. This paper will focus on the pathophysiology of hormone triggered cycle related inflammatory/allergic events and their relation with asthma. We reviewed the scientific literature on Pubmed database for studies on PMA. Key word were PMA, mastcells, estrogens, inflammation, oral contraception, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), and hormone free interval (HFI). Special attention will be devoted to the possibility of reducing the perimenstrual worsening of asthma and associated symptoms by reducing estrogens fluctuations, with appropriate hormonal contraception and reduced HFI. This novel therapeutical approach will be finally discussed.

A survey of bonobo (Pan paniscus) oral contraceptive pill use in North American zoos.

Contraception is an essential tool in reproductive management of captive species. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Reproductive Management Center (RMC) gathers data on contraception use and provides recommendations. Although apes have been given oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) for at least 30 years, there have been no published reports with basic information on why the pill is administered, formulations and brands used, and effects on physiology and behavior. Here, we report survey results characterizing OCP use in bonobos (Pan paniscus) housed in North American zoos, as well as information accumulated in the RMC's Contraception Database. Of 26 females treated, there have been no failures and nine reversals. The most commonly administered OCP formulation in bonobos contained ethinyl estradiol (EE) 35 μg/norethindrone 1 mg. Few females on combined oral contraceptives (COCs) were given a continuous active pill regimen; a hormone-free interval of at least 5 days was allowed in most. Crushing the pill and mixing with juice or food was common. Females on COCs seldom experienced breakthrough estrus or bleeding, while these conditions were sometimes observed for females on continuous COCs. All females on COCs exhibited some degree of perineal swelling, with a mean score of 3 or 3+ most commonly reported. Behavioral changes included less sexual behavior, dominant females becoming subordinate, and a negative effect on mood. No appreciable change in weight was noted. Taken together, these results indicate that OCPs are an effective and reversible contraceptive option for bonobos that can be used by zoos and sanctuaries to limit reproduction. Zoo Biol. 35:444-453, 2016. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Hemostatic effects of two desogestrel-containing combined oral contraceptive regimens: a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label study

Purpose of investigation: To compare the effects of desogestrel (DSG) 150 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg for 21 days followed by either seven days of EE ten mcg (21/7-active) or no treatment (DSG/EE+no Tx) on hemostatic markers. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label study that enrolled healthy premenopausal women. Non-inferiority of 21/7-active to DSG/EE+no Tx was determined if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the mean treatment difference in prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) over 24 weeks between groups was Results: 246 subjects (n=125, 21/7-active; n=121, DSG/EE+no Tx) comprised the primary analysis. Mean F1+2 levels increased in both 21/7-active and DSG/EE+no Tx regimens (least square [LS] mean changes +45 pmol/L and +56.8 pmol/L, respectively). LS mean treatment difference was -11.8 pmol/L (95% CI: -54.8, 31.2). Conclusion: The effect of adding EE ten mcg to the seven-day hormone-free interval of DSG/EE on F1+2 levels was non-inferior to traditional DSG/EE.

Rationale for eliminating the hormone-free interval in modern oral contraceptives.

Although most low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs) include 7-day hormone-free intervals (HFIs), these COCs could incompletely suppress ovarian activity. To review the impact of HFIs on ovarian suppression and tolerability, and evaluate the utility of COCs without traditional 7-day HFIs. PubMed was searched for clinical studies published in English between January 1980 and April 2015 on the impact of HFIs and HFI modifications in COCs. Articles assessing contraceptive efficacy or tolerability as the primary focus were included. Abstracts of 319 articles were screened. Analysis of the 161 articles selected revealed that suppression of ovarian activity with low-dose COCs with 7-day HFIs is suboptimal. Loss of ovarian suppression during 7-day HFIs is commonly associated with follicular development, and most dominant follicles appear during this period. By contrast, increased ovarian suppression was noted in regimens that shortened or eliminated the HFI, or that substituted low-dose ethinyl estradiol for the HFI. Extended regimens with modified HFIs may provide greater ovarian suppression with the potential for increased contraceptive effectiveness. Additional research is needed to evaluate whether COC regimens that include 10μg ethinyl estradiol instead of an HFI may improve tolerability.

CONTRACEPTION WITH DROSPIRENONE: EFFECT ON THE BODY WEIGHT AND SOME LIPID METABOLISM INDICATORS

The combined oral contraceptive containing 20 μ g of ethinylestradiol and 3 μ g of drospirenone is an effective contraception method with the optimum shortened hormone-free interval and good tolerance predetermined by the positive effect on the body weight, lipid metabolism, general state and symptoms related to liquid retention and hyperandrogenism. The data obtained in in vitro and in vivo studies about the role of drospirenone in blocking of adipocyte differentiation and triglyceride accumulation as well as about regulation of the white fat remodeling justify possible effects of this drug on prevention of negative metabolic consequences of the adipocyte dysfunction. Results of clinical studies are indicative of the body weight reduction and positive effect on the lipid profile without statistically significant effect on insulin sensitivity, which leads to high degree of the women satisfaction with this type of contraception.

Oral steroid contraception.

Oral steroid contraception is a popular method of family planning worldwide. Over the past several decades, this method of contraception has changed significantly by decreasing the estrogen dose, changing the progestin component, and reducing the hormone free interval. Despite the popularity of oral steroid contraception, there has been much criticism regarding the associated risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke. Despite these established, yet uncommon risks, oral steroid contraception has many important health benefits. This review highlights the available formulations of oral contraceptives along with their evidence-based associated risks and benefits. Highlights regarding future directions for development of novel oral contraceptives are also addressed.

Efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active combined oral contraceptive with continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol

ObjectiveSubstituting low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) for the hormone-free interval in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may enhance ovarian suppression and improve tolerability. This noncomparative phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of desogestrel (DSG)/EE followed by 7days of EE. Study designThis multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study enrolled sexually active women aged 18–40years at risk for pregnancy. Women received up to 1year, or 13 consecutive 28-day cycles, of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg for 21days and EE 10mcg alone for 7days. Participants kept diaries to record compliance, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index (PI) and life-table approach. Safety and tolerability were assessed primarily through reported adverse events (AEs). ResultsA total of 2858 women enrolled and 1680 completed the study. Forty-six pregnancies in 2401 women aged 18–35years occurred after COC initiation and up to 7days after last DSG/EE or EE-only tablet was taken. When cycles in which another contraceptive method was used were excluded, the PI was 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96–3.57]. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 1year of treatment was 2.47% (95% CI, 1.85–3.29) for all users aged 18–35years. When only cycles during which women considered compliant were included, the PI was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39–2.80). AEs were similar to those seen with other oral contraceptives. ConclusionsThis 21/7-active DSG/EE COC with 7days of low-dose EE was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention. Implications statementThis phase 3 open-label study demonstrated that a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg and 7days of EE 10mcg was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

Effect of oral contraceptives and doxycycline on endometrial MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity

ObjectivesTo describe the effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity and compare MMP activity in women taking a COC with or without doxycycline. Study designSubjects (n=20) underwent endometrial biopsies (1) in the late luteal phase of a baseline cycle prior to initiating COCs, (2) on days 19–21 while taking COCs in a standard 28-day cycle (7-day hormone-free interval) and (3) on days 26–28 while taking active COCs continuously for a 28-day cycle. During the continuous COC cycle, they were randomized to receive daily subantimicrobial dose doxycycline 40mg or placebo. ResultsCompared to baseline, COC treatment increased MMP-2 (p<.001) and MMP-9 (p<.001). MMP activity was lower in subjects taking a COC with doxycycline compared to those receiving placebo although only significantly lower for MMP-2 latent form (p=.002). ConclusionsUnscheduled bleeding with COCs may be the result of increased endometrial MMPs. Sample size limitations prevent us from determining how doxycycline affects MMP activity in COC users.