ObjectiveTime-lapse technology allows us to use embryo kinetics as potential markers for selection. Previous studies associate some of these markers with a higher implantation. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of culture media on embryo kinetics and to validate these markers for the different media utilized.DesignProspective double blinded cohort study.Materials and Methods723 oocytes were randomly divided at retrieval. Half of the oocytes from each donor were treated with media 1 (Global, USA) (n = 369), the other half with media 2 (Sage, USA) (n = 354). After injection, oocytes were placed inside the Embryoscope (Unisense-Fertilitech, Aahrus-Denmark), an incubator with programmable time-lapse image acquisition. Variables studied included: timing to 2 (T2), 3 (T3), and 4 cells (T4). We also studied variables associated with higher implantation rates such as: timing to 5 cell (T5), length of second cycle (CC2 = t3-t2) and synchrony from 2 to 4 cell embryos (S2 = t4-t3). Optimal ranges proposed for these variables were: 48.8-56.6 hours, < 12 hours and < 0.75 hours respectively.ResultsTabled 1T5S2CC2Out of range48.8-56.6 hOut of range< 0.75 hOut of range< 12 hMedia 1N15092129134126143%62.0%38.0%49.0%51.0%46.8%53.2%Media 2N14396133136131143%59.8%40.2%49.4%50.6%47.8%52.2%P valueNSNSNS Open table in a new tab ConclusionCulture media does not affect embryo kinetics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating culture media based on a continuous dynamic evaluation. The percentage of embryos within optimal ranges is not different. Therefore these markers can be used for embryo selection regardless of the media utilized. ObjectiveTime-lapse technology allows us to use embryo kinetics as potential markers for selection. Previous studies associate some of these markers with a higher implantation. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of culture media on embryo kinetics and to validate these markers for the different media utilized. Time-lapse technology allows us to use embryo kinetics as potential markers for selection. Previous studies associate some of these markers with a higher implantation. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of culture media on embryo kinetics and to validate these markers for the different media utilized. DesignProspective double blinded cohort study. Prospective double blinded cohort study. Materials and Methods723 oocytes were randomly divided at retrieval. Half of the oocytes from each donor were treated with media 1 (Global, USA) (n = 369), the other half with media 2 (Sage, USA) (n = 354). After injection, oocytes were placed inside the Embryoscope (Unisense-Fertilitech, Aahrus-Denmark), an incubator with programmable time-lapse image acquisition. Variables studied included: timing to 2 (T2), 3 (T3), and 4 cells (T4). We also studied variables associated with higher implantation rates such as: timing to 5 cell (T5), length of second cycle (CC2 = t3-t2) and synchrony from 2 to 4 cell embryos (S2 = t4-t3). Optimal ranges proposed for these variables were: 48.8-56.6 hours, < 12 hours and < 0.75 hours respectively. 723 oocytes were randomly divided at retrieval. Half of the oocytes from each donor were treated with media 1 (Global, USA) (n = 369), the other half with media 2 (Sage, USA) (n = 354). After injection, oocytes were placed inside the Embryoscope (Unisense-Fertilitech, Aahrus-Denmark), an incubator with programmable time-lapse image acquisition. Variables studied included: timing to 2 (T2), 3 (T3), and 4 cells (T4). We also studied variables associated with higher implantation rates such as: timing to 5 cell (T5), length of second cycle (CC2 = t3-t2) and synchrony from 2 to 4 cell embryos (S2 = t4-t3). Optimal ranges proposed for these variables were: 48.8-56.6 hours, < 12 hours and < 0.75 hours respectively. ResultsTabled 1T5S2CC2Out of range48.8-56.6 hOut of range< 0.75 hOut of range< 12 hMedia 1N15092129134126143%62.0%38.0%49.0%51.0%46.8%53.2%Media 2N14396133136131143%59.8%40.2%49.4%50.6%47.8%52.2%P valueNSNSNS Open table in a new tab ConclusionCulture media does not affect embryo kinetics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating culture media based on a continuous dynamic evaluation. The percentage of embryos within optimal ranges is not different. Therefore these markers can be used for embryo selection regardless of the media utilized. Culture media does not affect embryo kinetics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating culture media based on a continuous dynamic evaluation. The percentage of embryos within optimal ranges is not different. Therefore these markers can be used for embryo selection regardless of the media utilized.
Read full abstract