Evaluating the impact of higher-mode and inelastic dynamic responses of concrete frames on the performance of seismic intensity measures

Abstract

The accuracy of seismic risk-based evaluation depends on the selected seismic intensity measures (IMs). The performance of the selected IM is commonly assessed based on efficiency and sufficiency criteria, which reflect the ability of the IM to reduce epistemic uncertainty and avoid bias, respectively. Although various characteristics of structural dynamic response affect IM performance to different extents, the current literature determines IM suitability based on the overall response. This study examines the impact of two dynamic response characteristics, namely higher-mode effect and nonlinearity, on the efficiency and sufficiency of a comprehensive set of common and advanced IMs. Two correlation-based measures are then proposed to explicitly evaluate the effect of higher-mode effect and nonlinearity using statistical tests. The results show that the developed statistical measures can explain the inefficiency and insufficiency of an IM based on dynamic characteristics of response. In addition, while the IM’s efficiency and sufficiency changes for different structures and ground motion sets, vector-valued and energy-based scalar IMs provide more consistent performance. Lastly, the impact of higher-mode response and nonlinearity is more pronounced on IMs efficiency than IM sufficiency.