Hardware Removal Research Articles

Incidence of Acute vs Chronic Post-op Complications Following TAA: Are They Preventable?

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is becoming an increasingly common procedure with high patient satisfaction and improved outcomes. Although previous studies have explored various patient outcomes, there is variability in reporting methods and acute and chronic complications following TAA are poorly described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute and chronic postoperative complications in patients undergoing TAA at our institution. Methods: Following institutional board approval, a retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent TAA from 2002-2017 at our institution. Patients were followed from the time of surgery to their 1 year follow-up. Demographics and post-op complications were recorded at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year following surgery. Results: At our institution from 2002-2017, a total of 187 patients underwent TAA. The mean age of our cohort was 62.8 (Range 20-68). In our cohort, 106 were male and 81 were female, and the mean patient BMI was 31.6 (Range 33-89). At 4 weeks post- operatively, the most common acute complication was superficial infection (4.8%). Within 6 weeks post-operatively, 1 patient had a VTE (0.53%). The highest chronic complication following TAA was post-operative pain – 12.3% patients reported significant post-operative pain 1 year following surgery. 9.6% patients required hardware removal greater than 1 year following TAA. Conclusion: At our institution the most common acute complication at 4 weeks following TAA was surgical site infection (4.8%). The most common chronic complication was post-operative pain (12.3%). Further investigation is needed to understand the greatest contributing factors to these complications and future studies will focus on methods to minimize surgical site infection and post-operative pain following TAA.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is among the most common spine procedures. Adjacent segment disease (ASD), characterized by degenerative disease at an adjacent spinal level to a prior fusion, is a well-recognized and significant sequela following ACDF. Adjacent segment ACDF may be considered after the failure of non-surgical options for patients with symptomatic ASD. This study aimed to assess the incidence of dysphagia and other complications as well as radiographic outcomes in adult patients who have undergone ACDF with an integrated interbody spacer device for symptomatic ASD. This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD with commercially available integrated interbody spacers by three spine surgeons at an academic institution from March 2018 to April 2022. Demographic, radiographic, and postoperative data were collected, including dysphagia, device-related complications, and the need for revision surgery. There were 48 patients (26 male, 22 female) who met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.7 years, mean body mass index 19.5 kg/m2) who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD (1one-level, n= 44; 2-level, n= 4). Overall, 12 patients (25%) experienced dysphagia postoperatively before the first follow-up appointment. Nine of 44 (20.4%) of 1-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia, and 3 of 4 (75%) of 2-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia. Three patients had severe dysphagia which prompted an otolaryngology referral. Two of those patients remained symptomatic at 6 weeks postoperatively. Of 43 patients with prior plate cage systems, none required hardware removal at the time of surgery. Preoperative global and segmental lordosis were 9.07° ± 8.36° (P= 0.22) and 3.58° ± 4.57° (P= 0.14), respectively. At 6 weeks postoperatively, global and segmental lordosis were 11.44° ± 9.06° (P= 0.54) and 5.11° ± 4.44° (P= 0.44), respectively. This constitutes a change of+2.37° and+1.53° in global and segmental lordosis, respectively. The mean anterior disc height change between preoperative and immediate postoperative time points was 6.3 ± 3.1 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 6-week postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -1.5 ± 2.7 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 3-month postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -3.7 ± 5.0 mm. The posterior disc height changes at the same time points were 2.5 ± 1.7 mm, -0.4 ± 1.8. and -0.5 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. This fusion rate was 50% and 70% at 6 months and 1 year post-surgery, respectively. ACDF with integrated spacer is a viable alternative to traditional plate-cage systems for symptomatic ASD. An advantage over traditional plate-cage systems is that the removal of prior instrumentation is not needed in order to place implants. Based on a review of the literature, these standalone systems allowed for a shorter operative time and had less incidence of dysphagia than plate-cage systems for ASD after ACDF. The different standalone and plate-cage systems used in treating ASD after ACDF surgeries should be compared in prospective studies.

Percutaneous Juxtapedicular Cement Salvage of Failed Spinal Instrumentation? Institutional Experience and Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Instrumented spinal fusion constructs sometimes fail because of fatigue loading, frequently necessitating open revision surgery. Favorable outcomes after percutaneous juxtapedicular cement salvage (perc-cement salvage) of failing instrumentation have been described; however, this approach is not widely known among spine surgeons, and its biomechanical properties have not been evaluated. We report our institutional experience with perc-cement salvage and investigate the relative biomechanical strength of this technique as compared with 3 other common open revision techniques. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent perc-cement salvage was conducted. Biomechanical characterization of revision techniques was performed in a cadaveric model of critical pedicle screw failure. Three revision cohorts involved removal and replacement of hardware: (1) screw upsizing, (2) vertebroplasty, and (3) fenestrated screw with cement augmentation. These were compared with a cohort with perc-cement salvage performed using a juxtapedicular trajectory with the failed primary screw remaining engaged in the vertebral body. Ten patients underwent perc-cement salvage from 2018 to 2022 to address screw haloing and/or endplate fracture threatening construct integrity. Pain palliation was reported by 8/10 patients. Open revision surgery was required in 4/10 patients, an average of 8.9 months after the salvage procedure (range 6.2-14.7 months). Only one revision was due to progressive hardware dislodgement. The remainder avoided open revision surgery through an average of 1.9 years of follow-up. In the cadaveric study, there were no significant differences in pedicle screw pullout strength among any of the revision cohorts. Perc-cement salvage of failing instrumentation is reasonably efficacious. The technique is biomechanically noninferior to other revision strategies that require open surgery for removal and replacement of hardware. Open revision surgery may be avoided by perc-cement salvage in select cases.

The Duration of Hardware Retention After Radiologic Union of Surgically Treated Femoral Neck Fractures in Children May Predict the Aggravation or Occurrence of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head or Neck After Hardware Removal.

The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures who achieved radiologic consolidation is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for this complication. Seventy-one pediatric (mean age: 9.8±3.9y) were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors (age, sex, laterality, severity of initial displacement, type of fracture, time from trauma to reduction, reduction and fixation method, quality of reduction, time required to achieve radiologic union, duration of hardware retention, presence of AVN before hardware removal and follow-up time) were recorded. The severity of AVN was assessed based on radiographs with Ratliff's classification. Following hardware removal, the aggravation/occurrence of AVN was detected in 11 hips (15.5%). Among the 5 hips (7%) with aggravation of AVN, 1 (1.4%) with type II AVN and 3 (4.2%) with type III AVN exhibited aggravation of type I AVN, while the remaining hip (1.4%; type I) showed enlargement of the involved AVN area. Six hips (8.5%) developed AVN following hardware removal: 2 (2.8%) were classified as type I and 4 (5.6%) as type III. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that hardware retention >7 months after union is associated with a decreased rate of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head following hardware removal. The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of AVN following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures is 15.5%; hardware retention >7 months after radiologic union may reduce the risk of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head postimplant removal. Level III.

Outcomes of Surgically Treated Purely Ligamentous Stage II Lisfranc Injuries.

Low-energy stage II Lisfranc injuries are rare, and treatment can be operative or nonoperative based on a surgeon's assessment of midfoot stability. No previously published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data for Lisfranc injuries isolates purely ligamentous stage II injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyze PROMs for patients who underwent operative management of stage II Lisfranc injuries. Thirty-nine patients (39 feet) with confirmed Nunley-Vertullo stage II Lisfranc injuries between May 2012 and February 2022 were identified through a retrospective chart review. PROMs that were analyzed were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and patient satisfaction. Thirty-two open reduction internal fixations (ORIFs) and 7 fusions were performed. The mean latest follow-up was 44.6 (range, 12-92) months. There were 2 complications (5%, 2/39) that required a revision procedure. Twenty-six patients (67%, 26/39) underwent secondary surgery to remove retained hardware. The mean time to hardware removal was 3.97 (range, 2.70-7.47) months. The overall mean patient satisfaction score with overall medical care including clinical visits and interactions with medical staff personnel was 93.6/100. All PROMs (VAS, VR-12, FAAM) demonstrated statistically significant improvement (P < .05) from preoperative (injury) values to latest follow-up postinjury values. Patients who were treated surgically with stage II purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries via the methods used were found to mostly undergo hardware removal and have high levels of overall satisfaction with their process of medical care. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Impedance trend from a symptomatic perielectrode cystic cavity following deep brain stimulation: illustrative case.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical intervention for a growing number of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Patients who are affected by Parkinson's disease may benefit from DBS of either the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus internus. Patients who undergo DBS often notice a significant reduction in their clinical symptoms; however, the procedure is not without risks. Multicenter studies have reported postoperative complications such as hardware infection, intracranial hemorrhage, and perielectrode edema. The authors report a case of a perielectrode cyst managed conservatively. Tracking the impedance trend was a novel approach to monitor for changes within the cyst and to herald a clinical change in the patient. Perielectrode cystic formation can be a transient process that resolves spontaneously or with conservative, nonoperative management, and all diagnostic information is valuable in making clinical decisions. Impedance values have provided an appropriate estimation of this patient's clinical picture. The authors suggest treatment of edema and a cyst after DBS lead implantation through conservative management and observation, avoiding the removal of hardware if a patient's clinical picture is either stable or improving and forgoing additional clinical imaging if the impedance values are trending in an appropriate direction.

Kyphectomy in myelomeningocele revisited: risk factors for failure.

Lumbar kyphosis occurs in approximately 8-20% of patients with myelomeningocele (MMC). The purpose of this article is to analyze the risks and benefits of vertebrectomy and spinal stabilization in MMC children with severe lumbar kyphosis and to establish treatment guidelines. This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of 59 patients with MMC who underwent kyphectomy and posterior instrumentation in three centers. Average age at surgery was 7.9years (2weeks-17years). Sitting trunk position, skin status, kyphosis angle, and thoracic lordosis were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at an average follow-up of 8.2years (range 2.5-16). The correction was maintained by applying a short posterior instrumentation in 6 patients, and extending to the pelvis in 53 cases. Pelvic fixation was achieved using the Warner and Fackler technique in 24 patients, the Dunn-McCarthy in 8, Luque-Galveston in 8, sacral screws in 2, and ilio-sacral screws in 11. Sitting position improved postoperatively in 47 of the 53 patients who underwent pelvic fixation and only in one patient with short instrumentation. All 6 patients with long instrumentation and poor postoperative sitting balance were in the Dunn-McCarthy fixation group. Skin sores at the apex of the deformity disappeared postoperatively in all patients but recurred in two patients with short instrumentations. Kyphosis angle improved from 109° (45°-170°) preoperatively to 10° (0°-45°) postoperatively and 21° (0°-55°) at last follow-up. The best results were seen in cases where a cross-k-wire fixation of the kyphectomy site was used, augmented with a long thoraco-pelvic instrumentation consisting of Luque sublaminar wires in the thoracic region and a Warner-Fackler type of pelvic fixation. Good results were also found with the bipolar technique and ilio-sacral screw fixation. Six over 24 patients with the Warner and Fackler technique showed gradual dislodgment or hardware failure, with subsequent nonunion of the kyphectomy site in four. Infection, with or without wound dehiscence and/or hardware exposure, occurred in 17 cases, necessitating hardware removal in 9 patients. Lumbar kyphosis in MMC children is best managed by resection of enough vertebrae from the apex to produce a flat lumbar spine, with perfect bone-to-bone contact and long thoraco-pelvic instrumentation using the Warner and Fackler technique through the S1 foramina or the bipolar technique with ilio-sacral screw fixation. Additional local fixation of the osteotomy site using cross-wires with or without cerclage increases the stability of the construct. The majority of complications occurred in patients with short instrumentations or where residual kyphosis persisted postoperatively regardless of the type of pelvic fixation or hardware density. The Dunn-McCarthy technique for pelvic fixation following kyphectomy in MMC was less successful in producing stable pelvic fixation and should not be considered in this patient category.

Asymptomatic implant removal after fracture union based on request to remove. Is it worth considering, an Indian perspective?

Objectives Hardware removals are among the commonly performed surgical procedures in orthopedics, but they sometimes prove quite difficult. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk, benefit and drawbacks of asymptomatic implant removal based on patients’ desire. Material and Methods A total of 105 patients who had been previously treated for a fracture and voluntarily wanted its removal and who did not report clinical indications or occasional regional pain were included in the study cohort. Results For the 105 patients surveyed, implant removals were performed in the leg (41 patients; 39%), the ankle joint (32 patients; 30%), the thigh (19 patients; 18%) and the forearm and the wrist (15 patients; 14%). The most common indication for removal was patients’ request in 66 (62.8%) cases. Altogether, 98 (93%) patients were satisfied because of the fulfillment of their desire, despite the instances of complication being frequent (32.8%). Conclusion In our study, we reported a surprisingly high rate of satisfied patients after surgical hardware removal once their requests for hardware removal were taken into consideration. However, it was closely associated with multiple risks. Therefore, judicious selection of actually eligible patients is highly recommended instead of the unqualified fulfilment of their requests for removal.

Foot Surgery Using Resorbable Magnesium Screws

The use of bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws is new in foot surgery. Their relative merit over conventional titanium screws has not yet been proven. This prospective case series study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of bioabsorbable Mg screws and titanium screws. A consecutive series of patients (n=60; 11 men and 49 women) underwent corrective hallux valgus surgery. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. The assessment was based on a patient questionnaire, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) hallux valgus score, visual analog scale, patient's global impression of change (PGIC), and fifth metatarsus circumference (IF5C). The radiographic assessment included the intermetatarsal and hallux valgus angles, as well as time to osteotomy union and hardware failure. At 1 year, similar results were obtained radiographically. The healing of the osteotomies was significantly faster in the Mg group. Hardware failure was common in the Mg group (5/26) than in the TI group (0/34) but hardware removal was more common in the TI group (6/34) versus the MG group (0/26). IF5C increased by 8 ± 2 mm in the Mg group. The AOFAS and PGIC scores at 6 months were similar. Validated foot scores and radiographic analysis indicated that there was no detectable difference between the groups. The fast achievement of osteotomy union compensates for a high rate of hardware failure, resulting in patient satisfaction and avoiding reoperation for hardware removal.

Latarjet in women for anterior shoulder instability: a case series analysis.

The Latarjet procedure is traditionally used to treat chronic anterior shoulder instability associated with glenoid bone loss. However, few series have analyzed outcomes in a female-only population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a Latarjet bone block in this specific population. This single-center retrospective study included 15 women (mean age 35 ± 11.3; 19-60) reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2years. The procedure was performed using the open bone block screw technique (n = 7) or by arthroscopy with cortical button (n = 8). Clinical evaluation was based on active range of motion measurements, Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores, and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Radiographic analysis explored bone block healing at the last follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 48months (32-86), no recurrence was reported. The mean Rowe score was 91 points (70-100), Walch-Duplay 90 points (60-100), and SSV 87% (70-100). The active mobilities reached 169° (± 9°) in elevation, 57° (± 15°) in external rotation at side, and 89° (± 6°) in abduction. The return-to-sport rate was 91%. Five patients experienced persistent anterior pain, with screws requiring hardware removal in 2 (p = 0.02). Radiological assessment detected one case of nonunion (7%). Women treated with the Latarjet procedure experienced satisfactory midterm clinical outcomes. The arthroscopic technique using cortical button fixation seems to avoid residual anterior pain requiring hardware removal.

Allogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Background: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Use of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique for Distal Fibula Hardware Removal

Ankle fracture is one of the most common fractures that are mainly treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has been widely used for hand and wrist surgeries, this method has been scarcely utilized in ankle surgery. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has evaluated the safety and efficacy of the WALANT technique in distal fibula hardware removal surgeries. This study aimed to investigate the result of using the WALANT technique in distal fibula hardware removal surgery. From April 2020 until March 2021 randomized clinical trial was performed on 60 patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years in our educational orthopedic center. In group A, an anesthesiologist administered spinal anesthesia and in group B the WALANT technique was used for anesthesia. The results of the current study showed that the visual analog scale in group B a day after the surgery was significantly lower, in comparison to group A. The outcome of our study demonstrated lesser blood loss in patients operated under the WALANT. This finding could be related to the vasoconstrictive properties of epinephrine used in the WALANT solution. Our findings suggest that the WALANT technique application in the proper setting and appropriate patient selection could lead to reduced postoperative pain, minimal bleeding, and shorter admission time. Other advantages include the simplicity and safety of the technique, it is being time and cost-effective. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Metal hypersensitivity in foot & ankle orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review

IntroductionMetal hypersensitivity affects 10–15% of individuals. Orthopaedic implants contain various metals and, therefore, metal hypersensitivity may impact patient outcomes. PurposeWe report a systematic review of the literature on metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing foot and ankle (F&A) surgery. Our goal is to provide an overview presenting symptoms, diagnostic methods, treatment, and clinical outcomes. MethodsA comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed from its inception (01-Jan 1966) to 23-Nov 2021. MeSH search terms on F&A were used including orthopaedic surgeries, metal types, and hypersensitivity. All full-text, English, experimental and observational studies reporting on metal hypersensitivity in the context of foot and/or ankle surgeries using metallic orthopaedic devices were included. Article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction was performed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. ResultsFifteen studies were identified, reporting on 45 patients (18 male and 27 female). Median age was 58 years and mean follow-up was 20.8 months. 42 static and three arthroplasty implants were included. In total, 19 patients (42.2%) were diagnosed with metal hypersensitivity to a constituent of their implant, including two (4.4%) patients diagnosed without metal hypersensitivity testing. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) tested negative to their metal implant components. Of the 19 patients allergic to a constituent of their implant, 14 underwent hardware removal and improved. Four patients were asymptomatic and the last was symptomatic, but not revised. Of these, 23 patients retained their hardware (eight with skin reactions) and two symptomatic patients underwent hardware removal. ConclusionMetal hypersensitivity in the context of F&A surgery is not widely reported. It should be a differential diagnosis in patients who present with hypersensitivity-type symptoms once infection and mechanical failure are ruled out. This data informs a comprehensive algorithm for identifying and treating metal hypersensitivity in F&A patients. Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Effect of hardware removal and second-look arthroscopy after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is the standard and safe procedure for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Although hardware removal (HWR) is performed after post-OWHTO bone union, the effects of HWR on OWHTO have been rarely reported. We hypothesised that HWR would improve range of motion (ROM) and implant-related complications. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of HWR on postoperative ROM, the Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score/visual analogue scale (VAS) score and hardware-related complications after OWHTO. Patients who underwent OWHTO between January 2016 and June 2018 and HWR were retrospectively reviewed. To perform OWHTO, locking plates and prosthetic bone were used to achieve optimal stabilisation of biplanar osteotomy. HWR was performed after a second-look arthroscopy through the previous skin incision. For clinical evaluation, the JOA score, VAS score, and ROM were assessed before and 1year after HWR using the Wilcoxon rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of post-HWR improvement. Of 98 knees examined (91 patients), 80 (73 patients; 39 men and 34 women) were included. At the time of OWHTO, mean age was 64.0 ± 9.7years and body mass index, 25.5 ± 3.1kg/m2; Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1 was seen in 20 cases, KL-2 in 46, and KL-3 in 14. Mean periods between OWHTO and HWR were 13.4 ± 2.0months, and 11.9 ± 1.2months between HWR and evaluation. The JOA score and flexion angle significantly improved after HWR (The JOA score: p = 0.026 flexion angle: p < 0.001); however, the VAS score and extension angle did not (VAS score: p = 0.162, extension angle: p = 0.934). Hardware irritation was observed in four cases (5%), which improved after HWR. Logistic regression analysis revealed that lower preoperative KL grade and flexion angle were predictors of improvement after HWR [KL grade: p = 0.008; odds ratio 3.244, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.350-7.794; flexion angle: p < 0.001; odds ratio 1.150, 95% CI 1.062-1.245]. HWR improves flexion angle, clinical outcomes and hardware-related complications after OWHTO. Preoperative KL grade and flexion angle are predictors of improvement after HWR in patients who have undergone OWHTO.

Mid-term Incidence of Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis Following Open Reduction With Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Lisfranc Injuries

Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of Lisfranc injuries are associated with an increased risk for secondary surgery including hardware removal and salvage arthrodesis. In the current literature, rates of salvage arthrodesis vary due to small sample sizes and a low incidence of Lisfranc injuries. There is little evidence to identify specific surgical and patient-related variables that may result in later arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis following Lisfranc ORIF in a relatively large sample size. This retrospective review included patients who underwent ORIF for a Lisfranc injury between January 2007 and December 2012. A total of 146 patients met our criteria. Trans-articular fixation was used in 109 (74.6%) patients, 33 (22.6%) received percutaneous fixation and 4 (2.7%) extraarticular fixation. Five out of 120 (4.2%) patients required a salvage arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis that had a follow-up greater than 5 y but up to 10 y. The mean age of patients who underwent arthrodesis after ORIF was 24.5 ± 11.95 (16-48) y compared to 40.9 ± 15.8 (16-85) y. Patients who required an arthrodesis also had earlier hardware removal than patients who did not have an arthrodesis, 71.2 ± 28.3 (38-100) days and 131.4 ±101.2 (37-606) days, respectively. Patients who required salvage arthrodesis tended to be younger and hardware was removed earlier compared to those patients who did not require an arthrodesis. Four of the 5 patients who underwent a secondary arthrodesis had a loss of correction after hardware removal.

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for treatment of unstable lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children.

In the past, obviously displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children were treated satisfactorily with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, in recent years, more studies have mentioned closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of these fractures. In this retrospective investigation, the radiographic and clinical results of patients with these fractures that were initially managed with CRPP were newly classified. We classified these fractures into three groups according to the degree and pattern of fracture displacement as identified on four radiographic images. In Type I, the fracture is unstable and displacement is ≥2 mm; In Type II degree I, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with single rotation of fragment; In Type II degree II, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with single rotation of fragment, with rotation of fragment and antero-proximal displacement; In Type III, the fracture is unstable and displacement is >2 mm, with posterior dislocation of elbow joint. We also designed an algorithm for closed reduction of these fractures according to this new classification. We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical results of 37 unstable fractures (in 22 boys and 15 girls) that were treated with closed reduction. Twenty-one of 25 (84.0%) type I fractures, which could have been reduced to within 2 mm of residual displacement, were treated with closed reduction and pinning with 2 or 3 Kirschner wires (K wires). Three of 5 (60.0%) type II degree I, 3 of 4 (75.0%) type II degree II, and 3 of 3 (100%) type III fractures were treated with CRPP. In 4 of 25 (16.0%) type I, 2 of 5 (40.0%) type II degree I and 1 of 4 (25.0%) type II degree II fractures, closed reduction failed, so ORIF was implemented. There were no complications, such as nonunion, osteonecrosis of the capitellum, superficial or deep infection, malunion, cubitus varus or valgus, or early physeal arrest. Although the management of type III fractures may not be more difficult than type II fractures with a rotated fracture fragment, as elbow dislocations are usually easy reducible. This retrospective study showed that type III fractures should not be ignored as a lateral condyle fracture that can be cured with CRPP and that lateral humeral condyle fractures with obvious displacement and rotation can be initially treated with CRPP to achieve satisfactory recovery of the elbow. Kirschner wire (K wire) fixation is recommended to avoid reoperation or anesthesia for hardware removal.

Etiologies of Orthopedic Implant Removal Among Patients Who Underwent Orthopedic Fixation Surgeries in King Abdulaziz Medical City.

Hardware removal surgeries are considerably common. However, the justifications for these surgeries are debatable. The indications may vary from pain, surgical site infection, or failure of osteosynthesis. Additionally, the surgery can be performed withoutmedical indication. Following these surgeries, many complications can occur. Therefore, surgeons and patients should be aware of the appropriate indications and have realistic expectations of the risks and benefits of implant removal. This was a retrospective chart review study. We included all patients aged 17-86 years who underwent hardware removal surgery in the orthopedic surgery department of King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2010 to 2019. All relevant data, such as demographic characteristics, location and type of hardware, indication for hardware removal, duration between insertion and removal, and complications after removal were recorded and analyzed. A total of 244 medical records were reviewed with a mean patient age of 34years. Out of the total, 190 patients (77.9%) were male. The femur was the most common location of hardware removal, in 50 cases (20.58%). Plates and screws were the most common type of implants (40.2%). Most patients underwent hardware implantation because of fractures (89.3%). In total, 119 patients (48.8%) had the hardware removed electively. Only 29 patients (12%) reported postoperative complications; 190 patients (77.9%) were advised by their surgeon against hardware removal. Hardware removal procedures are commonly performed worldwide for various reasons, including infection, pain, and loosening. In this study, we have outlined the reasons for implant removal, the locations, complications, and the rationale behind this surgery. We have provided a new decision-making assessment, aimed at the general population and surgeons alike, that will help patients better comprehend the complications and risks associated with this elective surgery.

Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction With Plate and Screw Fixation in Management of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Proximal phalanx fractures are common, with surgical fixation indicated for unstable fractures. Traditionally, closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) resulted in decreased stiffness and tendon irritation compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that more recent studies would have more similar outcomes to CRPP. The purpose of this study was to compare CRPP and ORIF in terms of range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and complications. Four electronic databases were queried from 2010 to present. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a two-step review process to identify relevant articles. Patient demographics, total active motion (TAM), DASH, and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria including four comparative studies: Thirteen studies included TAM. The weighted average TAM was 228 ± 34° for CRPP and 223 ± 32° for ORIF (P = .07 with 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.5 to 10.5). Seven studies evaluated DASH scores; weighted average was 8.2 ± 8.9 for CRPP and 11.7 ± 6.5 for ORIF (P < .01 with 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Two studies directly compared CRPP to ORIF, favoring ORIF for both TAM with d = 1.07 and DASH with d = 0.23. Rates of tenolysis or hardware removal were higher for ORIF (P < .01). New literature suggests more equipoise with regard to treatment of proximal phalanx fracture with CRPP versus ORIF. Meta-analysis, Level II.

Posterior Fixation Without Debridement for Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis and Discitis: A 10-Year Retrospective Review.

Surgical treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis, discitis, and epidural abscesses is indicated in the setting of failure of antibiotic therapy, neurological deficits, epidural abscess, or spinal instability/deformity. Historically, surgical treatment mandated aggressive debridement and spinal stabilization. However, there is growing evidence that direct debridement may not be necessary and may contribute to morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of posterior instrumentation without debridement in treating spinal infections. A retrospective medical record review was performed to identify patients treated with posterior instrumentation for spontaneous spinal infections. Success of treatment was determined based on postoperative ambulatory status, surgical complications, and need for revision surgery. Twenty-seven patients treated with posterior-only long-segmented rigid fixation without formal debridement of infected material were included. The most common indications for surgical intervention included spinal instability (67%), neurologic compromise (67%), and failure of prolonged antibiotic treatment (63%). There were no recurrent deep infections in 21 of 22 patients who had long-term follow-up. Four patients required revision surgery, and 3 additional patients requested elective hardware removal. Postoperatively, 70% were ambulatory with no assistive devices postoperatively. Vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis are challenging medical problems. Single-stage long-segment fusion without formal debridement combined with antibiotics is effective in the management of spontaneous spinal infections. The present study suggests that acute instrumentation without anterior debridement is associated with a resolution of infection and improvements in neurologic deficits in patient with spontaneous spine infections.

Risk of Volar Locking Plate Removal After Distal Radius Fractures: Time-to-Event Analysis

The primary purpose of this study was to describe the rate of volar locking plate (VLP) removal after distal radius fracture and how long it takes for the risk of VLP removal to stabilize. The secondary purpose was to describe the reasons for VLP removal and analyze the relationship between it and the Soong index. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients aged >18 years with distal radius fracture who underwent VLP fixation were included. Hardware removal, time until VLP removal, and the primary reason for removal were recorded. The implant prominence was measured as described by Soong. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and risk tables to describe the risk of VLP removal and variation over time. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between Soong grade and VLP removal. A total of 313 wrists were included. There were 35 cases of VLP removal, with an overall incidence of 11.2% at 15 years of follow-up. The incidence rate was 1.2 per 100 individuals per year for the entire cohort. The risk of VLP removal decreased from 6.2% in the first postoperative year to 1.7% in the second year and 1.4% in the third year. Beyond that, the rate remained <1% per year throughout the follow-up period. The median hardware removal time was 11 months. The main reasons for VLP removal were tenosynovitis, implant-associated pain, and screw protrusion. We found no association between Soong grade and VLP removal. Volar locking plate removal after distal radius fracture was more common in the first year after surgery and remained notable until the third year. Regular monitoring and patient education to assess possible complications related to hardware are important during this period. Therapeutic IV.