Buildings equipped with transfer systems, such as transfer beams or transfer trusses, generally possess structural walls, necessitating an assessment of their adequacy in higher earthquake zones. A parametric study is performed on 2D RC frame buildings containing structural walls, (i) utilizing a transfer beam system by altering the position and distribution of the structural walls; and (ii) employing a transfer truss system by altering its positions and increasing the number of bays. The mass participation of buildings using transfer beam systems (∼57 to 69 %) is lower than those of employing transfer truss systems (∼61 to 86 %); it is essential to consider higher mode effects. The deformation behaviour of buildings with transfer systems has transitioned from flexural to shear, or a combination of both, by terminating structural walls or altering the positions of transfer trusses. The shear forces at transfer storeys are markedly increased, leading to considerable stiffness irregularities in elevation. The ratio of the average stiffness of the transfer storeys to the average stiffness of the conventional stories has increased from around 6.9 to 40 due to the inclusion of the transfer truss. The outcome from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses based on the maximum considered earthquake reveal that (i) it is essential to incorporate structural walls throughout the height of buildings; (ii) the presence of transfer beams enhances the vulnerability of the columns above, which leads to major stress concentration at the junctions of transfer beams and structural walls; (iii) the overall enhancement in stiffness is around 75 %, while the reductions in strength and deformability are 28.6 % and 27.5 %, respectively, when transitioning from a transfer beam to a transfer truss system; thereby, buildings using a transfer truss system exhibit reduced energy dissipation capacity, with a reduction in the response reduction factor of ∼ 86.5 %, and (iv) transfer beam systems caused severe damage to beams (exceeding 50 %) and occasionally to columns above or below the transfer storey, complicating retrofitting activities and requiring demolition instead. In turn, it is preferable to entirely avoid buildings with transfer systems in high earthquake zones, regardless of the presence of structural walls.
Read full abstract