--Many field studies of lizard behavior have reported that males perch higher than females. Some workers have suggested that this difference is a means of eliminating competition between the sexes for food items when food is scarce (food-competition avoidance hypothesis). Other workers have suggested that sexual differences in social behavior, e.g., male territoriality, are responsible (social-role hypothesis). To test these hypotheses, pairs of tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus, were placed in outdoor enclosures and provided daily with excess food. Their heights on 2-m tall cinder-block posts were recorded throughout the morning hours every 30 min for nine days during and for nine days after the reproductive season. The males perched an average of 29 cm higher than the females during the reproductive season (a significant difference), but only 17 cm higher during the post-reproductive period (not significantly different). Most of the reduction in distance between the sexes was due to the increased perching height of the females. I interpret these data as supporting the social-role hypothesis, and provide several suggestions to explain the increase in perch height of the females after the breeding season. This study was designed to test a pair of hypotheses concerning sexual differences in perch height preference often found among iguanid lizards. In general, males are seen perching higher than are females (but see Simon and Middendorf, 1985). Intraspecific competition for limited food resources has been proposed by some investigators to explain the perch height and size differences seen between the sexes (Rand, 1967; Schoener, 1967). Other workers, however, saw sexual differences in social roles as the explanation (Andrews, 1971; Scott et al., 1976; Stamps, 1977). According to this scenario, males perch higher so that they may survey the area for territorial intruders and for potential mates; females perch lower to search efficiently for nourishment that is needed for egg production (Scott et al., 1976). To test these conflicting hypotheses, Pounds and Jackson (1983) recorded the height at which male and female fence lizards, Sceloporus undulatus, were seen perching in the field. They found that males shifted perch height with season: during the breeding season, males perched significantly higher than did females, but after the breeding season ended, males perched at the same level as the females. They interpreted their findings as supporting the social-role hypothesis. However, they cautioned that it was still possible that the lizards were more food limited during the breeding season (early summer) than after. This could result in males looking for different food items from higher perches during the breeding season. They suggested that further study would be necessary to tease these two hypotheses apart. Using the tree lizard, Urosaurus ornatus, I attempted to do just that. Previous studies concerning perch height preferences were based on observations of basically undisturbed natural populations. In order to control food supply and provide uniform perches, the present study was conducted in semi-natural outdoor enclosures. Thus, by providing excess food, I could eliminate the possibility of competition for limited This content downloaded from 157.55.39.251 on Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:30 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Read full abstract