e12558 Background: Breast cancer (BC) is associated with miRNAs, the qualitative and quantitative analysis of which shows significant differences between molecular subtypes, as well as between miRNAs circulating in the bloodstream and detected in tumor tissue. Since there is no clear characteristics for markers of luminal B primary operable BC without Her 2 neu overexpression, our purpose was an evaluation of prognostic significance of miRNA-21, 221, 20a, 200a, 196a in such postmenopausal patients in order to create a diagnostic panel. Methods: The study included 120 samples of healthy tissues of patients with luminal A BC (group 1, mean age 76.16±3.14 years) and tumor tissues of patients with luminal B BC (group 2, mean age 69.5±3.2 years); invasive ductal carcinoma in all patients. The expression status was analyzed using 5 mioRNA markers associated, according to the literature, with various molecular subtypes of BC (miRNA-21, 221, 20a, 200a, 196a). The Thermo Scientific PureLink RNA Mini Kit was used for the total RNA isolation. The reverse transcription reaction was performed using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcriptase kit (Promega). The Livak/2 method was used to assess the relative expression of miRNAs. Results: The average relative expression was: miRNA-21 in group 1 – 0.2±0.01, group 2 – 1.5±0.05; miRNA- 221 in group 1 – 0.19±0.02, group 2 – 0.43±0.04; miRNA -20a in group 1 – 0.12±0.01, group 2 – 0.13±0.01, miRNA -200a in group 1 – 0.22±0.02, group 2 – 0.96±0.06; miRNA- 196a in group 1 – 1.06±0.02, group 2 – 1.56±0.04. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.0001); the difference was statistically insignificant only for miRNA -20a (p = 0.159955). Conclusions: Results of the study allow considering the overexpression of miR-21, 221, 200a and 196a and the relatively low expression of miR-20a as diagnostic markers for a diagnostic panel for luminal B BC without overexpression of HER2/neu.
Read full abstract