The purpose of this research is to investigate the function of prosecution within the framework of Pakistan's criminal justice system as seen through the lens of India. Through the use of historical and doctrinal research methodologies, the examination dives into the development of prosecutorial functions in both nations. Within the scope of this study, a comparison and contrast of the legislative frameworks that control the prosecutorial function is carried out. Particular attention is paid to important aspects such as prosecutorial discretion, pre-trial investigation, and trial advocacy. The purpose of this research is to investigate the ways in which the courts in Pakistan and India have interpreted the powers and restrictions of the prosecutor by analyzing significant cases. This comparative technique allows the investigation to identify both commonalities, which are a result of a shared colonial past, and differences, which are a result of separate legal processes. The research provides an in-depth analysis of the efficiency of the prosecution process in each nation, stressing both the positive and negative aspects of the system as well as prospective areas for improvement. The findings of this study present suggestions for enhancing the prosecutorial position within Pakistan's criminal justice system. These recommendations are derived from the Indian experience, which the research draws upon. One of the goals of this research is to make a contribution to the continuing conversations that are taking place about how to assure a more strong and efficient prosecutorial role, which would eventually result in a criminal justice system in Pakistan that is more effective and just.