Hiatal Dissection Research Articles

Automated task-level autonomy assessment in robotic surgery.

Surgical autonomy for trainees has remained elusive to quantify. Proportion of active control time (ACT) of a trainee during a robotic case can be used as a broad measure of autonomy. However, this metric lacks in the granular detail of quantifying at what specific steps trainees were actively participating. We aim to quantify trainee involvement during robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair at a task-specific level. We performed a retrospective review of surgical performance data from robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs performed. These cases were segmented into 5 tasks by AI-assisted annotation with human review. The segmented tasks included: hiatal dissection, gastric fundus mobilization, mediastinal dissection, cruroplasty and fundoplication. Tasks were excluded if video segmentation of tasks was incorrect. During each task, ACT was recorded for resident, fellow and attending. Resident and fellow ACT per task was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Residents had the highest %ACT in the hiatal dissection (53%), gastric fundus mobilization (84%) and fundoplication (57%) tasks. Fellows had greater than 80% ACT in all 5 tasks, with the highest %ACT in the gastric fundus mobilization (100%) and hiatal dissection (88%). There was a significant difference between resident and fellow ACT during mediastinal dissection and cruroplasty. This study demonstrates how objective performance metrics and automated case segmentation can quantify trainee participation at a task-specific level. By utilizing data afforded by a robotic surgery platform, we are able to provide an objective and automated form of assessment with minimal impact on the workflow of attendings and residents. Our findings can serve to inform residents on what steps they can expect to be involved in during the procedure, appropriate to their PGY level. With this task-level data, we can provide a roadmap for trainee progression to achieve full surgical autonomy.

Tailoring the wrap: intraoperative functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) during hiatal hernia repair

IntroductionThe introduction of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) has provided objective, real-time feedback on the geometric variations with each component of a hiatal hernia repair (HHR). The utility of this technology in altering intraoperative decision-making has been scarcely reported. Herein, we report a single-center series of intraoperative FLIP during HHR.MethodsA retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2020 and 2022 was conducted and all patients undergoing non-recurrent HHR with FLIP were queried. Patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative FLIP values and changes in decision-making, as well as early post-operative outcomes were reported. Both diameter and distensibility index (DI) were measured at 40 ml and 50 ml balloon inflation after hiatal dissection, after hiatal closure, and after fundoplication when indicated.ResultsThirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 ± 14 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The majority (53%) were type I hiatal hernias. The largest drop in DI occurred after hiatal closure, with minimal change seen after fundoplication (mean DI of 4.3 ± 2. after completion of HH dissection, vs 2.7 ± 1.2 after hiatal closure and 2.3 ± 1 after fundoplication when performed). In 13 (39%) of cases, FLIP values directly impacted intraoperative decision-making. Fundoplication was deferred in 4/13 (31%) patients, the wrap was loosened in 2/13 (15%); the type of fundoplication was altered to achieve adequate anti-reflux values in 2/13 (15%) patients, and in 1/13 (3%) the wrap was tightened.ConclusionFLIP measurements can be used intraoperatively to guide decision-making and alter management plan based on objective values. Long-term outcomes and further prospective studies are required to better delineate the value of this technology.

Circumferential resection margin rates in esophageal cancer resection- oncological equivalency and comparable clinical outcomes between open versus minimally invasive techniques: A retrospective cohort study.

Radical surgery for esophageal cancer requires macroscopic and microscopic clearance of all malignant tissue. A critical element of the procedure is achieving a negative circumferential margin (CRM) to minimize local recurrence. The utility of minimally invasive surgery poses challenges in replicating techniques developed in open surgery, particularly for hiatal dissection in esophago-gastrectomy. In this study, the technical approach and clinical and oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy are described with particular reference to CRM involvement. This cohort study included all patients undergoing either open or laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy between January 2004 to June 2022 in a single tertiary center. A standard surgical technique for hiatal dissection of the esophago-gastric junction developed in open surgery was adapted for a laparoscopic approach. Clinical parameters, length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications and mortality data were collected and analyzed by a Mann-Whitney U or Fisher's exact method. Overall 447 patients underwent an esophago-gastrectomy in the study with 219 open and 228 laparoscopic procedures. The CRM involvement was 18.8% in open surgery and 13.6% in laparoscopic surgery. The 90-day-mortality for open surgery was 4.1% compared with 2.2% for laparoscopic procedures. Median Intensive care unit (ITU), inpatient LOS and 30-day readmission rates were shorter for laparoscopic compared with open esophago-gastrectomy (ITU: 5 versus 8 days, P=0.0004; LOS: 14 versus 20 days, P=0.022; 30-day re-admission 7.46% versus 10.50%). Post-operative complication rates were comparable across both cohorts. The rates of starting adjuvant chemotherapy were 51.8% after open and 74.4% in laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy. This study presents a standardized surgical approach to hiatal dissection for esophageal cancer. We present equivalence between open and laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy in clinical, oncological and survival outcomes with similar rates of CRM involvement. We also observe a significantly shorter hospital length of stay with the minimally invasive approach.

Is systematic formal crural repair mandatory at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation implantation?

Laparoscopic placement of the LINX Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) device has become an accepted alternative to fundoplication in appropriate patients. Initial studies of MSA targeted to patients with 'early' disease allowed for the most minimal dissection of the esophagus to place the device, without hiatal dissection or repair (NoHHR), in patients with no or minimal hernia findings at surgery. Subsequent studies have compared systematic formal hiatal dissection and repair (Formal HHR) with the original minimal dissection technique. Review of published literature on MSA includes discussion on treatment of hiatal hernia at the time of implantation, accompanying the review of the physiology of the crural diaphragm. Formal hiatal hernia repair at the time of MSA implantation results in better control of reflux with less dysphagia and risk of postoperative hernia than NoHHR, regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia. Systematic crural repair should accompany any MSA implantation regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia.

Fundoplication in laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia.

Laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy (LHC) is the preferred treatment of achalasia. It improves dysphagia by dividing muscles of the lower oesophageal sphincter, but this intervention can result in debilitating gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in some patients. To prevent these reflux symptoms, most surgeons add a fundoplication to Heller's cardiomyotomy, but there is no consensus regarding this or the type of fundoplication which is best suited for the purpose. To assess how the addition of a fundoplication affects postoperative reflux and dysphagia in people undergoing LHC and compare the different types of fundoplications used in combination with LHC to determine which is better at controlling reflux without worsening the dysphagia. We searched three databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase) on 31 October 2021 and trial registers to identify all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language, comparing different fundoplications used in combination with LHC to treat achalasia. We also included RCTs where LHC with a fundoplication is compared with LHC without any fundoplication. We only included RCTs which recruited adult participants with achalasia undergoing LHC with minimal hiatal dissection. We excluded non-randomised studies or studies involving paediatric participants. We also excluded studies where the procedure was done by open surgery and where circumferential hiatal dissection of the oesophagus was carried out, unless it was necessary to reduce a hiatus hernia or to facilitate a Toupet or Nissen fundoplication. Two review authors independently identified studies to be included, assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool, and extracted the data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effect models with Review Manager (RevMan) software. We included eight studies in this review, with a total of 571 participants with an average age of 45 years (range 33.5 to 50). LHC without any fundoplication was performed in 65 (11.3%) participants, 298 (52.1%) had Dor fundoplication, 81 (14.1%) had Toupet fundoplication, 72 (12.6%) had Nissen's fundoplication, and 55 (9.6%) participants had angle of His accentuation. Three studies with a total of 143 participants compared LHC + Dor to LHC without fundoplication. We found that the evidence is very uncertain as to whether the addition of a Dor fundoplication made any difference to the outcome of postoperative pathological acid reflux (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.89; I2 = 56%; 2 studies, 97 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and uncertain for severe postoperative dysphagia (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 26.33; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 142 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three studies with 174 participants compared LHC + Dor to LHC + Toupet. The evidence suggests that there may be little to no difference in the outcomes of postoperative pathological acid reflux (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.43; I2 = 60%; 3 studies, 105 participants; low-certainty evidence) and severe postoperative dysphagia (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.15; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 123 participants; low-certainty evidence) between the two interventions, but the certainty of the evidence is low. One study with 138 participants compared LHC + Dor to LHC + Nissen. Nissen fundoplication caused increased severe postoperative dysphagia (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.83; 1 study, 138 participants; high-certainty evidence) when compared to Dor fundoplication. This study did not show a difference in postoperative pathological acid reflux (RR 4.72, 95% CI 0.23 to 96.59; 1 study, 138 participants; low-certainty evidence), but the certainty of evidence is low. One study with 110 participants compared LHC + Dor with LCH + angle of His accentuation, and reported that severe postoperative dysphagia was similar between the two interventions (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 8.95; 1 study, 110 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with moderate certainty of evidence. This study did not report on postoperative pathological acid reflux. When LHC was performed with minimal hiatal dissection, we were very uncertain whether the addition of a Dor fundoplication made a difference in controlling postoperative reflux, and we were uncertain if it increased the risk of severe postoperative dysphagia. There may be little to no difference in the outcomes of postoperative pathological acid reflux or severe dysphagia between Dor and Toupet fundoplications when used in combination with LHC, but the certainty of the evidence is low. Nissen (total) fundoplication used in combination with LHC for achalasia increased the risk of severe postoperative dysphagia. The angle of His accentuation and Dor fundoplication had a similar effect on severe postoperative dysphagia when combined with LHC, but their effect on postoperative pathological acid reflux was not reported.

586. CIRCUMFERENTIAL HIATAL DISSECTION DURING MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY CLINICAL AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES

Abstract Circumferential resection margin involvement is an independent prognostic factor in patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophago-gastric junction. However, there is currently no consensus on the extent and the technique of hiatal dissection. Herein, we aim to present our technique of circumferential hiatal dissection during 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophago-gastric junction with its related histopathological results. A prospective study of 200 consecutive patients undergoing 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy over a period of 60 months was conducted. Dissection of the hiatus included peri-esophageal surrounding tissues in a cylindrical fashion maximizing the distance from the esophageal wall. Crural muscle fibers and pleura bilaterally, pericardial fat anteriorly and pre-aortic tissue posteriorly were excised en bloc. Histopathological results particularly focused on involvement of the circumferential resection margin. Complete histological clearance (R0) was achieved in 96% (n=192) according to the criteria of the College of American Pathologists and in 95% (n=190) according to those of the Royal College of Pathologists. In pT3 tumors (n=102), the circumferential resection margin was negative in 97 patients (95%) according to the College of American Pathologists, and in 95 (93%) according to the Royal College of Pathologists. Adoption of this safe and reproducible technique might reduce the incidence of circumferential resection margin involvement and improve pathological outcomes. In addition, there may be positive implications for training and quality control.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in a Patient with Previous Belsey Mark IV Fundoplication: A Case Report

Background: Historically, the management for recurrent or persistent Gastro-esophageal reflux disease included selective vagotomy and fundoplication. Despite these surgical interventions, the risk of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and subsequent malignant transformation remains, requiring cancer resection surgery. We present a case of a patient with a gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, who underwent a pediatric thoracotomy and Belsey Mark IV fundoplication, and was successfully treated by Laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (LILE). Case Presentation: This 64-year-old gentleman with BE and GEJ adenocarcinoma was previously deemed unsuitable for curative surgery due to clinical staging indicating a tumor length of 10cm and suspected invasion of the left pleura. Further staging by Endoscopic ultrasound indicated no evidence of pleural invasion with the distal esophageal thickening in keeping with his previous Belsey Mark IV fundoplication. He underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and a subsequent LILE with complete laparoscopic reversion of the gastric fundoplication without injury to the gastroepiploic artery or fundus. There was sufficient preservation of conduit length to enable a tension free hand-sewn anastomosis with an uneventful post-operative recovery. Final histopathology confirmed ypT1 ypN0 moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with R0 resection margins. The patient has completed 24 months of cancer recurrence free surveillance. Conclusion: We describe the successful management of a patient by LILE on a background of previous hiatal fundoplication surgery, previously refused curative surgery. We highlight the importance of EUS as a staging modality for such cases showing invasive disease to increase the final clinical staging accuracy. We suggest a minimally invasive approach may be utilized for successful re-do hiatal dissection as an alternative to a conventional open surgery.

23 GASTRIC BYPASS AS REVISION SURGERY FOR FAILED FUNDOPLICATIONS

Abstract Laparoscopic fundoplication as anti-reflux technique has emerged and widely expanded as a cost effective alternative to life-long medical treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Long-term success rate ranges from 80–90% with this procedure, but side effects still exist even with experienced surgeons. Patients with a failed anti-reflux procedure are becoming a more common problem nowadays. Although most of these patients can be managed medically, still some of them will require revisional surgery. Methods We presented our experience from January 2015 to June 2019 facing cases of failed fundoplications. 59 cases with failed fundoplication requiring revision were included in the study. Redo fundoplications were decided preoperatively or intraoperatively to be difficult or unsafe to be done for these cases. Revision surgery for these cases was done using either distal gastrectomy and RY gastro-jejunostomy (22 cases) when the hiatal dissection was not feasible or unsafe due to obscure anatomy or Truncal vagotomy and RY gastro-jejunostomy (37 cases) when the hiatal dissection was easy and feasible. Results Laparoscopy was used in 49 cases and was successfully completed in 42cases (%) and 7conversion (%). Improvement of symptoms: Recurrent reflux or dysphagia was noted in 19 cases (32%) and complete disappeared in 26 cases (44%). One case had leak from the GJ and another one got hematemesis. Both cases were managed conservatively. Nine patient (15%) had bile gastritis with abdominal pain. Five patients (8.5%) complained of dumping symptoms. No mortality was recorded. Conclusion RY gastro-jejunostomy for failed fundoplications is a valid, feasible surgical option when redo fundoplication is difficult to be done or if associated with possible or expected complications.

634 ROBOTIC-ASSISTED HIATAL HERNIA AND GASTROESOPHAGEAL DISEASE SURGERY: INITIAL RESULTS AND EXPERIENCE IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION

Abstract Gastroesophageal reflux disease, associated with sliding or large paraesophageal hiatal hernia, represents a common disease that frequently needs a surgical solution. The repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias is still a challenge in minimally invasive surgery but the robotic approach seems to gain widespread acceptance because offers enhanced visualization, dexterity and reach, which may facilitate the hiatal reconstruction and mediastinal dissection. Methods Between June 2019 and February 2021, 23 patients (5 male, 18 female) underwent robotic approach fundoplication (19 sliding hernia, 3 paraesophageal and 2 gastroesophagic reflux) after being pre operative diagnosed. All surgeries were elective. Biosynthetic tissue absorbable mesh was applied in one patient with double time recurrence hernia. Sixteen patients underwent total fundoplication (Nissen), 6 patients had Toupet fundoplication, and one patient had hiatus repair without fundoplication. Results The mean age of the patients was 61 years. Biosynthetic mesh was used in one patient. The mean operative time was 127 minutes (80-240) and no intraoperative complications were described. There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic procedures. Nine of the twenty-three patients underwent redo hiatal hernia repairs and the mean hospital stay was 2 days. Only one patient had a major complication (Clavien Dindo 3b) requiring urgent surgery. The early and 30 day mortality rate was 0%. Conclusion In our experience, robotic approach to paraesophageal repair seems safe and effective with low complication rates even in high-risk patients and those with redo surgery. Subjectively, the robotic approach provides the surgeon better vision and maneuverability during the intervention. We hope to progressively increase the number of robotic cases to analyse long-term clinical outcomes such as hiatal hernia recurrences, need of medical therapy and quality of life.

Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study.

Experimental work comparing 3-Dimensional (3D) and 4K ultra-high-definition endovision system (4K) indicates that the latter with double the resolution of standard 2D high-definition systems may provide additional visual cues to compensate for the lack of stereoscopic vision. There is paucity of studies comparing 3D and 4K system in clinical settings. This randomized study compares 3D and 4K systems in three laparoscopic procedures of increasing complexity. 139 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (60 patients), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (49 patients) and laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with anti- reflux procedure (30 patients) between May 2018 and February 2020 were randomized to undergo surgery using either 3D or 4K systems. Primary objective was to measure total operative time. Secondary objectives were to compare workload perceived by surgeons using SURG-TLX and surgeon satisfaction score. Timings of key surgical steps and peri-operative course of the patients was also recorded. Data were analyzed using Stata Corp. 2015. Patients undergoing surgery with 3D and 4K systems were comparable in their clinical and demographic profiles. The mean total operative time in 3D and 4K groups was comparable in cholecystectomy (52.7 vs 56.2, p = 0.50), TAPP (63.8 vs 69.6, p = 0.25) and Heller's cardiomyotomy (124.7 vs 143.3, p = 0.14) with faster hiatal dissection in 3D group (8min, p = 0.02). Operative time was better in patients undergoing Heller's myotomy with Angle of His accentuation with 3D by 28min (p = 0.03). Total workload was similar in 3D and 4K groups in all the procedures but mental & physical demand was lower in 3D group in Heller's cardiomyotomy (p = 0.03, p = 0.01), Surgeon satisfaction score was comparable in all three procedures. Overall, 3D HD and 4K systems are comparable in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TAPP and Heller's Cardiomyotomy. Hiatal dissection time, mental and physical task load was better with 3D in Heller's Cardiomyotomy.

Evaluation of Anterior Phrenoesophageal Ligament Preservation During Hiatus Hernia Repair in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Anti-Reflux Measure.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure, but it had been reported to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its consequences. Some surgeons tried to decrease that by routine hiatal dissection with hiatus hernia (HH) repair. But, hiatal dissection with HH repair is considered an important risk factor for the newly emergent complication of intrathoracic sleeve migration (ITSM). We proposed a new hiatal repair technique, which is expected to improve GERD without increasing the potential for ITSM. This study aims to evaluate the results of this technique. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed at the Ain Shams University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. It included patients with morbid obesity and one of the following: Clinical manifestations of GERD with endoscopic evidence of HH/laxity or esophagitis. Asymptomatic HH/laxity. LSG combined and HH repair with anterior phrenoesophageal ligament (PEL) preservation was performed for all patients. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Patients were evaluated after 1 year with an upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in our study. After 1 year, the mean excess weight loss was 63% ± 23%. The mean GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score dropped to 12 ± 8. GERD-HRQL scores improved in 25 of documented esophagitis patients, worsened in 2, and did not change in 2 patients. Endoscopy showed a decrease in rate and degree of esophagitis (from 28 [87.5%] preoperatively to 8 [25%] patients after 1 year of follow-up). The improvement was better in patients with grade A and B esophagitis. Two patients were converted to gastric bypass due to persistent intractable GERD symptoms with grade C esophagitis despite medical treatment. No cases of ITSM were detected. Conclusion: Anterior PEL preserving HH repair combined with LSG is a safe and feasible technique that can control GERD manifestations without interference with the technique or outcome of LSG.

Hiatal repair in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a case report

Hiatal hernia after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an important postoperative complication that can cause severe morbidity or even mortality among patients with esophageal cancer. Usually repair of the hiatus immediately after esophageal reconstruction is suggested to prevent such complication. However, during the Ivor Lewis MIE procedure, hiatal repair is difficult to perform due to the deep-seated location of the hiatus after the final step of esophageal reconstruction in the right chest. The current study demonstrates a method of repairing the hiatus in the Ivor Lewis MIE. This is especially useful in the resection of a massive tumor near the esophagogastric (E-G) junction, which harbors a high risk of hiatal hernia when the hiatus is left unrepaired after extensive hiatal dissection.

Teacher and Trainee Learning Together—Dual Console and the 3 Arms

The purpose of this paper is to propose a method by which the trainer and the trainee can overcome their learning curves together. At a tertiary care facility where we have completely done away with the mandatory bedside procedure requirements, residents and fellows start all cases on the console and have graduated responsibilities assigned to them. Bedside assist cases were felt to take away from trainee precious console time when there were only on service for a limited period while providing laparoscopic skill training without any robot-specific experience. This is a cumulative experience of teaching residents and fellows under this system and its results. All trainees at a PG 3 level or greater were able to perform advanced hiatal dissection within 5 cases. The authors propose a paradigm that uses all 3 arms of the robot and a dual console system.

A218 Concurrent Hiatal Dissection Predicts Increased Reoperation and Readmission with Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Gastric Bypass

A218 Concurrent Hiatal Dissection Predicts Increased Reoperation and Readmission with Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Gastric Bypass

A237 Laparoscopic conversion to Roux en Y Gastric Bypass and Ligamentum Teres Cardiopexy for Gastroesophageal and Bile Reflux after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Subtle aberrations in the post-sleeve stomach may result in severe gastroesophageal and bile reflux. Cardiopexy of the stomach with the ligamentum teres, initially described in 1964 by Pedinielli, has been used to reinforce the lower esophageal sphincter and hinders mediastinal retraction of the stomach. However, diversion of duodenal contents is required for definitive treatment of bile reflux. The presented video depicts a case of 37 year-old female presenting with frequent regurgitation and reflux refractory to medical therapy 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Preoperative endoscopy was consistent with esophagitis and bile within the gastric sleeve. UGI showed delayed reflux and a small sliding hiatal hernia. Retained bile in the proximal sleeve was seen on intraoperative endoscopy. Hiatal dissection revealed laxity of the phrenoesophageal membrane. Retained posterior fundus was discovered with mobilization of the sleeve. The sleeve was transected to define the pouch. The ligamentum was released from the anterior abdominal wall and isolated from the falciform. A gastrotomy was performed to identify the z-line and ensure creation of a small pouch to minimize acid cell mass. A 100cm roux limb was brought in an antecolic, antegastric orientation after creation of a jejunojeunostomy. A hand sewn single layer gastrojejunostomy was performed. Following a leak test, the ligamentum teres was wrapped around the gastroesophageal junction and secured. Endoscopy was repeated to assess the tightness of the wrap. Mesenteric defects were closed. Patient was discharged on clear liquids on post-operative day 2. 60 days post-operatively the patient was without symptoms.

Video-based assessment for laparoscopic fundoplication: initial development of a robust tool for operative performance assessment.

While better technical performance correlates with improved outcomes, there is a lack of procedure-specific tools to perform video-based assessment (VBA). SAGES is developing a series of VBA tools with enough validity evidence to allow reliable measurement of surgeon competence. A task force was established to develop a VBA tool for laparoscopic fundoplication using an evidence-based process that can be replicated for additional procedures. The first step in this process was to seek content validity evidence. Forty-two subject matter experts (SME) in laparoscopic fundoplication were interviewed to obtain consensus on procedural steps, identify potential variations in technique, and to generate an inventory of required skills and common errors. The results of these interviews were used to inform creation of a task inventory questionnaire (TIQ) that was delivered to a larger SME group (n = 188) to quantify the criticality and difficulty of the procedural steps, the impact of potential errors associated with each step, the technical skills required to complete the procedure, and the likelihood that future techniques or technologies may change the presence or importance of any of these factors. Results of the TIQ were used to generate a list of steps, skills, and errors with strong validity evidence. Initial SMEs interviewed included fellowship program directors (45%), recent fellows (24%), international surgeons (19%), and highly experienced super SMEs with quality outcomes data (12%). Qualitative analysis of interview data identified 6 main procedural steps (visualization, hiatal dissection, fundus mobilization, esophageal mobilization, hiatal repair, and wrap creation) each with 2-5 sub steps. Additionally, the TIQ identified 5-10 potential errors for each step and 11 key technical skills required to perform the procedure. Based on the TIQ, the mean criticality and difficulty scores for the 11/21 sub steps included in the final scoring rubric is 4.66/5 (5 = absolutely essential for patient outcomes) and 3.53/5 (5 = difficulty level requires significant experience and use of alternative strategies to accomplish consistently), respectively. The mean criticality and frequency scores for the 9/11 technical skills included is 4.51/5 and 4.51/5 (5 = constantly used ≥ 80% of the time), respectively. The mean impact score of the 42/47 errors incorporated into the final rubric is 3.85/5 (5 = significant error that is unrecoverable, or even if recovered, likely to have a negative impact on patient outcome). A rigorous, multi-method process has documented the content validity evidence for the SAGES video-based assessment tool for laparoscopic fundoplication. Work is ongoing to pilot the assessment tool on recorded fundoplication procedures to establish reliability and further validity evidence.

Minimally Invasive Circumferential Hiatal Dissection for the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus and Esophago-gastric Junction: Technical Considerations Combined With Histopathological Outcomes.

Circumferential resection margin involvement is an independent prognostic factor in patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophago-gastric junction. However, there is currently no consensus on the extent and the technique of hiatal dissection. We describe a minimally invasive technique of circumferential hiatal dissection for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophago-gastric junction with its related histopathological results. A prospective study of 40 consecutive patients undergoing hybrid (laparoscopic/thoracotomic) or totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy over a period of 21 months was conducted. Dissection of the hiatus included peri-esophageal surrounding tissues in a cylindrical fashion maximizing the distance from the oesophageal wall. Crural muscle fibers and pleura bilaterally, pericardial fat anteriorly and pre-aortic tissue posteriorly were excised en bloc. Histopathological results particularly focused on involvement of the circumferential resection margin. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 24 (60%) patients. Complete histological clearance (R0) was achieved in 92.5% (n=37) according to the criteria of the College of American Pathologists and in 87.5% (n=35) according to those of the Royal College of Pathologists. In pT3 tumors (n=22), the circumferential resection margin was negative in 20 patients (91%) according to the College of American Pathologists, and in 17 (77%) according to the Royal College of Pathologists. Adoption of this safe and reproducible technique might reduce the incidence of circumferential resection margin involvement and improve pathological outcomes. In addition, there may be positive implications for training and quality control.

Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?

BackgroundHiatal dissection, restoration of esophageal intra-abdominal length, and crural closure are key components of successful antireflux surgery. The necessity of addressing these components prior to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been questioned. We aimed to compare outcomes of MSA between groups with differing hiatal dissection and closure. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 259 patients who underwent MSA from 2009 to 2017. Patients were categorized based on hiatal treatment: minimal dissection (MD), crural closure (CC), formal crural repair (FC), and extensive dissection without closure (ED). The primary outcome was normalization of postoperative DeMeester score (≤ 14.72). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess which preoperative predictors achieved normalization. ResultsOf the 197 patients, MD was used in 81 (41%); FC in 42 (22%); CC in 40 (20%); and ED in 34 (17%). Normalization occurred in 104 (53%) patients, with MD achieving normalization in 45/81 (56%); FC in 25/42 (60%); CC in 21/40 (53%); and ED 13/34 (38%). After regression, FC was most likely to normalize acid exposure. The presence of a hiatal hernia, defective LES, and higher preoperative DeMeester score were less likely to achieve normalization. ConclusionsHiatal dissection with restoration of esophageal length and crural closure during MSA increases the likelihood of normalizing acid exposure.

Short-Term Outcomes Predict Long-Term Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation.

Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been shown to be efficacious therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to maximal medical management. Herein, we present our experience with this procedure and an analysis of our outcomes. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 98 patients who underwent laparoscopic MSA for GERD at a single institution from 2012 to 2016. Symptoms were assessed with gastroesophageal reflux disease-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. Objective testing included pH testing, manometry, endoscopy, and upper GI series. Postimplantation interventions were recorded. Median follow-up was 46 months. Median preoperative DeMeester score was 32 (interquartile range 21-46). Esophagitis was present in 18%. Hiatal hernia was present in 59%. Operation required full hiatal dissection in 16%. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean hospital stay postimplantation was 18 hours. Reoperative intervention with device explant was necessary in 5 cases, one of which was for intraluminal device erosion. Median GERD-HRQL scores were 25 preoperatively, 8 in short-term follow-up at median 1 month, and 5 in long-term follow-up at median 46 months. Improvement in GERD-HRQL scores was statistically significant with both short and long term compared with preoperative (P < .05), but no different between short- and long-term follow-up. Daily bothersome dysphagia was present in 19 patients preoperatively and in 9 at long-term follow-up. Laparoscopic MSA is associated with excellent outcomes with decrease in GERD-HRQL scores in short term that are durable to longer term follow-up, and with low rates of new-onset dysphagia.

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats.

The goal of this protocol is to set up a preclinical model of bariatric surgery and, more specifically, OAGB in obese rats. Based on this preclinical model, longitudinal studies can be carried out to provide an improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying the outcomes seen after bariatric surgery in humans. For this purpose, rats are operated on through a laparotomy under general anesthesia with isoflurane. First, the surgeon creates a long and tubular gastric pouch: after greater curve and hiatal dissection, the nonglandular stomach is stapled and removed. Then, the remaining stomach is also stapled in order to create a gastric tube and exclude the antrum of the stomach. After that, the surgeon performs a single end-to-side gastrojejunostomy 35 cm from the duodenojejunal angle. This limb length has been chosen in order to reproduce the same ratio between the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) and common limb (CL) length as in human bariatric surgery. The operation ends by aponeurotic and cutaneous closure. The early postoperative management consists of subcutaneous hydration, an intramuscular prophylactic antibiotic injection, a parietal injection of xylocaine, the administration of painkillers, and a progressive reintroduction of diet.