Hardware Removal Research Articles

Systems issues limiting acute fracture care delivery at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Tanzania.

sub-Saharan Africa experiences a significant musculoskeletal trauma burden. Among patients who receive surgical treatment, there have been no reports as to how often surgical care is determined to be "adequate" or, if "inadequate", then what hospital and orthopaedic specialty-specific systems limitations might be prohibitive. data from patients presenting to the orthopaedic trauma service at a tertiary care center in sub-Saharan Africa were prospectively collected over a 6-week period and then retrospectively reviewed to determine whether the surgical treatment was "adequate" (or otherwise, "inadequate") according to the principle of restoring length, alignment, and rotation. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information; isolated spinal injury; infection; cases involving only removal of hardware; soft-tissue procedures; tumor cases; and medical (non-surgical) conditions. 112 cases were included for analysis. Surgery was indicated in 106 of 112 cases (94.6%), and of those, surgery was performed in 62 cases (58.4%). Among patients who underwent surgery with available post-operative imaging (n=56), surgical treatment was "inadequate" in 24 cases (42.9%). The most common reasons treatment was deemed "inadequate" included unavailability of appropriate implants (n=16), unavailability of intraoperative fluoroscopy (n=10) and incomplete intraoperative evaluation of injury (n=5). several systems limitations prevent the delivery of adequate surgical treatment in patients with acute orthopaedic traumatic injuries, including lack of intraoperative fluoroscopy and lack of implant availability. This study will serve as a useful baseline for ongoing efforts seeking to improve orthopaedic specialty resource availability and facilitate more effective fracture care in this region.

Carbon Footprint of Minor Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Climate change poses a substantial threat to human health, and operating rooms (ORs) have an outsized environmental impact. The Program for Research in Sustainable Medicine (PRiSM) designed a protocol for minor foot and ankle surgery intended to reduce waste, streamline instrument trays, and minimize laundry. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the carbon footprint of procedures performed using the PRiSM protocol vs a traditional protocol. Forty adult patients undergoing foreign body removal, hammertoe correction, toe amputation, hardware removal, mass excision, or gastrocnemius recession were randomized to the PRiSM or our "Traditional" protocol. The PRiSM protocol used a smaller instrument tray, fewer drapes and towels, and minimal positioning blankets. No changes were made to surgical site preparation or operative techniques. Environmental impact was estimated using the carbon footprint, measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). Emissions associated with OR waste, instrument processing, and laundry were calculated. On average, PRiSM cases had a smaller carbon footprint than Traditional cases (17.3 kg CO2e [SD = 3.2] vs 20.6 kg CO2e [SD = 2.0], P < .001). Waste-associated emissions from PRiSM cases were reduced (16.0 kg CO2e [SD = 2.7] vs 18.4 kg CO2e [SD = 1.8], P = .002), as were modeled instrument processing-related emissions (0.34 vs 0.91 kg CO2e). One superficial surgical site infection occurred in each group. We found a small but statistically significant reduction in the environmental impact of minor foot and ankle surgery when using the PRiSM vs Traditional protocol. The environmental impact of these cases was dominated by plastic waste-related emissions. Orthopaedic surgeons should think critically about what components of their surgical setup are truly necessary for patient care, as minor changes in product utilization can have significant impacts on waste and greenhouse gas emissions. Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Current Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Fibular Fractures: A National Database Study of Intramedullary vs. Plate Fixation Practice Patterns, Complications, and Cost.

Existing primary evidence comparing fibular intramedullary fixation (IMF) with traditional plate fixation (PF) for the treatment of distal fibular fractures remains limited by modest sample sizes. Using a large national database, this study aims to compare use rates, fracture patterns, patient characteristics, time to surgery, complication rates, and cost between fibular IMF and PF within the United States. Adults treated with fibular IMF or PF between October 2015 and October 2021 were identified within the PearlDiver Database. The ratio of IMF-treated to PF-treated patients was tracked temporally to compare use rates. Fracture patterns were determined using fracture diagnoses within one-month preceding surgery. Further comparisons of IMF- and PF-treated groups only included patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, and patients with upper tibia or tibia shaft fractures were excluded. An analysis of cohorts matched at a 1 : 4 (IMF: PF) ratio to control for risk factors was performed to compare time to surgery, complication rates (infection, nonunion, malunion, revision, hardware removal, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis), and cost. 39329 patients (2294 IMF and 37035 PF) were identified. IMF use trended upwards relative to PF use over time. Tibia and fibula shaft fractures were the most common injuries in IMF patients versus bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures in PF patients. A higher proportion of IMF patients had open fractures. IMF patients were younger, with higher mean ECI, fewer female patients, and higher rates of CKD. Percutaneous approaches were more common among IMF patients. There were no significant differences in time to surgery or complication rates. IMF was less costly. The popularity of IMF trended upwards across the study period. IMF was used more commonly in injuries involving higher energy trauma and soft tissue disruption. Overall, IMF patients were younger with more comorbidities. When used in similar populations, IMF appears to be a cost-effective alternative to PF.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Modern Augmented ACL Repair and Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the gold standard for primary ACL rupture since the 1990s. In the past decade, ACL repair has received renewed attention and increased research. To compare the clinical outcomes of modern augmented ACL repair versus autograft reconstruction for ACL ruptures. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted for prospective or retrospective comparative studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 3, 2023, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to maintain the stability of results. Nine studies were included (minimum follow-up period, 24-60 months). The total sample size was 833 patients (augmented repair group: 358 patients; autograft ACL reconstruction group: 475 patients). There were 4 randomized controlled trials (level 1), 1 prospective comparative study (level 2), 2 retrospective comparative studies (level 3), and 2 case-control studies (level 3). The augmented ACL repair group attained significantly higher Lysholm score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-3.01; P = .03) and hamstring strength (WMD = 36.69; 95% CI, 29.07-44.31; P < .01) but had higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 6.30; 95% CI, 2.44-16.23; P = .0001), reoperation (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.62; P = .0003), and failure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.03-2.43; P = .0003) compared with the autograft ACL reconstruction group. No significant differences were observed between the repair and reconstruction groups regarding postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Tegner scores, knee laxity, satisfaction, ACL revisions, complications, and reoperation rather than revision. Augmented ACL repair was associated with higher rates of reoperation, hardware removal, and failure compared with autograft ACL reconstruction in studies with minimum 2-year follow-up data. However, augmented ACL repair had higher Lysholm scores and hamstring strength versus autograft ACL reconstruction.

A Rapid and Safe Minimally Invasive Procedure for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Removal: A Case-Control Study and Technical Description.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a common minimally invasive treatment for traumatic thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures; however, research on hardware removal after successful healing is limited. We aimed to introduce a rapid, safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective method for percutaneous pedicle screw removal. We conducted a retrospective analysis of demographic (age, sex, body mass index, alcohol use, and current smoking), clinical (hypertension and diabetes mellitus), surgical (affected levels, number of screws, time of surgery, and blood loss), and treatment cost characteristics of 92 patients who had undergone percutaneous pedicle screw removal between May 2016 and February 2023. The first 57 patients underwent the conventional method, and the remaining 35 underwent the modified method. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the demographic parameters, complications, or affected levels between the groups. However, the average surgical time (P=0.000) was significantly shorter, and the average blood loss volume (P=0.002) and total cost (P=0.000) were significantly lower in the modified group than in the conventional group. Compared with the conventional method, our modified method can shorten the surgical time, reduce blood loss, and reduce the total cost of treatment. It is a quick and safe minimally invasive method that does not require additional surgical instruments and is suitable for implementation in primary hospitals.

Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants.

Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants.

Biomaterials augmented with filtered bone marrow aspirate for the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions. A comparison of clinical and cellular parameters.

Biomaterials augmented with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) are becoming increasingly utilized in the cartilage treatment. However, the potential role of cellular parameters in the intraoperatively applied BMAC have yet to be elucidated. (A) To evaluate clinical outcomes and safety of a combined single-step approach with scaffolds (fibrin glues, collagen gels, collagen-hydroxyapatite membrane) and filtered Bone Marrow Aspirate (fBMA) for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). (B) To identify significant factors for postoperative improvements, considering cellular parameters as potential predictors. All the patients operated on due to OLTs by the combination above were selected from the hospital registry database (35 pts, years 16-55, and minimally 1year follow-up). Treatment outcomes were followed clinically with Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and by pursuing serious adverse events (SAE) and graft failures (GF). Cellular parameters of the injected fBMA were determined. Pre- and postoperative PROMs values were compared to evaluate postoperative improvements. Multivariable regression models were applied to identify potential factors (demographics, medical history, joint and lesion characteristics, scaffold type, surgical and cellular parameters) that predict the treatment outcomes. At the mean follow-up of 32.2 (12.5) months, all Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and European Quality of Life in Five Dimensions Three-Level (EQ-5D-3L) values improved significantly. 4 (11%) SAE (3 arthrofibrosis, one hardware removal), and 3 (9%) GF occurred. Female gender and concomitant procedures were the main negative predictors for postoperative outcomes. The number of fibroblast colony forming units (CFU-F) or their proportion among total nucleated cells (CFU-F/TNC) were positively correlated with the improvements of some PROMs. Scaffolds augmented with fBMA proved as an adequate and safe approach for OLTs treatment. Cellular parameters seem to influence the treatment outcomes, thus further attention should be given to the intraoperatively applied products. Level IV.

Use of Fibula Nails With Proximal and Distal Fixation.

Ankle fractures are a frequent injury in the adult population and a quarter of all ankle fractures are classified as unstable, requiring surgical intervention. Plate-and-screw construct is the traditionally used fixation method for fibula fractures. The use of an intramedullary nail is an alternative fixation method, with current literature supporting very low complication rates and hardware removal surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes, including complication rates and implant removal rates, using a fibula nail with both proximal and distal fixation capabilities by an experienced surgeon. We retrospectively reviewed 203 consecutive fibula nail cases from a single surgeon using a mini-open technique for anatomic reduction. Demographic, operative, clinical, and radiographic outcome data were analyzed, specifically examining complication rates and need for implant removal. The average follow-up was 18.8 months (6-54 months). All fractures healed. We identified 2 cases of superficial wound infection, 1 superficial peroneal nerve irritation, and 1 case of implant removal. In the first 110 cases, 2 fractures were converted to a plate intraoperatively prior to a technique modification which has prevented this occurrence. No deep infection, delayed union, or nonunion occurred. Our data support that fibula nails with proximal and distal locking capabilities offer an alternative to plating with the potential for lower complication rates and lower need for implant removal. Level IV, case series.

Complications and Unplanned Reoperation After Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Arthrodesis

Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb is a common procedure to treat arthritis or instability. Studies reporting hardware complications and nonunion rates after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis report on small sample sizes. We aimed to describe the hardware complication rate, the nonunion rate, and the number of thumbs that achieve union among patients undergoing thumb MCP joint arthrodesis. A database spanning 5 urban hospitals in a single metropolitan region in the United States was searched for patients who underwent thumb MCP joint arthrodesis between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2020. After reviewing patient records, we identified 122 thumbs that underwent MCP joint arthrodesis and had a minimum follow-up of 90 days. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation after hardware complications and nonunion. Second, the number of thumbs that achieved radiographic union was reported for the tension band and screw fixation arthrodesis group. Twenty-two (18%) out of 122 thumbs had hardware complications after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis, and 11 (9%) out of 122 thumbs developed a nonunion. Patients who underwent screw fixation arthrodesis had no events of hardware complications and subsequent hardware removal. The nonunion rate was 9/65 (14%) in the tension band arthrodesis group and 2 (4%) of 45 in the screw fixation arthrodesis group. Of the thumbs that had available radiographs to assess the healing of the arthrodesis, 34 (81%) of 42 were radiographically united in the tension band arthrodesis group and 29 (91%) of 32 in the screw fixation group. Our data suggest that screw fixation has fewer hardware complications and a lower reoperation rate than tension band arthrodesis. Prognosis IV.

Ten-Year Minimum Follow-up Study of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion in Young vs Old Patients.

Painful degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP I), or hallux rigidus, mainly occurs in later stages of life. For end-stage hallux rigidus, MTP I arthrodesis is considered the gold standard. As young and active patients are affected considerably less frequently, it currently remains unclear, whether they benefit to the same extent. We hypothesized that MTP I arthrodesis in younger patients would lead to an inferior outcome with decreased rates of overall with lower rates of patient postoperative pain and function compared to an older cohort. All patients aged <50 years who underwent MTP I arthrodesis at our institution between 1995 and 2012 were included in this study. This group was then matched and compared with a group of patients aged >60 years. Minimum follow-up was 10 years. Outcome measures were Tegner activity score (TAS), a "Virtual Tegner activity score" (VTAS), the visual analog scale (VAS), and the Foot Function index (FFI). Sixty-one MTP I fusions (n = 28 young, n = 33 old) in 46 patients were included in our study at an average of 14 years after surgery. Younger patients experienced significantly more pain relief as reflected by changes in VAS and FFI Pain subscale scores. No difference in functional outcomes was found with change in the FFI function subscale or in the ability to have desired functional outcomes using the ratio of TAS to VTAS. Revision rate did not differ between the two groups apart from hardware removal, which was significantly more likely in the younger group. In patients below the age of 50 years with end-stage DJD of the first metatarsal joint, MTP I arthrodesis not only yielded highly satisfactory postoperative results at least equal outcome compared to an older cohort of patients aged >60 years at an average 14 years' follow-up. Based on these findings, we consider first metatarsal joint fusion even for young patients is a valid option to treat end-stage hallux rigidus. Level III, a case-control study.

A novel flexible fixation technique for Lisfranc injuries: clinical outcomes and radiographic follow-up

Objectives: The purpose of this investigation is to present the follow-up results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a continuous series of surgically managed Lisfranc injuries whose constructs included a novel technique. Methods: Our billing database was retrospectively queried by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify all Lisfranc injuries managed operatively between 2018 and 2021. Basic demographic data were collected. Clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed. Patients were contacted prospectively to complete the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement – Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, and PROMIS Depression surveys. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Sixteen patients were included. While all patients underwent flexible fixation (FF), nine of them underwent concomitant open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and seven, concomitant primary arthrodesis. Median radiographic and PROMs follow-up time was 7.3 months (IQR 4.4–11.6) and 25.8 (IQR 9.5–32.4), respectively. All fusion patients had evidence of joint fusion, and 8/9 of ORIF patients maintained articular congruity without evidence of arthritis at final follow-up. Median PROMs were 85 (64.75–93.5), 53.1 (49.7–57.75), 45.7 (37.7–51.3), and 46 (43.3–52.28) for the FAAM-ADL, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Pain Intensity, and PROMIS Depression scores, respectively. Conclusion: The novel FF technique proposed for residual tarsometatarsal subluxation in Lisfranc injuries appears to be safe and effective, with good PROMs at two-year follow-up and low complication rates, obviating the need for hardware removal. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutics Studies; Cases Series.

Association of hardware removal with secondary osteonecrosis following femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIt has been controversial that whether hardware removal will increase the risk of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) in fracture-healed patients who underwent internal fixation for femoral neck fractures (FNFs). This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the association of hardware removal with secondary hardware removal-induced ONFH (HR-ONFH).MethodsFour electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published up to March 10, 2023. Studies reporting the relative risk of hardware status (i.e., risk rate, odds ratio [OR], or hazard ratio [HR]) were included. Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias of included observational studies. Review Manager software was used to pool ORs and adjusted ORs.ResultsFive studies were included into quantitative synthesis. Hardware removal was associated with a reduced risk of HR-ONFH in the synthesis of crude odds ratios (OR, 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.96). In the synthesis of adjusted odds ratios, hardware removal was associated with an increased risk of HR-ONFH (OR, 1.76, 95% CI 1.23–2.51).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that hardware removal was associated with an increased incidence of HR-ONFH in fracture-healed patients who underwent internal fixation due to FNFs.

Incidence and Management of Hardware-Related Wound Infections in Spinal Cord, Peripheral Nerve Field, and Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Study

Introduction: Neuromodulation using deep brain stimulation (DBS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) to treat neurological, psychiatric, and pain disorders is a rapidly growing field. Infections related to the implanted hardware are among the most common complications and result in health-related and economic burden. Unfortunately, conservative medical therapy is less likely to be successful. In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify characteristics of the infections and investigated surgical and antimicrobial treatments. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with an infection related to DBS, SCS, and/or PNFS hardware over an 8-year period at our institution. Data were analyzed for type of neurostimulator, time of onset of infection following the neurosurgical procedure, location, and surgical treatment strategy. Surgical treatment of infections consisted of either a surgical wound revision without hardware removal or a surgical wound revision with partial or complete hardware removal. Data were further analyzed for the microorganisms involved, antimicrobial treatment and its duration, and clinical outcome. Results: Over an 8-year period, a total of 1,250 DBS, 1,835 SCS, and 731 PNFS surgeries were performed including de novo system implantations, implanted pulse generator (IPG) replacements, and revisions. We identified 82 patients with infections related to the neurostimulator hardware, representing an incidence of 3.09% of the procedures. Seventy-one percent of the patients had undergone multiple surgeries related to the neurostimulator prior to the infection. The infections occurred after a mean of 12.2 months after the initial surgery. The site of infection was most commonly around the IPG, especially in DBS and SCS. The majority (62.2%) was treated by surgical wound revision with simultaneous partial or complete removal of hardware. Microbiological specimens predominantly yielded Staphylococcus epidermidis (39.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (35.4%). After surgery, antimicrobials were given for a mean of 3.4 weeks. The antimicrobial regime was significantly shorter in patients with hardware removal in comparison to those who only had undergone surgical wound revision. One intracranial abscess occurred. No cases of infection-related death, sepsis, bacteremia, or intraspinal abscesses were found. Conclusion: Our data did show the predominance of S. epidermidis and S. aureus as etiologic organisms in hardware-related infections. Infections associated with S. aureus most likely required (partial) hardware removal. Aggressive surgical treatment including hardware removal shortens the duration of antimicrobial treatment. Clear strategies should be developed to treat hardware-related infections to optimize patient management and reduce health- and economic-related burden.

The Use of Resorbable Fixation for Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis

Summary: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) traditionally relies on the use of cranial distractors affixed with titanium screws to the posterior cranial vault transport segment to allow for expansion of intracranial volume. We describe a novel technique using the Synthes RAPIDSORB IPS resorbable fixation system for stable fixation of the distraction hardware for PVDO. In a retrospective review of our experience with the IPS system, there was no instance of hardware or fixation failure. This off-label use of the IPS system results in a significant reduction in operative time for hardware removal while allowing for a more limited dissection, which can help reduce devascularization of the bony regenerate, bony relapse, and other complications.

Adverse events related to triplanar 1st tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis: 5-year analysis of the united states food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database

BackgroundThe Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system represents an instrumented, jig-guided system to facilitate performing triplanar 1st tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. Literature available for this system is positive, although the vast majority is from inventor/consultant surgeons. The purpose of this manuscript is to review adverse event submissions recorded in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database specific to this system. MethodsThe Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was retrospectively reviewed from inception to 30 June 2023 for adverse events submitted for the Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system. Submissions that involved a medical device product other than this system, duplicate entries, and submissions with data extracted from already published literature were excluded. ResultsA total of 180 unique reports that met inclusion criteria during the 5-year period available were reviewed. The mean time between event occurrence and submission was 46.7-days. The most common entity submitting to the database were the manufacturer company representative or distributor in 66.4%. The most frequently encountered patient problems were pain in 41.9%, non-union in 18.2%, and hardware-related irritation in 11.7%. Reports that detailed a revision surgery described partial/complete hardware removal in 62.7% and revision with additional hardware implantation in 23.3%. ConclusionWhile no direct conclusions regarding the Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system can be drawn from the data as it consists of only adverse event reports, this study demonstrates the need for more non-inventor/consultant literature to further investigate adverse events related this particular system.

Decreased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Concurrent Hardware Removal During Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared to Staged Removal: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Hardware removal before conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) is a challenging task for the orthopaedic surgeon, although there is little consensus on the timing of hardware removal to mitigate risk of surgery-related complication following cTHA. Using a national insurance database, we evaluated patients who underwent hardware removal either on the same day or within 1 year before cTHA, resulting in a total of 7,756 patients. After matching based on demographic factors and comorbidities, both staged and concurrent groups consisted of 2,752 patients. The 90-day and 1-year risk of revision surgery, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), periprosthetic fracture, and aseptic loosening were calculated and compared. Demographic factors and comorbidities were further evaluated as risk factors for PJI. The rates of infection were 1.85% and 3.05% at 90 days postoperatively and 2.94% and 4.14% at 1 year postoperatively for concurrent versus staged cohorts, respectively (P = 0.004 and P = 0.02). No difference was observed at 90 days or 1 year between the two cohorts in risk of fracture, revision surgery, or aseptic loosening. Diabetes (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001), tobacco use (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), and obesity (P = 0.026 and P = 0.025) were identified as risk factors for PJI at both 90 days and 1 year postoperatively. The timing of hardware removal is associated with an increased risk of PJI, although no difference was observed in revision surgery, fracture, or loosening among staged versus concurrent cohorts. These findings are important to consider when surgeons are evaluating patients with periarticular implants surrounding their hip.

Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography for Enhanced Safety During Bar Removal Procedures After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

Background: Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum involves placement of retrosternal support (Nuss) bars. Hardware removal has been rarely associated with life-threatening hemorrhage from the heart, aorta, internal mammary arteries, and/or lung. There is no accepted standard intraoperative monitoring technique used during removal. We hypothesized that the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during Nuss bar removal would enhance safety of the procedure and be cost-effective. Methods: IRB-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent Nuss bar removal with intraoperative TEE monitoring over a 4-year period, from March 2013 to May 2017, was completed. Bar removal procedures were performed supine, under general anesthesia. TEE images were monitored and any distortion of the cardiac silhouette, new pericardial effusion, and/or cardiac arrhythmias would be considered evidence of possible bar adherence, triggering possible conversion to sternotomy or thoracotomy. Results: In total, 87 consecutive patients, mean age of 20 years, were identified. Bars had been in place for a mean of 30 months. Average procedure time was 67 minutes. No patients experienced arrhythmias, cardiac injury, or significant hemorrhage during removal. TEE gave excellent visualization of the cardiac silhouette and pericardium in all cases. No patient required insertion of an arterial line, a postoperative chest X-ray, or overnight hospitalization. Patients were discharged from the recovery room an average of 89 minutes postprocedure. Conclusion: TEE offers a minimally invasive safe way to visualize the pericardium and its contents during Nuss bar removal. Significant cardiac/mediastinal injuries should be immediately visible. The use of TEE is cost-effective and allows safe discharge the day of surgery.

Locking plate versus retrograde intramedullary headless compression screw for unstable extra-articular metacarpal base fractures of the thumb

The purpose was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between two fixation techniques used to treat extra-articular fractures involving the base of the thumb metacarpal: retrograde intramedullary cannulated headless screw (RICHS) and locking plate (LP). Fifty-one patients who underwent RICHS (n = 22) or LP fixation (n = 29) from January 2010 through 2020 were included in this retrospective case-control study with mean follow-up 39 months. No inter-group differences were observed comparing mean time to radiological union, grip strength, range of motion, pain severity or QuickDASH scores. Mean surgery time was shorter with RICHS (18.9 min) than with LP fixation (44.4 min). Mean time to return to work or routine activities was less in RICHS than LP (22 vs. 32 days), as was the percentage of patients requiring hardware removal (0% vs. 44.8%). We conclude that RICHS fixation requires less operating time and yields faster post-operative return to full function and fewer secondary procedures.

Arthrex Mini Tightrope Fixation for Chronic Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability.

Chronic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability is a complex clinical condition that is difficult to treat. Currently, there is no gold standard treatment. We present a novel technique using Arthrex Mini Tightrope for DRUJ stabilization. In this case series, a 1.6 mm K-wire was passed transversely through the distal ulna and radius. The Mini Tightrope was inserted into the end of the K-wire and pulled through the bone tunnels. Appropriate tension was achieved to stabilize the joint according to individual laxity comparable to the contralateral side. Five patients (3 males and 2 females) comprised this pilot series, with a mean age of 27.1 years. All sustained a traumatic injury at an average of 12.4 months before surgery (range: 5 to 32 mo). In addition, 3 patients had central triangular fibrocartilage complex tears treated with arthroscopy at the time of Mini Tightrope placement. While one patient was lost to follow-up after 7 weeks postoperative due to incarceration, 4 patients demonstrated coronal and sagittal stability in the context of DRUJ motion and a satisfactory range of motion. The mean time for the return to work for the two patients who were laborers or normal activity postoperatively was 5.2 weeks (range: 1 to 16.4 wk). Unrestricted activity was generally allowed 8 weeks postoperatively but varied by patient. The same 4 patients underwent hardware removal at an average of 31 weeks (range: 15 to 44 wk). Although this is only a pilot series, this suggests that temporary Mini Tightrope stabilization of the DRUJ may be a viable solution while upholding the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Volar Plate-Suture Fixation in the Treatment of Volar Rim Fractures of the Distal Radius

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to describe the volar plate-suture fixation technique for augmented repair of volar rim fractures of the distal radius and to report clinical outcomes and radiographic findings. Patients and Methods Twenty-one patients treated with volar plate-suture fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of interest included pain, joint motion, grip strength, surgical complications, additional surgeries, and radiographic parameters. Results Final follow-up office visits from surgery averaged 30.8 weeks (range 6–175 weeks). There was no report of residual wrist pain in most cases. Forearm and wrist motion measurements were within functional ranges and grip strength measurements averaged 63 ± 21% of the contralateral hand. There were no cases of infection, wound dehiscence, nerve injury, or nonunion. Hardware removal was performed in four patients for wrist pain attributed to the fixation implant(s). One patient underwent a wrist fusion for treatment of painful traumatic wrist arthritis. Failure of the fracture fixation construct to hold the carpus occurred in two patients. Changes in radiocarpal and intercarpal angles averaged less than 4 degrees and loss of articular reduction averaged less than 1 mm, although with relatively high standard deviations. Conclusion Suture fixation of volar rim fractures of the distal radius may be a useful technique in augmenting volar plate fracture fixation. Some loss of early postoperative fracture alignment should be expected. Level of Evidence IV, case series.