MANY YEARS ago, I discovered that, when I went to a high-tech conference that was not designed for educators, I often learned more, at least about technology. I am not sure whether other sectors are ahead of education, whether we're just falling behind, or whether just getting out is what's helpful. So for years I have consciously tried to attend at least one conference a year that is aimed at and attended by such people as telecommunications experts, graphic artists, those who work in the entertainment industry, corporate trainers, business executives, representatives of the military/industrial complex, chip designers, robot builders, and so on. What I have discovered from this practice of mine is that, if you hang around only with educators, you learn to think only the way they do. Your world will be too small. I do have a suspicion as to why you see more advanced technology at noneducation conferences. My suspicion is that business, industry, and the military are much bigger markets than education. I also suspect that educational institutions tend not to be early adopters of the newest technology, which is what conferences and trade shows highlight. In addition to attending what might seem like some weird high-tech conferences, I also receive and read sundry journals, such as Sound & Communication, a magazine for system integrators; DV-Digital Video, a journal about high-tech video; Teleconference, a journal devoted to enterprise-wide collaboration; Network World, whose title tells it all; and Technology Review, a journal from MIT, which I strongly recommend. Recently, I received a new journal, Streaming 4 Business.1 And it is this journal that prompted me to write this column. The phrase is a specific term that usually refers to motion video with accompanying audio that is delivered live over the Internet; that is, a user doesn't have to download a file to a personal computer and then play it back. Maybe I am a pessimist, but for years I just could not see how it would ever be possible to stream video to most users reliably and with any consistency over the clogged Internet. Obviously, if you're on a go-fast university-based LAN, as I am, streaming video over the LAN is not a problem. Most people, however, do not have such a great Internet connection. Reading Streaming 4 Business, I learned how companies like Akamai are solving the technological problems and making streaming video work well. Akamai Technologies of Cambridge, Massachusetts (http://www.akamai.com), uses to help its customers solve the problem of distributing high-quality streaming video and other rich media to users around the world. Currently, Akamai has more than 4,200 servers in 50 countries running on 225 different telecommunications networks! The reason? If the video won't go from here to there reliably, just move the video to there. This sounds straightforward, but it would be terribly redundant to move all the video to all the servers. To solve this problem, Akamai uses a sophisticated map-based algorithm to predict where and when users will need certain video, which it then moves to an edge server that is as close to the user as possible. Akamai also takes a unique approach to solving the problem of different users having Internet connections with different bandwidths. Most people who encode and stream video typically encode the video for three different Internet connection speeds, such as 28-56 kb/s, 128 kb/s (ISDN speed), and 300+ kb/s (high-speed connection). When you receive one of these video streams, if the Internet gets clogged up, the video hesitates, and the frame rate drops to a frame a second or less. Typically the video window size remains the same. Akamai takes a different approach and just reduces the size of the video window. The idea is to keep the video quality high and sacrifice window size. I have not had a chance to try out this technology, but I am eager to do so. …
Read full abstract