Hand-arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Research Articles

Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) for Children with Cerebral Palsy

ABSTRACTHand-arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy and Constrained-Induced Movement Therapy have shown evidence of effectiveness in improvement of upper extremity use in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP). The effectiveness of interventions that are based on intensive practice of activities that combine UE and LE functions has not been reported. We propose that bimanual UE activities that simultaneously require trunk and LE postural adaptations uniquely address motor control limitations of children with unilateral spastic CP. The aim of this perspective is to present such an approach Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE). HABIT-ILE is unique in selection of tasks and activities that require simultaneous control and coordination of UE and LE movements. It is a motor-learning-based approach using problem solving and highly structured practice. During the intervention, activities and tasks are progressively graded toward more complex bimanual coordination for the UE and increasing demands of the LE. HABIT-ILE is provided in small groups for 90 hr using a camp model. Future research (randomized controlled trial) is needed to determine the effectiveness of HABIT-ILE.

Effect of hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy on fine-motor performance in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy have impairments in bimanual coordination above and beyond their unilateral impairments. Aim of the studyThe current study was conducted to examine the effect of hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) on the affected upper extremity use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Subjects and proceduresThirty hemiparetic children ranged in age from 3 to7years with mild to moderate hand involvement participated in this study and they were divided equally into two groups (control and study). Children in the study group were engaged in play and functional activities that provided structured bimanual practice 3h per day for 12weeks, while children in the control group received traditional physical therapy program directed toward improving upper extremity use. Each child in the two groups was evaluated before and after the suggested treatment duration for detecting the level of hand performance using the Peabody Developmental Test of Motor Proficiency and hand grip strength by a hand held dynamometer. ResultsChildren in both groups demonstrated improved scores on the Hand grip strength while only children in the study group showed significant improvement in fine-motor performance scores (p<0.05). ConclusionThe results suggest that, hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy appears to have a positive impact on hand function in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual Training in Children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy in an Educational Setting

ABSTRACTWe examined the efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) in a special education preschool/kindergarten in Israel. Twelve children (1.5–7 years) with congenital hemiplegic cerebral palsy were randomized to receive modified CIMT (n = 6) or HABIT (n = 6). Occupational and physical therapists administered usual and customary care for 8 weeks; children then crossed over to receive CIMT or HABIT 2 hr/day, 6 days/week for 8 weeks from their occupational therapist. The Assisting Hand Assessment and Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test were administered 2 months prior to the intervention, immediately before, immediately after intervention, and 6 months after the first baseline assessment. Both groups demonstrated no change during baseline and comparable improvement following CIMT and HABIT (p < .001), which was maintained at 6-month follow-up. Results suggest that modified CIMT and HABIT provided in school-based settings can lead to improvements in quality of bimanual skill and movement patterns.

A multi‐site study of functional outcomes following a themed approach to hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy for children with hemiplegia

This study investigated the effects of a theme-based ('magic') variation of the hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy programme, in two different countries, in improving activity performance for children with hemiplegia, including those with severe movement restrictions. Twenty-three children with spastic hemiplegia (13 males, 10 females; mean age 10y 7mo, range 7-15y; Manual Ability Classification System level I, two; level II, 13; level III, eight), participated in one of three, 2-week, summer camps. A within-participant experimental design was used with the Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand Experience Questionnaire as primary outcome measures. Evaluations occurred immediately before the first day, on the last day, and 3months after intervention. Two groups underwent additional assessments 2weeks before the camp. Significant intervention effects were seen on the Assisting Hand Assessment (p=0.002) and on the Children's Hand Experience Questionnaire (p<0.001), the latter maintained at follow-up. The affected hand was reported to be used in 25% of bimanual activities before the camp, progressing to 93% after camp, and decreasing to 86% at follow-up. Severity of impairment did not influence progress. This themed approach to intensive intervention showed positive results in bimanual use, with improvements in independence sustained at follow-up. Although children across camps and motor severity made progress, some questions remain about intensity and duration of intervention to optimize longer-term outcomes.

To constrain or not to constrain, and other stories of intensive upper extremity training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy

Impaired hand function is among the most functionally disabling symptoms of unilateral cerebral palsy. Evidence-based treatment approaches are generally lacking. However, recent approaches providing intensive upper extremity training appear promising. In this review, we first describe two such approaches, constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bimanual training (hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy). We then summarize findings across more than 100 participants in our CIMT/bimanual training studies since 1997. We show that (1) at high intensities, CIMT and bimanual training improve dexterity and bimanual upper extremity use; (2) bimanual training may allow direct practice of functionally meaningful goals, and such practice may transfer to unpracticed goals and improve bimanual coordination; (3) 90 hours of CIMT and bimanual training leads to greater improvements than 60 hours of the same treatments; (4) higher doses may be required for bimanual training; (5) increased dosing frequency and shaping may be needed for older children; and (6) combined CIMT/bimanual approaches may be useful, but require sufficient intensity. Together these findings suggest that dosage (treatment amount and frequency), more so than ingredients, may well be the key to successful training protocols, especially for older children. Such rehabilitation efforts should be 'child-friendly', and as least invasive as possible, especially because these approaches may be provided throughout development.

The effect of intensive bimanual training on coordination of the hands in children with congenital hemiplegia

Recent studies have suggested efficacy of intensive bimanual training in improving the quality and quantity of affected hand use in children with hemiplegia. However, it is not known whether such training affects the coordination of the two hands. In the present study, 20 children with congenital hemiplegia (age 4-10 years; MACS levels I-II) were randomly assigned to either an intensive bimanual training (Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy: HABIT) group, or a control group consisting of equally intensive unimanual treatment (Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, CIMT) for 6h per day for 15 days (90h). To assess their bimanual coordination, children were asked to open a drawer with one hand and manipulate its contents with the other hand. 3-D movement kinematics were recorded and subsequently analyzed by a blind evaluator. The role of the two hands was varied. Following treatment, superior improvement in bimanual coordination was found for the bimanual training group as indicated by greater movement overlap (the percentage of time with both hands engaged in the task p = 0.047) and better goal synchronization (reduced time differences between the two hands completing the task goals, p = 0.005). The results suggest that bimanual training improves the spatial-temporal control of the two hands, and are in agreement with the principle of practice specificity.

COMPARISON OF ARM-HAND BIMANUAL INTENSIVE THERAPY AND CURRENT THERAPY FOR UNIMANUAL AND BIMANUAL FUNCTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

Introduction: Studies have showed that although Constraint Induced Movement Therapy can lead into improvement of hand function in children with Cerebral Palsy, it has several important limitations. Charles and Gordon introduced Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) in an attempt to compensate for such deficits. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of HABIT on unimanual and bimanual functions in children with Cerebral Palsy. Materials and Methods: The participants of this single-blinded randomized control study were twenty-eight children with CP who were divided into two groups of HABIT and controls according to a set of inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. Subjects in HABIT group received the intervention 6 hours per day over 10 successive days and the members of the other group were provided with occupational therapy services. Assessment tools administered in this study were Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Caregiver Functional Use Survey (CFUS), and Jebsen-Taylor Test in Hand Function. Independent and paired t tests were respectively used for comparing the two groups and to compare each group with regard to pre-test and post-test conditions. Results: Study results showed significant differences between two groups concerning dexterity, bilateral coordination, bimanual coordination, bimanual function, unimanual function and Caregiver Functional Use Survey (how well & how frequently) (P < 0.05). Also comparison of pre-test and post-test results for each of the two studied groups indicated improvement in most of domains evaluated. Conclusion: The protocol of Arm-Hand Bimanual Intensive Therapy may result in improvement of either bimanual or unimanual hand functions in children with cerebral palsy. Keywords: Arm-Hand bimanual intensive therapy, Hand function, Hemiplegia, Occupational therapy

Preliminary evidence suggests that hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) improves bimanual upper limb performance in children with mild to moderate hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Preliminary evidence suggests that hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) improves bimanual upper limb performance in children with mild to moderate hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Efficacy of a hand–arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial

Children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) have impairments in bimanual coordination above and beyond their unilateral impairments. Recently we developed hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT), using the principles of motor learning, and neuroplasticity, to address these bimanual impairments. A single-blinded randomized control study of HABIT was performed to examine its efficacy in children with hemiplegic CP with mild to moderate hand involvement. Twenty children (age range 3 y 6 mo-15 y 6 mo) were randomized to either an intervention (n=10: seven males, three females; mean age 8 y 7 mo, SD 4 y) or a delayed treatment control group (n=10: seven males, three females; mean age 6 y 10 mo, SD 2 y 4 mo). Children were engaged in play and functional activities that provided structured bimanual practice 6 hours per day for 10 days. Each child was evaluated immediately before and after the intervention, and again at 1-month post-intervention. Children in the intervention group demonstrated improved scores on the Assisting Hand Assessment, increased involved extremity use measured using accelerometry and a caregiver survey, bimanual items of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, and the simultaneity of completing a draw-opening task with two hands (p<0.05 in all cases). The results suggest that for this carefully selected subgroup of children with hemiplegic CP, HABIT appears to be efficacious in improving bimanual hand use.