研究干旱胁迫对平邑甜茶(<em>Malus hupehensis</em>)和楸子(<em>Malus prunifolia</em>)根系水力结构及其PV曲线水分参数的影响。设定正常与干旱2种水分处理,对2种苹果砧木进行氯化汞-巯基乙醇处理和压力室-容积(PV)曲线测定试验,并利用高压流速仪(HPFM),测定平邑甜茶和楸子根系水力结构。结果表明:随着水分胁迫的加重,平邑甜茶和楸子的根系导水率、根系叶比导水率、根系茎比导水率出现减少趋势。在适宜水分和重度干旱条件下,平邑甜茶根系叶比导水率分别为楸子根系叶比导水率的95%和92%,平邑甜茶根系茎比导水率分别为楸子根系茎比导水率的52%和62%,楸子与平邑甜茶相比在根系茎比导水率和根系叶比导水率上出现增加趋势。干旱胁迫可能会导致水通道蛋白的活性受到抑制,致使其根系导水率出现降低,继而导致了地上部分气体交换受到影响。严重干旱时,楸子与平邑甜茶相比可能具有更大的水孔蛋白表达量来抵御干旱胁迫。在2种水分条件下,楸子的初始质壁分离时的渗透势(<em>ψs</em><sup>tlp</sup>)、饱和含水时的渗透势(<em>ψs</em><sup>sat</sup>)、初始质壁分离时的相对水含量(RWC<sup>tlp</sup>)、初始质壁分离时的相对渗透水含量(ROWC<sup>tlp</sup>)、组织细胞总体弹性模量(ε')值与平邑甜茶相比较均处于较低水平,束缚水含量(<em>Va</em>)值处在较高水平。对PV曲线水分参数进行隶属函数综合评价得出的<em>Δ</em>值为楸子大于平邑甜茶,平邑甜茶和楸子之间<em>b</em>值差异不明显。在适宜水分和重度干旱条件下楸子所体现出的输水策略优于平邑甜茶。PV曲线水分参数同苹果砧木根系的水力结构一样能够随着植物所处的环境做出相应的调整。对于PV曲线水分参数研究发现,楸子在膨压保持方面与平邑甜茶相比,其抗旱性优于平邑甜茶。;Water deficit is a growing problem affecting the production of high quality apple fruit in many different parts of the world, including the northwestern region of the Loess Plateau of China. The use of genetically drought-resistant rootstocks is a promising water-saving practice in these apple-producing regions. To understand the mechanisms of water absorption and to better evaluate drought-resistant apple rootstocks, research on the relationship between hydraulic conductance, aquaporins, and osmosis adjustment in apple rootstocks during water stress is critical. In this study, we measured the effects of water deficit on hydraulic architecture and pressure-volume curve parameters of <em>Malus hupehensis</em> ‘Pingyitiancha' and <em>M. prunifolia</em> ‘Qiuzi'. Experiments were carried out on both rootstocks using two different treatment regimes; a suitable soil moisture treatment with soil water at 70%-75% of field capacity, and a drought stress treatment with soil water at 40%-45% of field capacity. Root hydraulic conductance was determined from mercuric chloride-mercaptoethanol immersion treatments, which trigger reversible inhibition of aquaporins, using a high-pressure flow meter (HPFM). Gas exchange was measured with a CIRAS-2 portable photosynthesis system. A pressure-volume curve was constructed from parameters obtained using a Model-1000 PMS pressure chamber. Hydraulic conductance, leaf area specific conductance, and sapwood area specific conductance in roots of <em>M. hupehensis</em> and <em>M. prunifolia</em> decreased when subjected to drought stress. Under conditions of suitable soil moisture, leaf area specific conductance and root sapwood area specific conductance for <em>M. hupehensis </em>were 95% and 52%, respectively, of those obtained for <em>M. prunifolia</em>; under severe drought conditions, these values were 92% and 62% of <em>M. prunifolia </em>measurements. <em>Malus prunifolia</em> had higher leaf area specific conductance and root sapwood area specific conductance than <em>M. hupehensis</em>. Drought stress can reduce aquaporin activity, thus decreasing root hydraulic conductance and subsequently affecting net photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration of aerial parts. Therefore, to resist water stress under severe drought, <em>M. prunifolia</em> may be able to express higher levels of aquaporins than <em>M. hupehensis</em>. Under both treatment conditions, osmotic potential at turgor loss point (<em>ψs</em><sup>tlp</sup>), osmotic potential at saturated point (<em>ψs</em><sup>sat</sup>), relative water content at turgor loss point (RWC<sup>tlp</sup>), relative osmotic water content at turgor loss point (ROWC<sup>tlp</sup>) and maximum bulk elastic modulus (ε') were higher in <em>M. hupehensis</em> than in <em>M. prunifolia</em>, whereas bound water content (<em>Va</em>) was higher in <em>M. prunifolia</em>. Comprehensive evaluation of pressure-volume curve parameters using subordinate function analysis revealed that the average value of the subordinate function (<em>Δ</em>) of <em>M. prunifolia</em> was larger than that of <em>M. hupehensis</em>; however, the slope (<em>b</em>) of the linear regression line between turgor pressure and leaf water content did not significantly differ between <em>M. prunifolia </em>and <em>M. hupehensis</em>. These results show that under both conditions, <em>M. prunifolia</em> employed a better water-use strategy than <em>M. hupehensis. </em>Both rootstock varieties were able to respond to changing environmental conditions by adjusting pressure-volume curve parameters and hydraulic architecture. Investigation of pressure-volume curve parameters revealed that <em>M. prunifolia </em>had a greater ability to maintain turgor and was more drought resistant than <em>M. hupehensis</em>.