Abstract Background Drving evaluation is a complex process in which Occupational Therapists (OTs) are often viewed as ideally suited to assist with given our extensive cognitive and upper limb assessments and interventions. As per National Guidelines, health professionals have an ethical obligation, and potentially a legal one, to give clear advice to the driver in cases where an illness or injury may elevate risk of impairment while driving. At present, a pathway does not exist to guide OTs on the extent of our role in supporting patients who plan to return to driving; thus, it remains unclear what is current practice for OTs working in the acute setting. Methods We completed a cross-sectional survey to determine current practice among the Dublin Academic Teaching Hospitals. Results 42 occupational therapists across 9 different specialities with varying levels of experience, from new staff grade to clinical specialists responded to the survey. The survey identified several commonly perceived areas of ambiguity for acute OTs, including, (1) if their workplace has a policy or pathway on the subject and, (2) the Road Safety Authority’s Guidelines for healthcare professionals in relation to medical fitness to drive. It highlighted a lack of knowledge in relation to onward services OTs can and/or should be linking their patients with for outpatient follow-up. Conclusion It is evident that there is a distinct lack of knowledge among acute OTs in our role in patients returning to driving following an inpatient admission. Additionally, it highlights a need for a resource to bridge this gap and for future work in building a clinical pathway to minimize ambiguity in this area and ensure we are delivering a service that is both legally and morally sound and fulfilling our duty of care.