Hierarchical Assessment Of Balance Research Articles

Responsiveness and interpretability of commonly used outcome assessments of mobility capacity in older hospital patients with cognitive spectrum disorders

BackgroundIn older hospital patients with cognitive spectrum disorders (CSD), mobility should be monitored frequently with standardised and psychometrically sound measurement instruments. This study aimed to examine the responsiveness, minimal important change (MIC), floor effects and ceiling effects of commonly used outcome assessments of mobility capacity in older patients with dementia, delirium or other cognitive impairment.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study that included acute older hospital patients with CSD (study period: 02/2015–12/2015), the following mobility assessments were applied: de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM), Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, 4-m gait speed test, 5-times chair rise test, 2-min walk test, Timed Up and Go test, Barthel Index mobility subscale, and Functional Ambulation Categories. These assessments were administered shorty after hospital admission (baseline) and repeated prior to discharge (follow-up). Global rating of mobility change scales and a clinical anchor of functional ambulation were used as external criteria to determine the area under the curve (AUC). Construct- and anchor-based approaches determined responsiveness. MIC values for each instrument were established from different anchor- and distribution-based approaches.ResultsOf the 63 participants (age range: 69–94 years) completing follow-up assessments with mild (Mini Mental State Examination: 19–24 points; 67%) and moderate (10–18 points; 33%) cognitive impairment, 25% were diagnosed with dementia alone, 13% with delirium alone, 11% with delirium superimposed on dementia and 51% with another cognitive impairment. The follow-up assessment was performed 10.8 ± 2.5 (range: 7–17) days on average after the baseline assessment. The DEMMI was the most responsive mobility assessment (all AUC > 0.7). For the other instruments, the data provided conflicting evidence of responsiveness, or evidence of no responsiveness. MIC values for each instrument varied depending on the method used for calculation. The DEMMI and HABAM were the only instruments without floor or ceiling effects.ConclusionsMost outcome assessments of mobility capacity seem insufficiently responsive to change in older hospital patients with CSD. The significant floor effects of most instruments further limit the monitoring of mobility alterations over time in this population. The DEMMI was the only instrument that was able to distinguish clinically important changes from measurement error.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00005591). Registered February 2, 2015.

The Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM): a useful tool to estimate length of hospital stay following hip and knee replacement

Background/Aims The Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility is a measure of balance and mobility that can detect recovery of physical function, and can be used to identify patients at risk of delayed discharge. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility scores as a predictor of length of hospital stay in patients following hip and knee replacement. Methods Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility scores were collected on 191 patients following primary total joint replacement. Regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility and length of stay. Results Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility scores of <31 on the first post-operative day predicted longer than mean length of stay (4 days) with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 83%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that a Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility score of 50 was the optimal cut-off point for discharge. Conclusions Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility offers a practical way to quantify and objectively track patients' physical function, and can help identify patients at risk of an increased length of stay on post-operative day one.

Reliability of mobility measures in older medical patients with cognitive impairment

BackgroundMobility is a key indicator of physical functioning in older people, but there is limited evidence of the reliability of mobility measures in older people with cognitive impairment. This study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability and measurement error of common measurement instruments of mobility and physical functioning in older patients with dementia, delirium or other cognitive impairment.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed in a geriatric hospital. Older acute medical patients with cognitive impairment, indicated by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of ≤24 points, were assessed twice within 1 day by a trained physiotherapist.The following instruments were applied: de Morton Mobility Index, Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility, Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, 4-m gait speed, 5-times chair rise test, 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, Barthel Index mobility subscale and Functional Ambulation Categories.As appropriate, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cohen’s kappa, standard error of measurement, limits of agreement and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were estimated.ResultsSixty-five older acute medical patients with cognitive impairment participated in the study (mean age: 82 ± 7 years; mean MMSE: 20 ± 4, range: 10 to 24 points). Some participants were physically or cognitively unable to perform the gait speed (46%), 2-min walk (46%), timed up and go (51%) and chair rise (75%) tests.ICC and kappa values were above 0.9 in all instruments except for the gait speed (ICC = 0.86) and chair rise (ICC = 0.72) measures. Measurement error is reported for each instrument. The absolute limits of agreement ranged from 11% (de Morton Mobility Index and Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility) to 35% (chair rise test).ConclusionsThe test-retest reliability is sufficient (> 0.7) for group-comparisons in all examined instruments. Most mobility measurements have limited use for individual monitoring of mobility over time in older hospital patients with cognitive impairment because of the large measurement error (> 20% of scale width), even though relative reliability estimations seem sufficient (> 0.9) for this purpose.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00005591). Registered 2 February 2015.

The Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM): an underutilised tool to track physical function and estimate length of stay

Purpose: Impaired mobility and balance correlate strongly with an individual's function and overall state of health. The Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) is a graphic and rapid assessment of balance and mobility originally designed for use within the hospitalised elderly. The measure has been used predominantly within frail elderly populations; however the aims of this study were to assess the utility of the HABAM to an elective orthopaedic population.

Impairments in balance and mobility identify delirium in patients with comorbid dementia.

ABSTRACTDiagnosing delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD) remains challenging because of a lack of specific tools, though motor dysfunction in delirium has been relatively under-explored. This study aimed to use dysfunction in balance and mobility (with the Hierarchical Assessment of Balance And Mobility: HABAM) to identify DSD. This is a cross-sectional multicenter study, recruiting consecutive patients ≥70 years admitted to five acute or rehabilitation hospitals in Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Switzerland. Delirium was diagnosed using DSM-5 criteria; dementia was determined by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Questionnaire of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. HABAM score was recorded at admission. Out of 114 patients (mean age ± SD = 82 ± 7; 54% female), dementia alone was present in 24.6% (n = 28), delirium alone in 18.4% (n = 21) and DSD in 27.2% (n = 31). Patients with DSD had a mean HABAM score 7 points greater than those with dementia alone (19.8 ± 8.7 vs 12.5 ± 9.5; p < 0.001); 70% of participants with DSD were correctly identified using the HABAM at a cut off of 22 (sensitivity 61%, specificity 79%, AUC = 0.76). Individuals with delirium have worse motor function than those without delirium, even in the context of comorbid dementia. Measuring motor function using the HABAM in older people at admission may help to diagnose DSD.

The delirium and population health informatics cohort study protocol: ascertaining the determinants and outcomes from delirium in a whole population

BackgroundDelirium affects 25% of older inpatients and is associated with long-term cognitive impairment and future dementia. However, no population studies have systematically ascertained cognitive function before, cognitive deficits during, and cognitive impairment after delirium. Therefore, there is a need to address the following question: does delirium, and its features (including severity, duration, and presumed aetiologies), predict long-term cognitive impairment, independent of cognitive impairment at baseline?MethodsThe Delirium and Population Health Informatics Cohort (DELPHIC) study is an observational population-based cohort study based in the London Borough of Camden. It is recruiting 2000 individuals aged ≥70 years and prospectively following them for two years, including daily ascertainment of all inpatient episodes for delirium. Daily inpatient assessments include the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, the Observational Scale for Level of Arousal, and the Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility. Data on delirium aetiology is also collected. The primary outcome is the change in the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status at two years.DiscussionDELPHIC is the first population sample to assess older persons before, during and after hospitalisation. The cumulative incidence of delirium in the general population aged ≥70 will be described. DELPHIC offers the opportunity to quantify the impact of delirium on cognitive and functional outcomes. Overall, DELPHIC will provide a real-time public health observatory whereby information from primary, secondary, intermediate and social care can be integrated to understand how acute illness is linked to health and social care outcomes.

Comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index and Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility in older acute medical patients.

To compare the measurement properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and the Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) in an older acute medical inpatient population. Cross-sectional. Older acute medical inpatients. The DEMMI, HABAM and further assessments were performed after hospital admission. Construct validity was assessed by testing 13 hypotheses on convergent and known-groups validity. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change were estimated based on a re-assessment of unchanged patients. Floor and ceiling effects were used to indicate adequacy of scale width. For both the DEMMI and HABAM, 11 (85%) hypotheses regarding construct validity were confirmed (n = 158). Both scales showed strong correlations with other multi-component mobility scales (Spearman's rho 0.75-0.92). Neither floor nor ceiling effects were evident. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.96-0.99) for the DEMMI and 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-0.99) for the HABAM, respectively (n = 30). The minimal detectable change with 90% confidence was 6 points on the 100-point DEMMI scale and 1 point on the 26-point HABAM scale. The DEMMI and the HABAM appear to be suitable for measuring mobility in older acute medical patients.

Hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility : German translation and cross-cultural adaptation

The hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility (HABAM) is an internationally established clinical mobility test which has good psychometric properties, allows an easy assessment of mobility and the graphical illustration of change over time in geriatric patients. The aims of this study were the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the English original HABAM into the German language as well as a preliminary analysis of the practicability and construct validity of the HABAM. The HABAM was translated into German following international guidelines. A prefinal version was clinically tested by physiotherapists in two geriatric hospitals over a period of 5 weeks. In order to make a final revision of the German HABAM version, structured in-depth feedback was obtained from the seven therapists who had used the HABAM most often. A total of 18 physiotherapists used the HABAM for 47 elderly inpatients for the initial assessment. The translated items and instructions seemed comprehensible but problems occurred concerning the conducting and documentation of the HABAM. Modifications led to the final German HABAM version and 85% of the HABAM assessments were performed within ≤ 10min. There was a correlation of rs= 0.71 with the Tinetti test and of rs = 0.68 with the Barthel index. A German HABAM version is now accessible for use in clinical practice. The results of a preliminary psychometric analysis indicate a potentially good practicability and sufficient construct validity. A comprehensive analysis of psychometric properties is pending.

Frailty and Mobility.

Frailty represents a state of heightened vulnerability. Mobility impairment contributes to the construct of frailty and channels adverse events. While mobility disorder is universal at a high burden of frailty, neither mobility nor balance dysfunction is sufficient to fully define frailty. Frailty represents proximity to complex system failure, with higher-order disturbance, such as mobility and balance disturbance, as a consequence. Impairment of mobility and balance is a common manifestation of illness in the frail individual and is therefore a sensitive marker of acute disease, putatively also in delirium. Clinical measurement of mobility and balance should be prioritized. Consequently, assessment tools, such as the de Morton Mobility Index and the Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility, are being explored, with the sensitivity of the latter illustrated in the acute hospital setting. Walking with speed and under dual/multi-task conditions better differentiates healthier and frail ambulant adults, providing a basis for screening older adults for pre-emptive interventions. Specific mobility and balance interventions reduce falls risk. However, patients with dementia walk too fast for their level of frailty, creating an ethical dimension to rehabilitation and risk. Overall, there is no need for reduced mobility to reinforce the frailty stereotype; both are potentially modifiable and amenable to intervention strategies.

Assessing balance and mobility to track illness and recovery in older inpatients.

Archetypal symptoms and signs are commonly absent in frail older people who are acutely unwell. This challenges both recognition of illness and monitoring of disease progression in people at high risk of prolonged hospital stays, institutionalization and death. To determine whether bedside assessment of balance and mobility could track acute changes in the health status of older people admitted to hospital. Prospective cohort study. Four hundred nine patients, with a mean age of 81.8years, admitted to general medical and rehabilitation wards at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia. No patient refused assessment, and the only exclusion criterion was age. The Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) was completed daily during the first 2weeks of admission. For each patient, frailty status was measured on admission by a Frailty Index based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA). Death and discharge destination. Poor performance in balance, transfers and mobility was associated with adverse outcomes. Forty-eight percent of patients with the lowest scores in all three domains died, compared with none with the highest scores. The relative risk of death for people who deteriorated during the first 48 h of admission was 17.1 (95% confidence interval: 4.9-60.3). Changes in HABAM scores were related to the discharge destination: patients discharged home showed the greatest rate of improvement, whereas those discharged to institutions stabilised at a lower level of performance. Fitter patients tended to have better performance on admission and faster recovery. Daily bedside observation of mobility and balance allows assessment of acute changes in the health of older people. Frailty slows recovery of mobility and balance, and reduces recovery potential. By identifying patients most vulnerable to adverse outcomes, the HABAM and FI-CGA may facilitate risk stratification in older people admitted to hospital.

Validity, responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference for the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in an older acute medical population

BackgroundThe de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) is a new mobility instrument that overcomes the limitations of existing instruments. It is the first mobility instrument that accurately measures the mobility of all older adults. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed report of investigations of the validity, responsiveness to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the DEMMI during its development in an older acute medical population.MethodsThis study was conducted using a head to head comparison design in two independent samples of older acute medical patients (development sample, n = 86; validation sample, n = 106). Consecutive patients (≥ 65 years) were assessed using the DEMMI, Barthel Index (BI) and Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) within 48 hours of hospital admission and discharge. Convergent and discriminant validity were investigated using Spearman's rho and known groups validity was investigated using a independent t test to compare DEMMI scores for patients who were discharged to home compared to inpatient rehabilitation. Criterion and distribution based methods were employed for estimating instrument responsiveness to change and the MCID.ResultsSignificant moderate to high correlations were identified between DEMMI and BI scores (r = 0.76 and r = 0.68) and DEMMI and HABAM scores (r = 0.91 and r = 0.92) in both samples. In both samples, DEMMI scores for patients who were discharged to home were significantly higher than for patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation and provided evidence of known groups validity. Patients who were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (n = 8) had a mean DEMMI score of 50.75 (sd = 11.29) at acute hospital discharge compared to patients who were discharged to home (n = 70) with a mean DEMMI score of 62.14 (sd = 18.41). MCID estimates were similar across samples using distribution and criterion based methods. The MCID for the DEMMI was 10 points on the 100 point interval scale. The DEMMI was significantly more responsive to change than the BI using criterion and distribution based methods in the validation sample.ConclusionThis study has validated the DEMMI in two independent samples of older acute medical patients. Estimates of its responsiveness and MCID have also been established. This study confirms that the DEMMI overcomes the limitations of the BI and HABAM and provides an advanced method for objectively assessing mobility for older acute medical patients.

A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients

BackgroundIndependent mobility is a key factor in determining readiness for discharge for older patients following acute hospitalisation and has also been identified as a predictor of many important outcomes for this patient group. This review aimed to identify a physical performance instrument that is not disease specific that has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor the mobility of older medical patients in the acute hospital setting.MethodsDatabases initially searched were Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restriction or limits on year of publication until July 2005. After analysis of this yield, a second step was the systematic search of Medline, Cinahl and Embase until August 2005 for evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument. Reports were included in this review if instruments described had face validity for measuring from bed bound to independent levels of ambulation, the items were suitable for application in an acute hospital setting and the instrument required observation (rather than self-report) of physical performance. Evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument was considered if data on measurement properties were reported.ResultsThree instruments, the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Physical Performance Mobility Examination (PPME) were identified as potentially relevant. Clinimetric evaluation indicated that the HABAM has the most desirable properties of these three instruments. However, the HABAM has the limitation of a ceiling effect in an older acute medical patient population and reliability and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) estimates have not been reported for the Rasch refined HABAM. These limitations support the proposal that a new mobility instrument is required for older acute medical patients.ConclusionNo existing instrument has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor mobility of older acute medical patients.

Discharge Delay in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Managed on a Critical Pathway

It has previously been reported that a critical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) significantly reduces bed days per patient managed but results in no difference in average length of stay, suggesting that discharge criteria were not successfully implemented. The present study sought to identify factors in the timing of discharge not taken into account by discharge criteria. Patients admitted with CAP and placed on a pneumonia critical pathway were studied. Patients' functional and cognitive status were evaluated using the Barthel Index, Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Once discharge criteria were met, the patient, a family member and the treating physician were interviewed to identify other factors contributing to length of stay. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study; 12 were discharged when they met discharge criteria and 19 stayed in hospital longer. There were no differences between patients discharged at stability versus those with an increased length of stay in terms of demographics, pneumonia severity score, functional or cognitive status at discharge using the Barthel Index (87.3+/-11.1 versus 83.8+/-8.6, respectively; P=0.46) and MMSE (27.1+/-1.1 versus 27.3+/-1.1, respectively; P=0.64); however, there was a significant difference in HABAM score at the time clinical stability was reached (22.6+/-1.3 versus 17.4+/-3.5, respectively; P=0.03), which correlated with physician and family assessments of patients' readiness for discharge. HABAM may be a useful tool to identify patients at risk of remaining in hospital after objective discharge criteria are met. Additional resources may be targeted at these patients to reduce length of stay in CAP.

Goal attainment scaling as a measure of clinically important change in nursing-home patients.

To assess the feasibility, validity and responsiveness of an individualized measure--goal attainment scaling-in long-term care. Prospective descriptive study. One academic and three community-based long-term care facilities. 53 nursing-home patients seen in consultation between July 1996 and June 1997. Specialized geriatric medicine consultation. Effect size and relative efficiency of the Barthel index, hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility, global deterioration scale, axis 8 (behaviour) of the brief cognitive rating scale, cumulative illness rating scale and the goal attainment scale. Mean goal attainment scale at follow-up was 46+/-7. The goal attainment scale was the most responsive measure, with an effect size of 1.29 and a relative efficiency of 53.7. The goal attainment scale did not correlate well with the other measures (-0.22 to 0.17). Goal attainment scaling is a feasible and responsive measure in long-term care. Although fewer problems in nursing-home patients than elderly inpatients are susceptible to intervention, clinically important goals can be achieved in this population.