Twenty rats received bilateral lesions at three levels of the hippocampus, 20 received bilateral lesions of the amygdaloid complex, and 20 served as unoperated controls. Sets of lesion groups were trained on one of four discrimination tasks differing in stimulus dis tinctiveness. I t was found that hippocampal lesioned rats were deficient on those tasks low in cue distinctiveness but similar to controls on those tasks high in cue distinctiveness. A control experiment showed that these findings could not be explained in terms of a failure of hippocampal lesioned rats to habituate to an irrelevant tactile stimulus present in those discrimination tasks in which hippocampallesioned rats were deficient. Rats with hippocampal lesions are said to per severate because of an inability to suppress or stop the initiation or execution of prepotent responses. Thus, deficits in the learning of a new task may be the result of perseveration on an old task. Since successive discrimination impairments in hippocam pal lesioned rats can be interpreted as a result of perseveration on the response against which dis crimination learning is measured (Douglas, 1967; Isaacson, Schmahz, & Douglas, 1966), the aim of the present experiment was to determine whether per severation was an inevitable consequence of hippo campectomy in rats, or whether it varied as a func tion of cue distinctiveness. Since it has been shown that rats with hippocampal lesions are less distracted by irrelevant stimuli during a trained runway response (Raphelson, Isaacson, & Douglas, 1965; Riddell, Rothblatt, & Wilson, 1969; Wickelgren & Isaacson, 1963), it might be expected that hippocampallesioned rats would not notice the relevant stimuli in a runway go, no-go successive discrimination task. EXPERIMENT 1 Stimuli were used which were thought to vary in distinctiveness because of the inherent dominance of certain sensory modalities in the rat and because of the inherent sensitivity of the rat to certain stimulus dimensions. Tactile stimuli (roughness and tempera ture) were used as highly distinctive stimulus dimen sions, while visual stimuli (brightness and orientation) were used as relatively indistinct dimensions. Further, it could be suggested that brightness was relatively higher in distinctiveness than the orientation di mension.
Read full abstract