Rates Of Healthcare Resource Utilization Research Articles

Changes in acute headache medication use and health care resource utilization: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating galcanezumab in adults with treatment-resistant migraine (CONQUER).

BACKGROUND: Patients with migraine, particularly with multiple prior preventive treatment failures, often have high rates of acute headache medication use and are at risk for overuse (acute or symptomatic headache medication use between 10 and 15 days per month [depending on the medication] for > 3 months). Furthermore, these patients have greater health care resource utilization (HCRU). OBJECTIVE: To examine acute headache medication use and HCRU with galcanezumab compared with placebo in a population with multiple prior migraine preventive treatment failures. METHODS: In the 3-month double-blind phase, patients with episodic or chronic migraine and treatment failures to 2 to 4 standard-of-care migraine preventive categories (lack of effectiveness or safety/tolerability) received galcanezumab 120 mg/month (following a 240-mg loading dose) or placebo; an optional 3 month open-label phase followed. Acute headache medication use (monthly days with acute headache medication utilization) was self-reported daily. The change from baseline in monthly days with acute headache medication used a mixed-model repeated measures analysis. HCRU was reported at baseline (for the previous 6 months) and at monthly visits. Migraine-related HCRU rates were evaluated in the total population per 100 patient-years. RESULTS: Of the 462 patients (galcanezumab n=232, placebo n=230), baseline mean days/month of acute headache medication was 12.3; 44.8% had acute headache medication overuse. Across months 1-3, least squares (LS) mean reductions in acute headache medication use were greater for the galcanezumab group (4.2) compared with placebo (0.9); the LS mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI = 2.7-4.1; P < 0.0001). Greater reductions in the galcanezumab group were observed as early as month 1; statistical separation continued at months 2 and 3 (all P < 0.0001). During the open-label phase, reductions from baseline ranged from 4.7 to 5.3 days and were similar in patients who transitioned from placebo to patients continuing galcanezumab. Reductions from baseline of migraine-specific health care visits (double-blind phase) were numerically greater with galcanezumab than placebo (215.5 vs 155.3). Patients switching to galcanezumab had reductions (212.9 days) similar to patients continuing galcanezumab (222.6 days). Migraine-specific emergency department visits decreased by two-thirds at month 3 in the galcanezumab group compared with nearly no reduction in the placebo group that experienced a similar reduction during the open-label phase. For both groups, migraine-specific hospitalizations were less than 2 per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that galcanezumab has the potential to reduce acute headache medication use and overuse and HCRU in patients with prior migraine preventive treatment failures. DISCLOSURES: Data were presented in part as a poster presentation at the 14th European Headache Congress (European Headache Federation), Virtual Meeting, July 3-5, 2020. Dr Ambrosini is on the advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company and received honorarium from Teva, Novartis, and Eli Lilly and Company. Dr Estemalik is on the advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, and Allergan and the speakers' bureau for Teva, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly and Company, Allergan, and Biohaven. He received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Teva, Lundbeck, and Allergan and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Company, Allergan, Biohaven, Teva, and Lundbeck. Dr Pascual received research support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Economy, Spain. He was also on advisory boards for Allergan, Amgen-Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, and Stendhal and received consulting fees or honoraria from Allegan, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis-Amgen, and Teva. Dr Rettiganti is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. She is also a minor stock and restricted stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. Mr. Stroud and Ms. Day are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. Dr Ford is an employee of and holds stock of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. She also received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Company.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML in Japan who were ineligible for first-line intensive chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly adults, and its prognosis worsens with age. Treatment options for patients in Japan ineligible for intensive chemotherapy include cytarabine/aclarubicin ± granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CA ± G), azacitidine (AZA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapy, and best supportive care (BSC). The country's aging population and the evolving treatment landscape are contributing to a need to understand treatment pathways and associated outcomes. This retrospective chart review evaluated outcomes in patients across Japan with primary/secondary AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy and began first-line treatment or BSC between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Of 199 patients (58% > 75years), 121 received systemic therapy (38 CA ± G, 37 AZA, 7 LDAC, 39 other) and 78 received BSC. Median OS was 5.4, 9.2, 2.2, 3.8, and 2.2months for CA ± G, AZA, LDAC, other systemic therapy, and BSC, respectively; median PFS was 3.4, 7.7, 1.6, 2.3, and 2.1months, respectively. HRU rates were uniformly high, with > 80% patients hospitalized in each cohort. The poor clinical outcomes and high HRU among Japanese AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy highlight an unmet need for novel therapies.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs 2 years pre- and post-lumbar spine surgery for stenosis: a national claims cohort study of 22,182 cases

BACKGROUND CONTEXTImproved understanding of the pre- and postoperative trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) is needed to better inform patient expectations and aid in the development of strategies to minimize the significant healthcare burden associated with lumbar spine surgery. PURPOSEExamine the time course of costs and HCRU in the 2 years preceding and following elective lumbar spine surgery for stenosis in a large national claims cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM® Marketscan® Research Databases 2007–2015). PATIENT SAMPLEAdult patients undergoing elective primary single-level lumbar surgery for stenosis with at least 2 years of continuous health plan enrollment pre- and postoperatively. OUTCOME MEASURESFunctional measures, including monthly rates of HCRU (15 categories), monthly gross covered payments (including payments made by the health plan and deductibles and coinsurance paid by the patient) overall, by HCRU category, and by spine versus non-spine-related. METHODSAll available patients were utilized for analysis of HCRU. For analysis of payments, only patients on noncapitated health plans providing accurate financial information were analyzed. Payments were converted to 2015 United States dollars using the medical care component of the consumer price index. Trends in payments and HCRU were plotted on a monthly basis pre- and post-surgery and assessed with regression models. Relationships with demographics, surgical factors, and comorbidities were assessed with multivariable repeated measures generalized estimating equations. RESULTSMedian monthly healthcare payments 2 years prior to surgery were $275 ($22, $868). Baseline HCRU at 2 years preoperatively was stable or only gradually rising (office visits, prescription drug use), but began an increasingly steep rise in many categories 6 to 12 months prior to surgery. Monthly payments began an increasingly steep rise 6 months prior to surgery, reaching a peak of $1,402 ($634, $2,827) in the month prior to surgery. This was driven by an increase in radiology, office visits, PT, injections, prescription medications, ER encounters, and inpatient admissions. Payments dropped dramatically immediately following surgery. Over the remainder of the 2 years, the median total payments declined only slightly, as a continued decline in spine-related payments was offset by gradually increased non-spine related payments as patients aged. By 2 years postoperatively, the percentage of patients using PT and injections returned to within 1% of the baseline levels observed 2 years preoperatively; however, spine-related prescription medication use remained elevated, as did other categories of HCRU (radiology, office visits, lab/diagnostic services, and also rare events such as inpatient admissions, ER encounters, and SNF/IRF). Patients with a fusion component to their surgeries had higher payments and HCRU preoperatively, and this did not resolve postoperatively. Variations in payments and HCRU were also evident among plan types, with patients on comprehensive medical plans—predominantly employer-sponsored supplemental Medicare coverage—utilizing more inpatient, ER, and inpatient rehabilitation & skilled nursing facilities. Patients on high-deductible plans had fewer payments and HCRU across all categories; however, we are unable to distinguish whether this is because they used fewer of these services or if they were paying for these services out of pocket without submitting to the payer. By 2 years postoperatively, 51% of patients had no spine-related monthly payments, while 33% had higher and 16% had lower monthly payments relative to 2 years preoperatively. CONCLUSIONSThis is the first study to characterize time trends in direct healthcare payments and HCRU over an extended period preceding and following spine surgery. Differences among plan types potentially highlight disparities in access to care and plan-related financial mediators of patients’ healthcare resource utilization.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Obesity and Diabetes.

IntroductionNonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with a substantial economic burden, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes.MethodsA de-identified healthcare claims database was used to identify adult patients newly initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin and having at least one medical claim with a diagnosis of AF, obesity determined by validated algorithm, and at least one claim with a diagnosis of diabetes or for antidiabetic medication from December 2011 to March 2020. Propensity score matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts on the basis of demographics and baseline characteristics. All-cause and NVAF-related HRU rates and costs were compared between treatments using rate ratios, and mean cost differences were calculated on a per patient per year (PPPY) basis.ResultsA total of 9999 matched pairs of patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes were identified in the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts. Rate ratios of all-cause HRU were significantly reduced with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all healthcare settings evaluated, except emergency room visits. The greatest impact was on physician office visits followed by hospital outpatient and inpatient visits. NVAF-related HRU was significantly lower for rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all care settings. Consistent with these findings, the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced by approximately 4 days among all patients for both all-cause and NVAF-related hospitalizations in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort. Rivaroxaban was associated with reductions in all-cause total healthcare costs by more than $5000 PPPY and NVAF-related medical costs by approximately $1100 PPPY.ConclusionIn comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban reduced HRU and costs, particularly hospital inpatient and outpatient visits and physician office visits, in patients with NVAF and comorbidities of obesity and diabetes.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01161-4.

Burden of illnessandoutcomes in second-line large B-cell lymphoma treatment: real-world analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.

Aims:To characterize elderly large B-cell lymphoma patients who progress to second-linetreatment to identify potential unmet treatment needs. Patients & methods: Retrospective USA cohort study, patients receiving second-lineautologous stem cell transplant (SCT)preparative regimen ('ASCT-intended') versus those who did not; stratified furtherinto those who received a stem cell transplantand those who did not. Primary outcomes were: healthcare resource utilization, costs andadverse events. Results: 1045 patients (22.0%) were included intheASCT-intended group, 23.3% of whom received SCT (5.1% of entire second-line population). Non-SCT patients were older andhad more comorbiditiesand generally higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and costs. Conclusion: Elderly second-line large B-cell lymphoma patients incurred substantial costs and a minority received potentially curative SCT, suggesting significant unmet need.

CML-353: Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) with Asciminib and Bosutinib among Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Previously Treated with ≥2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): Results from the Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 ASCEMBL Trial

Objective: To investigate HCRU among CML-CP patients who received asciminib or bosutinib after previously being treated with ≥2 TKIs in a clinical trial setting. Design: ASCEMBL enrolled adults with CML-CP who had previously been treated with ≥2 TKIs. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily (n=157) or bosutinib 500 mg once daily (n=76). Data were collected while on randomized treatment for the following HCRU categories: hospitalizations, emergency hospital visits, general practitioner visits, specialist visits, and urgent care visits. The reasons (adverse events, CML, and other) for accessing services were also captured. The number of patients in each arm with any HCRU, by category, was calculated and used to estimate rates per patient-year. Main Outcomes Measures: Median exposure to treatment; number of patients with HCRU, by category; rate of HCRU per patient-year. Results: As of the 25 May 2020 cut-off, the median duration of exposure was 43.4 and 29.2 weeks in the asciminib and bosutinib arms, respectively. In the asciminib arm, 24.2% (n=38) had HCRU compared to 36.8% (n=28) of those who received bosutinib, corresponding to rates per person-year of 0.32 and 0.80. The percentage of patients (and rates per person-year) with HCRU by category for asciminib and bosutinib were 14.0% (0.16) versus 18.4% (0.32) for hospitalizations, 1.9% (0.02) versus 5.3% (0.08) for emergency hospital visits, 4.5% (0.05) versus 6.6% (0.11) for general practitioner visits, 10.8% (0.13) versus 13.2% (0.24) for specialist visits, and 0% (0) versus 5.3% (0.08) for urgent care visits. A higher percentage of patients treated with bosutinib compared to asciminib required hospitalization (7.9% [n=6] versus 1.9% [n=3]) or a visit to a hospital emergency department (2.6% [n=2] versus 1.3% [n=2]) due to adverse events related to therapy. Length of stay in the hospital was also generally higher with bosutinib compared to asciminib, regardless of ward type (e.g., mean/median number of days: 10.2/6.5 versus 9.2/6.0 in general wards, 19.0/19.0 versus 13.0/5.0 in intensive care units, and 12.0/12.0 versus 7.3/3.0 in other care units). Conclusions: These results suggest that HCRU may be lower for CML-CP patients treated with asciminib compared with bosutinib.

Economic burden of rivaroxaban and warfarin among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with obesity and polypharmacy.

Aim: Evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with rivaroxaban and warfarin among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with obesity and polypharmacy. Materials & methods: IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus (January2010-September2019) data were used to identify NVAF patients with obesity (BMI ≥30kg/m2) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin. Weighted rate ratios and cost differences were evaluated post-treatment initiation. Results: Rivaroxaban was associated with significantly lower rates of HRU, including hospitalization (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.77, 0.92]). Medical costs were reduced in rivaroxaban users (difference [95% CI]: -US$6868 [-US$10,628, -US$2954]), resulting in significantly lower total healthcare costs compared with warfarin users (difference [95% CI]: -US$4433 [-US$8136, -US$582]). Conclusion: Rivaroxaban was associated with lower HRU and costs compared with warfarin among NVAF patients with obesity and polypharmacy in commercially insured US patients.

Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Burden of Illness in Sweden.

IntroductionPrimary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is an autoimmune disease that affects salivary and lachrymal glands and is associated with complex extraglandular manifestations. This study investigates the clinical and economic burden and disease course of pSS in Sweden.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study utilizes data from Swedish national registries and consists of patients at least 18 years of age diagnosed in secondary care with pSS, and matched members of the Swedish general population. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs were compared. The clinical burden of pSS during follow-up was explored via year-on-year prevalence of and time-to-first extraglandular manifestation. Employment status and retirement rates were used to investigate the impact of pSS on productivity.ResultsA total of 8884 patients with pSS and 88,233 general population comparators were included. Patients with pSS had significantly higher rates of HRU and higher healthcare costs than matched comparators, including twice as many outpatient visits. Costs were highest in year 1 post index before reducing in years 2 and 3 and stabilizing thereafter. Almost two-thirds of patients received their index diagnosis during an outpatient visit, and < 30% of diagnoses were from rheumatology departments. Overall, 41% of patients experienced a healthcare encounter that included a relevant extraglandular manifestation code during follow-up. Patients with pSS had significantly higher odds of early retirement than the general population at 5 years post index.ConclusionsPatients with pSS experience a high clinical and economic disease burden in Sweden.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00314-y.

Bleeding risk and healthcare resource utilisation in elderly patients treated with edoxaban or vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in Italy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) regarding both efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, elderly are underrepresented in the underlying clinical trials. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare risks of major bleeding events and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between AF patients treated with edoxaban or VKA in elderly. Methods A cohort study was conducted using claims databases of Caserta and Palermo Local Heath Units in Italy. AF patients starting use of edoxaban or VKA between August 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2018 were included. Date of the first dispensing was defined as the index date. The study population was matched based on a propensity score based on factors associated with the outcome. We restricted to patients aged ≥65, ≥1 year database history, and no use of the index drug in the year before index date. Incidence rates of bleeding outcomes and rates of HRU were assessed per 1,000 and 100 person-years follow-up (PY), respectively. Cox regression analyses to adjust for baseline covariates were used for comparisons of incidence rates of bleeding outcomes among all edoxaban and VKA users. Poisson regression analyses were used for comparisons of rates of HRU among all edoxaban and VKA users. Both analyses were adjusted for age. Sex, region and year of index date were considered for the adjusted models as well, using a backward stepwise approach to select eligible variables. Results 1,317 edoxaban users and 2,924 VKA users were included in the matched population. Mean age was 79 in both treatments groups, and 43% of the edoxaban users and 45% of the VKA users was male. Bleeding risks were significantly lower among edoxaban users compared to VKA users aged ≥65 (adjusted HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.19-0.83)) and among patients aged ≥75 (adjusted HR 0.37 (95% CI 0.16-0.86)). Among patients aged ≥65, edoxaban users were significantly less often hospitalised (RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.68)) and the total number of hospitalised days were also significant lower (RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.42-0.80)) compared to VKA users. Among patients aged ≥75, similar results were observed for the number of hospitalisations. Edoxaban users had significant less out-patient visits compared to VKA users (among patients aged ≥65 the RR was 0.44 (95% CI 0.39-0.50) and among patients ≥75 this was 0.40 (95% CI 0.35-0.47). Use of out-patient medication use was significantly lower among edoxaban users compared to VKA users among patients aged ≥65 (adjusted RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.95)) as well as among patients aged ≥75 (adjusted RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95)). Conclusion Study results show a decreased bleeding risk of edoxaban compared to VKA in both age groups of patients with AF. Hospital based HRU has shown to be lower among edoxaban users compared to VKA users in both age groups. Out-patient HRU was also lower among edoxaban users.

Increased Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Herpes Zoster Among Patients Aged ≥50 Years with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are potentially at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). Little is known about the impact of an HZ episode on health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with COPD. This retrospective cohort study of individuals aged ≥50 years in the United States (US) used administrative claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members (2013-2018). Two cohorts of patients with COPD, with HZ (COPD+/HZ+) and without HZ (COPD+/HZ-), were identified. All-cause and COPD-related HRU rates and costs (2018 US dollars) were compared between cohorts for up to 12 months of follow-up. Comparisons were controlled for baseline differences through propensity score adjustment. A total of 3415 COPD+/HZ+ and 35,360 COPD+/HZ- patients (mean ages 73.2 ± 9.0 and 72.4 ± 9.4 years, respectively) were identified. Patients in the COPD+/HZ+ versus COPD+/HZ- cohort had increased use of all-cause (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 1.21) and COPD-related (aIRR 1.27; 95% CI 1.21, 1.34) medical services (both P<0.001) and higher mean total all-cause ($4140 versus $3749 per person per month [PPPM]; adjusted cost difference +$313 PPPM) and COPD-related ($1541 versus $1231 PPPM; +$152 PPPM) costs (both P<0.004) in the year after HZ. HRU and cost burden is higher in patients with COPD with vs without HZ. These results could help to estimate the potential cost benefits of HZ vaccination among patients with COPD.

24. Economic Burden of Herpes Zoster Among Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundPrevious studies have evaluated the risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about the impact of an acute HZ episode on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with COPD in the US.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of individuals ≥50 years of age was conducted using administrative claims data from Optum Clinformatics for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members (01/01/2013 – 12/31/2018). Two cohorts of patients with COPD, with (Cohort A) and without (Cohort B) HZ episodes, were identified (Fig.1). COPD and HZ were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. All-cause HCRU rates were compared between cohorts using adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs), calculated using generalized linear models assuming a negative binomial distribution. Differences in all-cause costs were estimated by fitting a two-part model with a logit model in the first part and a gamma distribution for the second part. Potential differences between cohorts were accounted for by propensity scores, calculated using patients’ demographics and clinical characteristics at baseline and included as a covariate in multivariable regression analyses. ResultsAmong patients with COPD, 3,415 patients with HZ (mean age [standard deviation]=73.2 [9.0] years) and 35,360 without HZ (72.4 [9.4] years) were identified. Compared to patients with COPD but without HZ, patients with COPD and HZ had an increased rate of all-cause outpatient visits (adjusted IRR=1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15–1.22; p< 0.001) and Emergency Department visits (1.28; 1.20–1.35; p< 0.001) as well as higher all-cause total costs (adjusted cost difference, per patient per month [PPPM]=$313; 95% CI=$110–536; p< 0.004), in the first year of the observation period. All-cause mean costs PPPM and differences between cohorts were higher closer to the date of HZ diagnosis (or an imputed date for Cohort B, Fig.2).Figure 2: All-cause monthly costs ConclusionHCRU and cost burden is higher in patients ≥50 years old with COPD and HZ vs. without HZ. HZ vaccination may potentially reduce this burden among patients with COPD.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GSK study identifier: HO-19-19749)DisclosuresParinaz Ghaswalla, PhD, ORCID: 0000-0002-2883-5590, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Philippe Thompson-Leduc, MSc, ORCID: 0000-0001-9047-3941, Analysis Group, Inc. (Employee) Wendy Y. Cheng, MPH, PhD, ORCID: 0000-0002-8281-2496, GlaxoSmithKline (Other Financial or Material Support, I am an employee of Analysis Group, a consulting company that received research fund to conduct this study.) Min-Jung Wang, ScD, ORCID: 0000-0003-4432-3330, Analysis Group, Inc. (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Analysis Group received grant/research support from GSK) Michael Bogart, PharmD, ORCID: 0000-0002-1681-9710, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Brandon J. Patterson, PharmD, PhD, GSK (Employee, Shareholder) Mei-Sheng Duh, MPH, ScD, ORCID: 0000-0001-5035-6687, GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support) Suna Park, MS, GSK (Other Financial or Material Support, Analysis Group, Inc., where I am an employee, received funding for this study) Barbara P. Yawn, MD, Msc, ORCID: 0000-0001-7278-5810, GSK (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)

Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in the USA.

BackgroundPatients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease who relapse after or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. Recently, the anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; May 2016 and March 2017, respectively) as treatment options for R/R cHL patients.ObjectiveIn the absence of comparative clinical trials between these agents, this observational study was conducted to evaluate the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of patients with cHL initiated on pembrolizumab compared to nivolumab in the USA.Patients and MethodHealthcare insurance claims from Symphony Health’s IDV® (Integrated Dataverse) (July 2014–June 2018) were used in this retrospective study. The study population included adult patients with cHL initiated on pembrolizumab or nivolumab (index date). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between cohorts. All-cause and cHL-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits were measured during the observation (post-index) period and reported per patient-year (PPY). Rates of HRU were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs).ResultsA total of 92 and 218 patients initiated on pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, were included in the study population. After weighting, the mean age was similar at 55 years in both cohorts, while the proportion of females was lower in the pembrolizumab cohort (35.3%) compared to the nivolumab cohort (44.1%). Mean Quan–Charlson Comorbidity Index score was well balanced after weighting in the pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts (4.2 and 4.3, respectively). During the observation period, patients in the pembrolizumab cohort had significantly lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (RR [95% CI] 0.33 [0.09–0.80]) and cHL-related hospitalizations (RR [95% CI] 0.14 [0.02–0.37]) than those in the nivolumab cohort. Rates of all-cause and cHL-related outpatient visits were not statistically different between patients in the pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts.ConclusionsIn this real-world study, adult cHL patients initiated on pembrolizumab had significantly lower rates of all-cause and cHL-related hospitalizations compared to patients initiated on nivolumab.

Lower resource utilization for patients with healed diabetic foot ulcers during participation in a prevention program with foot temperature monitoring

IntroductionWe assessed the impact of a diabetic foot ulcer prevention program incorporating once-daily foot temperature monitoring on hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits, and rates of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence...

Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of Medicaid Beneficiaries

Introduction: There is limited contemporary evidence on clinical outcomes and healthcare use in sickle-cell disease (SCD) patients enrolled in US Medicaid. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates for rates of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), mortality, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in SCD patients enrolled in US Medicaid. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using nationwide Medicaid insurance claims data (2000-2013). Patients were included based on ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient HbSS SCD diagnosis claims after 365 days continuous enrollment in Medicaid (or continuous eligibility since birth if age at diagnosis is &amp;lt;1 year). Patients were followed until Medicaid disenrollment, death, bone marrow transplant, or end of data availability (December 31, 2013). Outcomes included frequency of VOCs, event rates of HRU including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and blood transfusions, and all-cause mortality during the follow-up period. All outcomes were reported as annualized event rates (with 95% confidence intervals). VOCs were stratified by age-group (&amp;lt;1, 2-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-35, 35+ years), VOCs at baseline (&amp;lt;2, 2-4, &amp;gt;=5), race (African American or not), and sex. The impact of VOCs on the risk of mortality was analyzed using an extended multivariable Cox model with VOCs modeled as time-varying and updated annually. Results: A total of 44,033 SCD patients were included in the analysis; 47% were female, 82% were African American, and a mean (SD) age of 15.7 (13.6). The average VOC rate was 3.71 (95% CI: 3.70-3.72) VOCs per person-year over an average follow-up period of 4.3 years. The rate of VOCs was substantially higher among patients aged 19-35 years and those with a higher VOC frequency at baseline (Table 1). Overall, the event rates (95%CI) per person year for other HRU outcomes were: 2.97 (2.97-2.98) ED visits, 2.39 (2.38-2.40) hospitalizations, 5.80 (5.79-5.81) outpatient visits, and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.90-0.91) blood transfusions. The mortality rate was 1.13 (95%CI: 1.08-1.17) events per 100 person-years overall, with the highest rate being 4.91 (95%CI: 4.58-5.25) events per 100 person-years among patients ≥ 35 years of age. Higher VOC burden in the preceding year was associated with an increased risk mortality: 2-4 VOC vs. 0 or 1 VOC: Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.36 (95%CI: 1.21-1.52); ≥ 5 VOC: HR= 1.56 (95%CI: 1.39-1.75). Conclusion: The burden of SCD in US Medicaid enrollees is substantial, especially during early adulthood, with markedly high rates of VOCs, mortality, and healthcare utilization. A higher VOC rate in the preceding year was associated with an increased risk of mortality suggesting a need for careful management of SCD patients with higher VOC burden. Table 1. Annualized rates of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) among sickle cell disease patients enrolled in Medicaid. VOC, vaso-occlusive crises; CI, confidence interval. Table 1 Disclosures Desai: Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Globe:Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated: Employment. McKerracher:CRISPR Therapeutics: Employment. Mutebi:Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated: Employment. Bohn:Bohn Epidemiology: Equity Ownership; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy. Achebe:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacosmos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fulcrum Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schneeweiss:Genentech: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Aetion, Inc.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Whiscon LLC: Consultancy.

Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in the United States

Background: Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease who relapse after or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. Recently, the anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved by the FDA (May 2016 and March 2017, respectively) as treatment options for R/R cHL patients. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, observational data may provide hypothesis-generating insight into the real-world outcomes of patients receiving these PD-1 inhibitors. This study aims to evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with cHL initiated on pembrolizumab compared to nivolumab in the United States. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted using Symphony Health's Patient Integrated Dataverse® (07/2014-06/2018). The date of the first dispensing or administration of pembrolizumab or nivolumab was assigned as the index date. Patients who received both treatments and who initiated nivolumab prior to pembrolizumab approval, or in the first months after, were classified in the pembrolizumab cohort. Included patients were required to meet the following criteria: ≥12 months of continuous clinical activity prior to the index date, ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient visits with a cHL diagnosis prior to the index date, no diagnosis of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, and ≥18 years of age at the index date. Baseline patient characteristics were assessed in the 12-month baseline prior to the index date. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score was used to adjust for observed differences in baseline covariates between cohorts. Rates per person-year (PPY) of all-cause and cHL-related (i.e., visits with a primary or secondary diagnosis of cHL) HRU were calculated for weighted cohorts during the follow-up period, which spanned from the index date to the end of clinical activity or data availability. Rates of HRU were compared using rate ratios (RRs) from Poisson regression models. Results: A total of 92 patients initiated on pembrolizumab and 218 patients initiated on nivolumab met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. Of the 92 pembrolizumab patients, 6 patients received nivolumab during the baseline period. After weighting, the mean age was similar at 55 years in both cohorts, while the proportion of female was lower in the pembrolizumab cohort (35.3%) compared to the nivolumab cohort (44.1%; standardized difference [StD]=17.9%). The mean (median) follow-up period was 295 (264) days for pembrolizumab users and 274 (208) days for nivolumab users (StD=9.4%). Mean Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was well balanced after weighting in the pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts (4.2 and 4.3, respectively; StD=2.2%); 13.8% and 15.0% had depressive disorders (StD=3.7%), and 8.5% and 10.2% had substance-related and addictive disorders (StD=5.8%), respectively. The mean number of baseline hospitalizations (pembrolizumab=1.6, nivolumab=1.5; StD=3.1%) was also well balanced after weighting. The total person-time of observation was 74.6 and 163.6 years for the weighted pembrolizumab and nivolumab cohorts, respectively. Over this period, patients in the pembrolizumab cohort had significantly lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (0.46) PPY than those in the nivolumab cohort (1.39; RR [95% confidence interval, CI]=0.33 [0.09-0.80], P=0.014; Figure). Furthermore, the rate of cHL-related hospitalizations PPY was significantly lower in the pembrolizumab cohort (0.06) compared to the nivolumab cohort (0.42; RR [95% CI]=0.14 [0.02-0.37], P&lt;0.001; Figure). A similar trend (i.e., ratio below 1) was observed for all-cause and cHL-related outpatient visits, but the difference was not statistically significant (all-cause RR [95% CI]=0.84 [0.56-1.11], P=0.200; cHL-related RR [95% CI]=0.90 [0.47-1.42], P=0.647). Conclusion: In this real-world study, adult cHL patients treated with pembrolizumab had significantly lower rates of all-cause and cHL-related hospitalizations than those treated with nivolumab. Fewer all-cause and cHL-related outpatient visits were also observed among pembrolizumab users. Additional research is warranted to further investigate these early trends in real-world HRU observed among patients with cHL receiving anti-PD1 therapies. Disclosures Laliberté: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Research Funding; Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Research Funding. Raut:Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Employment. Yang:Merck &amp; Co.: Employment. Germain:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Research Funding; Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Research Funding. Sen:Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Employment. MacKnight:Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Research Funding. Desai:Merck &amp; Co., Inc.: Employment. Duh:Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting firm that has received research funding from Shire, a Takeda company, to conduct this study: Employment; Shire: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding.

Analysis of Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Between Octreotide and Lanreotide Among Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors.

The aim of the study was to assess treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) receiving long-acting octreotide versus lanreotide, overall and in patients with carcinoid syndrome (CS). A provider-based claims database was used to identify NET patients who first initiated long-acting octreotide or lanreotide (index date) from January 2015 to November 2017. Propensity-score matching 1:1 was used. Patients with CS were identified from the previously mentioned matched cohorts. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Per-patient-per-month rates of healthcare resource utilization were compared using rate ratios from multivariable Poisson regression models. Multivariable linear regression models were used to compare mean monthly cost differences. The median TTD was similar between the 2 matched cohorts (N = 543 each; long-acting octreotide = 19.2 months, lanreotide = 17.5 months, P = 0.58). Significantly fewer NET-related outpatient visits (rate ratio = 0.95, P = 0.005) and significantly lower total healthcare costs (mean monthly cost difference: all-cause = US -$3701, NET-related = US -$3752, Ps < 0.001) were observed in the long-acting octreotide cohort than lanreotide. Similar results were found in CS patients. Patients on first-line long-acting octreotide and lanreotide had similar TTD. Long-acting octreotide was associated with significantly lower total healthcare costs than lanreotide.

Economic burden of hemophilia B in the US: a systematic literature review

Background: Hemophilia B (HB) is a rare disease caused by congenital Factor IX (FIX) deficiency. HB requires life-long management to prevent or manage bleeding and associated morbidity. Although HB affects only a small portion of the population, it is associated with high overall cost and imposes a significant financial burden on individuals, payers, and society in general. Due to variation in patient clinical characteristics and treatment choice, cost and healthcare resource utilization associated with disease management can vary significantly from patient to patient. Aims: To review published direct costs and healthcare resource utilization associated with the management of HB in the US. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Tufts CEA registry) to identify full-text studies (March 2009–March 2019). Additionally, a manual search for abstracts from relevant conferences was performed (from 2016). Studies were included in the review using pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria for population, study type, language (English), and location (US). Publications consisting of budget impact analysis, cost, burden of disease, healthcare resource utilization, and economics evaluations were included. Results: Of 693 titles and abstracts screened, a total of 17 studies evaluating cost and resource utilization in patients with HB in the US were included. Data sources for these studies included: medical records (n = 5), insurance claims databases (n = 10), and surveys (n = 2). Reported cost and resource use varied across studies depending on severity of the disease, treatment regimen, and product type: extended (EHL) or standard half-life (SHL). The cost of FIX replacement therapy constitutes the majority of costs in HB management. Among patients with severe or moderate HB, reported mean annual cost of FIX ranged from $187,070 to $925,864 with an average of $560,801. Annual cost of EHLs could exceed more than twice the cost of SHLs. For example, mean annual cost of EHL FIX was $921,291 vs $478,096 for SHL FIX. Rates of healthcare resource utilization were also substantial for patients with HB and include hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and physician visits. Conclusions: This systematic literature review found significant economic burden associated with HB in the US. The substantial costs and health resources utilized by patients highlight unmet needs remaining in HB.

US Integrated Delivery Networks Perspective on Economic Burden of Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.

ObjectiveOur objective was to assess healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with and without treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and those without MDD in US Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs).MethodsThis was a retrospective matched-cohort study. The Optum© Integrated Claims Electronic Health Record de-identified database was used to identify adult patients with TRD (January 2011–June 2017) across US IDNs. TRD patients were propensity score matched 1:1 with non-TRD MDD and non-MDD patients on demographics. Rates of HRU and costs were compared up to 2 years following the first antidepressant pharmacy claim (or randomly imputed date for non-MDD patients) using negative binomial and ordinary least squares regressions, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from nonparametric bootstraps (costs only) adjusted for baseline comorbidity index and costs.ResultsAll 1582 TRD patients were matched to non-TRD MDD and non-MDD patients and evaluated. TRD patients were on average 46 years old, and 67% were female. Mean duration of observation was 20.1, 19.6, and 17.9 months in the TRD, non-TRD MDD, and non-MDD cohorts, respectively. Patients with TRD had significantly higher rates of HRU than did non-TRD MDD patients (inpatient visits 0.35 vs. 0.16 per patient per year [PPPY]; adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.74–2.39]) and non-MDD patients (0.35 vs. 0.09 PPPY, adjusted IRR 3.05 [95% CI 2.54–3.66]). TRD patients incurred significantly higher costs PPPY than did non-TRD MDD patients ($US25,807 vs. 13,701, adjusted cost difference $US9479 [95% CI 7071–11,621]) and non-MDD patients ($US25,807 vs. 8500, adjusted cost difference $US11,433 [95% CI 8668–13,876]).ConclusionsHRU and costs associated with TRD are significant in US IDNs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0154-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Healthcare resource utilization by patients with treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis in England

Aims: To examine healthcare resource utilization associated with refractory myasthenia gravis (MG) in England.Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the Hospital Episode Statistics database collected between 1997 and 2016. Included patients were ≥18 years of age at the index MG diagnosis. Patients with refractory MG were identified using an algorithm based on treatments received. Healthcare resource utilization since the index date was compared between refractory and non-refractory cohorts.Results: The study included 1149 patients with MG, of whom 66 (5.7%) were refractory. Sex and age at diagnosis did not significantly differ between the refractory and non-refractory cohorts. Rates of healthcare resource utilization per person-year were significantly higher (p < .05) for patients with refractory compared to non-refractory MG for GP visits, visits to other healthcare professionals, outpatient visits and inpatient hospitalization. Patients in the refractory cohort spent more total days hospitalized since the index visit than patients in the non-refractory cohort (median, 33 vs. 16 days [p < .0001]).Limitations: The algorithm for identifying refractory patients did not include clinical criteria. Also, treatments administered in hospitals or by specialists were not available in the databases.Conclusions: Patients in England with refractory MG more often visit healthcare providers, are hospitalized and visit an emergency room than patients with non-refractory MG.

Incident gout and chronic Kidney Disease: healthcare utilization and survival

BackgroundUncontrolled gout can cause significant joint and organ damage and has been associated with impairments in quality of life and high economic cost. Gout has also been associated with other comorbid diseases, such as chronic kidney disease. The current study explored if healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and survival differs between patients with incident gout in the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsClalit Health Services (CHS) data were used to conduct a retrospective population-based cohort study of incident gout between 1/1/2006–31/12/2009. Incident cases of gout were identified and stratified by CKD status and by age group (< 55 and 55+ years). CKD status was defined as a pre-existing diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, chronic renal failure, kidney transplantation, or dialysis at index date. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as healthcare resource use, were reported.ResultsA total of 12,940 incident adult gout patients, with (n = 8286) and without (n = 4654) CKD, were followed for 55,206 person-years. Higher rates of HRU were observed for gout patients with CKD than without. Total annual hospital admissions for patients with gout and CKD were at least 3 times higher for adults < 55 (mean = 0.51 vs 0.13) and approximately 1.5 times higher for adults 55+ (mean = 0.46 vs 0.29) without CKD. Healthcare utilization rates from year 1 to year 5 remained similar for gout patients < 55 years irrespective of CKD status, however varied according to healthcare utilization by CKD status for gout patients 55+ years. The 5-year all-cause mortality was higher among those with CKD compared to those without CKD for both age groups (HR< 55 years = 1.65; 95% CI 1.01–2.71; HR55+ years = 1.50; 95% CI 1.37–1.65).ConclusionsThe current study suggests important differences exist in patient characteristics and outcomes among patients with gout and CKD. Healthcare utilization differed between sub-populations, age and comorbidities, over the study period and the 5-year mortality risk was higher for gout patients with CKD, regardless of age. Future work should explore factors associated with these outcomes and barriers to gout control in order to enhance patient management among this high-risk subgroup.