Hofferth and Phillips (1987) project that by 1995 two-thirds of preschool children will have an employed mother; this means that arranging substitute child care will be a necessity for the majority of families with preschool children. Families use a variety of strategies to provide substitute care when a single parent or both parents are employed. Parents may share care by having nonoverlapping work schedules, or they may use relatives for child care, or take the child to a family day care home or day care center. Research investigating the effects of child care costs, availability, and preferences on both women's employment and child care decisions has generally focused on the primary care arrangement. In reality, however, a significant proportion of families with preschool children use multiple care arrangements to enable them to meet work and family responsibilities. In two recent national surveys, 36% to 38% of preschool children with employed mothers had multiple care providers (Folk & Beller, 1993; Hofferth, Brayfield, Deich, & Holcomb, 1991). In this article, we explore possible reasons for the significant proportion of families using multiple care by examining (a) the patterns of combinations of child care types used and (b) the factors that increase the likelihood of using multiple care providers. We expand on previous research by providing a detailed description of both types and amounts of child care used by married and single mothers. In addition, we examine multiple care combinations used by families with either one or two preschool children. Previous research has examined multiple care for only one child in the family. FACTORS RELATED TO MULTIPLE CARE ARRANGEMENTS Neoclassical economic models of the household assume that parents derive satisfaction from consuming market- and home-produced goods and services, producing and enjoying children, and from leisure (Becker, 1981). In Blau's (1991) model of child care quality, parents simultaneously choose a child care provider, a set of market, goods and services, and an amount of nonwork time in order to maximize their satisfaction given their budget constraint. The budget constraint is determined by income (given a chosen work allocation) and prices of goods and services. According to Blau (1991), choice of a child care provider is based not only on desired quality of substitute child care, but also on a parent's preferences for consumer goods, leisure time, a desire for a provider with shared values, religion, and/or ethnicity, and advantages such as convenience, proximity, or reliability of the care provider. Trade-offs will occur among all these preferences based on their relative costs and perceived benefits. For example, parents might be willing to choose a child care provider less likely to foster the child's intellectual development in return for greater convenience or reliability of the arrangement. Using Blau's (1991) framework, we consider possible trade-offs that may affect the choice of using multiple care providers rather than a single care arrangement. In the following review, we examine previous research findings regarding the relationship between parental preferences, budget constraints, and other constraints and the use of multiple care. Parental Preferences Preferences for a provider with shared values, religion, or ethnic background (Blau, 1991) may lead parents to provide care themselves or to use an available relative. Limited availability of parents or relatives could lead parents to combine preferred care by a family member with other types of child care. For example, father's time availability for child care while the mother is employed is limited by the full-time work week of most married males. This constraint explains why fathers are more likely to provide care when the mother works part-time, and/or works a nonday shift (Presser, 1989) and why multiple care is more common when the father is the main provider of care (U. …
Read full abstract